UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Form 10-K

For the transition period from _______________ to ________________.

Commission file number: 333-31929

EchoStar DBS Corporation

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (303) 723-1000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

As of March 25, 2005, the Registrant’s outstanding common stock consisted of 1,015 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Annual report on Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     The following documents are incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference:

     None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We make “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 throughout this document. Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement of historical fact (such as when we describe what we “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect” or “anticipate” will occur and other similar statements), you must remember that our expectations may not turn out to be correct, even though we believe they are reasonable. We do not guarantee that any future transactions or events described herein will happen as described or that they will happen at all. You should read this document completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. Whether actual events or results will conform to our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:

i

All cautionary statements made herein should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. In this connection, investors should consider the risks described herein and should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

We assume no responsibility for updating forward-looking information contained or incorporated by reference herein or in other reports we file with the SEC.

In this document, the words “we,” “our,” “us,” and “EDBS” refer to EchoStar DBS Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. “EchoStar” and “ECC” refer to Echostar Communications Corporation and its subsidiaries.

ii

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

Brief Description of Business

EchoStar DBS Corporation (“EDBS,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and/or “our”) is a holding company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EchoStar Communications Corporation (“EchoStar” or “ECC”), a publicly traded company listed on the Nasdaq National Market. EDBS was formed under Colorado law in January 1996. EchoStar has placed ownership of its nine in-orbit satellites and related FCC licenses into our subsidiaries. We refer readers of this report to EchoStar’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Substantially all of EchoStar’s operations are conducted by our subsidiaries which operate two interrelated business units:

Since 1994, we have deployed substantial resources to develop the “EchoStar DBS System.” The EchoStar DBS System consists of our FCC-allocated DBS spectrum, our owned and leased satellites, EchoStar receiver systems, digital broadcast operations centers, customer service facilities, and certain other assets utilized in our operations. Our principal business strategy is to continue developing our subscription television service in the United States to provide consumers with a fully competitive alternative to cable television service.

Recent Developments

$1.0 Billion Senior Notes Offering. On October 1, 2004, we sold $1.0 billion principal amount of our 6 5/8% Senior Notes due October 1, 2014. The Notes were sold in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. We used the net proceeds from issuance of the Notes, together with available cash, to redeem all of our outstanding 10 3/8% Senior Notes due 2007.

10 3/8% Senior Notes Redemption. Effective October 1, 2004, we redeemed all of our outstanding 10 3/8% Senior Notes due 2007. In accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the notes, the $1.0 billion principal amount of the notes was redeemed at 105.188%, for a total of approximately $1.052 billion. The premium paid of approximately $51.9 million, along with unamortized debt issuance costs of approximately $4.1 million, were recorded as charges to earnings during the fourth quarter of 2004.

Cash Dividend. On December 14, 2004, EchoStar paid a one-time cash dividend of $1.00 per share, or approximately $455.7 million, on outstanding shares of its Class A and Class B common stock. On December 13, 2004, we paid a dividend of approximately $500.0 million to EchoStar to fund the payment of this dividend and other potential EchoStar cash needs.

Cablevision Satellite Acquisition. On January 20, 2005, we agreed to purchase certain satellite assets from Rainbow DBS Co., a subsidiary of Cablevision Systems Corporation for $200.0 million. Specifically, we have agreed to purchase Rainbow 1, a direct broadcast satellite located at 61.5 degrees West Longitude, together with the rights to 11 DBS frequencies at that location. The satellite includes 13 transponders, up to 12 of which can be operated in “spot beam” mode. Also, as part of this transaction, we will acquire ground facilities and related assets in Black Hawk, S.D. The transaction is subject to customary conditions including regulatory approval by the FCC. There can be no assurance that such approval will be obtained.

1

Settlement of EchoStar IV Arbitration. Several years ago, EchoStar filed a $219.3 million insurance claim as a result of the failure of our EchoStar IV satellite to operate properly. The satellite insurance consisted of separate, substantially identical policies with many carriers for varying amounts which, in combination, created a total insured amount of $219.3 million. All of the carriers contested the loss claim, resulting in arbitration under the terms of the policies.

On March 4, 2005, EchoStar agreed to settle its insurance claim and related claims for accrued interest and bad faith with all carriers who agree to pay their proportionate share of an aggregate net amount of $240.0 million. We retained title to and use of the EchoStar IV satellite. Payment from each settling carrier is due on or before April 26, 2005, with interest commencing to accrue on April 12, 2005. EchoStar has received signed agreements back from all insurers.

Amounts payable to us in excess of our previously recorded $106.0 million receivable will be recognized in income during the period in which the respective insurers sign the settlement agreement. See “Item 3 – Legal Proceedings” for more information relating to the underlying insurance claim and our historical accounting for that claim.

Internal Review. EchoStar’s Audit Committee recently completed a review of recordkeeping and internal control issues relating to certain of our vendor and third party relationships (the “Review”). The Review concluded that EchoStar’s recordkeeping in prior years and the current control environment were deficient and reported one instance in which one of EchoStar’s executive officers in charge of certain business functions directed the preparation, in prior years, of inaccurate documentation that was used to determine payments made to a vendor. Management has evaluated this instance and determined that it constitutes a “significant deficiency” in EchoStar’s internal control over financial reporting, as defined by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 2. Notwithstanding this determination, no adjustments to our consolidated financial statements were required as a result of the Review, and none were made. We are, however, implementing several changes recommended by EchoStar’s Audit Committee to our governance, operating and control policies and procedures. EchoStar’s has also taken disciplinary action and other steps to remediate the conduct underlying the deficiencies identified by the Audit Committee’s Review.

Following the March 10, 2005 publication of a news article purporting to describe the Review and other matters, EchoStar received a phone call from the Division of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission inquiring about the matters described in the news article. EchoStar intends to fully respond to that inquiry.

On March 14, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed against EchoStar, its chairman and chief executive officer Charles W. Ergen and the members of its board of directors in the District Court of Douglas County, Colorado. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the members of EchoStar’s board of directors breached their fiduciary duties to EchoStar in connection with the matters that were the subject of the Review.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act and accordingly file our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Public may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room. As an electronic filer, our public filings are maintained on the SEC’s Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is http://www.sec.gov.

WEBSITE ACCESS

Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act also may be accessed free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed such material with, or furnished it to, the SEC. The address of that website is http://www.echostar.com.

2

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the principal properties of EchoStar:

In addition to the principal properties listed above, we operate several DISH Network service centers strategically located in regions throughout the United States.

3

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Distant Network Litigation

Until July 1998, we obtained feeds of distant broadcast network channels (ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX) for distribution to our customers through PrimeTime 24. In December 1998, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Miami entered a nationwide permanent injunction requiring PrimeTime 24 to shut off distant network channels to many of its customers, and henceforth to sell those channels to consumers in accordance with the injunction.

In October 1998, EchoStar filed a declaratory judgment action against ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. EchoStar asked the Court to find that its method of providing distant network programming did not violate the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act (“SHVIA”) and hence did not infringe the networks’ copyrights. In November 1998, the networks and their affiliate association groups filed a complaint against EchoStar in Miami Federal Court alleging, among other things, copyright infringement. The Court combined the case that EchoStar filed in Colorado with the case in Miami and transferred it to the Miami Federal Court.

In February 1999, the networks filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction and Contempt Finding against DirecTV, Inc. in Miami related to the delivery of distant network channels to DirecTV customers by satellite. DirecTV settled that lawsuit with the networks. Under the terms of the settlement between DirecTV and the networks, some DirecTV customers were scheduled to lose access to their satellite-provided distant network channels by July 31, 1999, while other DirecTV customers were to be disconnected by December 31, 1999. Subsequently, substantially all providers of satellite-delivered network programming other than EchoStar agreed to this cut-off schedule, although we do not know if they adhered to this schedule.

In April 2002, EchoStar reached a private settlement with ABC, Inc., one of the plaintiffs in the litigation, and jointly filed a stipulation of dismissal. In November 2002, EchoStar reached a private settlement with NBC, another of the plaintiffs in the litigation and jointly filed a stipulation of dismissal. On March 10, 2004, EchoStar reached a private settlement with CBS, another of the plaintiffs in the litigation and jointly filed a stipulation of dismissal. EchoStar has also reached private settlements with many independent stations and station groups. EchoStar was unable to reach a settlement with five of the original eight plaintiffs -Fox and the independent affiliate groups associated with each of the four networks.

A trial took place during April 2003 and the District Court issued a final judgment in June 2003. The District Court found that with one exception our current distant network qualification procedures comply with the law. We have revised our procedures to comply with the District Court’s Order. Although the plaintiffs asked the District Court to enter an injunction precluding EchoStar from selling any local or distant network programming, the District Court refused. While the plaintiffs did not claim monetary damages and none were awarded, the plaintiffs were awarded approximately $4.8 million in attorneys’ fees. This amount is substantially less than the amount the plaintiffs sought. EchoStar asked the Court to reconsider the award and the Court has vacated the fee award. When the award was vacated, the District Court also allowed EchoStar an opportunity to conduct discovery concerning the amount of plaintiffs’ requested fees. The parties have agreed to postpone discovery and an evidentiary hearing regarding attorney’s fees until after the Court of Appeals rules on the pending appeal of the Court’s June 2003 final judgment. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of plaintiffs’ outstanding request for fees.

