e10v12bza
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 26, 2007
File No. 001-33807
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 2
to
Form 10
GENERAL FORM FOR
REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES
PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b)
OR 12(g)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
EchoStar Holding
Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Nevada
|
|
26-1232727
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
90 Inverness Circle E.
Englewood, Colorado
|
|
80112
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(303) 723-1000
Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of
the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class to be so Registered
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Each Class is to be
Registered
|
Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of
the Act:
None
EchoStar
Holding Corporation
Cross-Reference
Sheet Between the Information Statement and Items of
Form 10
Information
Included in the Information Statement and Incorporated by
Reference
into the Registration Statement on Form 10
Our information statement may be found as Exhibit 99.1 to
this Form 10. For your convenience, we have provided below
a cross-reference sheet identifying where the items required by
Form 10 can be found in the information statement.
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Caption
|
|
Location in Information Statement
|
|
1.
|
|
Business
|
|
See Summary, Risk Factors,
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements, The Spin-Off,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business
|
1A.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
See Summary, Risk Factors and
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements
|
2.
|
|
Financial Information
|
|
See Summary, Risk Factors,
Selected Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and
Adjusted Financial Data, Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined and Adjusted Financial Information and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
3.
|
|
Properties
|
|
See Properties
|
4.
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
|
See Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management
|
5.
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
See Management
|
6.
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
See Management
|
7.
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
See Risk Factors, Management,
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
and Certain Intercompany Agreements
|
8.
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
See Business Legal Proceedings
|
9.
|
|
Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrants Common
Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
See Summary, The Spin-Off and
Description of Our Capital Stock
|
10.
|
|
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
|
|
None
|
11.
|
|
Description of Registrants Securities to be Registered
|
|
See Description of Our Capital Stock
|
12.
|
|
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
|
|
See Management and Limitation of Liability and
Indemnification Matters
|
13.
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
See Selected Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
and Adjusted Financial Data, Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined and Adjusted Financial Information, and
Index to Financial Tables of EchoStar Holding
Corporation, Index to Statement of Net Assets to be
Contributed by EchoStar Communications Corporation, and
Index to Financial Tables of Sling Media, Inc. and
the financial statements referenced therein
|
14.
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure
|
|
None
|
15.
|
|
Financial Statements and Exhibits
|
|
See Index to Financial Tables of EchoStar Holding
Corporation, Index to Statement of Net Assets to be
Contributed by EchoStar Communications Corporation, and
Index to Financial Tables of Sling Media, Inc. and
the financial statements referenced therein
|
(a) List of Financial Statements and Schedules.
The following financial statements are included in the
information statement and filed as part of this Registration
Statement on Form 10:
(1) Combined Financial Statements of EchoStar Holding
Corporation, including Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm;
(2) Statement of Net Assets to be Contributed by EchoStar
Communications Corporation, including Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm; and
(3) Consolidated Financial Statements of Sling Media, Inc.,
including Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
The following financial statement schedule for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 is included in the
information statement and filed as part of this Registration
Statement:
None. All schedules have been included in the Combined Financial
Statements of EchoStar Holding Corporation or Notes thereto.
(b) Exhibits. The following documents are filed as exhibits
hereto:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Form of Separation Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of EchoStar Holding Corporation*
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws of EchoStar Holding Corporation*
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate of EchoStar
Holding Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Transition Services Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Form of Tax Sharing Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Form of Employee Matters Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Form of Intellectual Property Matters Agreement between EchoStar
Holding Corporation, EchoStar Acquisition L.L.C., Echosphere
L.L.C., EchoStar DBS Corporation, EIC Spain SL, EchoStar
Technologies Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Form of Management Services Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Manufacturing Agreement, dated as of March 22, 1995,
between HTS and SCI Technology, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
of Dish Ltd., Commission File
No. 33-81234)
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Agreement between HTS, EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., and ExpressVu
Inc., dated January 8, 1997, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1996, as amended, Commission
File No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Agreement to Form NagraStar L.L.C., dated as of
June 23, 1998, by and between Kudelski S.A., EchoStar
Communications Corporation and EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1998, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Satellite Service Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2003,
between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. and
EchoStar Communications Corporation (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Satellite Service Agreement dated
March 31, 2003 between SES Americom Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Satellite Service Agreement dated as of August 13, 2003
between SES Americom Inc., EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. and
EchoStar Communications Corporation (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Satellite Service Agreement, dated February 19, 2004,
between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. and
EchoStar Communications Corporation (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
March 10, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
February 19, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
April 30, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
October 21, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
November 19, 2004 between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
November 19, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc.,
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications
Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to
the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
December 20, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
April 6, 2005, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
June 20, 2005, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Form of EchoStar Holding Corporation 2008 Stock Incentive
Plan*
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form of EchoStar Holding Corporation 2008 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan*
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Form of EchoStar Holding Corporation 2008 Nonemployee Director
Stock Option Plan*
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Form of EchoStar Holding Corporation 2008 Class B CEO Stock
Option Plan*
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Form of Receiver Agreement between EchoSphere L.L.C. and
EchoStar Technologies L.L.C.
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Form of Broadcast Agreement between EchoStar Holding Corporation
and EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Form of Satellite Capacity Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of EchoStar Holding Corporation*
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Preliminary Information Statement of EchoStar Holding
Corporation, subject to completion, dated December 26, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on
Form 10 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
ECHOSTAR HOLDING CORPORATION
Charles W. Ergen
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: December 26, 2007
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Form of Separation Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of EchoStar Holding Corporation*
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws of EchoStar Holding Corporation*
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate of EchoStar
Holding Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Transition Services Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Form of Tax Sharing Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Form of Employee Matters Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Form of Intellectual Property Matters Agreement between EchoStar
Holding Corporation, EchoStar Acquisition LLC, Echosphere
L.L.C., EchoStar DBS Corporation, EIC Spain SL, EchoStar
Technologies Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Form of Management Services Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Communications Corporation*
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Manufacturing Agreement, dated as of March 22, 1995,
between HTS and SCI Technology, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
of Dish Ltd., Commission File
No. 33-81234)
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Agreement between HTS, EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. and ExpressVu
Inc., dated January 8, 1997, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1996, as amended, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Agreement to Form NagraStar L.L.C., dated as of
June 23, 1998, by and between Kudelski S.A., EchoStar
Communications Corporation and EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1998, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Satellite Service Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2003,
between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. and
EchoStar Communications Corporation (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Satellite Service Agreement dated
March 31, 2003 between SES Americom Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Satellite Service Agreement dated as of August 13, 2003
between SES Americom Inc., EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. and
EchoStar Communications Corporation (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Satellite Service Agreement, dated February 19, 2004,
between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. and
EchoStar Communications Corporation (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
March 10, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
February 19, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
April 30, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
October 21, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
November 19, 2004 between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
November 19, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
December 20, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
April 6, 2005, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated
June 20, 2005, between SES Americom, Inc., EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
of EchoStar Communications Corporation for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005, Commission File
No. 0-26176)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Form of EchoStar Holding Corporation 2008 Stock Incentive
Plan*
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form of EchoStar Holding Corporation 2008 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan*
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Form of EchoStar Holding Corporation 2008 Nonemployee Director
Stock Option Plan*
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Form of EchoStar Holding Corporation 2008 Class B CEO Stock
Option Plan*
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Form of Receiver Agreement between EchoSphere L.L.C. and
EchoStar Technologies L.L.C.
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Form of Broadcast Agreement between EchoStar Holding Corporation
and EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Form of Satellite Capacity Agreement between EchoStar Holding
Corporation and EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of EchoStar Holding Corporation*
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Preliminary Information Statement of EchoStar Holding
Corporation, subject to completion, dated December 26, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
exv10w26
Exhibit 10.26
[FORM OF]
RECEIVER AGREEMENT
This Receiver Agreement (Agreement) is entered into as of this ___ day of December, 2007,
by and between EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. (ETLLC), having a principal place of business at 90
Inverness Circle East, Englewood CO, 80112 and EchoSphere L.L.C. (Licensee), having a principal
place of business at 9601 S. Meridian Blvd., Englewood CO 80112.
INTRODUCTION
A. ETLLC has developed a proprietary Digital Satellite Receiver (as defined in Section 1.4
below) for use in conjunction with the DISH Network, a digital direct broadcast satellite (DBS)
programming service network owned and operated by Affiliates of Licensee in the United States (the
DISH System, as defined in Section 1.5 below).
B. Licensee is a distributor of consumer electronics products and desires to purchase OEM
Products (as defined in Section 1.10 below) from ETLLC solely for distribution and sale in
connection with the DISH Network in the Territory (as defined in Section 1.16 below).
C. ETLLC is willing to sell OEM Products to Licensee for such purposes, subject to and in
accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS
In addition to any other defined terms in this Agreement and except as otherwise expressly
provided for in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
1.1 Accessories means an antenna, LNB, feedhorn, feedarm, and other equipment necessary to
bring a satellite signal into the home, as such components may change from time to time in ETLLCs
sole discretion.
1.2 Affiliate means, with respect to a party to this Agreement, any person or entity
directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with such party.
1
1.3 Approved OEM Brand Name means those Licensee Marks, which have been approved in writing
by ETLLC (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld), for placement on the bezel (front
panel) of OEM Products and packaging therefor in accordance with the trademark usage guidelines (or
as otherwise mutually agreed) of both Licensee and ETLLC.
1.4 Digital Satellite Receiver means a digital satellite receiver/decoder for use in
connection with direct to home satellite programming services (including any remotes and related
components), whether stand alone or incorporated into another product (i.e., a television or VCR),
which may include Accessories.
1.5
DISH System means an MPEG-2, MPEG-4/DVB compliant Digital Satellite Receiver
manufactured by or on behalf of ETLLC solely for use in connection with the DISH Network.
1.6 ETLLC Marks means those trademarks, service marks or trade names owned by ETLLC or for
which ETLLC has the right to grant a sublicense, as such ETLLC Marks may change from time to time in
ETLLCs discretion.
1.7 Intellectual Property means all patents, copyrights, design rights, trademarks, service
marks, trade secrets, know-how and any other intellectual or industrial property rights (whether
registered or unregistered) and all applications for the same owned or controlled by ETLLC or
Licensee, as the case may be, anywhere in the world, but does not include patents, copyrights,
design rights, trademarks, service marks, trade secrets, know-how or any other intellectual or
industrial property rights (whether registered or unregistered) or applications for the same owned
or controlled by Affiliates of either ETLLC or Licensee.
1.8 Licensee Marks means the trademarks or trade names owned by Licensee, or for which
Licensee has a license to use or the right to grant a sublicense sufficient for the purposes of
this Agreement.
1.9 Reserved.
1.10 OEM Product means a Digital Satellite Receiver that: (i) is manufactured by or on
behalf of ETLLC; (ii) is branded with an Approved OEM Brand Name; (iii) is designed to be
compatible only with the DISH Network; and (iv) after being equipped with a Smart Card is designed
to be unable to receive, decode or descramble signals transmitted by satellite transponders that
are not owned, leased, or controlled by Licensee or an Affiliate of Licensee. For clarity and the
avoidance of doubt, a Digital Satellite Receiver which is specifically designed for a third party
other than Licensee or an Affiliate of Licensee shall not be considered an OEM Product.
1.11 Reserved.
2
1.12 Programming means the video and audio signals transmitted by DBS satellite transponders
that are owned or controlled by Licensee or an Affiliate and are part of the DISH Networks regular
programming services.
1.13 Reserved.
1.14 Smart Card means the card or smart chip, which, through the use of a secure
microprocessor, controls the ability of the OEM Product to access the Programming.
1.15 Term means the duration of this Agreement as specified in Section 10.1 hereof.
1.16 Territory means the geographic boundaries of: (i) the United States of America; (ii)
Puerto Rico; and (iii) any other territorial possession of the United States within DISH Networks
existing satellite footprint as of the date of this Agreement.
2. MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF OEM PRODUCTS BY ETLLC
2.1 Manufacture. ETLLC agrees to manufacture and sell OEM Products to Licensee during
the Term, and Licensee has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase OEM Products from ETLLC
during the Term, in accordance with and subject to the terms of this Agreement. ETLLC may select
and authorize any third party to manufacture OEM Products on ETLLCs behalf.
2.2 Authorization; Territory. Licensee shall be authorized to resell OEM Products
within the Territory solely to: (i) retailers, distributors, installers and end users
of the DISH Network; and (ii) solely for use in conjunction with the DISH Network in
the Territory. Licensee agrees that it shall not sell any OEM Product to: (a) any person or entity
other than those authorized in clauses (i) and (ii) of the preceding sentence; (b) any person or
entity who Licensee knows or has reason to know intends to use it, or resell it for use, in Canada
or at any other location outside of the Territory; or (c) any person or entity who Licensee knows
or has reason to know intends to use it, or resell it for use, in conjunction with a DBS service
other than the DISH Network.
2.3 Approved OEM Brand Names. Upon request by Licensee, ETLLC shall manufacture the
OEM Product with any of the Approved OEM Brand Names affixed to the bezel (front panel) of the OEM
Products in accordance with Section 8 below; provided, however, that ETLLC shall have no obligation
under this Section 2.3 unless at the time of such request Licensee issues and delivers to ETLLC a
firm Purchase Order for not less than 10,000 units of an OEM Product with an Approved OEM Brand
Name requested by Licensee which has not been previously manufactured
by ETLLC hereunder At the
request of Licensee, new Approved OEM Brand Names may be added upon prior written approval of ETLLC
(which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld). The
3
provisions of Section 8.1 shall apply to the use of ETLLC Marks on or in connection with OEM
Product delivered hereunder which include any Approved OEM Brand Name.
2.4
Costs. Licensee shall be responsible, and shall pay ETLLC in advance, for all costs
of labor and materials for the customization of an OEM Product with any Approved OEM Brand Name
hereunder, including without limitation: (a) any tooling required; (b) silk-screening front panels
of the satellite receivers; and (c) all costs in connection with the customization of any packaging
for OEM Products.
2.5 Identical Products. All OEM Products delivered hereunder to Licensee shall be
identical in functionality and technical specifications to DISH Systems, and shall be identical in
appearance to the DISH Systems except for the placement of Approved OEM Brand Names on OEM Products
pursuant to Section 2.3 above, as otherwise expressly provided herein and as otherwise mutually
agreed by the parties in writing.
2.6 Freedom of Action. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement is
non-exclusive in nature and that nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit or otherwise restrict
ETLLC and/or any of their Affiliates from entering into an agreement with any third party
concerning activities which are the same or similar activities to those contemplated in this
Agreement, or any other activity. ETLLC agrees that it shall not directly sell any
OEM Product to any person or entity other than Licensee.
3.
TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT
3.1 Trademark License Agreement. Licensee shall sign the Trademark License Agreement
in ETLLCs customary form.
4. PRICE; PAYMENT TERMS; RELATED MATTERS
4.1
Price. Licensee shall pay ETLLC for OEM Products cost plus a
mutually agreed upon margin
based upon the fair market value of the OEM Products taking into consideration, among other things,
the performance capabilities and technical specifications of the applicable model of OEM Product
(such as encryption technology used; size of hard drive; ability to decode high definition
programming and number of tuners) (the OEM Product Price). In the event the parties are unable
to agree upon the OEM Product Price, the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Article VIII of
the Separation Agreement by and between EchoStar Communications Corporation and EchoStar Holding
Corporation dated [___] (the Dispute Resolution Procedures) will be used to determine the fair
market value of the applicable OEM Product and such fair
4
market value as so determined shall be deemed to be the OEM Product Price for the applicable model.
4.2 Price Increases. Notwithstanding Section 4.1 above, increases in the OEM Product
Price shall not apply to any OEM Products that have been ordered under a firm and binding Purchase
Order by Licensee on or before the effective date of such price increase, provided the original
shipment date specified by Licensee is not more than thirty days after the date of ETLLCs
acceptance of such order.
4.3 Price Reductions. Notwithstanding Section 4.1 above:
(a) Price reductions shall be effective immediately, unless ETLLC specifies otherwise. In
the event of a price reduction on an OEM Product, Licensee is entitled to request in writing a
credit (Price Reduction Credit) in an amount based on the inventory of Licensee of that particular OEM Product, in accordance with the terms of this section. The amount
of credit shall equal the net amount of the price per unit reduction (the difference between the
old and new net price of the particular OEM Product to Licensee less any applicable discounts,
rebates, incentives, promotions or any other items which tend to have the economic effect of
reducing the bottom line price of the particular OEM Product to Licensee), multiplied by the lesser
of: (i) the number of units of that particular OEM Product which were purchased and paid for by
Licensee during a period of time to be mutually agreed upon immediately preceding the effective
date of the price reduction; or (ii) the sum of the number of units of that particular OEM Product
which were in the inventory of Licensee, plus the number of units of that
particular OEM Product which were in transit to Licensee (first-in first-out basis always assumed,
FIFO) as of the effective date of the price reduction.
(b) The OEM Products shall be compared for sameness, counted and priced as systems or
individual components in accordance with how they were originally purchased by Licensee from ETLLC
(OEM Products originally purchased as systems shall not be eligible for a Price Reduction Credit if
the price reduction applies to an individual component, and OEM Products originally purchased as
individual components shall not be eligible for a Price Reduction Credit if the price reduction
applies to a system). Within a reasonable period after the effective date of such price change,
Licensee shall furnish ETLLC an itemized inventory with serial
numbers, of the relevant OEM Products and corresponding Smart Cards for each OEM Product, as of
such date, including information as to the mode of original purchase from ETLLC (as systems or
individual components), the amount of time such OEM Products have been held in the inventory of
Licensee and any other information ETLLC may reasonably request. Any Price
Reduction Credit shall be applied by ETLLC to the purchase price of Licensees subsequent orders of
OEM Products from ETLLC. If at the time of the price reduction, Licensee has ordered but not yet
paid for OEM Products, Licensee shall only
5
be required to pay for such OEM Products at the reduced price. Therefore, no Price Reduction
Credit shall accrue to those orders.
(c) ETLLC shall have the right to audit upon reasonable notice the inventory of Licensee
to verify the accuracy of any request by Licensee for a Price Reduction
Credit. Licensee shall also provide, at ETLLCs request, the supporting information described in
the preceding paragraph in electronic format to facilitate the verification by ETLLC that an OEM
Product subject to a request for a Price Reduction Credit has not been activated on the DISH
Network.
4.4 Payment. Except as otherwise agreed to by the parties, all invoices to Licensee
hereunder shall be due, in immediately available funds, within 30 days from the date of invoice,
which shall be issued no earlier than the ship date for the OEM Products covered by the invoice.
4.5 Taxes. In addition to the prices Licensee pays for OEM Products, as provided
above, Licensee is responsible for any and all sales, use, gross receipts, excise and other taxes
applicable to the sale, use, transportation or addition to value of the OEM Products.
4.6 Shipping Costs. All OEM Products shall be shipped F.O.B. point of shipment Denver,
Colorado USA or such other location mutually agreed upon between the parties. Title and risk of
loss of OEM Products purchased under this Agreement shall pass to Licensee upon delivery by ETLLC
or its agent to the carrier for shipment thereof. Licensee shall be responsible for all costs of
shipping and insurance of OEM Products. Licensee shall have the sole responsibility to file any
claims with the carrier for damage, missing items or otherwise, and ETLLC shall have no liability
or responsibility if Licensee is unable to obtain full compensation for any loss from the claim.
Licensee shall select the method of shipment and carrier; provided, however, that, in the event
that Licensee fails to make the necessary arrangements for shipment, Licensee acknowledges and
agrees that ETLLC shall, without incurring any liability, have the option, in its sole discretion,
to select the method of shipment and the carrier on Licensees behalf and at Licensees expense.
4.7 Default. If Licensee defaults in any payment due ETLLC, or Licensee violates any
term or condition of this Agreement or of any credit extended by ETLLC or any Affiliate to
Licensee, ETLLC reserves the right to: (i) suspend any shipment to Licensee; (ii) require payment
for shipments prior to shipment or delivery; and/or (iii) require payment of all unpaid balances
prior to any shipment and payment for that shipment. Exercise of any of the above rights by ETLLC
shall not be construed as a limitation of ETLLCs authority to exercise any other rights which
ETLLC may have at law, in equity or pursuant to this Agreement.
5. ORDERS, SHIPMENT; FORECASTS; AND RETURNS
6
5.1 Forecast. Commencing on the fifth business day after this Agreement is executed by
all parties and by the fifteenth (15th) day of each month thereafter during the Term, Licensee will
send ETLLC a rolling forecast in accordance with the forecasting procedures set forth in Schedule 1
(the Forecast), the first month of which will be the following month. Subject to the
forecasting modification procedures set forth in Schedule 1, each Forecast shall be deemed a firm and
binding commitment for the purchase of the OEM Products specified therein. Upon failure of
Licensee to issue a Forecast by the twentieth (20th) day of any month, the previous
months Forecast shall automatically roll forward by one month and shall be subject to the
provisions of this Section 5. ETLLC shall confirm receipt and acceptance of the Forecast by
facsimile notice to Licensee within a reasonable time from receipt, which acceptance will confirm
the extent to which ETLLC can deliver the OEM Product and ETLLCs estimated delivery dates for the
OEM Product. The Forecast will be translated into a Purchase Order (as defined below), including
requested delivery dates, by Licensee in accordance with the Purchase Order procedures set forth in
Schedule 1.