The District Court’s injunction requires us to use a computer model to re-qualify, as of June 2003, all of our subscribers who receive ABC, NBC, CBS or Fox programming by satellite from a market other than the city in which the subscriber lives. The Court also invalidated all waivers historically provided by network stations. These waivers, which have been provided by stations for the past several years through a third party automated system, allow subscribers who believe the computer model improperly disqualified them for distant network channels to nonetheless receive those channels by satellite. Further, even though SHVIA provides that certain subscribers who received distant network channels prior to October 1999 can continue to receive those channels through December

4

2004, the District Court terminated the right of our grandfathered subscribers to continue to receive distant network channels.

EchoStar believes the District Court made a number of errors and appealed the decision. Plaintiffs cross-appealed. The Court of Appeals granted EchoStar’s request to stay the injunction until EchoStar’s appeal is decided. Oral arguments occurred during February 2004. It is not possible to predict how or when the Court of Appeals will rule on the merits of EchoStar’s appeal.

In the event the Court of Appeals upholds the injunction, and if EchoStar does not reach private settlement agreements with additional stations, we will attempt to assist subscribers in arranging alternative means to receive network channels, including migration to local channels by satellite where available, and free off air antenna offers in other markets. However, we cannot predict with any degree of certainty how many subscribers would cancel their primary DISH Network programming as a result of termination of their distant network channels. We could be required to terminate distant network programming to all subscribers in the event the plaintiffs prevail on their cross-appeal and EchoStar is permanently enjoined from delivering all distant network channels. Termination of distant network programming to subscribers would result, among other things, in a reduction in average monthly revenue per subscriber and a temporary increase in subscriber churn.

Satellite Insurance

Several years ago, EchoStar filed a $219.3 million insurance claim for a total loss under the launch insurance policies covering our EchoStar IV satellite. The satellite insurance consists of separate substantially identical policies with different carriers for varying amounts that, in combination, create a total insured amount of $219.3 million. The insurance carriers include La Reunion Spatiale; AXA Reinsurance Company (n/k/a AXA Corporate Solutions Reinsurance Company), United States Aircraft Insurance Group; Assurances Generales De France I.A.R.T. (AGF); Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London; Great Lakes Reinsurance (U.K.) PLC; British Aviation Insurance Group; If Skaadeforsikring (previously Storebrand); Hannover Re (a/k/a International Hannover); The Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Company, Ltd.; Marham Space Consortium (a/k/a Marham Consortium Management); Ace Global Markets (a/k/a Ace London); M.C. Watkins Syndicate; Goshawk Syndicate Management Ltd.; D.E. Hope Syndicate 10009 (Formerly Busbridge); Amlin Aviation; K.J. Coles & Others; H.R. Dumas & Others; Hiscox Syndicates, Ltd.; Cox Syndicate; Hayward Syndicate; D.J. Marshall & Others; TF Hart; Kiln; Assitalia Le Assicurazioni D’Italia S.P.A. Roma; La Fondiaria Assicurazione S.P.A., Firenze; Vittoria Assicurazioni S.P.A., Milano; Ras - Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta S.P.A., Milano; Societa Cattolica Di Assicurazioni, Verano; Siat Assicurazione E Riassicurazione S.P.A, Genova; E. Patrick; ZC Specialty Insurance; Lloyds of London Syndicates 588 NJM, 1209 MEB and 861 MEB; Generali France Assurances; Assurance France Aviation; and Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd.

The insurance carriers offered EchoStar a total of approximately $88.0 million, or 40% of the total policy amount, in settlement of the EchoStar IV insurance claim. EchoStar rejected this settlement offer and submitted its claim to arbitration pursuant to the terms of the insurance policies.

On March 4, 2005, EchoStar agreed to settle its insurance claim and related claims for accrued interest and bad faith with all carriers who agree to pay their proportionate share of an aggregate net amount of $240.0 million. We retained title to and use of the EchoStar IV satellite. Payment from each settling carrier is due on or before April 26, 2005, with interest commencing to accrue on April 12, 2005. EchoStar has received signed agreements back from all insurers.

Gemstar

During October 2000, Starsight Telecast, Inc., a subsidiary of Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc. (“Gemstar”), filed a suit for patent infringement against EchoStar and certain of its subsidiaries in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Asheville Division.

In December 2000, EchoStar filed suit against Gemstar-TV Guide (and certain of its subsidiaries) in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado alleging violations by Gemstar of various federal and state anti-trust laws and

5

laws governing unfair competition. Gemstar filed counterclaims alleging infringement of additional patents and asserted new patent infringement counterclaims.

In February 2001, Gemstar filed additional patent infringement actions against EchoStar in the District Court in Atlanta, Georgia and with the ITC. EchoStar settled all of the litigation with Gemstar during 2004 (See Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

Superguide

During 2000, Superguide Corp. (“Superguide”) filed suit against EchoStar, DirecTV and others in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Asheville Division, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,038,211, 5,293,357 and 4,751,578 which relate to certain electronic program guide functions, including the use of electronic program guides to control VCRs. Superguide sought injunctive and declaratory relief and damages in an unspecified amount. We examined these patents and believe that they are not infringed by any of our products or services.

On summary judgment, the District Court ruled that none of the asserted patents were infringed by us. These rulings were appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. During February 2004, the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the District Court’s findings and remanded the case back to the District Court for further proceedings. Based upon the settlement with Gemstar discussed above, EchoStar now has an additional defense in this case based upon a license from Gemstar. EchoStar will continue to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe on any of the patents, EchoStar may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly electronic programming guide and related features that we currently offer to consumers. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the suit or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C.

In November of 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. filed a lawsuit against EchoStar, DirecTV, Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in Federal District Court in Denver, Colorado. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (“the ‘094 patent”) and 4,992,066 (“the ‘066 patent”). The ‘094 patent relates to certain methods and devices for transmitting and receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The ‘066 patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on removable cards. We examined these patents and believe that they are not infringed by any of our products or services. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving EchoStar as the only defendant.

During January 2004, the judge issued an order finding the ‘066 patent invalid. In August of 2004, the Court ruled the ‘094 invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and Comcast. EchoStar’s case is stayed pending the appeal of the Charter case. EchoStar intends to continue to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe on any of the patents, EchoStar may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the suit or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

TiVo Inc.

During January 2004, TiVo Inc. filed a lawsuit against EchoStar in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 6,233,389 (“the ‘389 patent”). The ‘389 patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing what the patent calls “time-warping.” We have examined this patent and do not believe that it is infringed by any of our products or services. During March 2005, the Court denied EchoStar’s motion to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. EchoStar intends to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that

6

we infringe this patent, EchoStar may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the suit or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Acacia

In June 2004, Acacia Media Technologies filed a lawsuit against EchoStar in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit also named DirecTV, Comcast, Charter, Cox and a number of smaller cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an intellectual property holding company which seeks to license the patent portfolio that it has acquired. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992, 5,253,275, 5,550,863, 6,002,720 and 6,144,702 (herein after the ‘992, ‘275, ‘863, ‘720 and ‘702 patents, respectively). The ‘992, ‘863, ‘720 and ‘702 patents have been asserted against EchoStar.

The asserted patents relate to various systems and methods related to the transmission of digital data. The ‘992 and ‘702 patents have also been asserted against several internet adult content providers in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On July 12, 2004, that Court issued a Markman ruling which found that the ‘992 and ‘702 patents were not as broad as Acacia had contended.

Acacia’s various patent infringement cases have now been consolidated for pre-trial purposes in the United States District court for the Northern District of California. EchoStar intends to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe on any of the patents, EchoStar may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the suit or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

California Action

A purported class action relating to the use of terms such as “crystal clear digital video,” “CD-quality audio,” and “on-screen program guide,” and with respect to the number of channels available in various programming packages was filed against EchoStar in the California State Superior Court for Los Angeles County in 1999 by David Pritikin and by Consumer Advocates, a nonprofit unincorporated association. The complaint alleges breach of express warranty and violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Civil Code Sections 1750, et seq., and the California Business & Professions Code Sections 17500 & 17200. A hearing on the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and EchoStar’s motion for summary judgment was held during 2002. At the hearing, the Court issued a preliminary ruling denying the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. However, before issuing a final ruling on class certification, the Court granted EchoStar’s motion for summary judgment with respect to all of the plaintiffs’ claims. Subsequently, EchoStar filed a motion for attorneys’ fees which was denied by the Court. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal of the court’s granting of EchoStar’s motion for summary judgment and EchoStar cross-appealed the Court’s ruling on EchoStar’s motion for attorneys’ fees. During December 2003, the Court of Appeals affirmed in part; and reversed in part, the lower court’s decision granting summary judgment in EchoStar’s favor. Specifically, the Court found there were triable issues of fact whether EchoStar may have violated the alleged consumer statutes “with representations concerning the number of channels and the program schedule.” However, the Court found no triable issue of fact as to whether the representations “crystal clear digital video” or “CD quality” audio constituted a cause of action. Moreover, the Court affirmed that the “reasonable consumer” standard was applicable to each of the alleged consumer statutes. Plaintiff argued the standard should be the “least sophisticated” consumer. The Court also affirmed the dismissal of Plaintiffs’ breach of warranty claim. Plaintiff filed a Petition for Review with the California Supreme Court and EchoStar responded. During March 2004, the California Supreme Court denied Plaintiff’s Petition for Review. Therefore, the action has been remanded to the trial court pursuant to the instructions of the Court of Appeals. Hearings on class certification were conducted on December 21, 2004 and on February 7, 2005. The Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for class certification on February 10, 2005. It is uncertain whether the Plaintiff will appeal this decision. Therefore, it is not possible to make an assessment of the probable outcome of the litigation or to determine the extent of any potential liability.

7

Retailer Class Actions

EchoStar has been sued by retailers in three separate purported class actions. During October 2000, two separate lawsuits were filed in the Arapahoe County District Court in the State of Colorado and the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, respectively, by Air Communication & Satellite, Inc. and John DeJong, et al. on behalf of themselves and a class of persons similarly situated. The plaintiffs are attempting to certify nationwide classes on behalf of certain of our satellite hardware retailers. The plaintiffs are requesting the Courts to declare certain provisions of, and changes to, alleged agreements between EchoStar and the retailers invalid and unenforceable, and to award damages for lost incentives and payments, charge backs, and other compensation. EchoStar is vigorously defending against the suits and has asserted a variety of counterclaims. The United States District Court for the District of Colorado stayed the Federal Court action to allow the parties to pursue a comprehensive adjudication of their dispute in the Arapahoe County State Court. John DeJong, d/b/a Nexwave, and Joseph Kelley, d/b/a Keltronics, subsequently intervened in the Arapahoe County Court action as plaintiffs and proposed class representatives. EchoStar has filed a motion for summary judgment on all counts and against all plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed a motion for additional time to conduct discovery to enable them to respond to our motion. The Court granted a limited discovery period which ended November 15, 2004. The Court is hearing discovery related motions and EchoStar expects the Court to follow with a briefing schedule for the motion for summary judgment. It is not possible to make an assessment of the probable outcome of the litigation or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Satellite Dealers Supply, Inc. (“SDS”) filed a lawsuit against EchoStar in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas during September 2000, on behalf of itself and a class of persons similarly situated. The plaintiff was attempting to certify a nationwide class on behalf of sellers, installers, and servicers of satellite equipment who contract with EchoStar and who allege that we: (1) charged back certain fees paid by members of the class to professional installers in violation of contractual terms; (2) manipulated the accounts of subscribers to deny payments to class members; and (3) misrepresented, to class members, the ownership of certain equipment related to the provision of our satellite television service. During September 2001, the Court granted EchoStar’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the Court’s order dismissing the case. The Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. The trial court denied EchoStar’s motions for sanctions against SDS. Both parties perfected appeals before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit upheld the dismissal. The Fifth Circuit vacated and remanded the District Court’s denial of EchoStar’s motion for sanctions. The District Court subsequently issued a written opinion containing the same findings. The only issue remaining is EchoStar’s collection of costs, which were previously granted by the Court.

StarBand Shareholder Lawsuit

During August 2002, a limited group of shareholders in StarBand, a broadband Internet satellite venture in which EchoStar invested, filed an action in the Delaware Court of Chancery against EchoStar and EchoBand Corporation, together with four EchoStar executives who sat on the Board of Directors for StarBand, for alleged breach of the fiduciary duties of due care, good faith and loyalty, and also against EchoStar and EchoBand Corporation for aiding and abetting such alleged breaches. Two of the individual defendants, Charles W. Ergen and David K. Moskowitz, are members of EchoStar’s Board of Directors. The action stems from the defendants’ involvement as directors, and EchoStar’s position as a shareholder, in StarBand. During July 2003, the Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss on all counts. The Plaintiffs appealed. On April 15, 2004, the Delaware Supreme Court remanded the case instructing the Chancery Court to re-evaluate its decision in light of a recent opinion of the Delaware Supreme Court, Tooley v. Donaldson, No. 84,2004 (Del. Supr. April 2, 2004). Plaintiffs filed a motion to amend their complaint which was denied by the Court. The Plaintiffs appealed the denial of their motion to amend and the appeal is pending. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the litigation or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Enron Commercial Paper Investment Complaint

During November 2003, an action was commenced in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, against approximately 100 defendants, including EchoStar, who invested in Enron’s commercial paper.

8

The complaint alleges that Enron’s October 2001 prepayment of its commercial paper is a voidable preference under the bankruptcy laws and constitutes a fraudulent conveyance. The complaint alleges that EchoStar received voidable or fraudulent prepayments of approximately $40.0 million. EchoStar typically invests in commercial paper and notes which are rated in one of the four highest rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. At the time of EchoStar’s investment in Enron commercial paper, it was considered to be high quality and considered to be a very low risk. The defendants have moved the Court to dismiss the case on grounds that Enron’s complaint does not adequately state a legal claim. Those motions are currently under consideration by the Court. It is too early to make an assessment of the probable outcome of the litigation or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Bank One

During March 2004, Bank One, N.A. (“Bank One”) filed suit against EchoStar and one of our subsidiaries, EchoStar Acceptance Corporation (“EAC”), in the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio alleging breach of a duty to indemnify. Bank One alleges that EAC is contractually required to indemnify Bank One for a settlement it paid to consumers who entered private label credit card agreements with Bank One to purchase satellite equipment in the late 1990s. Bank One alleges that EchoStar entered into a guarantee wherein it agreed to pay any indemnity obligation incurred by Bank One. During April 2004, EchoStar removed the case to federal court in Columbus, Ohio. EchoStar denies the allegations and intends to vigorously defend against the claims. EchoStar filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint which was granted in part and denied in part. The Court granted EchoStar’s motion, agreeing EchoStar did not owe Bank One a duty to defend the underlying lawsuit. However, the Court denied the motion in that Bank One will be allowed to attempt to prove that EchoStar owed Bank One a duty to indemnify. The case is currently in discovery. It is too early in the litigation to make an assessment of the probable outcome of the litigation or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Church Communications Network, Inc.

During August 2004, Church Communications Network, Inc. (“CCN”) filed suit against EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. (“ESLLC”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. CCN contends that our contractual relationship with Dominion Video Satellite, Inc., a direct broadcast provider that airs only Christian programming, constitutes a breach of a commercial television services agreement between ESLLC and CCN (the “CCN Agreement”). Further, CCN contends that our reluctance to disclose the confidential provisions of the Dominion/EchoStar agreement warrant causes of action for negligent misrepresentation, intentional misrepresentation, and non-disclosure. We filed a motion to dismiss CNN’s complaint, or alternatively to transfer the case to a Colorado court. The Court denied our motion to dismiss, but granted our motion to transfer. As a result, the action was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Thereafter, we filed a motion to dismiss the case in the Colorado court. The motion to dismiss is currently pending before the Court and the case is currently in discovery.

Although the CCN Agreement specifically limits damages to $500,000, CCN initially sought $1.5 million. As this case progressed, CCN initially increased the amount of its alleged damages to over $3.0 million and has recently indicated that it is now seeking damages in excess of $15.0 million. As this is currently in early discovery it is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the litigation or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Vivendi

In January 2005, Vivendi Universal, S.A. (“Vivendi”), filed suit against EchoStar Communications Corporation in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that EchoStar has anticipatorily repudiated or is in breach of an alleged agreement between EchoStar and Vivendi pursuant to which we are allegedly required to broadcast a music-video channel provided by Vivendi. Vivendi’s complaint seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, and damages in an unspecified amount. Vivendi has since filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, in which it asks the Court to order EchoStar to broadcast the Vivendi music-video channel during the pendency of the litigation and to pay Vivendi for the provision of its music-video channel. EchoStar intends to

9

vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court determines that Vivendi is entitled to a preliminary injunction, we may be required to broadcast the Vivendi music-video channel during the pendency of the litigation, which would impact the bandwidth that we have available to broadcast other services. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that EchoStar has a contractual obligation to broadcast the Vivendi music-video channel and that EchoStar is in breach of that obligation, we may be required to broadcast the Vivendi music-video channel and be subject to substantial damages. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the suit or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Fox Sports Direct

During June 2004, Fox Sports Direct (“Fox”) sued EchoStar in the United States District Court Central District of California for alleged breach of contract. During October 2004, EchoStar reached a settlement with Fox for an immaterial amount.

Other

In addition to the above actions, EchoStar is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information. As of March 25, 2005, all 1,015 issued and outstanding shares of our common stock were held by EchoStar. There is currently no established trading market for our common stock.

Cash Dividend. On December 14, 2004, EchoStar paid a one-time cash dividend of $1.00 per share, or approximately $455.7 million, on outstanding shares of its Class A and Class B common stock. On December 13, 2004, we paid a dividend of approximately $500.0 million to EchoStar to fund the payment of this dividend and other potential EchoStar cash needs.

Payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings and capital requirements, our debt facilities, and other factors the Board of Directors considers appropriate. We currently intend to retain our earnings, if any, to support future growth and expansion. Our ability to declare dividends is affected by covenants in our debt facilities.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Our strategy for 2005 will focus on improving our operating results and free cash flow by attempting to increase our subscriber base, reduce churn, control rising subscriber acquisition costs and maintain or improve operating margins. We will also focus on improving our competitive position by leveraging our increased satellite capacity to pursue strategic initiatives.

Operational Results and Goals

Increase our subscriber base and reduce churn. We added approximately 1.480 million net new subscribers during 2004, ending the year with approximately 10.905 million DISH Network subscribers. We remain committed to growing our subscriber base with high quality customers by continuing to offer compelling consumer promotions. These promotions include offers of free or low cost advanced consumer electronics products, such as digital video recorders and high definition receivers, as well as various promotional offers of our DISH Network programming

10

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

packages, which we believe generally have a better “price-to-value” relationship than packages currently offered by most other subscription television providers.