5.2 Purchase Orders. Licensee will order OEM Products by written purchase order
(Purchase Order) issued during the term of this Agreement. A Purchase Order shall be a binding
commitment by Licensee and is subject to confirmation and acceptance by ETLLC. Any failure to
confirm a Purchase Order shall not be deemed acceptance by ETLLC. ETLLC will make commercially
reasonable efforts to fulfill all valid Purchase Orders issued by Licensee. ETLLC will inform
Licensee of any rejection of a Purchase Order, in whole or in part, within a reasonable time after
such rejection. Purchase Orders of Licensee shall state only: (i) identity of goods; (ii) quantity
of goods; (iii) purchase price of goods; and (iv) requested ship date of goods. Any additional
terms stated in a Purchase Order shall not be binding upon ETLLC unless expressly agreed to in
writing by ETLLC. In the event of any conflict between the terms of a Purchase Order and the terms
of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
5.3 Cancellations and Modifications. Licensee may not cancel or modify any Purchase
Order that has been confirmed and accepted by ETLLC, except with the prior written consent of
ETLLC.
5.4 Shipment. Shipments will be made in standard shipping packages that have been
approved by Licensee. All shipments will include a packing slip which lists items contained in the
shipment by part number, descriptions (including the serial number and corresponding Smart Card
number for each OEM Product), quantity, and purchase order number. Not later than a reasonable time
before the scheduled delivery dates, Licensee will notify ETLLC in writing of the specific shipping
destinations and the specific quantity of OEM Products to be shipped to each destination, which
Licensee agrees will be at least one full truckload per destination or such other minimum quantity
as the parties may agree to from time to time in writing.
5.5 Shipment Dates; Quantities. ETLLC will use reasonable commercial efforts to make
shipments of OEM Products by the dates specified in Purchase Orders
7
accepted from Licensee; provided however, that ETLLC shall be permitted to modify shipping
dates due to circumstances beyond ETLLCs reasonable control. All deliveries are contingent on
ETLLC or its third party manufacturer receiving timely shipment of necessary materials for
production. Within a reasonable time after ETLLC becomes aware that it will not be able to make
shipment of all or a portion of the OEM Products by the date specified in a particular Purchase
Order accepted from Licensee, ETLLC shall give Licensee notice setting forth an estimated delivery
date. Licensee shall have the right, but not the obligation to reduce the total quantity of OEM
Products requested in that Purchase Order in accordance with the Purchase Order modification
procedures set forth in Schedule 1.
5.6 Partial Shipments. ETLLC reserves the right to ship OEM Products in a single or by
multiple deliveries. Except as expressly provided herein, failure of ETLLC to ship on or about the
date requested in any Purchase Order shall not entitle Licensee to cancel or amend such order.
ETLLC reserves the right to ship all or a portion of any Purchase Order, including partial Purchase
Orders. Licensee shall pay for such portion of the shipment as is actually shipped.
5.7
Sale of OEM Products by ETLLC. While, subject to Section 5.5, Licensees obligation
to honor Purchase Orders submitted to ETLLC is absolute, in the event that Licensee breaches this
obligation, then, in addition to all other remedies available to ETLLC under this Agreement, at
law, in equity or otherwise, and notwithstanding anything to the
contrary herein ETLLC
and/or any of its Affiliates shall have the right, but not the obligation, to sell the OEM Products
covered by the relevant Purchase Order(s) (Excess Inventory) without removing Licensees
markings.
6. WARRANTY
6.1 Warranty of OEM Products.
6.1.1 General Warranty. ETLLC warrants that each OEM Product will be free from defects
in materials and workmanship for the warranty period customarily
provided by ETLLC to Licensee for like product (the Warranty). The materials portion of this Warranty shall not
apply to: (i) any OEM Product that is abused, damaged by external causes, altered or misused; or
(ii) OEM Product damaged due to improper installation or use. OEM Products shall be considered
free from defects in workmanship if they are manufactured in accordance with ETLLCs manufacturing
workmanship standards (or those of any third party which manufactures the OEM Product on ETLLCs
behalf), conform to the product specifications, and successfully complete product acceptance tests
for the product.
6.1.2 Deadline for Claims; Disclaimer. ALL CLAIMS FOR WARRANTY FULFILLMENT MUST BE
RECEIVED BY ETLLC (OR ITS DESIGNEE) NO LATER THAN A REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME AFTER THE EXPIRATION
OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD FOR THE PRODUCT. THIS WARRANTY IS THE ONLY WARRANTY GIVEN BY ETLLC. ETLLC
MAKES, AND LICENSEE RECEIVES, NO
8
OTHER WARRANTY EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. ALL WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED AND EXCLUDED HEREFROM.
6.1.3 Exclusive Remedy. Licensees exclusive remedy for fulfillment of the Warranty
shall be at, at ETLLCs option, repair by ETLLC at an ETLLC or third party facility of ETLLCs
choice, replacement of the defective OEM Product, or return of the Purchase Price within a
reasonable period of time after receipt of the OEM Product by ETLLC.
6.2 Licensees Warranty Obligations. In addition to the obligations of Licensee
elsewhere in this Article 6, Licensee shall:
6.2.1 receive at a Licensee facility all OEM Products returned for both in-warranty and
out-of-warranty repair;
6.2.2 submit a daily report to ETLLC listing the serial number of each OEM Product and
corresponding Smart Card number which have been received by Licensee and for which the subscriber
has received a replacement OEM Product and/or Smart Card;
6.2.3 for in-warranty and out-of-warranty returns, conduct, at its own expense, an initial
review of the OEM Product to verify the existence of a defect;
6.2.4 in the case of OEM Products for which no defect is found, take such actions as it deems
appropriate and ETLLC shall have no liability hereunder;
6.2.5 in the case of in-warranty OEM Products with defects which are covered by the Warranty
and verified by Licensee, ship such OEM Products at Licensees expense, to an ETLLC or third party
facility, as designated by ETLLC, for treatment in accordance with the Warranty in Section 6.1.1
above, with ETLLC responsible for all costs associated with the shipment of conforming OEM Products
to Licensees facility to replace failed units covered by the Warranty;
6.2.6 in the case of out-of-warranty OEM Products with defects verified by Licensee (including
in-warranty OEM Products with defects not covered by the Warranty), Licensee shall take such
actions as it deems appropriate and ETLLC shall have no liability hereunder; and
6.2.7 reimburse ETLLC, within a reasonable period of time the customary screening fee, and any
out of pocket expenses of ETLLC to third parties, including but not limited to the costs of
returning the OEM Product to Licensee, in relation to OEM Products returned by Licensee under the
preceding subsections for which there was no problem found upon testing by ETLLC, or with respect
to which problems were identified which are not covered by the warranty.
9
6.3 Licensee Warranty.
6.3.1 Reserved.
6.3.2 Reserved.
6.3.3 Licensee shall purchase all Smart Cards necessary to repair OEM Products exclusively
from ETLLC. ETLLC shall supply Licensee with a float of Smart Cards for use in the repair of OEM
Products in a quantity per 1,000 combined sales of OEM Products to end users that is
consistent with ETLLCs Smart Card warranty replacement history; provided, however, that ETLLC
shall provide Smart Cards in excess of that quantity in the event that Licensee can adequately
justify its need therefore for the repair of OEM Products. ETLLC shall supply Smart Cards to
Licensee for the purposes set forth in this Section 6.3.3 in accordance with the customary practice
of the parties. In the event that NagraStar LLC, or other entity from which ETLLC purchases Smart
Cards, subsequently increases the price charged to ETLLC for Smart Cards, ETLLC shall increase the
price of Smart Cards to be supplied to Licensee under this Section 6.3.3 consistent with the
parties customary practice. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that Smart Cards are only being made
available to Licensee under this Section 6.3.3 in order to for Licensee to repair OEM Products. In
view of the potential for a subscriber to defraud DISH Network by improperly obtaining a
replacement Smart Card under a false warranty claim, Licensee agrees that it will not use Smart
Cards provided by ETLLC under this Section 6.3.3 for any purpose whatsoever other than repair of
OEM Products. Licensee further acknowledges and agrees that, with respect to Smart Cards that have
been lost, end users must purchase replacement Smart Cards directly from ETLLC (or such other entity
as ETLLC may designate from time to time in writing) subject to such terms and conditions and at
such prices as ETLLC may determine from time to time in its sole discretion.
6.4 ETLLC Smart Card Warranty.
(a) ETLLC warrants that any Smart Cards purchased by Licensee from ETLLC in conjunction with
an OEM Product or under Section 6.3.3 above shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship
for the warranty period customarily provided by ETLLC to Licensee for like product (Warranty
Period). Licensee shall return defective Smart Cards purchased by Licensee from ETLLC in
conjunction with an OEM Product or under Section 6.3.3 above at Licensees expense. If a Smart
Card purchased by Licensee from ETLLC in conjunction with an OEM Product or under Section 6.3.3
above is: (i) verified as having failed during the Warranty Period; (ii) returned to ETLLC by
Licensee within a reasonable period of time after expiration of the Warranty Period; and (iii)
confirmed as defective by ETLLC, Licensees exclusive remedy for fulfillment of this warranty shall
be, at ETLLCs option, for ETLLC to repair and return or replace and return conforming Smart Cards
to Licensee at no charge to Licensee, or refund Licensee the purchase price of such defective Smart
Cards.
10
(b) THE LIMITED WARRANTY PROVIDED BY ETLLC FOR SMART CARDS IN SECTION 6.4 IS IN LIEU OF ALL
OTHER WARRANTIES, WHETHER STATUTORY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OF
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL ETLLC BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT,
EXEMPLARY, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOSS OF USE) ARISING OUT OF OR
IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE, USE OR PERFORMANCE OF ANY SMART CARDS AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH
DAMAGES ARE BASED UPON BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR ANY OTHER
LEGAL THEORY.
(c) Licensee agrees to provide ETLLC with a written report matching the identification number
of each replacement Smart Card with the serial number of the OEM Product into which it is installed
prior to returning the OEM Product to the end-user. In addition, Licensee shall notify ETLLC of
the disposition and identification number of all Smart Cards that Licensee has replaced but not
returned to ETLLC within a reasonable time of such replacement.
7. EXPORT RESTRICTIONS
Licensee acknowledges and understands that U.S. export laws relating to the OEM Products and
Smart Cards provided therewith may change from time to time in the future. Licensee acknowledges
that it is Licensees sole responsibility to be and remain informed of all U.S. laws relating to
the export of OEM Products and Smart Cards outside of the U.S. Licensee further acknowledges and
agrees that ETLLC has absolutely no obligation to update Licensee regarding the status of U.S.
export laws or any other U.S. laws relating to the export of OEM Products or Smart Cards outside of
the U.S. Without ETLLC giving any consent for export of the OEM Products or Smart Cards and
subject to territorial limitations of this Agreement, Licensee represents, warrants and covenants
that: (i) prior to exporting or selling any OEM Products or Smart Cards outside of the U.S., it
will investigate all applicable U.S. laws relating to the export of OEM Products and Smart Cards
outside of the U.S.; (ii) it will not export or reexport any OEM Product or Smart Card to Cuba,
Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan or Syria or any other any destination in any country
prohibited by U.S. export laws governing OEM Products or Smart Cards without the prior approval of
the United States Government; and (iii) it will not use any OEM Product or Smart Card directly or
indirectly to support the design, development, production or use of nuclear, chemical or biological
weapons or ballistic missiles. Licensee is strictly prohibited from violating any U.S. law
relating to the export or sale of OEM Products or Smart Cards outside of the U.S. Should Licensee
export or sell any OEM Product or Smart Card outside of the U.S. in violation of this Agreement
and/or U.S. law, this Agreement shall automatically terminate.
8. TRADEMARKS
11
8.1 ETLLCs Marks.
8.1.1 In addition to the Approved OEM Brand Names affixed to the OEM Products under this
Agreement, ETLLC shall have the right to affix such of the ETLLC Marks on or in connection with the
OEM Products, including, but not limited to, on the Accessories and packaging and on the electronic
on screen guide, in accordance with the usage guidelines for the ETLLC Marks or ETLLCs User
Interface Specification, as such guidelines and/or specification may change from time to time in
ETLLCs sole discretion. ETLLC agrees that Licensee shall not be required to accept the use of
the ETLLC Marks on the OEM Products in any manner inconsistent with the usage guidelines for the
Licensee Marks and the terms of this Section 8.1 without the prior written consent of Licensee,
which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
8.1.2 Notwithstanding Section 8.1.1 above and Section 8.1.3 below, Licensee acknowledges and
agrees that the ETLLC Marks customarily used and the minimum size and manner of placement
requirements for the ETLLC Marks currently set forth in:
(i) ETLLCs trademark usage guidelines and User Interface Specification;
and (ii) this Section 8.1.2, are consistent with Licensees usage guidelines for use in connection
with the Licensee Marks, and may continue to be applied by ETLLC in the size and manner customarily
used and set forth in ETLLCs trademark usage guidelines and User Interface Specification respectively and this
Section 8.1.2 for the term of this Agreement, including any extensions thereto. Specifically, and
without limitation of the foregoing, Licensee agrees that ETLLC shall have the right for the
duration of the term and any extensions thereof to affix the ETLLC Marks on or in connection with
the OEM Products, including without limitation on the Accessories and packaging and on the
electronic program guide, such that the ETLLC Marks are displayed in a manner which is at least
equally as prominent as the Approved OEM Brand Names affixed to the same. In the event that
Licensee desires to change its usage guidelines in a manner that would effect the rights granted to
ETLLC by Licensee under this Section 8.1.2, the parties agree to discuss the possibility of
altering the application of the ETLLC Marks, Licensee Marks and Third Party Marks to the OEM
Products in such a manner as will be consistent with the new usage guidelines proposed by Licensee
and insure to ETLLC as nearly as possible the same results to which ETLLC is entitled under this
Section 8.1.2.
8.1.3 Licensee agrees not to use any of the ETLLC Marks in any manner inconsistent with the
usage guidelines for the ETLLC Marks and without the prior written consent of ETLLC, and, subject
to Section 8.1.2 above, ETLLC agrees that Licensee shall not be required to use the ETLLC Marks in
any manner inconsistent with the usage guidelines for the Licensee Marks without the prior written
consent of Licensee which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Licensee shall not use any
of the ETLLC Marks without the prior written consent of ETLLC, which consent ETLLC may withhold in
its sole discretion. Licensee expressly acknowledges and understands that ETLLC and its Affiliates
claim to have the absolute ownership of, or right to allow Licensee to use, the ETLLC Marks.
12
8.1.4 Regardless of whether ETLLC grants Licensee permission to use any ETLLC Mark, Licensee
agrees that it will not in any way dispute or impugn the validity of any of the ETLLC Marks or
registrations of the ETLLC Marks, nor the sole proprietary right of ETLLC and its Affiliates
thereto, nor the right of ETLLC and its Affiliates to use or license the use of the ETLLC Marks in
the Territory or elsewhere, either during the Term or at any time thereafter. Licensee further
agrees not to perform, either during the Term or at any time thereafter, any act or deed either of
commission or of omission which is inconsistent with ETLLC or its Affiliates proprietary rights
in and to the ETLLC Marks, whether or not the ETLLC Marks are registered.
8.2 Licensees Marks.
8.2.1 ETLLC agrees not to use any of the Licensee Marks in any manner inconsistent with the
usage guidelines for the Licensee Marks and without the prior written consent of Licensee, and
Licensee agrees that ETLLC shall not be required to use the Licensee Marks in any manner
inconsistent with the usage guidelines for the ETLLC Marks without the prior written consent of
ETLLC which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. ETLLC shall not use any of the Licensee
Marks without the prior written consent of Licensee, which consent Licensee may withhold in its
sole discretion; provided however, that no consent shall be required
for ETLLC or an Affiliate to
sell Excess Inventory under Section 5.7 above, for which
Licensee hereby grants to ETLLC and its
Affiliates a license to the Licensee Marks and any Approved OEM Brand names only as necessary for
the marketing and sale of such Excess Inventory. ETLLC expressly acknowledges and understands that
Licensee and its Affiliates claim to have the absolute ownership of, or right to allow ETLLC to
use, the Licensee Marks.
8.2.2 Regardless of whether Licensee grants ETLLC permission to use any Licensee Mark, ETLLC
agrees that it will not in any way dispute or impugn the validity of any of the Licensee Marks or
registrations of the Licensee Marks, nor the sole proprietary right of Licensee and its Affiliates
thereto, nor the right of Licensee and its Affiliates to use or license the use of the Licensee
Marks in the Territory or elsewhere, either during the Term or at any time thereafter. ETLLC
further agrees not to perform, either during the Term or at any time thereafter, any act or deed
either of commission or of omission which is inconsistent with Licensee or its Affiliates
proprietary rights in and to the Licensee Marks, whether or not the Licensee Marks are registered.
8.3 Third Party Trademarks. Licensee may also request that ETLLC affix to the OEM
Products the DVB and MPEG 2, MPEG 4 standard trademarks, provided that no third party
trademarks shall be more than half as large as the Licensee and ETLLC trademarks. Licensee
recognizes and understands that ETLLC has no authority to grant Licensee any rights to affix the
DVB, MPEG 2 and MPEG 4 standard trademarks to an OEM Product. Should Licensee desire to do
so, Licensee must negotiate the entitlement of such rights with the applicable rights holders.
Licensee hereby acknowledges that, in the future, ETLLC may be obligated to affix the
trademarks, service marks or trade names of the owners of third party technology that is presently,
or at some time in the future, incorporated into the OEM Product, and
13
Licensee hereby grants its
approval for ETLLC to affix any such trademarks, service marks or trade names to the OEM Product
subject to the size requirements set forth above, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise.
9. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
9.1 General. At all times during the term of this Agreement and for a period of five
(5) years thereafter, the parties and their employees will maintain, in confidence, the terms and
provisions of this Agreement, as well as all data, summaries, reports or information of all kinds,
whether oral or written, acquired, devised or developed in any manner from the other partys
personnel or files, or as a direct or indirect result of a partys actions or performance under
this Agreement, and each party represents that it has not and will not reveal the same to any
persons not employed by such party, except: (i) at the written direction of the party which is the
owner of such information; (ii) to the extent necessary to comply with law, the valid order of a
court of competent jurisdiction or the valid order or requirement of a governmental agency or any
successor agency thereto, in which event the disclosing party shall notify the owner of the
information in advance, prior to making any disclosure, and shall seek confidential treatment of
such information; (iii) as part of its normal reporting or review procedure to its parent company,
its auditors and its attorneys, provided such parent company, auditors and attorneys agree to be
bound by the provisions of this paragraph; or (iv) to the extent necessary to permit the
performance of obligations under this Agreement.
9.2 Subscriber Information. All subscribers who subscribe to any of the Programming
and/or any other programming services offered by Licensee and/or any of its Affiliates shall be
deemed customers of Licensee for all purposes relating to programming services (including without
limitation video, audio and data services) and the hardware necessary to receive programming
services. ETLLC acknowledges and agrees that the names, addresses and other identifying
information of such subscribers (Subscriber Information) are as between ETLLC and Licensee, with
respect to the delivery of programming services and the hardware necessary to receive programming
services, proprietary to Licensee, and shall be treated with the highest degree of confidentiality
by ETLLC. ETLLC will not directly or indirectly use any Subscriber Information for the purpose of
soliciting, or to permit any others to solicit, such subscribers to subscribe to any other
programming services or to promote the sale of any hardware product used in connection with
programming services, and ETLLC shall under no circumstance directly or indirectly reveal any
Subscriber Information to any third party for any reason without the express prior written consent
of Licensee, which Licensee may withhold in its sole and absolute discretion; provided, however,
that nothing shall prohibit ETLLC from utilizing its own customer list for its general business
operations unrelated to the delivery and/or promotion of programming services or the sale of any
product used in conjunction with programming services. The provisions of this Section 9.2 shall
survive termination or expiration of this Agreement indefinitely.
14
9.3 Equitable Relief. ETLLC agrees that a breach of the obligations set forth in this
Section 9 will result in the substantial likelihood of irreparable harm and injury to the Licensee
or its Affiliates for which monetary damages alone would be an inadequate remedy, and which damages
are difficult to accurately measure. Accordingly, ETLLC agrees that Licensee and its Affiliates
(or either of them) shall have the right, in addition to any other remedies available, to obtain
immediate injunctive relief (without the necessity of posting or filing a bond or other security)
to restrain the threatened or actual violation hereof by the ETLLC, its Affiliates, its employees
and agents, as well as other equitable relief allowed by the federal and state courts. The
foregoing is agreed to without prejudice to the Licensee and its Affiliates (or either of them) to
exercise any other rights and remedies they may have, including without limitation, the right to
terminate this Agreement and seek damages or other legal or equitable relief. The provisions of
this Section 9.3 shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement indefinitely.
9.4 Economic Benefits Derived Held in Trust. In the event that ETLLC derives an
economic benefit, in any form, from a violation of its obligations under Section 9.2, it is hereby
agreed that such economic benefit is the property of Licensee and that ETLLC shall deliver the cash
value of the economic benefit to Licensee immediately upon receipt of the economic benefit. It is
further agreed that ETLLC shall hold such economic benefit in trust for the benefit of Licensee
until such time as its cash value is delivered to Licensee. The foregoing is agreed to without
prejudice to Licensee to exercise any other rights and remedies it may have, including without
limitation, the right to terminate this Agreement and seek damages or other legal or equitable
relief. The provisions of this Section 9.4 shall survive termination or expiration of this
Agreement indefinitely.