However, there are many reasons we may not be able to maintain our current rate of new subscriber growth. For example, our subscriber growth would decrease if our partners in our co-branding and other distribution relationships de-emphasize or discontinue their efforts to acquire DISH network subscribers, or if they begin offering non-DISH Network video services. Our subscriber growth would also be negatively impacted to the extent our competitors offer more attractive consumer promotions, including, among other things, better priced or more attractive programming packages or more compelling consumer electronic products and services, including advanced digital video recorders, video on demand (“VOD”) services, and HDTV services or additional local channels. Many of our competitors are also better equipped than we are to offer video services bundled with other telecommunications services such as telephone and broadband data services, including wireless services.

In order to increase our subscriber base we must control our rate of customer turnover, or “churn.” Our percentage monthly churn for the year ended December 31, 2004 was approximately 1.62%, compared to our percentage churn for the same period in 2003 of approximately 1.57%. Our principal strategy to control churn is to attract higher quality long term customers by imposing heightened credit requirements and tailoring our promotions toward subscribers desiring multiple receivers and advanced products such as digital video recorders and high definition receivers. We also plan to continue to offer advanced products to existing customers through our lease promotions and to initiate other loyalty programs to improve our overall subscriber retention. However, there can be no assurance these and other actions we may take to control subscriber churn will be successful, and we are unlikely to be able to continue to grow our subscriber base at current rates if we cannot control our customer churn.

We also continue to undertake initiatives with respect to our conditional access system to further enhance the security of the DISH Network signal and attempt to make theft of our programming commercially impractical or uneconomical. However, piracy and many other factors may have a material adverse impact on our subscriber churn.

Control rising subscriber acquisition costs. We generally subsidize installation and all or a portion of the cost of EchoStar receiver systems in order to attract new DISH Network subscribers, and these and other subscriber acquisition costs have increased significantly over the past year. If a subscriber churns earlier than previously estimated, we may not fully recover the costs related to the acquisition of that subscriber. Our principal strategies to control rising subscriber acquisition costs involve growing our base with higher quality customers who are less likely to churn and reducing the overall cost of subsidized equipment we provide to new customers. Our principal method for reducing the cost of subscriber equipment is to lease our receiver systems to new subscribers rather than selling systems to them at little or no cost. Leasing enables us to, among other things, reduce our future subscriber acquisition costs by redeploying equipment returned by disconnected lease subscribers to new subscribers. We are further reducing the cost of subscriber equipment through our design and deployment of EchoStar receivers with multiple tuners that allow the subscriber to receive our DISH Network services in multiple rooms using a single set-top box, thereby reducing the number of EchoStar receivers we deploy to each subscriber household. However, our overall subscriber acquisition costs, including amounts expensed and capitalized, both in the aggregate and on a per new subscriber basis, may materially increase in the future to the extent that we introduce more aggressive promotions or newer, more expensive consumer electronics products in response to new promotions and products offered by our competitors. In addition, new compression technologies will inevitably render some portion of our current and future EchoStar receivers obsolete and we will incur additional costs, which may be substantial, to upgrade or replace these set-top boxes.

Maintain or improve operating margins. We will continue to work to generate cost savings during 2005 by improving our operating efficiency and attempting to control rising programming costs. During 2004, our operating margins were negatively impacted by costs associated with the expansion of our installation, in-home service and call center operations. We are attempting to control these costs by improving the quality of the initial installation, providing better subscriber education in the use of our products and services, and enhancing our training programs for our in-home service and call center representatives. However, these initiatives may not be sufficient to maintain or increase our operational efficiencies and we may not be able to continue to grow our operations cost effectively.

11

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Our operating margins have also been adversely impacted by rising programming costs. Payments we make to programmers for programming content represent one of the largest components of our operating costs. We expect programming providers to continue to demand higher rates for their programming. We will continue to negotiate aggressively with programming providers in an effort to control rising programming costs. However, there can be no assurance we will be successful in controlling these costs, and we may be forced to drop one or more channels if we cannot reach acceptable agreements with all of our content providers. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will be able to increase the price of our programming to offset these programming rate increases without affecting the competitiveness of our programming packages.

Leverage Increased Satellite Capacity. We have recently entered into agreements to purchase or lease a substantial amount of additional satellite capacity. We are currently evaluating various opportunities to utilize this capacity, including, but not limited to, launching satellite two-way and wireless broadband data services, increasing our international programming and expanding our local and high definition programming. However, we face a variety of risks and uncertainties that may prevent us from utilizing this additional satellite capacity profitably. These risks include, among other things, the risks that there may be insufficient market demand for these new services and program offerings, or that customers might find competing services and program offerings more attractive. In addition, many of these new services depend on successful development of new technologies which may not perform as we expect. Our results of operation and financial condition will be adversely affected if we cannot make profitable use of this additional satellite capacity.

Explanation of Key Metrics and Other Items

Subscriber-related revenue. “Subscriber-related revenue” consists principally of revenue from basic, movie, local, international and pay-per-view subscription television services, advertising sales, digital video recorder fees, equipment rental fees and additional outlet fees from subscribers with multiple set-top boxes and other subscriber revenue. Contemporaneous with the commencement of sales of co-branded services pursuant to our agreement with SBC Communications, Inc. (“SBC”) during the first quarter of 2004, “Subscriber-related revenue” also includes revenue from equipment sales, installation and other services related to that agreement. Revenue from equipment sales to SBC is deferred and recognized over the estimated average co-branded subscriber life. Revenue from installation and certain other services performed at the request of SBC is recognized upon completion of the services.

Development and implementation fees received from SBC are being recognized in “Subscriber-related revenue” over the next several years. In order to estimate the amount recognized monthly, we first divide the number of co-branded subscribers activated during the month under the SBC agreement by total estimated co-branded subscriber activations during the life of the contract. We then multiply this percentage by the total development and implementation fees received from SBC. The resulting estimated monthly amount is recognized as revenue ratably over the estimated average co-branded subscriber life.

Effective January 1, 2004, we combined “Subscription television service” revenue and “Other subscriber-related revenue” into “Subscriber-related revenue.” All prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Equipment sales. “Equipment sales” consist of sales of digital set-top boxes and related components by our ETC subsidiary to an international DBS service provider. “Equipment sales” also include unsubsidized sales of DBS accessories to retailers and other distributors of our equipment domestically and to DISH Network subscribers. “Equipment sales” does not include revenue from sales of equipment to SBC. Effective January 1, 2004, “Equipment sales” includes non-DISH Network receivers and other accessories sold by our EchoStar International Corporation subsidiary to international customers which were previously included in “Other” revenue. All prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Other. “Other” sales consists principally of subscription television service revenues from the C-band subscription television service business of Superstar/Netlink Group L.L.C. (“SNG”) that we acquired in April 2004.

Subscriber-related expenses. “Subscriber-related expenses” principally include costs incurred in connection with our in-home service and call center operations, overhead costs associated with our installation business, programming expenses, copyright royalties, residual commissions paid to retailers or distributors, billing, lockbox,

12

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

subscriber retention and other variable subscriber expenses. Contemporaneous with the commencement of sales of co-branded services pursuant to our agreement with SBC during the first quarter of 2004, “Subscriber-related expenses” also include the cost of sales and expenses from equipment sales, direct costs of installation and other services related to that relationship. Cost of sales from equipment sales to SBC are deferred and recognized over the estimated average co-branded subscriber life. Expenses from installation and certain other services performed at the request of SBC are recognized as the services are performed.

Satellite and transmission expenses. “Satellite and transmission expenses” include costs associated with the operation of our digital broadcast centers, the transmission of local channels, satellite telemetry, tracking and control services, satellite and transponder leases, and other related services.

Cost of sales – equipment. “Cost of sales – equipment” principally includes costs associated with digital set-top boxes and related components sold by our ETC subsidiary to an international DBS service provider and unsubsidized sales of DBS accessories to DISH Network subscribers and to retailers and other distributors of our equipment domestically. “Cost of sales – equipment” does not include the costs from sales of equipment to SBC. Effective January 1, 2004, “Cost of sales - equipment” includes non-DISH Network receivers and other accessories sold by our EchoStar International Corporation subsidiary to international customers which were previously included in “Cost of sales – other.” All prior period amounts conform to the current period presentation.

Cost of sales – other. “Cost of sales – other” principally includes programming and other expenses associated with the C-band subscription television service business of SNG we acquired in April 2004.

Subscriber acquisition costs. Under most promotions, we subsidize the installation and all or a portion of the cost of EchoStar receiver systems in order to attract new DISH Network subscribers. Our “Subscriber acquisition costs” include the cost of EchoStar receiver systems sold to retailers and other distributors of our equipment, the cost of receiver systems sold directly by us to subscribers, net costs related to our promotional incentives, and costs related to installation and acquisition advertising. We exclude the value of equipment capitalized under our equipment lease program from our calculation of “Subscriber acquisition costs.” We also exclude payments and the value of returned equipment related to disconnected lease program subscribers from our calculation of “Subscriber acquisition costs.”

SAC and Equivalent SAC. We are not aware of any uniform standards for calculating SAC and believe presentations of SAC may not be calculated consistently by different companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate SAC by dividing total “Subscriber acquisition costs” for a period by the number of gross new DISH Network subscribers during the period. We include all new DISH Network subscribers in our calculation, including DISH Network subscribers added with little or no subscriber acquisition costs. “Equivalent SAC” adds to “Subscriber acquisition costs” the value of equipment capitalized under our new subscriber lease program less the value of returned equipment related to disconnected lease program subscribers, which became available for sale rather than being redeployed through the lease program, together with payments received in connection with equipment not returned to us.

General and administrative expenses. “General and administrative expenses” primarily include employee-related costs associated with administrative services such as legal, information systems, accounting and finance. It also includes outside professional fees (i.e. legal and accounting services) and building maintenance expense and other items associated with administration.

Interest expense. “Interest expense” primarily includes interest expense, prepayment premiums and amortization of debt issuance costs associated with our debt and convertible debt securities, net of capitalized interest.

Other. The main components of “Other” income and expense are equity in earnings and losses of our affiliates, gains and losses on the sale of investments, and impairment of marketable and non-marketable investment securities.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). EBITDA is defined as “Net income (loss)” plus “Interest expense” net of “Interest income,” “Taxes” and “Depreciation and amortization.”

DISH Network subscribers. We include customers obtained through direct sales, and through our retail networks, including our co-branding relationship with SBC and other distribution relationships, in our DISH Network subscriber

13

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

count. We believe our overall economic return for co-branded and traditional subscribers will be comparable. We also provide DISH Network service to hotels, motels and other commercial accounts. For certain of these commercial accounts, we divide our total revenue for these commercial accounts by an amount approximately equal to the retail price of our most widely distributed programming package, AT60 (but taking into account, periodically, price changes and other factors), and include the resulting number, which is substantially smaller than the actual number of commercial units served, in our DISH Network subscriber count.

During April 2004, we acquired the C-band subscription television service business of SNG, the assets of which primarily consist of acquired customer relationships. Although we expect to convert some of these customer relationships from C-band subscription television services to our DISH Network DBS subscription television service, acquired C-band subscribers are not included in our DISH network subscriber count unless they have also subscribed to our DISH Network DBS television service.

Monthly average revenue per subscriber (“ARPU”). We are not aware of any uniform standards for calculating ARPU and believe presentations of ARPU may not be calculated consistently by other companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate average monthly revenue per subscriber, or ARPU, by dividing average monthly “Subscriber-related revenues” for the period (total “Subscriber-related revenues” during the period divided by the number of months in the period) by our average DISH Network subscribers for the period. Average DISH Network subscribers are calculated for the period by adding the average DISH Network subscribers for each month and dividing by the number of months in the period. Average DISH Network subscribers for each month are calculated by adding the beginning and ending DISH Network subscribers for the month and dividing by two. As discussed in “Subscriber-related revenue” above, effective January 1, 2004 we include amounts previously reported as “Other subscriber-related revenue” in our ARPU calculation. All prior period amounts conform to the current period presentation.

Subscriber churn/subscriber turnover. We are not aware of any uniform standards for calculating subscriber churn and believe presentations of subscriber churn may not be calculated consistently by different companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate percentage monthly subscriber churn by dividing the number of DISH Network subscribers who terminate service during each month by total DISH Network subscribers as of the beginning of that month. We calculate average subscriber churn for any period by dividing the number of DISH Network subscribers who terminated service during that period by the average number of DISH Network subscribers eligible to churn during the period, and further dividing by the number of months in the period. Average DISH Network subscribers eligible to churn during the period are calculated by adding the DISH Network subscribers as of the beginning of each month in the period and dividing by the total number of months in the period.

Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as “Net cash flows from operating activities” less “Purchases of property and equipment,” as shown on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

14

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2003.

15

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

DISH Network subscribers. As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately 10.905 million DISH Network subscribers compared to approximately 9.425 million at December 31, 2003, an increase of approximately 15.7%. DISH Network added approximately 1.480 million net new subscribers for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to approximately 1.245 million net new subscribers during the same period in 2003. We believe the increase in net new subscribers resulted from a number of factors, including the commencement of sales under our co-branding agreement with SBC and other distribution relationships and an increase in our distribution channels. Temporary product shortages and installation delays during the second half of 2003 were substantially eliminated during the first quarter of 2004 which also contributed to the current year increase.

A material portion of our new subscriber additions are derived from our relationship with SBC. However, SBC recently announced that in 2005 it will begin deploying an advanced fiber network that will enable it to offer video services directly. Our net new subscriber additions and certain of our other key operating metrics would be adversely affected to the extent SBC de-emphasizes or discontinues its efforts to acquire DISH Network subscribers.

Additionally, as the size of our subscriber base continues to increase, if percentage subscriber churn remains constant, increasing numbers of gross new subscribers are required to sustain net subscriber growth.

Subscriber-related revenue. DISH Network “Subscriber-related revenue” totaled $6.677 billion for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $1.267 billion or 23.4% compared to the same period in 2003. This increase was directly attributable to continued DISH Network subscriber growth and the increase in “ARPU” discussed below.

ARPU. Monthly average revenue per subscriber was approximately $54.87 during the year ended December 31, 2004 and approximately $51.21 during the same period in 2003. The $3.66 or 7.1% increase in monthly average revenue per DISH Network subscriber is primarily attributable to price increases of up to $2.00 in February 2004 and 2003 on some of our most popular packages, and from equipment sales, installation and other services related to our relationship with SBC. This increase was also attributable to a reduction in the number of DISH Network subscribers receiving subsidized programming through our free and discounted programming promotions, the increased availability of local channels by satellite, increases in our advertising sales and increases in the number of DISH Network subscribers with multiple set-top boxes and digital video recorders. We provided local channels by satellite in 152 markets as of December 31, 2004 compared to 101 markets as of December 31, 2003.

Impacts from our litigation with the networks in Florida, FCC rules governing the delivery of superstations and other factors could cause us to terminate delivery of network channels and superstations to a substantial number of our subscribers, which could cause many of those customers to cancel their subscription to our other services. In the event the Court of Appeals upholds the Miami District Court’s network litigation injunction, and if we do not reach private settlement agreements with additional stations, we will attempt to assist subscribers in arranging alternative means to receive network channels, including migration to local channels by satellite where available, and free off air antenna offers in other markets. However, we cannot predict with any degree of certainty how many subscribers might ultimately cancel their primary DISH Network programming as a result of termination of their distant network channels. We could be required to terminate distant network programming to all subscribers in the event the plaintiffs prevail on their cross-appeal and we are permanently enjoined from delivering all distant network channels. Termination of distant network programming to subscribers would result in, among other things, a reduction in average monthly revenue per subscriber and a temporary increase in subscriber churn.

In April 2002, the FCC concluded that our “must carry” implementation methods were not in compliance with the “must carry” rules. If the FCC finds our subsequent remedial actions unsatisfactory, while we would attempt to continue providing local network channels in all markets without interruption, we could be forced by capacity constraints to reduce the number of markets in which we provide local channels. This could cause a temporary increase in churn and a small reduction in average monthly revenue per subscriber.

Equipment sales. For the year ended December 31, 2004, “Equipment sales” totaled $369.3 million, an increase of $77.5 million or 26.6% compared to the same period during 2003. This increase principally resulted from an increase in sales of DBS accessories to retailers and other distributors of our equipment domestically and to DISH Network subscribers.

16

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

We currently have certain binding purchase orders and a minimum volume commitment with an international DBS service provider through March 31, 2006 and we are actively trying to secure new orders from other potential international customers. However, we cannot guarantee at this time that those negotiations will be successful. A significant portion of our equipment revenue depends largely on sustaining substantial orders from this international DBS service provider and other international operators, which in turn, depends on other factors, such as the level of consumer acceptance of direct-to-home satellite TV products and the increasing intensity of competition for international subscription television subscribers. We have recently decided to downsize and eliminate certain product lines sold by our EchoStar International Corporation subsidiary and accordingly, we expect that future sales of our non-DISH Network receivers and other accessories to international customers will decline as compared to historical levels.

Other. “Other” sales totaled $97.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $66.6 million compared to the same period during 2003. This increase is primarily attributable to the subscription television service revenues from C-band subscribers of the SNG business that we acquired in April 2004.

Subscriber-related expenses. “Subscriber-related expenses” totaled $3.581 billion during the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $857.8 million or 31.5% compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in “Subscriber-related expenses” was primarily attributable to the increase in the number of DISH Network subscribers, which resulted in increased expenses to support the DISH Network. “Subscriber-related expenses” represented 53.6% and 50.3% of “Subscriber-related revenue” during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in this expense to revenue ratio primarily resulted from increases in our programming and subscriber retention costs, and costs associated with the expansion of our installation, in-home service and call center operations. These increased operational costs, some of which are temporary, related to, among other things, more complicated installations required by receivers with multiple tuners and a larger dish, or “SuperDISH” which is used to receive programming from our FSS satellites. The increase also resulted from cost of sales and expenses from equipment sales, installation and other services related to our relationship with SBC. Since margins related to our co-branded subscribers are lower than for our traditional subscribers, we expect this relationship to continue to negatively impact this ratio to the extent that we continue to add co-branded subscribers under our SBC agreement. The ratio of “Subscriber-related expenses” to “Subscriber-related revenue” could also continue to increase if our programming and retention costs increase at a greater rate than our “Subscriber-related revenue” and if we are unable to improve efficiencies related to our installation, in-home service and call center operations.

We currently offer local broadcast channels in approximately 155 markets across the United States. In 38 of those markets, two dishes are necessary to receive all local channels in the market. SHVERA now requires, among other things, that all local broadcast channels delivered by satellite to any particular market be available from a single dish within 18 months of the law’s December 8, 2004 effective date. Because we had planned to transition all local channels in any particular market to the same dish by 2008 rather than in the shorter transition period mandated by SHVERA, satellite capacity limitations may force us to move the local channels in as many as 30 markets to different satellites, requiring subscribers in those markets to install a second or a different dish to continue receiving their local network channels. We may be forced to stop offering local channels in some of those markets altogether.