10. TERM AND TERMINATION
10.1 Term. This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and shall
continue for two (2) years thereafter (the Initial Term) unless terminated sooner as provided in
this Agreement. Licensee shall have the exclusive right, but not the obligation, to extend this
Agreement annually for up to two (2) years (each a Renewal Term and the Initial Term and any
Renewal Term collectively the Term), upon submission of written notice to ETLLC no less than one
hundred eighty (180) calendar days prior to expiration of the current Term.
10.2 Termination By Either Party Upon Default. This Agreement may be terminated by a
party (the Affected Party) upon the occurrence of any of the following with respect to the other
party (the Other Party):
10.2.1 The Other Party commits a payment default which is not cured within ten (10) days of
receipt of written notice from the Affected Party.
10.2.2 The Other Party defaults on any obligation or breaches any representation, warranty or
covenant in this Agreement (regardless of whether breach
15
or default of such obligation,
representation, warranty or covenant is designated as giving rise to a termination right), and such
default or breach is not cured within thirty (30) days of receipt of written notice from the
Affected Party. The parties agree that all obligations, representations, warranties and covenants
contained in this Agreement, whether or not specifically designated as such, are material to the
agreement of the parties to enter into and continue this Agreement.
10.3 Termination by ETLLC. ETLLC may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to
Licensee at any time in case of: (i) acquisition of Licensee, directly or indirectly, by a third
party, or the merger of Licensee with a third party, which manufactures set-top boxes (this Section
10.3 will not apply to an acquisition of Licensee by, or the merger of Licensee with, an Affiliate
of Licensee; provided that such Affiliate is not a direct or indirect manufacturer of set-top
boxes); (ii) Licensees falsification of any material records or reports required hereunder; or
(iii) a material breach, as determined in ETLLCs sole judgment, by Licensee of the confidentiality
provisions contained in Section 9 above.
10.4 Purchase During Notice Period. During any notice and cure period under Section
10.2, ETLLC will determine in its sole judgment the amount of OEM Products, if any, Licensee may
purchase.
10.5 Termination for Convenience by Licensee. Licensee may terminate this Agreement
for any or no reason by providing ETLLC not less than sixty (60) days prior written notice setting
forth the termination date for this Agreement.
10.6 Payment, Forfeiture and Cancellation. Upon expiration or termination of this
Agreement for any reason, all sums due ETLLC must be immediately paid. Any credit or allowance
under any cooperative or incentive program or other promotion (including any credit or allowance
against the future purchase of OEM Products) which has not been applied by such date shall be
forfeited unless otherwise expressly provided in the program or promotion, and all orders in
process may at ETLLCs option be deemed canceled unless in transit or paid for in advance by
Licensee. ETLLC and Licensee hereby waive all claims against each other in connection with such
forfeiture and cancellation.
10.7 Survival of Certain Obligations. Termination or expiration of this Agreement for
any reason shall not terminate any obligation or liability of one party to the other which is
specified in this Agreement to expressly survive termination or expiration, which arises by
operation of law or which logically is to be performed after termination or expiration, nor
preclude or foreclose recovery of damages or additional remedies available to any party under
applicable law, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement.
11 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
16
11.1 Representations, Warranties and Covenants of Licensee. Licensee represents,
warrants and covenants, as follows, which representations, warranties and covenants shall survive
the execution of this Agreement:
11.1.1 Licensee has the right and authority to enter into this Agreement and the execution,
delivery and performance by Licensee of this Agreement have been duly authorized by all requisite
corporate action and will not violate any provision of
Licensees articles of organization, or any provision of any agreement by which Licensee is bound or affected.
11.1.2 Licensee acknowledges the applicability of U.S. export control regulations which
prohibit the sale, export, reexport or diversion of certain products and technology to certain
countries, and will not sell, export or reexport any of the OEM Products, in the form received, or
as modified or incorporated into other equipment, except as permitted under this Agreement and
authorized by such regulations.
11.1.3 Licensee is not, nor at any time will it be, in violation of any applicable Law by
entering into and undertaking the performance of this Agreement and in performing its obligations
pursuant to this Agreement. Licensee agrees to comply with any and all applicable laws.
11.1.4 Licensee shall provide to ETLLC such adequate assurances as ETLLC may require from time
to time in order to ensure that the requirements of this Section 11.1 have been met, and will
continue to be met on an ongoing basis, by Licensee.
11.1.5 Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, Licensee makes no other
representations or warranties, either express or implied, statutory or otherwise, and all such
warranties are hereby excluded except to the extent such exclusion is absolutely prohibited by law.
11.2 Representations, Warranties and Covenants of ETLLC. ETLLC represents, warrants
and covenants as follows, which representations, warranties and covenants shall survive the
execution of this Agreement:
11.2.1 ETLLC has the right and authority to enter into this Agreement and the execution,
delivery and performance by ETLLC of this Agreement have been duly authorized by all requisite
corporate action and will not violate any provision of ETLLCs articles of organization, or any provision
of any agreement by which ETLLC is bound or affected.
11.2.2 ETLLC is the beneficial owner of Intellectual Property created independently by it, and
such Intellectual Property is not subject to any
covenant or other restriction preventing or limiting ETLLCs right to manufacture the OEM
Products as contemplated by this Agreement.
17
11.2.3 ETLLC is not, nor at any time will it be, in violation of any applicable Law by
entering into and undertaking the performance of this Agreement and in performing their obligations
pursuant to this Agreement. ETLLC agrees to comply with any and all applicable Laws.
11.2.4 ETLLC shall provide to Licensee such adequate assurances as Licensee may require from
time to time in order to ensure that the requirements of this Section 11.2 have been met, and will
continue to be met on an ongoing basis, by ETLLC.
11.2.5 Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, ETLLC makes no other
representations or warranties, either express or implied, statutory or otherwise, and all such
warranties are hereby excluded except to the extent such exclusion is absolutely prohibited by law.
12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
12.1 Limitation. IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY PARTY BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL,
EXEMPLARY, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOSS OF USE OR LOST
BUSINESS, REVENUE, PROFITS OR GOODWILL) ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT,
TERMINATION OR ANY OTHER MATTER RELATED HERETO. IN ADDITION TO AND WITHOUT LIMITATION OF THE
FOREGOING, ETLLC SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY TO LICENSEE OR ANYONE CLAIMING THROUGH
LICENSEE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE (INCLUDING, GENERAL, INDIRECT, EXEMPLARY, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL AND
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES) ARISING OUT OF ANY FAILURE OR DELAY IN SHIPMENT, LATE SHIPMENT, OR DELIVERY
OF ALL OR ANY PART OF ANY ORDER.
12.2 Risk Allocation. The parties agree that each and every provision of this
Agreement which provides for a limitation of liability, disclaimer of warranties or exclusion of
damages is expressly intended to be severable and independent of any other provision since they
represent separate elements of risk allocation between the parties and shall be separately
enforced. This Section 12.2 shall expressly survive the expiration or termination of this
Agreement.
13. INDEMNIFICATION
13.1 General Indemnity
13.1.1 By Licensee. In addition to the intellectual property indemnity in Section
13.2.1 below, Licensee shall defend, indemnify and hold ETLLC and its Affiliates, and any and all
of its and their respective officers, directors, shareholders,
18
employees, agents and
representatives, and any and all of its and their assigns, successors, heirs and legal
representatives (collectively the ETLLC Group), harmless from and against any and all claims,
demands, litigation, settlements, judgments, damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including,
but not limited to, reasonable attorneys fees) incurred by the ETLLC Group arising directly out
of: (i) a breach or default of any obligation, representation, warranty or covenant of Licensee
hereunder; (ii) manufacture and sale to Licensee of OEM Products bearing, or use by ETLLC or an
Affiliate of, any Approved OEM Brand Name on or in connection with the OEM Products as provided in
this Agreement; and (iii) any claims of third parties otherwise arising out of or in connection
with the marketing, promotion, sale and distribution of OEM Products.
13.1.2 By ETLLC. In addition to the intellectual property indemnity in Section 13.2.2
below, ETLLC shall defend, indemnify and hold Licensee and its Affiliates, and any and all of its
and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents and representatives, and
any and all of its and their assigns, successors, heirs and legal representatives (collectively the
Licensee Group), harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, litigation, settlements,
judgments, damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable
attorneys fees) incurred by the Licensee Group arising directly out of: (i) a breach or default of
any obligation, representation, warranty or covenant of ETLLC hereunder; and (ii) any claim
whatsoever of product liability with respect to the OEM Products.
13.2 Intellectual Property Indemnity
13.2.1 By Licensee.
(a) Licensee, at its own expense, shall defend any suit brought against ETLLC insofar as based
upon a claim that the OEM Product(s), as such, directly infringes any third party trademark, trade
name or service mark (Third Party Mark) due to any trademark, trade name or service mark affixed
to the OEM Products at Licensees request, and shall indemnify ETLLC against any final award of
damages or costs in such suit. This indemnity is conditional upon ETLLC giving Licensee prompt
notice in writing of any suit for such infringement, full authority at Licensees option to settle
or conduct the defense thereof and full assistance and cooperation in said defense.
(b) No cost or expense shall be incurred on behalf of Licensee without its written consent.
(c) The foregoing states the entire liability of Licensee in connection with infringement of a
Third Party Mark by an OEM Product, and except as
stated in this clause, Licensee will not be liable for any loss or damage of whatever kind
(including in particular any incidental, indirect, special or consequential damage)
19
suffered by
ETLLC in respect of the infringement of any Third Party Intellectual Property by an OEM Product.
13.2.2 By ETLLC.
(a) Except as otherwise agreed to by the parties, ETLLC, at its own expense, shall defend any
suit brought against Licensee insofar as based upon a claim that an OEM Product or any Accessory
thereto directly infringes (excluding Third Party Marks affixed to the OEM Products at Licensees
request) any third party patent, copyright, trademark, service mark, trade secret, mask work or
other intellectual or industrial property right (Third Party Intellectual Property) and shall
indemnify Licensee against any final award of damages or costs in such suit. This indemnity is
conditional upon Licensee giving ETLLC prompt notice in writing of any suit for such infringement,
full authority at ETLLC option to settle or conduct the defense thereof and full assistance and
cooperation in said defense.
(b) No cost or expense shall be incurred on behalf of ETLLC without its written consent.
(c) Except as otherwise agreed to by the parties, in the event that a OEM Product is in such
suit held to constitute infringement, ETLLC at its own election and at its own expense may either
procure for Licensee the rights to continue the sale of a OEM Product, or modify a OEM Product so
that it becomes non-infringing.
(d) ETLLC shall not be obligated to defend against, and shall not be liable for infringement
of any Third Party Intellectual Property claim covering combination of a OEM Product with any other
product not supplied by ETLLC.
(e) ETLLC is not liable for any claim or demand, based upon infringement or alleged
infringement of any Third Party Intellectual Property, when the damages in such claim or demand are
directly or indirectly measured by amount of use of any OEM Product, irrespective of whether such
claim or demand alleges that the OEM Product as such, or its use, infringes or contributes to the
infringement of such Third Party Intellectual Property.
(f) Except as otherwise agreed to by the parties, ETLLCs liability under this Section 13.2
shall be limited to US $2,500,000.00 per occurrence or US $5,000,000.00 in the aggregate.
(g) Except as otherwise agreed to by the parties, the foregoing states the entire liability of
ETLLC in connection with infringement of Third Party Intellectual Property by the OEM Products and
except as stated in this clause, ETLLC will not be liable for any loss or damage of whatever kind
(including in particular
any incidental, indirect, special or consequential damage) suffered by Licensee or any other
person in respect of the infringement of any Third Party Intellectual Property.
20
13.3 Indemnification Procedure. The party seeking indemnification (the Indemnified
Party) shall promptly notify the party from whom indemnification is being sought (the
Indemnifying Party). The Indemnified Party shall not make any admission as to liability or agree
to any settlement of or compromise any claim without the prior written consent of the Indemnifying
Party. The Indemnifying Party shall be entitled to have the exclusive conduct of and/or settle all
negotiations and litigation arising from any claim and the Indemnified Party shall, at the
Indemnifying Party request and expense, give the Indemnifying Party all reasonable assistance in
connection with those negotiations and litigation.
14. GENERAL
14.1 Taxes. Any and all payments required to be made by Licensee to ETLLC under this
Agreement are exclusive of any tax, levy or similar governmental charge (Taxes) that may be
assessed against Licensee by any jurisdiction. In the event that, under the laws of any
jurisdiction, Licensee is required to withhold Taxes on any such payment (with the exception for
income Taxes assessed against ETLLC, or any Affiliate thereof), the amount of the payment will be
automatically increased so that the amount actually remitted to ETLLC, net of all Taxes, equals the
amount invoiced or otherwise due. Licensee shall forthwith pay any amounts deducted or withheld
from such payments to the relevant taxing or other authority in accordance with applicable law.
Within thirty (30) days after the date of any payment of Taxes, Licensee will furnish to ETLLC a
copy of a receipt evidencing payment thereof.
14.2 Remedies Cumulative. It is agreed that the rights and remedies herein provided
in case of default or breach of this Agreement are cumulative and shall not affect in any manner
any other remedies that any party may have by reason of such default or breach. The exercise of
any right or remedy herein provided shall be without prejudice to the right to exercise any other
right or remedy provided herein, at law, or in equity.
14.3 Notice. Any notice to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be sent
by facsimile transmission, or by first class certified mail, postage prepaid, or by overnight
courier service, charges prepaid, to the party notified, addressed to such party at the following
address, or sent by facsimile to the following fax number, or such other address or fax number as
such party may have substituted by written notice to the other party. The sending of such notice
with confirmation of receipt thereof (in the case of facsimile transmission) or receipt of such
notice (in the case of delivery by mail or by overnight courier service) shall constitute the
giving thereof:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If to Licensee:
|
|
9601 South Meridian Boulevard
Englewood, Colorado 80112
Attn: General Counsel |
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If to ETLLC:
|
|
90 Inverness Circle East
Englewood, Colorado 80112
Attn: Mark Jackson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and to
Attn: General Counsel |
14.4 Independent Contractors. This Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby
are not intended to create an agency, partnership or joint venture relationship between the
parties, or confer any benefit on any third party. All agents and employees of each party shall be
deemed to be that partys agents and employees exclusively, and the entire management, direction,
and control thereof shall be vested exclusively in such party. Each party, its agents and
employees, shall not be entitled to any benefits, privileges or compensation given or extended by
the other party to its employees.
14.5 Waiver. The failure or delay of either party to exercise any right hereunder
shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such right, and the delay or failure of either party to give
notice of, or to terminate this Agreement for, breach or default shall not be deemed to be a waiver
of the right to do so for that or any subsequent breach or default or for the persistence in a
breach or default of a continuing nature.
14.6 Choice of Law and Exclusive Jurisdiction.
14.6.1 This Agreement shall be governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of
the State of Colorado and the United States of America, without giving effect to the conflict of
law provisions thereof. The parties acknowledge and agree that they and their counsel have
reviewed, or have been given a reasonable opportunity to review, this Agreement and that the normal
rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting
party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments or Schedules
hereto.
14.6.2 Except as otherwise agreed to by the parties, any and all disputes arising out of, or
in connection with, the interpretation, performance or the nonperformance of this Agreement or any
and all disputes arising out of, or in connection with, transactions in any way related to this
Agreement and/or the relationship between the parties (including but not limited to the termination
of this Agreement or the relationship or disputes under rights granted pursuant to statutes or
common law, including those in the country in which Licensee is located) shall be litigated solely
and exclusively before the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The parties
consent to the in personam jurisdiction of said court for the
purposes of any such litigation, and waive, fully and completely, any right to dismiss and/or
transfer any action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 1404 or 1406 (or any successor statute). In the event
the United States District Court for the District of Colorado does
22
not have subject matter
jurisdiction of said matter, then such matter shall be litigated solely and exclusively before the
appropriate state court of competent jurisdiction located in Arapahoe County, State of Colorado.
14.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire, final and complete
understanding between the parties hereto relevant to the subject matter of this Agreement, and it
supersedes and replaces all previous understandings or agreements, written, oral, or implied,
relevant to the subject matter of this Agreement made or existing before the date of this
Agreement. Except as expressly provided by this Agreement, no waiver or modification of any of the
terms or conditions of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by both
parties.
14.8 Force Majeure. Neither party shall be liable to the other party for
nonperformance or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement due to causes
reasonably beyond its control or which cause makes performance a commercial impracticability,
including: (i) materials or part shortages and software discrepancies or anomalies (provided such
shortages, discrepancies, or anomalies are not reasonably within the control of ETLLC); and (ii)
acts of God, fire, explosion, flood, windstorm, earthquake, trade embargoes, strikes, labor
troubles or other industrial disturbances, accidents, governmental regulations, riots, and
insurrections (Force Majeure). Upon the occurrence of a Force Majeure condition, the affected
party shall immediately notify the other party with as much detail as possible and shall promptly
inform the other party of any further developments. Immediately after the Force Majeure event is
removed or abates, the affected party shall perform such obligations with all due speed. Neither
party shall be deemed in default of this Agreement if a delay or other breach is caused by a Force
Majeure event. If a Force Majeure event is expected to continue for more than three (3) months,
any party may terminate this Agreement by providing thirty (30) days prior written notice to the
other party. Such termination shall be without any continuing liabilities or obligations on the
part of one party to the other of any kind except as expressly set forth herein.
14.9 Severability. If any term or provision herein, or the application thereof to any
person, entity, or circumstances shall to any extent be invalid or unenforceable in any pertinent
jurisdiction, the remainder hereof shall not be affected thereby but shall be valid and enforceable
as if the invalid term or provision were not a part hereof.
14.10 Headings. The descriptive headings contained in this Agreement are included for
convenience and reference only and shall not be held to expand, modify, amplify or aid in the
interpretation, construction or meaning of this Agreement.
14.11
Assignment. Subject to Section 10.3, Licensee may assign its rights and delegate its duties under this
Agreement in whole or in part at any time; provided, however, that, in the event
that Licensee assigns this Agreement to a non-Affiliate, the assignee must be at least as
creditworthy as Licensee at the time they originally executed this Agreement. ETLLC may not
assign any rights or delegate any duties under this Agreement without Licensees prior written
consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld,
23
except to an Affiliate of ETLLC;
provided, however, that, such Affiliate is: (i) at least as creditworthy as ETLLC
at the time it originally executed this Agreement; and (ii) is not a direct or indirect provider of
direct to home programming. Any attempt to assign the Agreement without such consent shall be void.
This Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors
and permitted assigns.
14.12 Compliance with Law. The parties shall comply with, and agree that this
Agreement is subject to, all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations, and
all amendments thereto, now enacted or hereafter promulgated in force during the term of this
Agreement.
24
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly
authorized officers or representatives as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES L.L.C.
|
|
|
By: |
__________________________
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
|
ECHOSPHERE L.L.C.
|
|
|
By: |
__________________________
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
25
exv10w27
Exhibit 10.27
[Form of]
Broadcast Services Agreement (Uplinking)
This Broadcast Services Agreement (Broadcast Agreement) and the EHC Service Order
Form attached hereto and incorporated herein (the Service Order) is binding and made
effective as of the Effective Date (as defined in the Service Order), by and between
EchoStar Holding Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, (EHC) and EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.,
a Colorado limited liability company, (Customer). Collectively the Broadcast Agreement
and the Service Order shall be referred to as the Agreement. EHC and Customer shall each
be referred to herein as a Party and collectively as the Parties.
1. Teleport Services. EHC shall provide, and Customer shall purchase, all or any of the
applicable services set forth in this Article 1 (collectively Teleport Services)
as specifically requested and priced within the Service Order. The Teleport Services shall be
provided at an EHC owned, operated and/or controlled facility at such location as delineated in the
Service Order (a Teleport). Collectively, the Teleport Services, Channel Origination
Services and/or the Channel Management Services (each as described below) shall be referred to as
the Service(s). EHC shall have the right to re-configure, re-specify or relocate all or
any portion of the Services or Teleport at its sole discretion so long as such does not materially
alter the quality of any of the Services.
(a) Downlinking Customer Channel Content. EHC shall downlink Customer
Channel(s) (as defined in the Service Order) from either a Customer-provided or a EHC-provided
satellite space segment (hereinafter referred to as a Transponder and the specified
bandwidth thereon allocated to Customer Channel(s), referred to as the Transponder
Capacity, both as specified in the Service Order). At an antenna located at the Teleport, EHC
shall receive the Customer Channel(s) downlinked from either a Customer-provided or a EHC-provided
Transponder. Either Customer or EHC may provide the integrated receiver decoders (IRDs)
as specified in the Service Order. Unless expressly set forth in the Agreement to the contrary,
Customer is responsible for providing, operating and maintaining all equipment, at locations other
than the Teleport, necessary for reception of the downlinked Customer Channel(s). If EHC provides
the IRDs, then upon termination or expiration of the Teleport Services set forth in this
Section 1(a), Customer shall at its cost, return all such IRDs to the Teleport. Failure
to return such IRDs to the Teleport within thirty (30) days subsequent to such termination or
expiration shall entitle EHC to, and Customer shall pay EHC, a dollar amount equal to the
replacement cost of such IRDs.