The transition of all local channels to the same dish could result in disruptions of service for a substantial number of our customers, and our ability to timely comply with this requirement without incurring significant additional costs is dependent on, among other things, the successful launch and operation of one or more additional satellites. It is possible that the costs of compliance with this requirement could exceed $100.0 million. To the extent some of those costs are passed on to our subscribers, and because many subscribers may be unwilling to install a second dish where one had been adequate, we expect that our subscriber churn could be negatively impacted.

In the normal course of business, we enter into various contracts with programmers to provide content. Our programming contracts generally require us to make payments based on the number of subscribers to which the respective content is provided. Consequently, our programming expenses will continue to increase to the extent we are successful in growing our subscriber base. In addition, because programmers continue to raise the price of content, there can be no assurance that our “Subscriber-related expenses” as a percentage of “Subscriber-related revenue” will not materially increase absent corresponding price increases in our DISH Network programming packages.

17

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Satellite and transmission expenses. “Satellite and transmission expenses” totaled $107.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $33.3 million or 44.8% compared to the same period in 2003. This increase primarily resulted from commencement of service and operational costs associated with the increasing number of markets in which we offer local network channels by satellite as previously discussed, and increases in our FSS satellite lease payment obligations. “Satellite and transmission expenses” totaled 1.6% and 1.4% of “Subscriber-related revenue” during each of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in the expense to revenue ratio principally resulted from additional operational costs to support the commencement of service and on-going operations of our local markets discussed above. These expenses will increase further in the future as we increase the size of our satellite fleet, if we obtain in-orbit satellite insurance, as we increase the number and operations of our digital broadcast centers and as additional local markets and other programming services are launched.

Cost of sales – equipment. “Cost of sales – equipment” totaled $306.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $112.1 million or 57.8% compared to the same period in 2003. This increase primarily resulted from the increase in sales of DBS accessories to retailers and other distributors of our equipment domestically and to DISH Network subscribers discussed above, and approximately $18.4 million in charges related to slow moving and obsolete inventory. “Cost of sales – equipment” represented 82.9% and 66.5% of “Equipment sales,” during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in the expense to revenue ratio principally related to the charges for slow moving and obsolete inventory discussed above, and an approximate $6.8 million reduction in the cost of set-top box equipment during 2003 resulting from a change in estimated royalty obligations. This increase in the expense to revenue ratio also related to a decline in margins on the sales of DBS accessories and on sales by our ETC subsidiary to an international DBS service provider due to reductions in prices and increased sales of lower margin accessories.

Cost of sales – other. “Cost of sales – other” totaled $30.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $30.2 million compared to the same period in 2003. This increase is primarily attributable to expenses associated with the C-band subscription television service business of SNG we acquired in April 2004.

Subscriber acquisition costs. “Subscriber acquisition costs” totaled approximately $1.532 billion for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $221.0 million or 16.9% compared to the same period in 2003. “Subscriber acquisition costs” during the year ended December 31, 2003 included a benefit of approximately $77.2 million comprised of approximately $42.8 million related to a reduction in the cost of set-top box equipment resulting from a change in estimated royalty obligations and $34.4 million from a litigation settlement. The increase in “Subscriber acquisition costs” was attributable to a larger number of gross DISH Network subscriber additions during the year ended December 2004 compared to the same period in 2003, partially offset by a higher number of DISH Network subscribers participating in our equipment lease program and the acquisition of co-branded subscribers during 2004 as discussed under “SAC and Equivalent SAC” below.

SAC and Equivalent SAC. Subscriber acquisition costs per new DISH Network subscriber activation were approximately $444 for the year ended December 31, 2004 and approximately $453 during the same period in 2003. SAC during the year ended December 31, 2003 included the benefit of approximately $77.2 million discussed above. Absent this benefit, our SAC for 2003 would have been approximately $27 higher, or $480. The decrease in SAC during the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 (excluding this benefit) was directly attributable to the acquisition of co-branded subscribers during 2004. Excluding the effect of co-branded subscribers, SAC would have increased during the current year as compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in SAC (excluding the effect of co-branded subscribers) was primarily related to more expensive promotions offered during 2004 including up to three free receivers for new subscribers and free advanced products, such as digital video recorders and high definition receivers. Further, during 2004, since a greater number of DISH Network subscribers activated multiple receivers, receivers with multiple tuners or other advanced products, including SuperDISH, installation costs increased as compared to 2003. These factors were partially offset by an increase in DISH Network subscribers participating in our equipment lease program and reduced subscriber acquisition advertising.

Penetration of our equipment lease program increased during the second half of 2004. Our capital expenditures will continue to increase to the extent we maintain or increase our lease penetration as a percentage of new subscriber additions. Although we believe the increase in capital expenditures from penetration of our equipment lease program

18

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

will continue to be partially mitigated by the redeployment of equipment returned by disconnected lease program subscribers, new compression technologies will inevitably render some portion of our current and future EchoStar receivers obsolete, and we will incur additional costs, which may be substantial, to upgrade or replace these set-top boxes. Our “Subscriber acquisition costs,” both in aggregate and on a per new subscriber activation basis, may further materially increase in the future to the extent that we introduce other more aggressive promotions if we determine that they are necessary to respond to competition, or for other reasons.

Equipment capitalized under our lease program for new customers totaled approximately $574.8 million and $108.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Returned equipment related to disconnected lease program subscribers, which became available for sale rather than being redeployed through the lease program, together with payments received in connection with equipment not returned to us, totaled approximately $60.8 million and $30.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. If we included in our calculation of SAC the equipment capitalized less the value of equipment returned and payments received, our Equivalent SAC would have been approximately $593 during 2004 compared to $480 during 2003. As discussed above, “Subscriber acquisition costs” during 2003 included a benefit of approximately $77.2 million or $27 per subscriber. Absent this benefit, our Equivalent SAC, would have been $507 for the year ended December 31, 2003. This increase is primarily attributable to a greater number of DISH Network subscribers activating multiple receivers, and advanced products, such as SuperDISH, digital video recorders and high definition receivers.

Subscriber acquisition promotions. As previously discussed, our “Subscriber acquisitions costs” include, among other things, net costs related to our subscriber acquisition promotions. During the year ended December 31, 2004, our significant new subscriber promotions were as follows:

Digital Home Advantage – Effective February 1, 2004, our Digital Home Advantage promotion provided new lease subscribers up to four installed EchoStar receivers, including various premium models, with a qualifying programming subscription. The subscriber is required to pay a monthly rental fee for each leased receiver, but is not required to agree to a minimum lease period. The subscriber must provide a valid major credit card, their social security number, have an acceptable credit score, and pay a one-time set-up fee of $49.99. The subscriber receives a $49.99 credit on their first month’s bill. Effective October 19, 2004, the promotion was expanded whereby the consumer may agree to either a one or two year commitment in exchange for receiving the benefits of our Digital Home Protection Plan, an optional extended warranty program, without charge for one or two years, respectively. Since we retain ownership of equipment installed pursuant to the Digital Home Advantage promotion, equipment costs are capitalized and depreciated over a period of up to four years. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate duration of our current equipment lease promotion, we expect it to continue through at least July 31, 2005.

Free Dish – Effective February 1, 2004, our Free DISH promotion provided new subscribers with a choice of up to three installed EchoStar receivers, including one premium receiver model for $49.99. The subscriber receives a $49.99 credit on their first month’s bill. To be eligible, subscribers must provide a valid major credit card, their social security number, have an acceptable credit score, and make a one or two year commitment to subscribe to a qualified programming package, depending on the set-top box models selected by the subscriber. Certain advanced products, including digital video recorders and high definition receivers, require additional upgrade fees. The Free Dish promotion ended on January 31, 2005.

Free for All – Effective February 1, 2004, our Free for All promotion provides new subscribers who purchase one or two installed receiver systems for $149.00 or $199.00, respectively, a monthly credit of $10.00 for 15 or 20 months, respectively. The subscriber must subscribe to a qualifying programming package and provide their social security number. Effective February 1, 2005, new subscribers under our Free for All promotion who purchase one or two receiver systems and subscribe to a qualifying programming package receive a monthly credit of $5.00 for 30 or 40 months, respectively. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate duration of the Free for All promotion, we expect it to continue through at least July 31, 2005.

General and administrative expenses. “General and administrative expenses” totaled $380.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $61.4 million or 19.3% compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in “General and administrative expenses” was primarily attributable to increased personnel and infrastructure expenses to support the growth of the DISH Network. “General and administrative expenses” represented 5.3% and

19

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

5.6% of “Total revenue” during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease in this expense to revenue ratio resulted primarily from “Total revenue” increasing at a higher rate than our “General and administrative expenses.”

Non-cash, stock-based compensation. During 1999, EchoStar adopted an incentive plan under its 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, which provided certain key employees with incentives including stock options. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we recognized $1.2 million of compensation under this performance-based plan, a decrease of $2.4 million compared to the same period in 2003. All deferred compensation remaining as of December 31, 2003 was recognized during the quarter ending on March 31, 2004.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share Based Payment” (“SFAS 123®”) which is effective for financial statements as of the beginning of the first interim period that begins after June 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating which transitional provision and fair value methodology we will follow. However, we expect that any expense associated with the adoption of the provisions of SFAS 123® will have a material negative impact on our results of operations.

Depreciation and amortization. “Depreciation and amortization” expense totaled $490.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $105.6 million or 27.4% compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in “Depreciation and amortization” expense primarily resulted from additional depreciation related to the commencement of commercial operation of our EchoStar IX satellite in October 2003, and increases in depreciation related to equipment leased to customers and other depreciable assets, including finite lived intangible assets, placed in service during 2003 and 2004. As of December 31, 2003, EchoStar IV was fully depreciated and accordingly, we recorded no expense for this satellite during the year ended December 31, 2004. This partially offset the increase in depreciation expense discussed above.