(b) Transmission of Customer Channel Content. EHC shall receive and transmit (in a
format and/or quality which is acceptable to EHC) the content contained in the Customer Channel(s),
(Content), such Content which may include video, audio, data and/or other information in
accordance with the provisions of this Agreement).
(c) HVAC and Power. HVAC and Utility power (120vac or 208vac) at the Teleport for all
the applicable equipment (whether such equipment is provided by EHC or
Customer) shall be supplied by EHC. In the event of utility power failure at the Teleport,
all such critical equipment will have power supplied by an uninterruptible power supply with
sufficient battery capacity to allow time for a EHC-supplied generator to be automatically switched
on-line.
(d) Rack Space for Necessary Equipment. EHC will provide environmentally controlled
rack space adequate for all the applicable equipment (whether such equipment is provided by EHC or
Customer) within equipment racks owned by EHC and located within the Teleport, (Rack
Space). The EHC racks in which the necessary equipment is located may not be dedicated solely
or exclusively to the Customer.
(e) EHC Provided Equipment. EHC shall provide and configure at its sole discretion
all, or a portion of, the equipment necessary equipment within the Teleport to provide the
Service(s) requested by Customer pursuant to this Agreement. Such EHC equipment may not be
dedicated solely or exclusively to the Customer. All equipment provided by EHC shall remain the
sole property of EHC.
(f) Additional Teleport Services and Limitations. (i) Any additional Teleport
Services required or requested by Customer over and above that as initially contemplated in the
Service Order shall be subject to availability and additional charges. (ii) Additional Rack Space
may not be contiguous with the initial Rack Space. (iii) In no event shall EHC be required, nor
shall Customer request, any Services which exceed the Transponder Capacity.
2. Satellite Services. In the event EHC provides a Transponder and/or Transponder Capacity
(collectively Satellite Services) such Satellite
Services may be subject to the terms and
conditions of satellite services agreement(s). For the avoidance of
doubt the satellite services agreements are not
incorporated into this Agreement and are separate, severable
contract(s) from this Agreement.
3. Channel Origination Services. EHC shall provide, and Customer agrees to pay for any
applicable Services set forth in this Article 3 (collectively Channel Origination
Services), as specifically requested and priced within the Service Order.
(a) Channel Monitoring. EHC shall provide the necessary personnel and equipment at
the Teleport for monitoring the transmission of the Content at the Beginning Demarcation Point to
the Ending Demarcation Point on a 24 hours per day, 7 days per week (24 x 7) basis. EHC will
monitor the Content and communicate with Customer regarding any technical problems in connection
with the Content.
-2-
(b) Commercial Insertion Reports and Tapes. Upon written request from Customer, EHC
shall provide to Customer commercial insertion reports indicating which commercials were
transmitted to the Ending Demarcation Point and the time each such insert was completed (the
As Run Logs); and (ii) a video / audio tape with a time stamp of each program (per
Customer Channel) that was transmitted by EHC (the Logger Tapes). As a general rule,
Customer should request As Run Logs in advance; however, EHC shall make commercially reasonable
efforts to maintain As Run Logs, which can be provided to Customer upon request, for a period of
thirty (30) days following the transmission date. Logger Tapes must be requested in advance so as
to reasonably give EHC the opportunity to purchase and configure any necessary equipment therefor.
4. Channel Management Services. EHC shall provide, and Customer agrees to pay for any
applicable Services set forth in this Article 4 (collectively Channel Management
Services) as specifically requested and priced in the Service Order.
(a) Additional Graphics Creation. One time, upon written request from Customer, EHC
will develop and implement industry standard graphics file(s) (Basic Graphics) for each
Customer Channel for which any Services are being provided under this Agreement pursuant to each
then current Service Order at no charge to Customer. Customers written request shall delineate
all information necessary for the creation of such Basic Graphics. Such Basic Graphics shall be
limited to station logos, station identification bugs and trouble slides. Subsequent to EHC
providing any Basic Graphics, Customer may request, and EHC shall provide, additional graphics
(Additional Graphics) including but limited to text scrolls and custom slides. Customer
shall pay EHC an hourly rate (as set forth in the Service Order) for the creation of any Additional
Graphics. EHC shall provide Customer the specifications for any such graphics and Customer shall
be responsible for providing EHC with all applicable images for the creation of any such graphics.
(b) Additional Graphics Insertion. EHC shall insert such Basic Graphics or Additional
Graphics into programs within a Customer Channel as per Customers written request. Any Additional
Graphics which are inserted into programs within a Customer Channel shall incur additional charges
(as set forth in the Service Order) per program (per Customer Channel) in which Additional Graphics
are inserted. In the event Customer provides any graphics for insertion EHC shall provide Customer
the specifications for any such graphics.
(c) Voice Overs Creation. At its studios and subject to availability, EHC will
develop, produce and record audio voice messages for the insertion into programs within a Customer
Channel (Voice Overs) per Customers written request. Voice Over studio / production
sessions shall be booked by Customer in blocks of four (4) hours of recording and production time
(each a Production Session). Customer shall provide EHC with all information necessary
to create any Voice Overs.
(d) Voice Overs Insertion. EHC shall insert Voice Overs (either Customer produced or
EHC produced) into programs within a Customer Channel as per Customers written request. Any such
Voice Overs which are inserted shall incur additional charges (as set forth in the Service Order)
per program (per Customer Channel) in which Voice Overs are inserted.
-3-
(e) Dubbing from Tape-to-Tape. Upon written request from Customer, EHC shall record,
tape-to-tape, any program (each program not to exceed two (2) hours) on the Customer Channel which
it receives via tape. EHC shall charge Customer (as set forth in the Service Order) per program
(per Customer Channel) that it dubs from tape-to-tape for Customer.
(f) Dubbing from Downlink. Upon written request from Customer, EHC shall record any
program (each program not to exceed two (2) hours) on the Customer Channel which it receives via
downlink. EHC shall charge Customer (as set forth in the Service Order) per program (per Customer
Channel) that it dubs from downlink for Customer.
(g) Re-Configuring Data Rate for Customer Channels. In the event Customer elects to
re-configure the data rate at which a Customer Channel is transmitted, then EHC shall re-configure
such data rate in the manner customarily used by the Parties to
re-configure data rates.
5. Customer Provided Equipment. Customer shall have the right, but not the obligation to:
(i) provide a portion of, or all of, the equipment necessary for EHC to provision the Services to
Customer; or (ii) have EHC purchase on Customers behalf a portion of, or all of, the equipment
necessary for EHC to provision the Services to Customer (clause (i) and (ii) collectively
Customer Equipment). In the event that Customer exercises its right to have EHC purchase
Customer Equipment (an Equipment Purchase) then: (a) such Equipment Purchase shall be
included within the definition of Services; (b) EHC shall use commercially reasonable efforts to
promptly procure the Equipment Purchase; and (c) Customer
shall pay to EHC a cost plus a mutually agreed margin based upon the
fair market value for such Equipment Purchase taking into consideration,
among other things, the performance capabilities and technical
specifications of the Equipment Purchase and the expertise of the services
required to procure the Equipment Purchase (the "Equipment Cost"). In the
event that the Parties are unable to agree on the Equipment Cost,
the dispute resolution
procedures set forth in Article VIII of the Separation Agreement by and between EchoStar
Communications Corporation and EchoStar Holding Corporation dated [ ] (the Dispute Resolution
Procedures) will be used to determine the fair market value of
the Equipment Cost and such fair market value as so determined shall
be deemed the Equipment Cost. All Customer Equipment provided by Customer or to be purchased on Customers behalf
shall be listed in an Appendix A to the Service Order.
(a) Limitations. Customer Equipment shall remain the property of Customer, and
maintenance, repair, or replacement of Customer Equipment shall be the sole responsibility of
Customer.
(b) Removal of Customer Equipment. Within thirty (30) calendar days after the end of
the Service Term Expiration (as delineated in the Service Order) for Teleport Services or any
extension period thereof (if any), or termination of the Agreement, Customer shall remove all
Customer Equipment from the Rack Space and/or Teleport at Customers sole cost under EHC
supervision. Customer shall provide EHC with at least ten (10) calendar days written notice prior
to such removal. Customer shall not be entitled to use the Teleport Services after expiration or
termination thereof. If Customer Equipment is located at the Teleport and Customer fails to remove
such Customer Equipment from the Teleport within such thirty (30) calendar day period, EHC shall
have the right to either: (i) remove such Customer Equipment and issue an invoice to Customer for
the cost of removal and shipment to the address set forth on Customers Notice Information (as set
forth in the Service Order); or (ii) notify Customer that EHC elects to take ownership of such
Customer Equipment, in which case Customer hereby
-4-
consents and agrees to such change of ownership. In the event any damage to the Rack Space or
Teleport (reasonable wear and tear excepted) results from any use of the Rack Space and/or removal
of Customer Equipment, Customer shall pay EHC the cost of repairs. Customer accepts all
responsibility for Customer Equipment, including but not limited to risk of loss of its Equipment,
except to the extent caused by EHCs gross negligence or willful misconduct.
6. Teleport Access. In the event Customer is providing Customer Equipment or EHC has
purchased Customer Equipment on Customers behalf, and such Customer Equipment is located at a EHC
owned, operated or leased facility, Customer shall have access to Customer Equipment for normal
maintenance purposes from 08:00 to 17:00 local time, weekends and holidays excluded, and Customer
shall give the Teleport a minimum of five (5) business days advance written notice of its need for
access to such Customer Equipment. For emergency servicing purposes, Customer shall have access to
Customer Equipment located at the Teleport upon notice that is reasonable under such emergency
circumstances. EHC may revoke, effective immediately without notice, the access of any individual
to the Teleport. EHC reserves the right to escort any entities entering a Teleport and to monitor
(and/or inspect) such entities work, means and methods, and EHC may charge Customer, on a per hour
basis in accordance with Article 9 below, for such. Such right is intended only for the
benefit of EHC and shall not be construed as constituting any: warranty; certification of
compliance or performance by EHC; or in any way alleviating or diminishing any of Customers
obligations. Customer acknowledges that EHC is granting only permission to access and utilize the
Rack Space (as defined in the Service Order) and that EHC is not granting any leasehold or other
real property interests in the Rack Space or the Teleport.
7. Demarcation Points. The demarcation points for Teleport Services are as follows: (a)
the point at which EHC obtains control of Customer Channel(s) (as defined in the Service Order) for
downlinking or transmitting in accordance with the Agreement (Beginning Demarcation
Point); and (b) the point at which EHC relinquishes control of the Customer Channel(s) having
already downlinked or transmitted them in accordance with the Agreement (Ending Demarcation
Point). Collectively the Beginning Demarcation Point and the Ending Demarcation Point are
referred to herein as the Demarcation Points. The Demarcation Points shall be set forth
in the Service Order. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, Customer shall be
solely responsible for: (i) delivery of properly formatted Content to the Beginning Demarcation
Point; and (ii) for receiving such Content at the Ending Demarcation Point.
8. Service Initiation Date. EHC shall initiate the Service(s) described herein on the
date(s) set forth in the Service Order (the Service Initiation Date for each applicable
Service). Customers obligation to pay for the Service(s) shall begin on the Service Initiation
Date for each applicable Service, unless the applicable Service has not begun as of that date due
to some fault of EHC. If a delay in the readiness of any Service is caused for any other reason
which is the fault of Customer, including but not limited to the failure of Customer Equipment
and/or Customer-provided Transponder to be ready, then the delay shall not affect Customers
obligation to begin payment on the Service Initiation Date for the applicable Service(s).
-5-
9. Charges and Payment.
MRC / NRC. Monthly recurring charges (MRC(s)) as further
defined in this sentence) and non-recurring charges (NRC(s) as further defined in this sentence) shall be provided to Customer
by EHC at a cost plus a mutually agreed margin based upon the fair market value of the Service, taking into consideration, among
other things, the performance capabilities and technical
specifications of the Services. In the event the Parties are unable to agree
upon the MRC or NRC, the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Article VIII of the Separation Agreement by and between EchoStar
Communications Corporation and EchoStar Holding Corporation dated [ ] (the Dispute Resolution Procedures) will be used
to determine the fair market value of the applicable Service and such fair market value as so determined shall be deemed to be the MRC or NRC
(as the case may be) for the applicable Service.
(a) Payment. MRCs and NRCs for the Service(s) shall be paid monthly in advance in US
Dollars by no later than the last business day of each month preceding the month in which a Service
is to be rendered. EHC shall invoice each months MRC based upon its projected Cost Formula with
the projected Cost Formula calculated by EHC by utilizing historical Costs (as defined in Schedule
1) as well as taking into account future business and technology plans. The Parties shall true-up
any difference between the projected Cost Formula and the actual Cost Formula at such times as
mutually agreed upon, but in any event not less than once per calendar year. Any payment not
received within five (5) business days of its due date will be subject to late payment interest at
a rate of one and a half percent (1.5%) per month or the maximum rate allowed by law, whichever is
greater. Customer shall not offset any sums due to it pursuant to any other agreement(s) between
Customer, or any of its Affiliates, and EHC, or any of its Affiliates, against any amount which is
due to EHC pursuant to this Agreement. Affiliate means any person or entity directly or
indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with another person or entity.
(b) Labor Charges. If at Customers request, EHC performs labor related to the
Service(s) but which is outside the scope of EHCs responsibilities as set forth in this Agreement
(Additional Labor), then EHC shall be entitled to charge Customer for such Additional
Labor in accordance with this Article 9.
(c) Deposit. EHC may require Customer to provide EHC with financial security
(Deposit) as security in the amount set forth in the Service Order for payment of any
charges and other liabilities of Customer. The Customer shall still be responsible for the timely
payment of charges for the Service(s). EHC shall be entitled to draw upon the Deposit for any late
payment or any other liabilities that the Customer may incur in connection with any Service, and
the Customer shall be obliged to replenish the Deposit. Failure to do so shall be a material
breach of the Agreement. Following termination of the entire Agreement EHC will return to the
Customer any remaining Deposit minus any offsets (if any) which EHC may deduct from the Deposit to
cover any outstanding liabilities for any Service.
(d) Taxes. EHCs rates and charges for Service(s) do not include taxes. Except for
EHCs taxes on (i) gross and/or net income and/or (ii) real estate, Customer will pay all local,
state, national taxes or charges, including any Universal Service Fees which are imposed on or
based upon the provision to, sale to or use of Service(s) by Customer.
10. Term.
(a) Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall
expire on the earlier of: (i) the date all Services have been terminated in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement; (ii) the date all Services have expired in
-6-
accordance with the terms of the Service Order; or (iii) the secondary anniversary of the
first Service Initiation Date (as defined in Section 8 above) for the first Service
provided to Customer.
(b) Renewal. Customer shall have the exclusive right, but not the obligation, to
extend the Agreement annually for up to two (2) years, upon submission of written notice to EHC no
later than one hundred eighty (180) calendar days prior to expiration of the current term.
(c) Service Orders. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or in
any Service Order, in no event shall a Service Order continue to be effective following the
expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.
11. Teleport Service Outages and Service Failures.
(a) Teleport Service Outages.
(i) Customer acknowledges the possibility of an unscheduled period of time during which a
Customer Channel is not available (Outage). An Outage shall be measured on a per
Customer Channel basis and shall begin when EHC receives notice of the Outage from the Customer, or
when EHC discovers the Outage (whichever occurs first) and will be considered to have ended when
the affected Customer Channel has been restored. For an Outage to be counted toward the
accumulated Outage time for which Customer may be entitled to a credit as set forth in Section
11(b) below (Outage Credit), Customer shall submit a written Outage notice to EHC
(which identifies the Outage and requests an Outage Credit) within five (5) calendar days of the
Outage. If EHC does not receive Customers written Outage notice within such five (5) calendar day
period, the Outage shall not be counted toward the accumulated Outage time. For the avoidance of
doubt, the term Outage shall include all Outages specified in Section 11(a)(ii).
(ii) Termination for Chronic Outages. In the event that the cumulative Outages
experienced on a Customer Channel exceed the industry standard service level (a
Chronic Channel Outage), Customer shall have the right to terminate this Agreement in
whole or in part as to any one or more Customer Channels, so long as such Chronic Channel Outage
condition is not remedied within thirty (30) days after EHCs receipt of such written notice.
(b) Outage
Credit Calculation. In the event that Outages exceed the industry
standard service level (an Excessive Outage), Customer
shall be entitled to an Outage Credit based upon that Customer Channels prorated portion of the
applicable Teleport Services MRC and the length of such Outage as calculated pursuant to the
equation in the table below. Any Outage Credit due shall be credited on Customers monthly
invoices. The total Outage Credits for any one
(1) calendar year for a Customer Channel shall not exceed an amount equal to one (1) month of a
Customer Channels prorated portion of the applicable Teleport Services MRC for such affected
Customer Channel.
-7-
Outage Credit Calculation
Outage duration (in number of minutes), multiplied by the Customer Channels
prorated portion of the applicable Teleport Services MRC,
divided by 43,200
(deemed number of minutes in a month.)
For the avoidance of doubt and solely by way of example, an affected Customer Channels prorated
portion of the applicable Teleport Services MRC shall be calculated as follows: If the Teleport
Services MRC is $100 for all Customer Channels and there are an aggregate of 10 Customer Channels,
one Customer Channels prorated portion of the Teleport Services MRC would be $10.
(c) Service Failure. Customer acknowledges the possibility of an unscheduled period
of time during which all or any portion of the Service(s) (excluding Teleport Services which are
subject to Section 11(a) above) are not available, are interrupted or otherwise fail
(Service Failure). In the event of a Service Failure, Customer shall be entitled to
receive a credit (pro rata if applicable) for the applicable Service Failure (Service Failure
Credit).
(d) Exceptions. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, EHC shall not be
responsible for and shall not be in default or breach of this Agreement as a result of, nor shall
it be held liable for any Outages, Service Failures, Outage Credits, Service Failure Credits or
other damages, claims, losses, or costs and expenses on account of, any interruption of any
Services, nor shall such interruption be deemed an Outage or Service Failure, if such interruption
or failure occurs due to any of the following: (i) de minimus degradation or interruptions of
Customer Channel(s) due to protection switching; (ii) any failure on the part of Customer to
perform its obligations pursuant to the Agreement, including, but not limited to the failure of
Customer to provide Content to EHC in a format and/or quality in accordance with EHC
specifications; (iii) the failure of transmission lines, fiber, Customer Equipment, equipment,
connections, or other facilities provided by Customer or any third party; (iv) the failure or
nonperformance of any earth station not operated by EHC; (v) interference from a third party
transmission or usage; (vi) testing of the Services as mutually agreed to in advance; (vii)
interruption or degradation due to atmospheric attenuation of the Content signal including but
limited to sun transit outage, rain fade or weather; (viii) Force Majeure Events (as defined in
Section 20(b)); (ix) telecommunications interruptions and/or failure of the Transponder;
(x) any act or failure to act by Customer; (xi) interruptions due to tests and adjustments
necessary to maintain the Services in satisfactory operating condition; (xii) reconfiguration(s)
performed or directed by Customer; and/or (xiii) scheduled EHC maintenance.
(e) Exclusive Remedy. Except as expressly set forth in Section 11(b) (i.e.
Outage Credits) and 11(c) (i.e. Service Failure Credits) of this Agreement, neither EHC nor
its Affiliates shall have any liability for any Outages or Services Failure. For Outages, Outage
Credits from EHC (as set forth in Section 11(b) above) and termination rights for Chronic
-8-
Outages (as set forth in Section 11(a)(ii) above) are Customers sole and exclusive
remedy(s) with respect to Outages. For a Service Failure, Service Failure Credits from EHC (as set
forth in Section 11(c) above) are Customers sole and exclusive remedy(s) with respect to
Service Failures. In no event shall an Outage or a Service Failure be deemed a breach of this
Agreement and all other remedies or damages at law or in equity Customer may have against EHC in
connection with any Outage or Service Failure are waived.
12. Insurance. In the event Customer is providing Customer Equipment and such Customer
Equipment is located at a EHC owned, operated or leased facility, to cover its employees and/or
agents performing work at the Teleport, and Customer Equipment or other property located at the
Teleport, Customer shall carry and maintain at its sole cost during the Service Term of the
Teleport Services, with insurance companies having at least A- and be assigned a financial size
category of at least Class IX as rated in the most recent edition of Bests Key Rating Guide for
insurance companies or a rating of at least AAA as rated by Standard & Poors, the insurance
indicated below as a minimum requirement:
|
|
|
Type of Coverage: |
|
Limits of Liability: |
(i) Workers Compensation
|
|
Statutory per State |
(ii) Employers Liability
|
|
$1,000,000 per occurrence |
(iii) Broad Form Property Damage
|
|
$3,000,000* per occurrence |
(iv) Third Party Property Damage
|
|
$3,000,000* per occurrence |
|
|
|
* |
|
The limits of liability required above can be satisfied by a
combination of primary and excess liability insurance. |
Customer shall provide to EHC at or prior to the Effective Date, certificates of insurance or proof
of subscription to any state fund evidencing that Customer is maintaining all of the insurance
required hereunder, and stating that EHC shall be provided with a copy of such certificates at the
execution of any amendment thereto and at each policy renewal thereof, which certificates or proofs
shall be in a form acceptable to EHC. All policies shall (a) be endorsed to include EHC, its
stockholders, Affiliates, directors, officers and employees as additional insureds (the
Additional Insureds); (b) be primary and non-contributory coverage to any insurance or
self-insurance maintained by the Additional Insureds; (c) contain an endorsement waiving
subrogation rights of insurer against the Additional Insureds, and (d) shall be issued by
insurer(s) and in a form reasonably satisfactory to EHC. All deductibles shall be paid by
Customer, assumed by Customer, for the account of Customer and EHC, and at Customers sole risk.
(a) No Obligation on EHC. EHC will not insure nor be responsible for any loss or
damage, regardless of cause, to any Customer Equipment or property of any kind, including loss of
use thereof, owned, leased or borrowed by the Customer, its employees, servants or agents.
(b) Contractors. If Customer utilizes contractor(s) per the Agreement, then Customer
shall require such contractor(s) to comply with these insurance requirements. Customer will supply
subcontractors certificates of insurance to EHC before any work commences.
-9-
13. Operational Notices. To report Outages, Service Failures and/or technical problems
Customer shall call the Teleport, which shall be available to answer customers call on a 24 x 7
basis. EHC will communicate with Customer regarding any technical problems with any Customer
Channel or Service. For purposes of these communications from EHC, Customer agrees that EHC should
contact the operational contacts of Customer set forth in the Service Order and in the order listed
therein. Customer shall update its list of operational contacts with EHC as needed. EHC shall not
be responsible for any Outages, Service Failures or other technical problems with any Customer
Channel(s) or Service in the event that EHC has attempted to communicate with Customers
operational contacts according to the information provided by Customer to EHC and EHC is unable to
establish communications with them.
14. Warranty. EXCEPT AS SET FORTH HEREIN, ANY SERVICE(S), SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT OR PRODUCTS
PROVIDED BY EHC TO CUSTOMER, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, SHALL BE AS IS WITHOUT WARRANTY OF
ANY KIND WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AND EHC MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. CUSTOMER EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT NO OTHER REPRESENTATIONS OR
WARRANTIES HAVE BEEN MADE.
15. Liability Restrictions.
(a) NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT TO THE CONTRARY, IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER
PARTY, ITS AFFILIATES, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR ASSIGNS BE LIABLE FOR ANY
CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY OR INDIRECT DAMAGES, INCLUDING, BY WAY OF
EXAMPLE AND NOT LIMITATION, LOSS OF BUSINESS, PROFITS, USE, DATA, OR OTHER ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE,
WHETHER SUCH CLAIM IS CHOATE OR INCHOATE, WHETHER BY STATUTE, IN TORT, OR IN CONTRACT, EVEN IF SUCH
PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
(b) IN NO EVENT SHALL EHC, AND ITS AFFILIATES AND ITS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICERS,
DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS AND SHAREHOLDERS, AND ITS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNS, HEIRS,
SUCCESSORS AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES (THE EHC GROUP) BE LIABLE FOR: (i) CONTENT THAT IS
TRANSMITTED BY CUSTOMER OR THIRD PARTIES VIA THE SERVICE(S); OR (ii) FOR ANY OUTAGE OR SERVICE
FAILURE ATTRIBUTABLE IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO ANY OF THE EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH SECTION 11(d)
OR OTHER CAUSES BEYOND EHCS CONTROL.
(c) EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11(b) AND 11(c) OF THIS AGREEMENT, IN NO
EVENT SHALL THE EHC GROUP BE LIABLE FOR ANY OUTAGE, SERVICE FAILURE, DEFECT, ERROR, INTERRUPTION,
DELAY, OR ATTENUATION OF ANY OF THE SERVICES.
(d) AS A MATERIAL CONDITION OF ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT AT THE PRICE SPECIFIED IN THE
SERVICE ORDER, AND IN REGARD
-10-
TO ANY AND ALL CAUSES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, CUSTOMER AGREES EHCS
AGGREGATE LIABILITY SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE LESSER OF: (i) THE ACTUAL DIRECT DAMAGES; OR (ii) THE
MRC AND/OR NRC AMOUNTS ACTUALLY PAID (EXCLUDING ANY DEPOSITS) TO EHC BY CUSTOMER IN CONNECTION WITH
THE CONTESTED SERVICE DURING THE PRECEEDING MONTH FROM THE TIME THE EVENT RESULTING IN LIABILITY
OCCURS. IN THE EVENT OF EHC LIABILITY PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT, EHC MAY ELECT, AT ITS DISCRETION
AND SOLE OPTION, TO PAY SUCH REQUIRED AMOUNTS OR PROVIDE A CREDIT AGAINST SERVICES. THE PROVISIONS
OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL SURVIVE EXPIRATION OR TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT (FOR ANY REASON OR NO
REASON WHATSOEVER) INDEFINITELY.
16. Indemnification.
(a) Notwithstanding anything to contrary contained herein, Customer shall indemnify, defend
and hold the EHC Group harmless from and against, any and all costs, losses, liabilities, damages,
lawsuits, judgments, claims, actions, penalties, fines and expenses (including, without limitation,
interest, penalties, reasonable attorney fees and all monies paid in the investigation, defense or
settlement of any or all of the foregoing), that arise out of, or are incurred in connection with:
(i) material breach of the Agreement, breach of any warranty, representation or covenant, or fault,
negligence, act or omission, by the Customer or its Affiliates, directors, employees, agents or
contractors; (ii) bodily injury including death, or property damage incurred by Customer or its
Affiliates, directors, employees, agents or contractors as related to any Service, howsoever
caused; (iii) the quality, content, alleged defects in, or failure (however caused) of any Service;
(iv) the failure by Customer, its Affiliates or downstream customers of Customer, or any third
party, to obtain approval, consent, or authorization relating to the content transmitted over any
Service, including without limitation claims relating to any violation of copyright law, export
control laws; (v) Customers or its Affiliates alleged breach of any national or international
laws, rules and regulations applicable to it; (vi) alleged infringement of intellectual property
rights including patents arising from Content, Customer Equipment, Customer-provided facilities,
apparatus, or systems, or combining such with any of the Services and/or EHC-provided equipment;
and/or (vii) EHC acting in accordance with the instructions of the Customer.
In the event of any claim for indemnification by the EHC Group under this Section, the EHC
Group shall be entitled to representation by counsel of its own choosing, at Customers sole cost
and expense. The EHC Group shall have the right to the exclusive conduct of all negotiations,
litigation, settlements and other proceedings arising from any such claim and Customer shall, at
its own cost and expense, render all assistance reasonably requested by EHC in connection with any
such negotiation, litigation, settlement or other proceeding.
The provisions of this Section 16 shall survive expiration or termination of this
Agreement (for any reason or no reason whatsoever) indefinitely.
-11-
17. Termination and Suspension.
(a) EHC may, at its option, terminate or suspend all or any portion of the Agreement (i.e. all
or any Services provided hereunder) without liability by giving Customer written notice as follows:
(i) if Customer fails to make any payment due to EHC within (5) days of Customers receipt from
EHC of written notice of such failure; (ii) if Customer breaches any material provision of this
Agreement, and (A) if such breach is capable of remedy, Customer does not cure such breach within
thirty (30) days of Customers receipt from EHC of written notice of such breach, or (B) if such
breach is not capable of remedy, or has occurred more than once, immediately upon Customers
receipt of written notice from EHC of such breach; or (iii) if Customer files a petition in
bankruptcy or is adjudicated bankrupt or insolvent, or files or has filed against it any petition
or answer seeking any reorganization, composition, liquidation or similar relief for itself under
any applicable statute, law or regulation or makes any general assignment for the benefit of its
creditors, or admits in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due. In no
event shall EHCs election to suspend the Agreement and/or any Service(s) be construed as a waiver
of EHCs right to terminate the Agreement and/or any Service(s).
(b) Customer may terminate any Channel Origination Services and/or any Channel Management
Services for any reason or no reason, by giving EHC sixty (60) days written notice without any
Customer Termination Liability as defined in Section 17(d) below. Provided that
the Customer is not in breach of any material provision of this Agreement, Customer may terminate
all or any portion of the Teleport Services, without any Customer Termination Liability, by giving
EHC written notice as follows: (i) if EHC breaches any material provision of this Agreement, and
(A) if such breach is capable of remedy, EHC does not cure such breach within thirty (30) days of
receipt of written notice of such breach, or (B) if such breach is not capable of remedy,
immediately upon receipt of written notice of such breach; or (ii) if EHC files a petition in
bankruptcy or is adjudicated bankrupt or insolvent, or files or has filed against it any petition
or answer seeking any reorganization, composition, liquidation or similar relief for itself under
any applicable statute, law or regulation or makes any general assignment for the benefit of its
creditors, or admits in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due.
(c) Upon termination or expiration of all or any portion of any Services and/or the Agreement
for whatever reason, the Customer shall cease using all the terminated or expired Services.
Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, in such event all outstanding
indebtedness of the Customer to EHC under this Agreement, adjusted for any applicable Outage
Credits and/or Service Failure Credits, shall become immediately due and payable.
(d) In the event Customer terminates any portion of the Agreement for any reason except for
that as set forth in Section 17(b) above, within thirty (30) days of such termination
Customer shall pay EHC a sum equal to the projected Cost Formula that Customer would have paid EHC
to provide the Teleport Services for the remainder of the Service Term, had such Teleport Services
not been terminated (a Customer Termination Liability). The Parties agree this is a
proper assessment of the loss of bargain and damages EHC will incur, and is not a penalty.
-12-
(e) The Customer shall remain liable to pay all charges for any suspended Services during any
period of suspension and, for the avoidance of doubt, any such suspensions shall not be deemed an
Outage or Service Failure and no Outage Credits or Service Failure Credits are payable by EHC to
the Customer for any such period of suspension.
18. Confidentiality. The terms and conditions of this Agreement as well as all financial,
business, technical and other confidential and proprietary information that is disclosed or
provided in connection herewith by any Party to the Agreement or their Affiliates shall be kept and
treated as strictly confidential by each Party and their Affiliates and shall not be disclosed to
any third party without the other Partys prior written consent.
19. Representations, Covenants and Warranties.
(a) Customer represents, covenants and warrants that: (i) it has and will obtain all
applicable clearances and licenses, consents and approvals necessary to enable it to operate,
receive and use the Services and to perform its other obligations under this Agreement; (ii) it is
in compliance with, and performance of its obligations hereunder will not violate or conflict with,
any applicable law or regulation of any jurisdiction to which it is subject; (iii) it will only use
the Services and/or display or transmit any information or Content in connection with the Services
in compliance at all times with all applicable laws and regulations; (iv) it is and shall be solely
responsible for the acquisition of sufficient rights from, and all payments to, the owners of all
Content it transmits or receives and shall adhere to all applicable Federal Communications
Commission and regulatory guidelines as related to such Content; and (v) no Content provided to EHC
in connection with the Agreement shall contain any material which is patently obscene, libelous, or
that violates or infringes any copyright, right of privacy or literary or dramatic right of any
person or entity; (vi) it will follow established standard industry practices and procedures for
frequency co-ordination and will not request any Service in a manner that could reasonably be
expected to interfere with or cause physical harm to satellites or other services that EHC offers.
(b) EHC covenants that it shall provide the Services lawfully and with reasonable skill and
care to recognized industry standards using appropriately experienced and trained personnel.
20. Miscellaneous.
(a) Assignment. Neither Party may assign its rights or delegate its duties under the
Agreement without the other Partys written consent which consent will not be unreasonably
withheld, except that notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, either Party may
assign its rights and/or delegate any portion of its duties under the Agreement without the other
Partys consent to any of such Partys Affiliates capable of performing the assigning Partys
obligations hereunder, or in connection with a change of control whether by merger, sale of stock,
sale of assets or otherwise. Any attempted assignment in violation of the foregoing will be void
and of no effect.
(b) Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be held liable for any delay or failure in
performance of any part of the Agreement from any cause beyond its control and without its
-13-
fault or negligence, such as acts of God, acts of civil or military authority, government
regulations, embargoes, epidemics, war, terrorist acts, riots, insurrections, fires, explosions,
earthquakes, nuclear accidents, floods, power blackouts, meteorological or astronomical
disturbances, satellite failure, satellite launch failure, Transponder failure and/or unusually
severe weather conditions (each a Force Majeure Event). Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary contained herein, if any Force Majeure Event affects EHCs ability to provide a Service
and continues for: (i) thirty (30) consecutive days or less, then the affected Service shall
remain in effect; and (ii) more than thirty (30) consecutive days, then either Party may cancel the
affected Service with no liability on the part of any Party. Notwithstanding anything contained
herein to the contrary, if after the occurrence of a Force Majeure Event, EHC is able to provide
Services to Customer via a manner outside that which the parties normally provision and accept
Services, Customer hereby agrees to utilize commercially reasonable efforts to accept such
provision of such Services by EHC.
(c) Choice of Law and Jurisdiction. Except as otherwise agreed to by the Parties,
this Agreement and the legal relations between the Parties hereto, including all disputes and
claims, whether arising in contract, tort or under statute, shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado, USA, without giving effect to its conflict of
law provisions. Any and all disputes arising out of, or in connection with, the interpretation,
performance or the nonperformance of the Agreement or any and all disputes arising out of, or in
connection with, transactions in any way related to the Agreement and/or the relationship between
the Parties shall be litigated solely and exclusively before the United States District Court for
the District of Colorado. The Parties consent to the in personam jurisdiction of said court for
the purposes of any such litigation, and waive, fully and completely, any right to dismiss and/or
transfer any action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404 or §1406 (or any successor statute). In the event
the United States District Court for the District of Colorado does not have subject matter
jurisdiction of said matter, then such matter shall be litigated solely and exclusively before the
appropriate state court of competent jurisdiction located in Arapahoe County, State of Colorado,
USA.
(d) Entire Agreement/Amendments. This Agreement together with any Service Orders
constitutes the Parties entire agreement and supersedes all prior agreements, proposals, or
discussions, whether oral or written with respect to the matters set forth herein. This Agreement
may only be modified by a written amendment signed by an authorized representative of each Party.
(e) Independent Contractor. The Parties are independent contractors for all purposes
and at all times. Each Party has the responsibility for, and control over, the methods and details
of performing it obligations hereunder. Each Party will be responsible for the hiring, training,
supervision, tools, work policies and procedures of its own employees, and each will be responsible
for the compensation, discipline and termination of its own personnel. Neither Party will have any
authority to act on behalf of, nor bind the other Party to any obligation other than as expressly
provided in the Agreement.
(f) Notices. Except for the communication of Operational Notices (pursuant to
Section 13) or other information of an urgent nature for which telephone communication
between the operational contacts of the Parties is appropriate, or as otherwise expressly set forth
-14-
to the contrary herein, any notice or other communications required or permitted to be given
hereunder shall be in English, in writing and shall be delivered personally or sent by facsimile
transmission, or by first class certified mail, postage prepaid, or by overnight courier service,
charges prepaid, to the Party to be notified, addressed to such Party at the address set forth
below, or sent by facsimile to the fax number set forth below, or such other address or fax number
as such Party may have substituted by written notice to the other Party. The sending of such
notice with confirmation of receipt thereof (in the case of facsimile transmission) or receipt of
such notice (in the case of personal delivery or delivery by mail or by overnight courier service)
shall constitute the giving thereof:
If to EHC:
EchoStar Holding Corporation
Attn: General Counsel
Address: 90 Inverness Circle East, Englewood, Colorado 80112
With Copy To:
EchoStar Holding Corporation
Attn: Vice President of Engineering
Address: 530 Echostar Drive, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82007
If to the Customer to:
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.
Attn: General Counsel
Address: 9601 S. Meridian Blvd., Englewood, Colorado 80112
(g) Waiver. Except where timeframes for a specific action by a Party are expressly
delineated in the Agreement, if either Party fails to enforce any right or remedy under the
Agreement, that failure is not a waiver of the right or remedy for any other breach or failure by
the other Party. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the Party making the
waiver.
(h) Construction. Because the Parties actively negotiated the Agreement, the
Agreement will not be construed against the drafter.
(i) Severability. If any provision of the Agreement is found to be unenforceable, the
Agreements unaffected provisions will remain in effect and the Parties will negotiate a mutually
acceptable replacement provision consistent with the Parties original intent.
-15-
(j) Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement shall not provide any person who is not
a Party to the Agreement with any remedy, claim, liability, reimbursement, cause of action, or
other right in excess of those existing without reference to the Agreement.
(k) Headings. The headings and numbering of Articles, Sections and Subsections in the
Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be construed to define or limit any of the terms
herein or affect the meaning or interpretation of the Agreement.
(l) Trademarks. Nothing in the Agreement will be construed to give the Customer any
rights to use any EHC trademarks, service marks, or logos without the express prior written consent
of EHC.
(m) Supremacy. In the event of a conflict between the main body of this Agreement and
language in the Service Order, the language of this Agreement shall prevail and the Service Order
shall automatically be modified to conform to the language of the main body of this Agreement.
(n) Attorneys Fees. In the event of litigation involving the Agreement, the
prevailing Party in any such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs
and expenses incurred in such action from the other Party, including without limitation the cost of
reasonable attorneys fees as determined by the judge of the court.
(o) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by facsimile and in counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same
document.
[AGREEMENT SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
-16-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused the Agreement to be entered into as of the
Effective Date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECHOSTAR HOLDING CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
|
ECHOSTAR SATELLITE L.L.C.
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
-17-
exv10w28
Exhibit 10.28
[FORM OF]
ECHOSTAR HOLDING CORPORATION
SATELLITE TRANSPONDER SERVICE AGREEMENT
THIS SATELLITE TRANSPONDER SERVICE AGREEMENT (the Agreement) by and between EchoStar
Holding Corporation (EHC), a Nevada corporation with a place of business at 90 Inverness
Circle East, Englewood, Colorado 80112 and EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. (Customer), a
Colorado limited liability company with a place of business at 9601 South Meridian Blvd.,
Englewood, Colorado 80112 is made effective as of the [___] day of December, 2007. Defined terms used
in this Agreement shall have the meanings specified below.
ARTICLE I.
Service Provided
1.1. Scope. During the Service Term, EHC will provide to Customer Non-Preemptible
Service on [___] Ku-Band Transponder(s) (or the equivalent thereof) on the [___] Satellite
presently located at the [___]° W.L. orbital position (Service). Service will be
provided subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement,
including, but not limited to, Attachment A (Transponder Performance Specifications) and Attachment
B (EHC Satellite Users Guide), which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The Satellite is authorized to be and is located at the [___]°W.L. orbital position. The
Satellite may, however, be located at any other orbital position hereafter authorized by the
Federal Communications Commission (the FCC). Technical performance criteria for the
Satellite are described in the Transponder Performance Specifications set forth in Attachment
A. The Service shall initially be provided using Transponders Nos. [___] on the Satellite.
1.2. Term. The term for Service provided under this Agreement (the Service
Term) shall commence on January 1, 2008 (the Commencement Date) and, except as
otherwise provided herein, shall continue, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement, until the earliest of: (i) the End-of-Life or Replacement Date
of the Satellite unless EHC elects to provide Service on the Replacement Satellite in accordance
with Section 3.3; (ii) the date the Satellite becomes a Satellite Failure; (iii) the date
the Transponder on which Service is being provided hereunder becomes a Transponder Failure; or (4)
2 years from the Commencement Date (the Projected Termination Date).
1.3. Service Priorities. In the event that Customers Transponder becomes a Transponder Failure, Customer
acknowledges and agrees that neither Customers Service nor any Transponder on which such Service
is provided shall be restored by preempting any other service or by using a Replacement Transponder
and/or a vacant transponder (or any portion thereof), and Customers Service and/or the Transponder
on which such Service is provided shall not be restored.
1.4. Notices. All notices regarding technical or operational matters requiring
immediate attention will be given by telephone to the telephone numbers set forth below and shall
be followed by written notification. All other notices or requests that are required or permitted
to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be sent by facsimile transmission, or by first
class certified mail, postage prepaid, or by overnight courier service, charges prepaid, to the
party to be notified, addressed to such party at the address set forth below, or sent by facsimile
to the fax number set forth below, or such other address(es) or fax number(s) as such party may
have substituted by written notice to the other party. The sending of such notice with
confirmation of receipt thereof (in the case of facsimile transmission) or receipt of such notice
(in the case of delivery by mail or by overnight courier service) shall constitute the giving
thereof.
|
|
|
If to be given to Customer:
|
|
If to be given to EHC: |
|
|
|
Attn: [ ]
|
|
Attn:
[ ] |
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.
|
|
EchoStar Holding Corporation |
|
|
|
If by overnight courier:
|
|
If by overnight courier: |
9601 South Meridian Blvd.
|
|
90 Inverness Circle East |
Englewood, Colorado 80112
|
|
Englewood, Colorado 80112 |
|
|
|
If by U.S. mail:
|
|
If by U.S. mail: |
P.O. Box 6655
|
|
[__________] |
Englewood, Colorado 80155
|
|
Englewood, Colorado 80155 |
Fax #: [___]
|
|
Fax #: [___] |
|
|
|
cc: EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.
|
|
cc EchoStar Holding Corporation |
Attention: Office of the General Counsel
|
|
Attention: Office of the General Counsel |
Same address as above
|
|
Same address as above |
Fax #: [___]
|
|
Fax #: [___] |
|
|
|
EHCs 24 Hour Emergency Telephone # for Technical/Operational Issues:
Tel #: [___]
Customers 24 Hour Emergency Telephone # for Technical/Operational Issues:
Tel #: [___]
ARTICLE II.