Interest income. “Interest income” totaled $30.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $11.8 million or 62.5% compared to the same period in 2003. This increase principally resulted from higher average balances and returns on our cash and marketable investment securities during 2004 as compared to 2003.

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. “Interest expense” totaled $433.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $26.3 million or 6.5% compared to the same period in 2003. This increase primarily resulted from an increase in prepayment premiums and the write-off of debt issuance costs totaling approximately $134.7 million in 2004 compared to approximately $60.1 million in 2003. This increase was partially offset by a net reduction in interest expense of approximately $57.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 related to the debt redemptions and repurchases of our previously outstanding senior debt during 2003 and 2004. See Note 4 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $1.204 billion during the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $97.5 million or 8.8% compared to $1.106 billion during the same period in 2003. EBITDA during the year ended December 31, 2003 included a benefit of approximately $77.2 million related to the change in estimated royalty obligations and litigation settlement discussed above. Absent this 2003 benefit, our increase in EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2004 would have been $174.7 million. The increase in EBITDA (excluding this benefit) was primarily attributable to the changes in operating revenues and expenses discussed above. EBITDA does not include the impact of capital expenditures under our new and existing subscriber equipment lease programs of approximately $654.9 million and $118.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

20

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying financial statements:

EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used as a measurement of operating efficiency and overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful measure for those evaluating companies in the multi-channel video programming distribution industry. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Income tax benefit (provision), net. Our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as operating loss, tax credit and other carry-forwards. We follow the guidelines set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”) regarding the recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the balance sheet and provide any necessary valuation allowances as required. Determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about the timing of future events, including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities. We currently have an approximate $577.5 million valuation allowance recorded as an offset against all of our net deferred tax assets. In accordance with SFAS 109, we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance based on historical evidence, including trends, and future expectations in each reporting period. In the future, at such time as is required by SFAS 109, all or a portion of the current valuation allowance may be reversed. We recognized “Net income” for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and accordingly, now believe that if this trend continues it is more likely than not we will reverse our current recorded valuation allowance in the near term which will have a material positive impact on our “Net income (loss).” However, there can be no assurance if or when all or a portion of our valuation allowance will be reversed.

Net income (loss). “Net income” was $299.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2004, a decrease of $20.2 million or 6.3% compared to $319.6 million for the same period in 2003. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower “Operating income” and higher “Interest expense” partially offset by an increase in “Interest income” resulting from the factors discussed above.

21

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2002.

22

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

DISH Network subscribers. As of December 31, 2003, we had approximately 9.425 million DISH Network subscribers compared to approximately 8.180 million at December 31, 2002, an increase of approximately 15.2%. DISH Network added approximately 1.245 million net new subscribers for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to approximately 1.350 million net new subscribers during the same period in 2002. We believe the reduction in net new subscribers for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to the same period in 2002, resulted from a number of factors, including stronger competition from advanced digital cable and cable modems. Additionally, as the size of our subscriber base continues to increase, even if percentage churn remains constant, increasing numbers of gross new subscribers are required to sustain net subscriber growth.

Subscriber additions during the second half of 2003 were negatively impacted by delays in the delivery of several newly developed products, which resulted in a temporary product shortage, and product installations in the third and fourth quarter of 2003. These delays were substantially eliminated during the first quarter of 2004.

Subscriber-related revenue. DISH Network “Subscriber-related revenue” totaled $5.409 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $986.0 million or 22.3% compared to the same period in 2002. This increase was directly attributable to continued DISH Network subscriber growth and the increase in “ARPU” discussed below.

ARPU. Monthly average revenue per subscriber was approximately $51.21 during the year ended December 31, 2003 and approximately $49.37 during the same period in 2002. The $1.84 or 3.7% increase in monthly average revenue per subscriber is primarily attributable to price increases of up to $2.00 in February 2003 on some of our most popular packages, the increased availability of local channels by satellite and an increase in the number of DISH Network subscribers with multiple set-top boxes. During 2003, we launched 47 additional local markets compared to the launch of 18 additional markets during 2002. These increases were partially offset by certain subscriber promotions, under which new DISH Network subscribers received free programming for the first three months of their term of service, and other promotions under which DISH Network subscribers received discounted programming.

Equipment sales. For the year ended December 31, 2003, “Equipment sales” totaled $291.8 million, a decrease of $54.2 million or 15.7% compared to the same period during 2002. The decrease in “Equipment sales” principally resulted from a decline in the number of digital set-top boxes and related components sold by our ETC subsidiary to an international DBS service provider.

Subscriber-related expenses. “Subscriber-related expenses” totaled $2.723 billion during the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $506.8 million or 22.9% compared to the same period in 2002. The increase in “Subscriber-related expenses” was primarily attributable to the increase in the number of DISH Network subscribers. This growth resulted in increased expenses to support the DISH Network, including programming costs, personnel expenses, the opening of a new call center, and increased operating expenses related to the expansion of our DISH Network Service L.L.C. business. “Subscriber-related expenses” represented 50.3% and 50.1% of “Subscriber-related revenue” during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in “Subscriber-related expenses” as a percentage of “Subscriber-related revenue” primarily resulted from an approximately $30.2 million reversal of an accrual during 2002 related to the replacement of smart cards in satellite receivers owned by us and leased to consumers. This accrual reversal decreased the 2002 expense to revenue ratio from 50.8% to 50.1%. The increase in the expense to revenue ratio from 2002 to 2003 was partially offset by an increase in monthly average revenue per subscriber and increased operating efficiencies.

Satellite and transmission expenses. “Satellite and transmission expenses” totaled $74.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $17.7 million or 31.2% compared to the same period in 2002. This increase primarily resulted from commencement of service and operational costs associated with the increasing number of markets in which we offer local network channels by satellite as previously discussed. “Satellite and transmission expenses” totaled 1.4% and 1.3% of “Subscriber-related revenue” during each of the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Cost of sales – equipment. “Cost of sales – equipment” totaled $193.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of $33.2 million or 14.6% compared to the same period in 2002. This decrease related primarily to a decrease in sales of digital set-top boxes and related components by our ETC subsidiary to an international DBS service

23

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

provider. “Cost of sales – equipment” during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 include non-recurring reductions in the cost of set-top box equipment of approximately $6.8 million and $6.5 million, respectively. “Cost of sales - equipment” represented 66.5% and 65.6% of “Equipment sales,” during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Subscriber acquisition costs. “Subscriber acquisition costs” totaled approximately $1.311 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $137.8 million or 11.7% compared to the same period in 2002. The increase principally resulted from the sale of equipment at little or no cost to the subscriber, a decrease in subscriber equipment leases and increases in acquisition marketing as discussed under “SAC and Equivalent SAC” below. This increase was partially offset by benefits of approximately $77.2 million which were recorded in 2003. These benefits include approximately $34.4 million related to the receipt of a reimbursement payment for previously sold set-top box equipment pursuant to a litigation settlement and approximately $42.8 million related to a reduction in the cost of set-top box equipment resulting from a change in estimated royalty obligations. “Subscriber acquisition costs” during the year ended December 31, 2002 included a benefit of approximately $47.7 million resulting from the non-recurring reduction in the cost of set-top box equipment as a result of favorable litigation developments and the completion of royalty arrangements with more favorable terms than estimated amounts previously accrued.

SAC and Equivalent SAC. Subscriber acquisition costs per new DISH Network subscriber activation were approximately $453 for the year ended December 31, 2003 and approximately $421 during the same period in 2002. As discussed above, SAC during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 included benefits of approximately $77.2 million and $47.7 million, respectively. Absent these benefits, our SAC for 2003 and 2002 would have been approximately $27 and $17 higher, respectively, or $480 and $438, respectively. The increase in SAC (excluding these benefits) during the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002 was primarily attributable to an increase in the sale of equipment at little or no cost to the subscriber, including our promotion in which subscribers are eligible to receive up to three free receivers or a free digital video recorder, together with a decrease in subscriber equipment leases. The increase also resulted from an increase in acquisition marketing in 2003 compared to 2002.

Equipment capitalized under our lease program for new customers totaled approximately $108.1 million and $277.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Returned equipment related to disconnected lease program subscribers, which became available for sale rather than being redeployed through the lease program, together with payments received in connection with equipment not returned to us, totaled approximately $30.2 million and $37.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. If we included in our calculation of SAC the equipment capitalized less the value of equipment returned and payments received, our Equivalent SAC would have been approximately $480 during 2003 compared to $507 during 2002. As discussed above, “Subscriber acquisition costs” during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 included benefits of approximately $77.2 million and $47.7 million, respectively. Absent these benefits, our Equivalent SAC for 2003 and 2002 would have been $507 and $524, respectively. This decrease principally resulted from a greater percentage of returned leased equipment being redeployed to new lease customers and relatively less of that equipment being offered for sale as remanufactured equipment.

General and administrative expenses. “General and administrative expenses” totaled $319.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $18.7 million or 6.2% compared to the same period in 2002. The increase in “General and administrative expenses” was primarily attributable to increased personnel and infrastructure expenses to support the growth of the DISH Network. “General and administrative expenses” represented 5.6% and 6.3% of “Total revenue” during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This decrease in “General and administrative expenses” as a percent of “Total revenue” was the result of increased administrative efficiencies.