Payment
2.1. Monthly Recurring Service Charge. During the Service Term, Customer will pay to EHC
for Service a monthly recurring service charge based upon the fair market value of the
Service taking into consideration, among other things, the spot market prices for similar satellite
capacity, the orbital location of the Satellite and
-2-
the
frequency on which the Satellite is providing the Services (the
"MRC"). In the event the parties are unable to agree upon the MRC, the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Article VIII of the Separation
Agreement by and between EchoStar Communications Corporation and EchoStar Holding Corporation dated
[___] (the Dispute Resolution
Procedures) will be used to determine the MRC and such fair
market value as so determined shall be deemed to be the MRC for the
applicable Services.
2.2. Billing and Payment. Unless mutually agreed upon otherwise, invoices will be
issued monthly thirty (30) days in advance of the quarter in which Service is to be provided and
are payable on the first day of such quarter by wire transfer as per the remittance instructions on
the respective monthly invoice. On payments not received by the due date (Delinquent
Payments), EHC will assess, until such time as payment in full is made, a late payment charge
of the lesser of the Delinquent Payment multiplied by: (i) one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month
compounded monthly; or (ii) the maximum rate permitted by applicable law. A failure or delay by
EHC to send an invoice will not relieve Customer either of its obligation to pay for Service on a
timely basis or of its obligation to pay late payment charges in the event of late payment. In
addition to any other rights EHC may have under this Agreement, at law, in equity or otherwise (all
of which are hereby expressly reserved), EHC may suspend provision of Service on seventy-two (72)
hours notice for Customers failure to pay any sums due to EHC and/or any of its Affiliates.
2.3. Taxes and Other Charges. All charges under this Agreement (including but not
limited to the MRC) are exclusive of taxes, duties and other fees or charges levied by governmental
authority (including but not limited to Universal Service Fees, if applicable) on the Service or
the facilities used to provide the Service. Customer will pay directly or reimburse EHC for all
such taxes, duties and other fees or charges, including but not limited to Universal Service Fees,
if applicable. The provisions of this Article II shall survive expiration or termination of this
Agreement (for any reason or no reason whatsoever) indefinitely.
ARTICLE III.
Service Parameters
3.1. Credits. Credits for Interruptions in Service of five (5) minutes or more
(Interruption Credit) shall be granted to Customer as follows:
Interruption Credit = (Number of minutes in Interruption/43,200) multiplied by the MRC
The length
of an Interruption will be measured from the time EHC is notified by Customer of
the Interruption until Service is restored.
3.2. Exceptions. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, EHC shall not be
responsible for and shall not be in default or breach of this Agreement as a result of, nor shall
it be held liable for any Interruption Credits or other damages, claims, losses, or costs and
-3-
expenses on account of, any interruption of the Service, if such interruption or failure occurs due
to any of the following: (i) de minimus degradation or Interruptions of the Service due to
reasonable protection switching in conformance with industry standards; (ii) Interruption or
degradation due to atmospheric attenuation of the signal; (iii) any failure on the part of Customer
to perform its obligations as required under this Agreement; (iv) the failure of transmission
lines, fiber, any Customer provided equipment, connections, or other facilities provided by
Customer or any third party, excluding any EHC Affiliates; (v) the failure or nonperformance of any
earth station not operated by EHC; (vi) EHCs compliance with an action by any court, agency,
legislature or other governmental authority that makes it unlawful for EHC to provide the Services
or any part thereof in accordance with this Agreement (vii) interference from a third party
transmission or usage other than by EHC or its Affiliates; (viii) testing of the Service as
mutually agreed to in advance; (ix) sun transit outage, rain fade, weather or Force Majeure Events;
(x) any act or failure to act by Customer; (xi) any outage caused by any reconfigurations performed
or directed by Customer, however unlikely; or (xii) scheduled maintenance. Any Interruption Credit
shall be reflected on the first invoice issued by EHC following an Interruption. The
aforementioned credit will be Customers sole and exclusive remedy for unavailability of Service
and/or failure of Service to meet the Transponder Performance Specifications set forth in
Attachment A.
3.3. Transponder Assignment/Reassignment. Customer agrees that the Services will be
used solely for the transmission of digital signals. The Transponder assignments may be changed
from time to time in the manner customarily used by the parties to change Transponder assignments
in the past.
ARTICLE IV.
Service Responsibilities
4.1. Laws and Regulations Governing Service. Location and operation of the Satellite,
EHCs satellite system and EHCs ability to perform are subject to all applicable laws and
regulations, including without limitation, the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the
rules and regulations of the FCC.
4.2. Use Conditions. Customers use of the Service and use of the Service by any
other person or entity (Customers Designees) shall be: (i) in compliance with all
applicable laws and the Transponder Authority; and (ii) only within the United States of America or
such other jurisdiction(s) as permitted by applicable law. Customer will not use, and will cause
Customers Designees not to use the Service: (a) for any unlawful purpose, including violation of
laws governing the content of material transmitted using the Service; and/or (b) without first
obtaining any and all necessary Transponder Authority. Customer is permitted to allow Customers
Designees to access use of the Service for the purpose of transmitting digital signals to the
extent that such use is not prohibited by rule, regulation or law and subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement. Customer shall provide EHC with at least five (5) business days
prior written notice of any use of Service by Customers Designees and of the identity of any such
Customers Designee. Should Customer permit use of such Service by any Customers Designee,
Customer shall be a guarantor of compliance by each such Customers Designee with all of the terms,
conditions, representations and warranties of this Agreement and any breach or
-4-
default of any of
the terms, conditions, representations and/or warranties of this Agreement by any such Customers
Designee shall be deemed to be a breach or default of this Agreement by Customer and any acts or
omissions of Customers Designees related to the use of the Service shall be deemed to be acts or
omissions of Customer for purposes of this Agreement. If Customers or Customers Designees use
of Service or non-compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement (including but not
limited to this Section 4.2.): (i) causes, or would reasonably be expected to cause,
interference to or threatens the availability or operation of any services or facilities provided
by EHC; or (ii) would reasonably be expected to result in: (a) a breach or violation of any other
agreement between Customer or any of its Affiliates one the one hand and any member of the EHC
Group on the other hand; (b) a claim against the EHC Group; or (c) the institution of criminal
proceedings or administrative proceedings that would reasonably be expected to result in sanctions
or other non-monetary remedies against EHC and/or any of its Affiliates, then, in addition to any
other remedies that may be available to EHC hereunder, EHC shall be entitled to suspend and/or
restrict such non-compliant use of the Service.
ARTICLE V.
Operational Matters
5.1. Service Access. Customer is responsible for providing, operating and maintaining the equipment necessary to
access the Satellite and Service. Customer at its expense shall provide EHC with any descrambling
or decoding devices that may be required for signal monitoring. At a mutually agreed time, and
prior to Customer transmitting from its earth station(s), Customer will demonstrate to EHCs
designated Technical Operations Center that its earth station(s) comply with the satellite access
specifications contained in the EHC Satellite Users Guide.
5.2. Action to Protect Satellite. EHC shall have sole and exclusive control of
operation of the Satellite. If circumstances occur which in EHCs reasonable judgment pose a
threat to the stable operation of the Satellite, EHC shall have the right to take any and all
actions it reasonably believes are or may be necessary or advisable to protect the Satellite,
including discontinuance or suspension of operation of the Satellite, the Transponder(s) or any
other transponder, without any liability to Customer, except that Customer may receive an
Interruption Credit computed as provided in Article III of this Agreement. EHC shall give
Customer as much notice as practical under the circumstances of any such discontinuance or
suspension. If it becomes necessary to discontinue or suspend service on one or more transponders
on the Satellite, and operational circumstances allow EHC to select the transponder or transponders
to be discontinued or suspended, EHC will make such selection in Reverse Contract Order.
ARTICLE VI.
Indemnification
Customer shall indemnify, defend and hold EHC and its Affiliates, and its and their respective
officers, directors, employees, agents and shareholders, and its and their respective assigns,
heirs, successors and legal representatives (collectively the EHC Group) harmless from
and against, any and all costs, losses, liabilities, damages, lawsuits, judgments,
-5-
claims, actions,
penalties, fines and expenses (including, without limitation, interest, penalties, reasonable
attorney fees and all monies paid in the investigation, defense or settlement of any or all of the
foregoing), that arise directly or indirectly out of, or are incurred in connection with: (i)
Customers performance or failure of performance under this Agreement; (ii) the failure of Customer
to comply with, or any violation of, any applicable laws; (iii) any claim of pirating, infringement
or imitation of the logos, trademarks or service marks of programming providers; (iv) the acts or
omissions of Customer or Customers Designees arising out of, resulting from or in connection with
the Service or any use of the Service; and (v) third party claims (including those of Customers
Designees) arising out of, resulting from or in connection with any failure to provide Service or
any use of Service provided hereunder. In the event of any claim for indemnification by the EHC
Group under this Article VI, the EHC Group shall be entitled to representation by counsel of its
own choosing, at Customers sole cost and expense. The EHC Group shall have the right to the
exclusive conduct of all negotiations, litigation, settlements and other proceedings arising from
any such claim and Customer shall, at its own cost and expense, render all assistance reasonably
requested by EHC in connection with any such negotiation, litigation, settlement or other
proceeding. The provisions of this Article VI shall survive expiration or termination of this
Agreement (for any reason or no reason whatsoever) indefinitely.
ARTICLE VII.
Warranty Disclaimer; Limitation of Liability
7.1. Warranty Disclaimer. NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING
ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, APPLY TO SERVICE PROVIDED
HEREUNDER OR THE EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES USED TO PROVIDE SERVICE. THE CONVEYING BY EHC OF
PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OR OTHER INFORMATION TO CUSTOMER SHALL IN NO WAY ALTER THIS DISCLAIMER.
7.2. Limitation of Liability. As a material condition of entering into this Agreement
at the price specified herein, and in regard to any and all causes arising out of or relating to
this Agreement, including but not limited to claims of negligence, breach of contract or warranty,
failure of a remedy to accomplish its essential purpose or otherwise, Customer agrees that EHCs
and EHCs Affiliates entire liability shall not exceed in the aggregate, the MRC paid by Customer
to EHC for Service in the month preceding the event that is the cause of liability, plus
any credits or refunds that are due with respect to such event pursuant to Article III or
Section 9.3, respectively. Customer agrees that in no event shall EHC or any of its
Affiliates or the manufacturer or launch service provider of the Satellite be liable for (i) any
indirect, incidental, consequential, punitive, special or other similar damages (whether in
contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability or under any other theory of liability),
including but not limited to loss of actual or anticipated revenues or profits, loss of business,
customers or goodwill, or damages and expenses arising out of third party claims or (ii) any
damages of whatever kind, in the event the Satellite is positioned at an orbital location other
than as specified in Section 1.1. The foregoing exclusions shall apply even if such
party(s) has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The provisions of this Article VII
shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement (for any reason or no reason whatsoever)
indefinitely.
-6-
ARTICLE VIII.
Confidentiality and Nondisclosure
8.1. Certain Information Regarding Service. Customer hereby agrees not to disclose to
third parties (without the prior written consent of EHC, which consent may be withheld in the sole
and absolute discretion of EHC for any reason or no reason) the terms and conditions of this
Agreement (including but not limited to the prices, payment terms, schedules, protection
arrangements, and restoration provisions of this Agreement) and all information provided to
Customer related to the design and performance characteristics of the Satellite, and any subsystems
or components thereof, including but not limited to the Transponder.
8.2. Proprietary Information. To the extent that either party discloses to the other any other information which it
considers proprietary, said party shall identify such information as proprietary when disclosing it
to the other party by marking it clearly and conspicuously as proprietary information. Any
proprietary disclosure to either party, if made orally, shall be identified as proprietary
information at the time of disclosure. Any such information disclosed under this Agreement shall
be used by the recipient thereof only in its performance under this Agreement. Neither party shall
be liable for the inadvertent or accidental disclosure of such information marked as proprietary,
if such disclosure occurs despite the exercising of the same degree of care as the receiving party
normally takes to preserve and safeguard its own proprietary information (but not less than
reasonable care) or if such information: (i) is or becomes lawfully available to the public from a
source other than the receiving party before or during the period of this Agreement; (ii) is
released in writing by the disclosing party without restrictions; (iii) is lawfully obtained by the
receiving party from a third party or parties without obligation of confidentiality; (iv) is
lawfully known by the receiving party prior to such disclosure; or (v) is at any time lawfully
developed by the receiving party completely independently of any such disclosure or disclosures
from the disclosing party. In addition, neither party shall be liable for the disclosure of any
proprietary information which it receives under this Agreement pursuant to judicial action or
decree, or pursuant to any requirement of any government or any agency or department thereof,
having jurisdiction over such party, provided that in the reasonable opinion of counsel for
such party such disclosure is required, and provided further that such party to the
extent reasonably practical shall have given the other party notice prior to such disclosure. The
provisions of this Article shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement (for any
reason or no reason whatsoever) indefinitely.
ARTICLE IX.
Termination
9.1. Termination for Convenience. Customer may terminate this Agreement for any
reason or no reason without penalty or any further obligation by providing at least sixty (60) days
prior written notice of termination to EHC.
9.2. Termination for Cause. In addition to any rights of termination provided in
other Articles of this Agreement, either party may terminate this Agreement by giving the other
party written notice thereof in the event: (i) the other party materially breaches this Agreement
-7-
and fails to cure such breach within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice thereof
(except that if Customer fails to pay amounts due hereunder, such cure period shall be reduced to
five (5) business days), provided, however, except for failure of Customer to pay amounts due under
this Agreement and except for breaches by Customer that could be expected to result in harm to the
Satellite and/or the Transponder, that if the event for which the notice is given is of a nature
that may not reasonably be cured within said thirty (30) day period, the non-breaching party shall
not have the right to terminate this Agreement under this Article for so long as the other party
commences good faith efforts to cure such breach within said thirty (30) day period and diligently
pursues such efforts to conclusion; or (ii) the other party is unable to perform its obligations as
a result of its becoming insolvent or the subject of insolvency proceedings,
including without limitation if the other party is judicially declared insolvent or bankrupt,
or if any assignment is made of the other partys property for the benefit of its creditors, or if
a receiver, conservator, trustee in bankruptcy or other similar officer is appointed by a court of
competent jurisdiction to take charge of all or any substantial part of the other partys property,
or if a petition is filed by or against the other party under any provision of the Bankruptcy Act
now or hereafter enacted, and such proceeding is not dismissed within sixty (60) days after filing;
or (iii) Interruption(s) with respect to more than fifty percent (50%) of the transponders leased
hereunder continue for thirty (30) consecutive days and the sole cause of the Interruption is a
Force Majeure Event. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement,
Customer acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement may be terminated by EHC upon the expiration
or earlier termination of any agreement(s) between Customer and/or any of its Affiliates, on the
one hand, and EHC and/or any of its Affiliates, on the other hand.
9.3. Refunds. In the event of the expiration of this Agreement pursuant to
Section 1.2 EHC shall be entitled to retain all amounts paid by Customer to EHC under this
Agreement, except that EHC shall refund any portion of amounts paid by Customer to EHC which relate
to Service not provided by EHC plus any credits that may be due to Customer pursuant to
Article III.
9.4. Termination Liability. In the event of termination of this Agreement, EHC shall
be entitled to retain all amounts paid by Customer to EHC under this Agreement, and any credits
that may otherwise be due to Customer pursuant to Article III shall be forfeited. In
addition, EHC may, in its sole and absolute discretion for any reason or no reason, elect to: (i)
pursue any and all rights and remedies it may have at law, in equity or otherwise (all of which are
hereby expressly reserved); or (ii) immediately recover from Customer as liquidated damages and not
as a penalty an amount equal to the net present value (as of the date of such termination) of the
remaining unpaid MRC, computed as if this Agreement remained in effect until the Projected
Termination Date, utilizing a discount rate of 5% per annum, plus late payment charges
pursuant to Section 2.2 on such amount from the date of termination until payment in full
(the Termination Value). If EHC elects (ii) above and recovers such amount, EHC agrees
to use reasonable efforts to obtain a qualified replacement customer(s), but shall not be required
to obtain a customer(s) for service on the surrendered Transponder(s) before obtaining a
customer(s) for any other unused transponder, to obtain any particular customer(s) or to set any
particular minimum price in connection with such service. In the event EHC does obtain a qualified
replacement customer(s), EHC thereafter shall pay to Customer eighty-five percent (85%) of the
gross proceeds received by EHC either (x) from the provision of service to such replacement
customer(s) using the Transponder(s) prior to the Projected Termination Date, or (y)
-8-
from the sale
of the Transponder(s) to such replacement customer(s) and attributable to the period prior to the
Projected Termination Date; provided that in no event shall such payment exceed the
Termination Value paid by Customer.
9.5. Inability to Regain Transponder. If upon expiration or termination of this Agreement for any reason or no reason by either
party, EHC is unable to regain the use of all, or any part of, the Transponder(s) free and clear of
any claims (including, but not limited to, claims of a debtor in bankruptcy) or liens arising as a
result of the use of the Transponder(s) by Customer or Customers Designees, then in addition to
all other remedies available to EHC pursuant to this Agreement, at law, in equity, or otherwise
(all of which are hereby expressly reserved), Customer shall be obligated, without regard to any
such termination or expiration, to continue to pay EHC the payments provided for in Article
II.
ARTICLE X.
General Provisions
10.1. Force Majeure. Neither party will be liable to the other by reason of any
failure in performance of this Agreement if the failure arises out of acts of God or of the public
enemy, acts of the other party, acts of any local, county, state, federal or other government in
its sovereign or contractual capacity, fires, floods, adverse weather conditions (including but not
limited to solar flares or sun outages with respect to satellite transmission interference),
epidemics, quarantines, restrictions, sabotage, acts of terrorism, acts of third parties, strikes
or other labor disturbances, freight embargoes, whole or partial satellite malfunctions, uplink
failure, or any other event which is beyond the reasonable control of that party (each, a
Force Majeure Event). In no event shall Customers failure to make payment when due be
excused by a Force Majeure Event.
10.2. No Implied License. The provision of services or the conveying of any
information under this Agreement shall not convey any license by implication, estoppel or
otherwise, under any patents or other intellectual property rights of Customer or EHC, and/or their
Affiliates, contractors and/or vendors.
10.3. No Third Party Rights; No Fiduciary Relationship. Nothing contained in this
Agreement shall be deemed or construed by the parties or by any third party to create any rights,
obligations or interests in third parties, or to create the relationship of principal and agent,
partnership or joint venture or any other fiduciary relationship or association between the
parties.
10.4. No Waiver; Remedies Cumulative. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any
of the terms of this Agreement will be binding unless in writing and signed by both parties. All
remedies and rights hereunder and those available under contract, in law, in equity and otherwise
shall be cumulative, and the exercise by a party of any such right or remedy shall not preclude the
exercise of any other right or remedy available under this Agreement in law, in equity, under
contract or otherwise (all of which are hereby expressly reserved). The failure of any party to
insist upon strict performance of any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach
of the same or similar nature.
-9-
10.5. Costs and Attorneys Fees. In addition to all other amounts payable under this
Agreement, EHC shall be entitled to recover from Customer: (i) costs of collection of any amounts,
including reasonable attorneys fees and disbursements; and (ii) costs, including reasonable
attorneys fees and disbursements, incurred in seeking to prevent use of Service contrary to the
terms of this Agreement. The provisions of this Article shall survive expiration or termination of
this Agreement (for any reason or no reason whatsoever) indefinitely.
10.6. Governing Law and Jurisdiction. Except as otherwise agreed to by the parties,
the relationship between the parties and their present and future Affiliates, including without
limitation all disputes, controversies or claims, whether arising in contract, tort, under statute
or otherwise, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Colorado, applicable to contracts to be made and performed entirely within the State of Colorado by
residents of the State of Colorado, without giving any effect to its conflict of law provisions.
The parties and their present and future Affiliates consent to and submit to the in personam
jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado and the appropriate
State Court located in Arapahoe County, State of Colorado for the purposes set forth in this
Article and waive, fully and completely, any objection to venue and right to dismiss and/or
transfer any action pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404 or 1406 (or any successor statute).
In the event that the United States District Court for the District of Colorado does not have
subject matter jurisdiction over any such matter, then such matter shall be litigated solely and
exclusively before the appropriate state court of competent jurisdiction located in Arapahoe
County, State of Colorado. The provisions of this Article shall survive expiration or termination
of this Agreement (for any reason or no reason whatsoever) indefinitely.