Non-cash, stock-based compensation. During 1999, EchoStar adopted an incentive plan under its 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, which provided certain key employees with incentives including stock options. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we recognized $3.5 million of compensation under this performance-based plan, a decrease of $7.7 million compared to the same period in 2002. This decrease was primarily attributable to proportionate vesting and stock option forfeitures resulting from employee terminations. The remaining deferred compensation of $1.2 million as of December 31, 2003 was recognized over the remaining vesting period, ending on March 31, 2004.

24

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

We report all non-cash compensation based on stock option appreciation as a single expense category in our accompanying statements of operations. The following table represents the other expense categories in our statements of operations that would be affected if non-cash, stock-based compensation was allocated to the same expense categories as the base compensation for key employees who participate in the 1999 incentive plan:

Depreciation and amortization. “Depreciation and amortization” expense totaled $385.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $29.3 million or 8.2% compared to the same period in 2002. The increase in “Depreciation and amortization” expense principally resulted from an increase in depreciation related to the commencement of commercial operation of EchoStar VII, VIII and IX in April 2002, October 2002, and October 2003, respectively, and leased equipment and other additional depreciable assets placed in service during 2003.

Interest income. “Interest income” totaled $18.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $8.8 million compared to the same period in 2002. This increase principally resulted from higher cash and marketable investment securities balances in 2003 as compared to 2002 partially offset by lower returns.

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. “Interest expense” totaled $407.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $68.1 million or 20.1% compared to the same period in 2002. This increase primarily resulted from prepayment premiums and accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs totaling approximately $60.1 million related to the full and partial redemptions and repurchases of certain of our debt securities and additional interest expense totaling approximately $36.3 million related to our $2.5 billion senior notes offering during October 2003. This increase also resulted from a $15.4 million reduction in the amount of interest capitalized during the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002. Interest is capitalized during the construction phase of a satellite, however, capitalization of additional interest ceases upon commercial operation of the satellite. Therefore, once EchoStar VII, EchoStar VIII and EchoStar IX commenced commercial operation during April 2002, October 2002 and August 2003, respectively, we ceased capitalizing interest related to these satellites. The expensing of this previously capitalized interest resulted in an increase in “Interest expense.” This increase was partially offset by a reduction in interest expense of approximately $42.8 million as a result of the debt redemptions and repurchases discussed above.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $1.106 billion during the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to $812.5 million during the same period in 2002. The improvement was primarily attributable the increase in the number of DISH Network subscribers, which continues to result in revenue sufficient to support the cost of new and existing subscribers. The improvement was partially offset by a decrease in subscribers leasing equipment and a corresponding increase in equipment subsidies compared to the same period in 2002, as well as a decrease in “Equipment sales.” EBITDA does not include the impact of capital expenditures under our new and existing subscriber equipment lease program of approximately $118.6 million during 2003, and our new subscriber equipment lease program of $277.6 million during 2002.

25

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying financial statements:

EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used as a measurement of operating efficiency and overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful measure for those evaluating companies in the multi-channel video programming distribution industry. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Net income. “Net income” was $319.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $272.7 million compared to $46.9 million for the same period in 2002. The improvement was primarily attributable to an increase in “Operating income,” the components of which are discussed above.

Seasonality

Our revenues vary throughout the year. As is typical in the subscription television service industry, the first half of the year generally produces fewer new subscribers than the second half of the year. Our operating results in any period may be affected by the incurrence of advertising and promotion expenses that do not necessarily produce commensurate revenues until the impact of such advertising and promotion is realized in future periods.

Inflation

Inflation has not materially affected our operations during the past three years. We believe that our ability to increase the prices charged for our products and services in future periods will depend primarily on competitive pressures. We do not have any material backlog of our products.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risks Associated With Financial Instruments

As of December 31, 2004, our restricted and unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities had a fair market value of approximately $726.3 million which was invested in: (a) cash; (b) debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies; (c) commercial paper and notes with an overall average maturity of less than one year and rated in one of the four highest rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations; and (d) instruments with similar risk characteristics to the commercial paper described above. The primary purpose of these investing activities has been to preserve principal until the cash is required to, among other things, fund operations, make strategic investments and expand the business. Consequently, the size of this portfolio fluctuates significantly as cash is received and used in our business.

Our restricted and unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities had an average annual return for the year ended December 31, 2004 of approximately 2.1%. A hypothetical 10.0% decrease in interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $3.1 million in annual interest income. The value of certain of the investments in this portfolio can be impacted by, among other things, the risk of adverse changes in securities and

26

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK - Continued

economic markets generally, as well as the risks related to the performance of the companies whose commercial paper and other instruments we hold. However, the high quality of these investments (as assessed by independent rating agencies), reduces these risks. The value of these investments can also be impacted by interest rate fluctuations.

At December 31, 2004, all of the $726.3 million was invested in fixed or variable rate instruments or money market type accounts. While an increase in interest rates would ordinarily adversely impact the fair market value of fixed and variable rate investments, we normally hold these investments to maturity. Consequently, neither interest rate fluctuations nor other market risks typically result in significant realized gains or losses to this portfolio. A decrease in interest rates has the effect of reducing our future annual interest income from this portfolio, since funds would be re-invested at lower rates as the instruments mature. Over time, any net percentage decrease in interest rates could be reflected in a corresponding net percentage decrease in our interest income.

We currently classify all marketable investment securities as available-for-sale. We adjust the carrying value of our available-for-sale securities to fair market value and report the related temporary unrealized gains and losses as a separate component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income” within “Total stockholder’s equity (deficit),” net of related deferred income tax. Declines in the fair market value of a marketable investment security which are estimated to be “other than temporary” are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations, thus establishing a new cost basis for such investment. We evaluate our marketable investment securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether declines in the fair market value of these securities are other than temporary. This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things, the fair market value of our marketable investment securities compared to the carrying amount, the historical volatility of the price of each security and any market and company specific factors related to each security. Generally, absent specific factors to the contrary, declines in the fair market value of investments below cost basis for a period of less than six months are considered to be temporary. Declines in the fair market value of investments for a period of six to nine months are evaluated on a case by case basis to determine whether any company or market-specific factors exist which would indicate that such declines are other than temporary. Declines in the fair market value of investments below cost basis for greater than nine months are considered other than temporary and are recorded as charges to earnings, absent specific factors to the contrary.

As of December 31, 2004, we had unrealized losses of approximately $1.7 million as a part of “Accumulated other comprehensive income” within “Total stockholder’s equity (deficit).” During the year ended December 31, 2004, we did not record any charge to earnings for other than temporary declines in the fair market value of our marketable investment securities. Realized gains and losses are accounted for on the specific identification method. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, our portfolio generally, and our strategic investments particularly, has experienced and continues to experience volatility. If the fair market value of our marketable securities portfolio does not remain above cost basis or if we become aware of any market or company specific factors that indicate that the carrying value of certain of our securities is impaired, we may be required to record charges to earnings in future periods equal to the amount of the decline in fair market value.

We also have strategic equity investments in certain non-marketable investment securities including equity interests we received in exchange for non-cash consideration (See Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K). We account for such unconsolidated investments under either the equity method or cost method of accounting. These securities are not publicly traded and accordingly, it is not practical to regularly estimate the fair value of these investments, however, these investments are subject to an evaluation for other than temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things, company business plans and current financial statements, if available, for factors that may indicate an impairment of our investment. Such factors may include, but are not limited to, cash flow concerns, material litigation, violations of debt covenants and changes in business strategy. The fair value of these investments is not estimated unless there are identified changes in circumstances that are likely to have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly traded is dependent on the success of their business and their ability to obtain sufficient capital to execute their business plans. Since private markets are not as liquid as public markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain full value for them. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we had $52.7 million aggregate carrying amount of non-marketable and unconsolidated

27

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK - Continued

strategic equity investments, of which all was accounted for under the cost method. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we did not record any impairment charges with respect to these investments. As of December 31, 2004, we estimated the fair value of our fixed-rate debt and mortgages and other notes payable to be approximately $4.412 billion using quoted market prices where available, and third party valuations or discounted cash flow analyses when it was practicable to do so. The interest rates assumed in these discounted cash flow analyses reflect interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The fair value of our fixed-rate debt and mortgages is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A hypothetical 10.0% decrease in assumed interest rates would increase the fair value of our debt by approximately $134.5 million. To the extent interest rates increase, our costs of financing would increase at such time as we are required to refinance our debt. As of December 31, 2004, a hypothetical 10.0% increase in assumed interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by approximately $28.2 million.

We have not used derivative financial instruments for hedging or speculative purposes.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our Consolidated Financial Statements are included in this report beginning on page F-1.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

As part of EchoStar’s evaluation of its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, EchoStar identified certain deficiencies in its internal control over financial reporting that constitute a “significant deficiency” as defined by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 2. This significant deficiency resulted in part from the failure to maintain accurate books and records identified by the Review described under “Item 1 Description of Business – Recent Developments — Internal Review.” That Review reported one instance in which one of our executive officers in charge of certain business functions directed the preparation in prior years of inaccurate documentation that was used to determine payments made to a vendor. EchoStar has also identified several other significant deficiencies, none of which individually or in the aggregate constituted a “material weakness” in its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004.

28

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

29

30

31

32

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

33

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
EchoStar DBS Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of EchoStar DBS Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholder’s equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of EchoStar DBS Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 29, 2005

F-2

ECHOSTAR DBS CORPORATION

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

ECHOSTAR DBS CORPORATION

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

ECHOSTAR DBS CORPORATION

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

ECHOSTAR DBS CORPORATION