10.7. Headings; Severability; Customer Purchase Orders. All titles and headings in
this Agreement are for reference purposes only and will not affect the meaning or construction of
the terms of this Agreement. The parties agree that each provision of this Agreement shall be
construed as separable and divisible from every other provision and that the enforceability of any
one provision shall not limit the enforceability, in whole or in part, of any other provision
hereof. If any one or more of the provisions contained herein, or the application thereof to any
person, entity, or circumstance, for any reason are held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable
in any respect, then such provision(s) shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible, and the
remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be unaffected thereby and will remain in full force
and effect. Customer agrees that any purchase order or other similar document that Customer may
issue in connection with this Agreement will be for Customers internal purposes only and,
therefore, even if acknowledged by EHC, will not in any way add to, subtract from, or in any way
modify the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
10.8. Assignment. Customer may not assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement or any
or all of its rights and/or obligations under this Agreement to any third party without EHCs prior
written consent to such assignment or transfer, which consent may be withheld in the sole and
absolute discretion of EHC for any reason or no reason. EHC may, at any time and from time to time
in its sole and absolute discretion for any reason or no reason, assign this Agreement to an
Affiliate of EHC in whole or in part without the consent of Customer, which consent shall not be
required.
-10-
10.9. Construction. Customer and EHC hereby represent, warrant, acknowledge and agree
that the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against
the drafting party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement, including without
limitation any amendments hereto.
10.10. Facsimile Signatures; Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by
facsimile and/or in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of
which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
10.11. Trademarks. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed to give Customer any
rights to use any EHC trademarks, service marks, or logos without the express prior written consent
of EHC, which consent may be withheld for any reason or no reason in the sole and absolute
discretion of EHC.
10.12. Entire Agreement/Amendments. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. Except as otherwise
expressly provided herein, no party shall be bound by any communications between them on the
subject matter of this Agreement, unless the communication is: (i) in writing; (ii) bears a date
contemporaneous with or subsequent to the date of this Agreement; and (iii) is signed by all
parties to this Agreement. The parties specifically acknowledge there are no unwritten side
agreements or oral agreements between the parties regarding the subject matter of this Agreement
which alter, amend, modify or supplement this Agreement. In the event of any conflict or
inconsistency between the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Agreement and the
terms and conditions set forth in any Attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the
body of this Agreement shall control. In addition to any provisions of this Agreement that
expressly survive termination or expiration, any provision of this Agreement that logically would
be expected to survive termination or expiration, shall survive for a reasonable time period under
the circumstances.
10.13. No Offsets. In no event shall Customer or any of its Affiliates offset any amounts due to EHC or any of
its Affiliates from Customer or any of its Affiliates for any reason, against amounts owed to
Customer or any of its Affiliates by EHC or any of its Affiliates. If Customer and/or any of its
Affiliates are indebted to EHC or any of its Affiliates for any reason, Customer and its Affiliates
hereby acknowledge and agree that EHC and its Affiliates shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to offset any such amounts due to EHC or its Affiliates from Customer or its Affiliates
for any reason against any money otherwise due to Customer or its Affiliates from EHC or its
Affiliates, as well as any and all amounts for which EHC and/or any of its Affiliates may become
liable to third parties by reason of Customers and/or any of its Affiliates acts in performing
or failing to perform, Customers and/or any of its Affiliates obligations under this Agreement or
any other agreement. Further, EHC and/or its Affiliates may, but shall have no obligation to,
withhold such sums from any monies due or to become due to Customer and/or its Affiliates under
this Agreement and/or any other agreement or from funds or equipment to be paid or disbursed to
Customer and/or its Affiliates pursuant to business dealings between the parties and/or their
respective Affiliates not reflected in any contract, as EHC, at any time and from time to time in
its sole and absolute discretion for any reason or no reason, deems necessary to protect EHC and/or
any of its Affiliates from any loss, damage, or expense relating to or arising out of Customers or
any of its Affiliates actions,
-11-
inaction or performance under this Agreement or any other
agreement, or in response to any claim or threatened claim of which EHC becomes aware concerning
Customer or its Affiliates or the performance of Customers or any of its Affiliates duties under
this Agreement or any other agreement. The provisions of this Article shall survive expiration or
termination of this Agreement for any reason or no reason indefinitely.
ARTICLE XI.
Definitions
The following definitions shall apply to all capitalized terms, whether used in the singular
or plural form, which are not otherwise defined in this Agreement:
Affiliate means any person or entity directly or indirectly controlling, controlled
by or under common control with another person or entity.
Business Preemptible Service or Business Preemptible Transponder means a
satellite service or transponder that is not entitled to restoration in the event it becomes a
Transponder Failure and may be preempted at any time to restore:
(i) a satellite failure; (ii) a
Protected Service or Protected Transponder that becomes a transponder
failure; (iii) any other
service or transponder (including a Preemptible Service or Preemptible Transponder) experiencing
technical difficulties or interference; or (iv) other service offerings of EHC or any of its
Affiliates, including but not limited to mass move protection, construction and launch delay
protection and launch failure protection. In addition, such Business Preemptible Service or
Business Preemptible Transponder may be preempted for any other reason (including but not limited
to, EHCs desire to provide service on such Transponder to another customer).
End-of-Life means the date on which, in EHCs reasonable judgment, a satellite
should be taken out of service because of insufficient fuel.
Fully Protected Service means a satellite service that may not be preempted to
restore another service, and if restoration thereof is needed as a result of a satellite failure or
as a result of a transponder failure under circumstances in which no Protection Transponder is
available on the satellite on which such satellite service is located, is entitled to restoration,
subject to availability of facilities and to the conditions of the applicable contract, on another
satellite.
Interruption means any period during which a Transponder fails to meet the
Transponder Performance Specifications set forth in Attachment A (or, following a
reassignment or relocation pursuant to Section 3.3, the substantial equivalent thereof) and
such circumstances preclude the use of the Transponder for its intended purpose.
Non-Preemptible Service means a satellite service on which such service is provided
that may not be preempted to restore another service and that is not itself entitled to be restored
by preempting any other service or by using a Replacement Transponder or a vacant transponder.
-12-
Preemptible Service or Preemptible Transponder means a satellite service
or transponder that is not entitled to restoration in the event it becomes a Transponder Failure
and may be preempted at any time to restore: (i) a satellite
failure; (ii) a Protected Service or
Protected Transponder that becomes a transponder failure; or (iii) other service offerings of EHC or
any of its Affiliates, including but not limited to mass move protection, construction and launch
delay protection and launch failure protection.
Protected Service or Protected Transponder means a service or transponder
that is entitled to preempt a Preemptible Service or Preemptible Transponder.
Protection Transponder means a Replacement Transponder or Preemptible Transponder
used to restore a Protected Service.
Replacement Date means the date on which a Replacement Satellite is made capable of
carrying communications traffic at the orbital location to which the Satellite is assigned and,
following EHC testing and verification, EHC determines that such satellite is ready for commercial
operation.
Replacement Satellite means any replacement or successor to the then-current
Satellite or to the Ku-band payload of the Satellite which is capable of carrying communications
traffic at the orbital location to which the Satellite is assigned and providing performance
substantially equivalent to the Transponder Performance Specifications set forth in Attachment
A.
Replacement Transponder means a spare transponder, which is accessible for purposes
of providing restoration and which is capable of carrying communications traffic within the
parameters as described in the transponder performance specifications for the transponder to be
restored.
Reverse Contract Order means, as to each service or transponder on the Satellite, in
order from the latest date on which a binding agreement for the taking of such
service has been executed by both a customer and EHC, to the earliest such date. If Reverse
Contract Order is to be determined among more than one class of service, then Reverse Contract
Order means first in order from the latest such date to the earliest such date among Business
Preemptible Services, second in such order among Preemptible Services, third in such order among
Non-Preemptible Services, fourth in such order among Transponder Protected Services and last in
such order among Fully Protected Services. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any service being
provided to the United States government or any department or agency thereof, whether through a
prime contract or a subcontract, shall be deemed to have an earlier date of binding agreement than
Customer hereunder.
Satellite means the communications spacecraft designated [__________] to be operated by
EHC or in accordance with Section 1.1, a Replacement Satellite. When used in the lower
case, satellite means a domestic communications satellite operating in Ku-band.
-13-
Satellite Failure means a satellite:
1) on which one or more of the basic subsystems fail, rendering the use of the satellite for
its intended purposes impractical, as determined by EHC in its reasonable business judgment, or on
which more than one-half of the transponders on the payload are transponder failures; and
2) that EHC has declared a failure.
For purposes of this definition, a hybrid satellite with multiple band payloads shall be
treated, at EHCs option, either: (i) as a single satellite; or (ii) as though the multiple band
payloads were located on separate satellites.
Transponder means a Ku-band radio frequency transmission channel on the Satellite,
used to provide service to Customer pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Customer acknowledges
and agrees that due to circumstances, including but not limited to the characteristics of
Customers traffic, Customers ground segment configuration, and the characteristics of traffic on
cross polarized transponders on the Satellite and of carriers on satellites in proximity to the
Satellite, the entire bandwidth of the Transponder may not be usable by Customer for the operation
of all types of carriers. When used in the lower case, transponder means a Ku-band radio
frequency transmission channel on a communications satellite.
Transponder Authority means all retransmission consents and any and all other
consents, authorizations and approvals required by law or under contract and/or pursuant to any
governmental action (including but not limited to any consent, authorization and/or approval
required under the rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission) for Customers
use of the Services, Satellite and/or Transponder.
Transponder Failure means, with respect to any Transponder used to provide service
to Customer under this Agreement, any of the following events:
1) such Transponder fails to meet the Transponder Performance Specifications set forth in
Attachment A (or, following a reassignment or relocation pursuant to
Section 1.1 or Section 3.3, the substantial equivalent thereof) in any
material respect for any period of five (5) consecutive days;
2) twenty (20) or more creditable Interruptions of fifteen (15) minutes or more in duration
shall occur within any ninety (90) consecutive days; or
3) such Transponder shall fail to meet the Transponder Performance Specifications set forth in
Attachment A (or, following a relocation or reassignment pursuant to Section 1.1 or
Section 3.3, the substantial equivalent thereof) in any material respect for any period of
time under circumstances that make it clearly ascertainable or predictable, based on satellite
industry engineering standards, that a failure set forth in Paragraphs 1) or 2) above will occur.
-14-
For the purpose of this definition, measurement of periods of failure hereunder shall commence
when Customer has vacated its signal to permit verification of the existence of the failure by EHC.
Transponder Protected Service means a satellite service that may not be preempted to
restore another service, that is itself entitled to be restored by Protection Transponders on the
same satellite in the event it becomes a Transponder Failure but that is not entitled to be
restored if there is no such Protection Transponder available.
-15-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute
this Agreement as of the date and year first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECHOSTAR HOLDING CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECHOSTAR SATELLITE L.L.C.
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
exv99w1
EXHIBIT 99.1
EchoStar
Communications Corporation
9601 S. Meridian Blvd.
Englewood, Colorado 80112
December [ ], 2007
Dear EchoStar Communications Corporation Shareholder:
We are pleased to inform you that on December 11, 2007, the
Board of Directors of EchoStar Communications Corporation
approved the spin-off of EchoStar Holding Corporation, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of EchoStar Communications Corporation.
EchoStar Holding Corporation will hold the technology and
certain infrastructure assets of EchoStar Communications
Corporation. EchoStar Communications Corporation will retain its
consumer pay-TV business, DISH Network. We believe that our
separation into two independent publicly-traded companies is in
the best interests of each of the businesses. Immediately
following the completion of the spin-off, EchoStar
Communications Corporation intends to change its name to
DISH Network Corporation.
The spin-off of EchoStar Holding Corporation is anticipated to
occur on or about January 1, 2008 by way of a pro rata
dividend to EchoStar Communications Corporation shareholders.
For each share of EchoStar Communications Corporation
Class A common stock or Class B common stock you hold
as of 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on December 27,
2007, which is the record date of the spin-off, you will be
entitled to receive a dividend of 0.20 of a share of the
same class of EchoStar Holding Corporation common stock. Please
note that if you sell your shares of Class A common stock
of EchoStar Communications Corporation after the record date but
before the distribution date, the buyer of those shares will be
entitled to receive the shares of our Class A common stock
issuable in respect of the shares sold. The distribution of
shares of our Class A common stock will be made in
book-entry form, which means that no physical Class A stock
certificates will be issued in the distribution. No fractional
shares of EchoStar Holding Corporation Class A or
Class B common stock will be issued. If you would have been
entitled to a fractional share of EchoStar Holding Corporation
Class A common stock in the distribution, you will receive
cash in lieu of a fractional share interest.
Shareholder approval of the spin-off is not required, and you
are not required to take any action to receive shares of
EchoStar Holding Corporation common stock.
Immediately following the spin-off, you will own shares of
common stock of both EchoStar Communications Corporation and
EchoStar Holding Corporation. EchoStar Communications
Corporation Class A common stock will continue to trade on
the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol
DISH. We have applied to list our Class A
common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol
SATS.
We expect the spin-off to be tax-free for all shareholders of
EchoStar Communications Corporation, except for any cash
received in lieu of fractional shares. To that end, we have
received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service confirming
that the spin-off will be tax free to shareholders of EchoStar
Communications Corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. The spin-off is subject to certain customary
conditions, including the receipt of any necessary regulatory
approvals.
The enclosed information statement, which is being mailed to all
EchoStar Communications Corporation shareholders, describes the
spin-off and contains important information about EchoStar
Holding Corporation, including its historical and pro forma
combined financial statements.
We look forward to your continued support as a shareholder in
both EchoStar Communications Corporation and EchoStar Holding
Corporation.
Sincerely,
Charles W. Ergen
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EchoStar
Holding Corporation
90
Inverness Circle East
Englewood, Colorado 80112
December [ ], 2007
Dear EchoStar Holding Corporation Shareholder:
It is my pleasure to welcome you as a shareholder of our new
company, EchoStar Holding Corporation. As an independent,
publicly-traded company, we believe we can more effectively
focus on our objectives and satisfy the strategic needs of our
company. In addition, we will have the opportunity to offer our
employees incentive opportunities linked to our performance as
an independent, publicly-traded company, which we believe will
enhance employee performance.
EchoStar Holding Corporation intends to operate two primary
businesses, a digital set-top box business and a fixed satellite
services business:
|
|
|
Digital Set-Top Boxes. Our set-top box
business designs, develops and distributes award-winning digital
set-top boxes and related products for direct-to-home satellite
service providers. In 2006, our set-top box business shipped
over nine million set-top boxes. Most of these set-top boxes
were sold to EchoStar Communications Corporation, but we also
sold set-top boxes to Bell ExpressVu and other international
customers.
|
|
|
Fixed Satellite Services. Our fixed satellite
services business will be developed using the nine owned or
leased in-orbit satellites and related FCC licenses, a network
of seven full service digital broadcast centers, and leased
fiber optic capacity with points of presence in approximately
150 cities that will be contributed to us by EchoStar
Communications Corporation. We expect that our primary customer
will initially be EchoStar Communications Corporation. However,
we will also lease capacity in the spot market and to government
and enterprise customers.
|
We have applied to list our Class A common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol SATS.
We currently expect that our Class A common stock will
begin trading on January 2, 2008.
I invite you to learn more about EchoStar Holding Corporation by
reviewing the enclosed information statement. We thank you in
advance for your support as a shareholder in EchoStar Holding
Corporation.
Sincerely,
Charles W. Ergen
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Information contained herein is subject to completion or
amendment. A registration statement on Form 10 relating to
these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
DECEMBER 26, 2007
INFORMATION STATEMENT
ECHOSTAR HOLDING
CORPORATION
90 Inverness Circle E.
Englewood, Colorado 80112
Class A Common Stock
Class B Common Stock
(par value $0.001 per share)
We are sending this information statement to you to describe the
spin-off of EchoStar Holding Corporation. Prior to the spin-off
described in this information statement, we were a wholly-owned
subsidiary of EchoStar Communications Corporation, which we
refer to as ECC. We are engaged in the design, development and
distribution of set-top boxes, antennae and other equipment for
the direct to home satellite television industry.
Following the spin-off, we will also be engaged in the provision
of fixed satellite transmission services. We expect that the
spin-off will be tax-free to ECC shareholders for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, except for any cash
received in lieu of fractional shares. We have received a ruling
from the Internal Revenue Service confirming that the spin-off
will be tax free to shareholders of EchoStar Communications
Corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Immediately
following the spin-off, ECC intends to change its name to
DISH Network Corporation.
For each share of ECC Class A common stock or ECC
Class B common stock held by you as of 5:00 p.m.,
New York City time, on December 27, 2007, the record
date for the spin-off, you will receive 0.20 of a share of the
same class of our common stock. The distribution of shares of
our Class A common stock will be made in book-entry form,
which means that no physical Class A stock certificates
will be issued in the distribution. No fractional shares of
EchoStar Holding Corporation Class A or Class B common
stock will be issued. If as a result of the foregoing ratio you
would be entitled to receive a fraction of a share of our
Class A common stock, you will receive cash in lieu of such
fractional share interest. We expect the shares of our
Class A common stock and Class B common stock to be
distributed by ECC to you on or about January 1, 2008,
which we refer to as the distribution date.
No vote of ECCs shareholders is required in connection
with the spin-off. We are not asking you for a proxy and you are
requested not to send us a proxy. No action is required of you
to receive shares of our common stock, which means that:
|
|
|
you will not be required to pay for the shares of any class of
our common stock that you receive in the spin-off, and
|
|
|
you do not need to surrender or exchange shares of any class of
ECC common stock in order to receive shares of our common stock,
or to take any other action in connection with the spin-off.
|
There is no current trading market for any class of our common
stock. We expect, however, that a limited trading market for our
Class A common stock, commonly known as a when
issued trading market, will develop shortly after the
record date for the spin-off, and we expect regular
way trading of our Class A common stock will begin
the first trading day after the distribution date. We have
applied to list our Class A common stock on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market under the symbol SATS. We
expect that our Class A common stock will begin trading on
January 2, 2008. Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, will immediately after the distribution date
beneficially own approximately 50.0% of our outstanding equity
and possess approximately 80.0% of the total voting power
represented by all of our common stock, which is equivalent to
his ownership and voting interests in ECC.
In reviewing this information statement, you should carefully
consider the matters described under the caption Risk
Factors beginning on page 16.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved these
securities or determined if this information statement is
truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
This information statement is not an offer to sell, or a
solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities.
The date of this information statement is
December [ ], 2007.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
|
|
i
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this information statement and provides an overview of our
company and the material aspects of our spin-off from ECC. It is
intended for convenience only and should not be considered
complete. You should read the entire information statement
carefully, particularly the risk factors discussed beginning on
page 16, and our combined audited and unaudited historical
and unaudited pro forma financial statements and notes to those
statements appearing elsewhere in this information statement.
References in this information statement to
(i) EHC, Spinco, we,
our and us refer to EchoStar Holding
Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, after giving
effect to the spin-off and (ii) EchoStar
Communications Corporation, ECC and DISH
Network refer to EchoStar Communications Corporation and
its consolidated subsidiaries, other than us, unless the context
otherwise requires. The transaction in which we will be
separated from ECC is sometimes referred to in this information
statement as the separation, the
distribution or the spin-off.
We describe in this information statement the businesses to
be transferred to us by ECC in connection with the spin-off as
if the transferred businesses were our businesses. However, we
are a newly formed entity and we have not conducted any
operations prior to the spin-off. Our historical and pro forma
financial data included in this information statement may not be
indicative of our future performance and does not necessarily
reflect what our financial condition and results of operations
would have been had we operated as a separate, stand-alone
entity during the periods presented, particularly since changes
will occur in our operations and capitalization as a result of
our spin-off from ECC.
Our historical combined financial statements reflect the
historical financial position and results of operations of
entities included in the consolidated financial statements of
ECC, representing almost exclusively ECCs set-top box
business, using the historical results of operations and
historical bases of assets and liabilities of this business. Our
historical combined financial statements included herein reflect
sales to ECC at cost and do not include certain satellites,
uplink and satellite transmission assets, real estate and other
assets and related liabilities that will be contributed to us by
ECC in the spin-off. These assets and liabilities, which will
primarily comprise our fixed satellite services business, have
been separately audited and are included in the Statement of Net
Assets to be Contributed by ECC and Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
and Adjusted Financial Information included herein. The
financial condition and results of operations of our fixed
satellite services business have not been included in our
historical combined financial statements because our fixed
satellite services business was operated as an integral part of
ECCs subscription television business and did not
constitute a business in the historical financial
statements of ECC. Our historical financial data also does not
include financial information of Sling Media, Inc., which was
recently acquired by ECC and will be contributed to us in the
spin-off. Sling Medias audited consolidated financial
statements are included elsewhere in this information statement,
and its historical financial information also has been included
in our Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Adjusted Financial
Information.
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
Our
Business
We intend to operate two primary businesses, a digital set-top
box business and a fixed satellite services business. We expect
that the primary customer for each of these businesses initially
will be ECC.
Digital
Set-Top
Boxes
Our set-top box business designs, develops and distributes
award-winning digital set-top boxes and related products for
direct-to-home satellite service providers. In 2006, our set-top
box business shipped over nine million set-top boxes. Most of
these set-top boxes were sold to ECC, but we also sold set-top
boxes to Bell ExpressVu and other international customers. We
currently employ over 700 engineers in our set-top box business.
Fixed
Satellite Services
Our fixed satellite services business will be developed using
nine owned or leased in-orbit satellites and related FCC
licenses, a network of seven full service digital broadcast
centers, and leased fiber optic capacity
1
with points of presence in approximately 150 cities. All of
these assets and related contracted liabilities will be
contributed to us in the spin-off. We expect that our primary
customer initially will be ECC. However, we will also lease
capacity in the spot market and to government and enterprise
customers.
Other
Business Opportunities
ECC has entered into agreements to construct and launch an
S-band satellite and to lease its transponder capacity to a Hong
Kong joint venture, which in turn will sublease a portion of the
transponder capacity to an affiliate of a Chinese governmental
entity to support the development of satellite-delivered mobile
video services in China. ECC has also recently completed several
strategic investments and we intend to evaluate strategic
development and investment opportunities both in the
United States and in international markets. These
investments of ECC will be transferred to us as part of the
spin-off, and are part of our strategy to expand our business
and support the development of new satellite-delivered services,
such as mobile video services. The expertise we develop through
these investments may also help us to improve and expand the
services that we provide to our existing customers. However,
these investments involve a high degree of risk and are
concentrated in a few companies. The risks of these investments
include, among other things, the risks that required regulatory
approvals and other conditions may not be obtained or satisfied,
that these companies may not be able to enter into distribution
and other relationships, and that the companies in which we
invest or with whom we partner may not be able to compete
effectively in their markets or that there may be insufficient
demand for the new services planned by these companies.
Sling
Media, Inc.
Sling Media, Inc. was acquired in October 2007 by ECC and will
be transferred to us as part of the spin-off. Sling Media is the
maker of the Slingbox, which allows consumers to watch and
control their television programming at any time, from any
location, using personal computers, personal digital assistants,
smartphones and other digital media devices. This information
statement includes historical financial statements and other
information regarding Sling Media.
Our
Strategy
We intend to pursue the following key strategies:
|
|
|
Expand set-top box business to additional
customers. We believe our separation from ECC may
enhance our opportunities to sell set-top boxes to a broader
group of multi-channel video distributors. Historically, certain
multi-channel video distributors have perceived us as a
competitor due to our affiliation with ECC. After the spin-off,
we believe we could have opportunities to enter into commercial
relationships with these multi-channel video distributors. There
can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful in
entering into any of these commercial relationships,
particularly if we continue to be perceived as affiliated with
ECC as a result of common ownership and related management.
|
|
|
Leverage satellite capacity and related
infrastructure. Our fixed satellite services
business has excess satellite and leased fiber capacity that we
believe was in large part created through innovation and
operational efficiencies at ECC. While we expect that ECC will
initially be our primary customer for fixed satellite services,
we believe market opportunities exist to utilize our capacity to
provide digital video distribution, satellite-delivered IP,
corporate communications and government services to a broader
customer base.
|
|
|
Offer comprehensive network infrastructure
solutions. We intend to leverage our over 700
engineers to customize infrastructure solutions for a broader
base of customers. For example, we could offer a customer the
ability to deliver a fully integrated video programming delivery
solution, incorporating our satellite and backhaul capacity,
customized set-top boxes and network design and management
services.
|
|
|
Capitalize on change in regulations. Changes
in federal law and regulations applicable to the set-box
industry may create opportunities for us to expand our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital transition. Congress has mandated that
by February 2009 all network broadcasts be transmitted
digitally, which will require households that receive
over-the-air broadcast signals with an analog television to
obtain a digital converter device. This digital converter device
is a new product
|
2
and we believe that we are in a position to develop and market
devices that could allow us to effectively compete in this new
market.
|
|
|
|
|
Removable security systems. The Federal
Communications Commission, or FCC, mandated that by July 2007
cable providers use removable security modules to provide
conditional access security for television content. The FCC
intends for this regulation to spur competition in the retail
cable set-top box market, providing an even playing field
between leased cable set-top boxes and retail-bought,
cable-ready TVs and cable set-top box equipment. We believe this
new regulation may create an opportunity for us to compete on a
more level field in the domestic market for cable set-top boxes.
|
|
|
|
Exploit international opportunities. We
believe that direct-to-home satellite service is particularly
well-suited for countries without extensive cable
infrastructure, and we intend to continue to try to secure new
customer relationships from international direct-to-home
satellite service providers.
|
|
|
Pursue strategic partnerships, joint ventures and
acquisitions. We intend to selectively pursue
partnerships, joint ventures and strategic acquisition
opportunities that we believe may allow us to expand into new
markets, broaden our portfolio of products or intellectual
property, and strengthen our relationships with our customers.
|
|
|
Act on the set-top box replacement cycle. The
broader adoption of high definition television by consumers will
require more advanced compression and security technologies
within set-top boxes. This may launch a replacement cycle,
particularly among subscription television providers with
substantial bases of legacy equipment, which may create
additional market opportunities for us.
|
Summary
Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock involves risks associated
with our business, the spin-off and ownership of our common
stock. The following list of risk factors is not exhaustive.
Please review and consider carefully the risks relating to these
and other matters summarized below and described in greater
detail under the section entitled Risk Factors
beginning on page 16 of this information statement.
General
Risks Affecting Our Business
|
|
|
We may not realize the potential benefits that we expect from
the spin-off. Certain of these benefits depend upon market
acceptance of our separation from ECC which we cannot predict
and which may be affected by significant common stock ownership
by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer as well as
interlocks between our management and board of directors. In
addition, we will incur significant costs as a separate company,
which may exceed our estimates. We will also incur some negative
effects from our separation from ECC, including loss of access
to ECCs financial resources.
|
|
|
We currently depend on ECC and Bell Express Vu for substantially
all of our revenue, and the loss of, or a significant reduction
in orders from, either of these two customers would
significantly reduce our revenue and adversely impact our
operating results. ECC accounted for over 80% of our revenue in
each of the last three years and the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and it is under no obligation to remain
our customer in the future.
|
|
|
|
We currently have substantial unused satellite capacity. Future
costs associated with this excess capacity will negatively
impact our margins if we do not generate revenue to offset these
costs. In addition, because a substantial portion of the
capacity of each of our AMC-15, AMC-16 and EchoStar IX
satellites remains unused, there is a significant risk that in
the future, in addition to reporting lower than expected
revenues and profitability, we will be required to record a
substantial impairment charge relating to one or more of these
satellites. We currently estimate that these potential charges
could aggregate up to $250 million, which, if incurred
would have a material adverse effect on our reported operating
results and financial position. Furthermore, it is possible that
in 2008 ECC will discontinue the use of some or all of the
capacity on one or more other satellites that it will initially
lease from us. To the extent that this occurs and we are unable
to find other customers to lease this additional excess
capacity, we may be required to record substantial additional
impairment charges that we currently estimate could aggregate up
to $100 million. We performed a preliminary assessment of
the recoverability of the satellites to be contributed by ECC as
if the
|
3
|
|
|
spin-off had been consummated and preliminarily concluded that
the recoverability of the satellites will not be impaired as of
the distribution date.
|
|
|
|
Our historical combined and pro forma financial information
included in this information statement are not indicative of our
future financial position, future results of operations or
future cash flows, nor do they reflect what our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows would have been as
a stand-alone company during the periods presented. We were not
profitable in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
each of 2006, 2005 and 2004, as our operations have historically
been dedicated primarily to support ECC and we provided our
products and services to ECC at cost.
|
|
|
Our ability to decrease our losses or to generate revenues will
depend in part on our ability to grow our business. This may
require significant additional capital that may not be available
to us. We may also use a significant portion of our existing
cash and marketable securities to fund stock buyback programs.
Our board of directors has approved a program in which we may
repurchase up to $1.0 billion of our Class A common
stock during 2008.
|
|
|
If ECC enters into a business combination transaction, or
Mr. Ergen no longer controls a majority of the voting power
of ECC or of us, our relationship with ECC could be terminated
or substantially curtailed with little or no advance notice. Any
material reduction in our sales to ECC as a result of a change
in control of ECC would have a significant material adverse
effect on our business and financial position.
|
|
|
Our future success may depend on our ability to identify and
successfully exploit opportunities to acquire other businesses
or technologies to complement, enhance or expand our current
business or products or otherwise offer us growth opportunities.
We may not be able to pursue these growth opportunities
successfully.
|
|
|
We have entered into certain strategic transactions and
investments in Asia and elsewhere, and we may increase our
strategic investment activity in the United States and in
international markets. These investments, which we believe could
become substantial over time, involve a high degree of risk, are
concentrated in a few companies and could expose us to
significant financial losses if the underlying ventures are not
successful. These investments may also cause us to defer or
suspend share repurchases.
|
|
|
Our business relies on intellectual property, some of which is
owned by third parties, and we may inadvertently infringe their
patents and proprietary rights. We may be required to cease
developing or marketing infringing products, to obtain licenses
from the holders of the intellectual property at a material
cost, or to redesign those products in such a way as to avoid
infringing the patent claims of others.
|
|
|
Our businesses change rapidly as new technologies are developed.
These new technologies may cause our services and products to
become obsolete. Changes in existing technologies could also
cause demand for our products and services to decline.
|
Risks
Affecting Our Set-Top Box Business
|
|
|
We depend on sales of set-top boxes for nearly all of our
revenue, and if sales of our set-top boxes decline, our business
and financial position will suffer. The set-top box business is
highly competitive and our ability to compete in this industry
will depend substantially on our ability to develop and
manufacture products and services at competitive costs,
successfully bring new technologies to market and penetrate new
markets for set-top boxes, including among customers such as
cable television operators that are competitors of DISH Network
and have historically been and may continue to be reluctant to
deal with us. These potential customers also have well
established relationships with other set-top box providers, such
as Motorola and Cisco Systems, which acquired Scientific Atlanta
in 2006.
|
|
|
Our commercial success in selling our set-top boxes to cable
television operators depends significantly on our ability to
obtain licenses to use the conditional access systems deployed
by these operators in our set-top boxes. The owners of these
conditional access systems are also in many cases competitors of
ours. There can be no assurance we will be able to obtain such
licenses on acceptable terms or at all.
|
|
|
In order to grow our revenue and business and to build a large
customer base, we believe we will be required to increase our
sales of set-top boxes in international markets. We have limited
experience selling our set-top boxes internationally. To succeed
in expanding these sales efforts, we believe we must hire
|
4
|
|
|
additional sales personnel and develop and manage new
relationships with cable operators and other providers of
digital television in international markets.
|
|
|
|
Our set-top boxes are extremely complex and can have defects in
design, manufacture or associated software. We could incur
significant expenses, lost revenue, and reputational harm if we
fail to detect or effectively address such issues through
design, testing or warranty repairs.
|
|
|
We obtain many components for our set-top boxes from a single
supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance on a
single or limited group of suppliers, particularly foreign
suppliers, and our increasing reliance on subcontractors,
involves several risks. These risks include a potential
inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components,
and reduced control over pricing, quality, and timely delivery
of these components.
|
|
|
Future demand for our set-top boxes will depend significantly on
the growing market acceptance of high definition television, or
HDTV. The effective delivery of HDTV will depend on digital
television operators developing and building infrastructure to
provide wide-spread HDTV programming.
|
|
|
During April 2006, a jury concluded that certain of our digital
video recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by Tivo. If
the Tivo jury verdict is upheld on appeal, to the extent that
ECC does not indemnify us, we will be required to pay
substantial damages
and/or
license fees, and if we were not able to successfully implement
alternative technology (including the successful defense of any
challenge that such technology infringes Tivos patent), we
could also be prohibited from distributing DVRs, or be required
to modify or eliminate certain user-friendly DVR features that
we currently offer to consumers.
|
Risks
Affecting Our Fixed Satellite Services Business
|
|
|
The fixed satellite services industry is highly competitive and
is characterized by long-term leases and high switching costs.
Therefore, it will be difficult to displace customers from their
current relationships with our well-established competitors and
we may face competition from others in the future.
|
|
|
Satellites are subject to significant operational risks while in
orbit. While we believe that our satellite fleet is generally in
good condition, certain satellites in our fleet have experienced
malfunctions or anomalies, some of which have had a significant
adverse impact on their commercial operation. There can be no
assurance that we can recover critical transmission capacity in
the event one or more of our in-orbit satellites were to fail.
Therefore, the loss of a satellite or other satellite
malfunctions or anomalies could have a material adverse effect
on us.
|
|
|
We are subject to comprehensive governmental regulation by the
FCC for our domestic satellite operations. We are also regulated
by other federal agencies, state and local authorities and the
International Telecommunication Union. Domestic and
international regulations regarding the licensing, authorization
and operations of satellite communications providers may
restrict our fixed satellite services operations.
|
|
|
ECC has not historically carried and we do not anticipate
carrying insurance for any of the in-orbit satellites that we
will own.
|
Risks
Relating to the Spin-Off
|
|
|
The allocation of assets, liabilities, rights, indemnifications
and other obligations between ECC and us under the separation
agreement and the related commercial and other agreements we
will enter into with ECC may not reflect what two unaffiliated
parties might have agreed to.
|
|
|
|
ECC has received a private letter ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service, or IRS, to the effect that, among other things,
the spin-off, together with certain related transactions, will
qualify for tax-free treatment under Sections 355 and
368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. Although a private letter ruling
relating to the qualification of the spin-off under
Sections 355 and 368(a)(l)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, generally will be binding on the IRS, the
validity of such ruling, if obtained, will be subject to the
accuracy of factual representations and assumptions made in the
ruling request. If the spin-off does not qualify for tax-free
treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then, in
general, ECC would be subject to tax as if it had sold the
common stock of our company in a taxable sale for its fair
market value. ECCs shareholders would be subject to tax as
if they had received a distribution equal to the fair market
value of our common stock that was distributed to them, which
would be treated as a taxable dividend to the extent of
ECCs
|
5
|
|
|
earnings and profits. It is expected that the amount of any such
taxes to ECC and its shareholders would be substantial.
|
|
|
|
Actual or perceived conflicts of interest may arise between ECC
and us in a number of areas relating to our past and ongoing
relationships, including: (i) cross officerships,
directorships and stock ownership, (ii) intercompany
transactions, (iii) intercompany agreements and
(iv) business opportunities. In particular, Charles W.
Ergen will be the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board and will beneficially own approximately 50.0% of the total
equity and control 80.0% of the total voting power, of each of
ECC and us. Thus, Mr. Ergen will have the ability to elect
a majority of ECCs and our directors and to control all
other matters requiring the approval of ECCs and our
shareholders.
|
Risks
Relating to our Common Stock and the Securities Market
|
|
|
An active trading market may not develop or be sustained for our
Class A common stock after the spin-off. In addition, the
prices at which our Class A common stock may trade after
the spin-off may decline or be subject to volatility.
|
|
|
We expect that some of our shareholders, including possibly some
of our larger shareholders, will sell the Class A common
stock that they receive in the spin-off because, among other
reasons, our business profile or market capitalization as an
independent, publicly-traded company do not fit their investment
objectives. These sales may adversely affect the market price
for our Class A common stock as well as the market
perception of our business.
|
|
|
We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common
stock. We intend to retain any earnings to finance the operation
and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying
any cash dividends in the future.
|
Other
Information
We are a Nevada corporation. Our principal executive offices are
located at 90 Inverness Circle E., Englewood, Colorado 80112.
Our telephone number is
(303) 723-1000.
6
Summary
Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Adjusted
Financial Data
The following tables set forth our summary historical and
unaudited pro forma combined and adjusted financial data. The
summary historical combined financial data relating to our
combined financial condition and results of operations for each
of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 are derived from our historical
combined financial statements for the corresponding periods
included elsewhere in this information statement. The historical
combined financial data for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 reflects, in our opinion, all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary to fairly present the data for such interim periods.
The data should be read in conjunction with our historical
combined financial statements and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included elsewhere in this information
statement.
Our historical combined financial data included in this
information statement may not be indicative of our future
performance and does not necessarily reflect what our financial
condition and results of operations would have been had we
operated as a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods
presented, particularly since changes will occur in our
operations and capitalization as a result of our spin-off from
ECC.
Our historical combined financial statements reflect the
historical financial position and results of operations of
entities included in the consolidated financial statements of
ECC, representing almost exclusively ECCs set-top box
business, using the historical results of operations and
historical bases of assets and liabilities of this business. Our
historical combined financial statements included herein reflect
sales to ECC at cost and do not include certain satellites,
uplink and satellite transmission assets, real estate and other
assets and related liabilities that will be contributed to us by
ECC in the spin-off. These assets and liabilities, which will
primarily comprise our fixed satellite services business, have
been separately audited and are included in the Statement
of Net Assets to be Contributed by ECC and Unaudited
Pro Forma Combined and Adjusted Financial Information
included herein. The financial condition and results of
operations of our fixed satellite services business have not
been included in our historical combined financial statements
because our fixed satellite services business was operated as an
integral part of ECCs subscription television business and
did not constitute a business in the historical
financial statements of ECC. Our historical financial data also
does not include financial information of Sling Media, Inc.,
which was recently acquired by ECC and will be contributed to us
in the spin-off. Sling Medias audited consolidated
financial statements are included elsewhere in this information
statement, and its historical financial information also has
been included in our Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and
Adjusted Financial Information.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial data included herein
has been adjusted to give effect to, among other things, the
contribution of certain net assets to us, the distribution of
our common stock by ECC to its shareholders and the contribution
to us of Sling Media. The assumptions used and pro forma
adjustments derived from such assumptions are based on currently
available information and we believe such assumptions are
reasonable under the circumstances. Further information
regarding the pro forma adjustments can be found under the
caption Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Adjusted
Financial Information in this information statement.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial data presented for
the year ended December 31, 2006 and as of and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 are derived from our
unaudited pro forma combined and adjusted financial information.
The data should be read in conjunction with our Selected
Combined Financial Data, Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined and Adjusted Financial Information, and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in
this information statement. The unaudited pro forma combined
financial statements are not indicative of our future
performance and do not necessarily reflect what our financial
condition and results of operations would have been had the
spin-off been completed on the dates assumed. Also, they may not
reflect the results of operations or financial condition which
would have resulted had we operated as a separate, stand-alone
entity during the periods presented.
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,592,381
|
|
|
$
|
1,182,768
|
|
|
$
|
1,132,899
|
|
|
$
|
2,080,259
|
|
|
$
|
1,525,320
|
|
|
$
|
1,513,691
|
|
|
$
|
1,720,091
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
1,606,709
|
|
|
|
1,222,936
|
|
|
|
1,152,875
|
|
|
|
2,058,924
|
|
|
|
1,562,767
|
|
|
|
1,546,755
|
|
|
|
1,760,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(14,328
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,976
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,335
|
|
|
$
|
(37,447
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33,064
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(9,296
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39,943
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,486
|
)
|
|
$
|
104,835
|
|
|
$
|
(34,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
89,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
90,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash flows from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(34,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,374
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,193
|
)
|
|
$
|
(78,916
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
$
|
(160,236
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,953
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,781
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,619
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
$
|
198,625
|
|
|
$
|
91,176
|
|
|
$
|
104,534
|
|
|
$
|
39,782
|
|
|
$
|
69,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
$
|
1,538,516
|
|
|
$
|
530,753
|
|
|
$
|
323,576
|
|
|
$
|
106,109
|
|
|
$
|
143,437
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,837,454
|
|
|
$
|
919,624
|
|
|
$
|
517,821
|
|
|
$
|
229,392
|
|
|
$
|
277,843
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
$
|
389,137
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
$
|
647
|
|
Net investment in EHC
|
|
$
|
3,242,225
|
|
|
$
|
863,768
|
|
|
$
|
502,283
|
|
|
$
|
217,132
|
|
|
$
|
258,452
|
|
8
Summary
of the Spin-Off
The following is a brief summary of the terms of the spin-off.
|
|
|
Distributing Company |
|
EchoStar Communications Corporation, a Nevada corporation. After
the distribution, EchoStar Communications Corporation will not
own any shares of common stock of EchoStar Holding Corporation. |
|
|
|
Separated Company |
|
EchoStar Holding Corporation, a Nevada corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of ECC. After the distribution, EchoStar
Holding Corporation will be an independent, publicly-traded
company. However, all of ECCs directors after the
distribution, except James DeFranco, Cantey Ergen and Gary S.
Howard, will also be directors of EHC. Charles W. Ergen, our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, will continue to be the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ECC. In addition,
certain executive officers of ECC will also serve as our
executive officers. Based on Mr. Ergens ownership as
of November 30, 2007, Mr. Ergen will beneficially own
approximately 50.0% of the total equity and approximately 80.0%
of the total voting power of each of ECC and us. |
|
|
|
Primary purposes of the spin-off |
|
The board of directors of ECC believes that creating
independent, focused companies is the best way to realize the
full value of ECCs businesses. The board of directors of
ECC considered the following potential benefits, among others,
in making its determination to consummate the spin-off: |
|
|
|
|
|
creating effective management incentives tied to
each of EHC and ECCs performance and increasing the
ability to attract and retain personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
|
creating opportunities to effectively develop and
finance expansion plans;
|
|
|
|
|
|
creating separate companies that have different
financial characteristics, which may appeal to different
investor bases; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
allowing each company to separately pursue the
business strategies that best suit its long-term interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The board of directors of ECC also considered the costs and
risks associated with the spin-off. The board of directors of
ECC considered, among other factors: |
|
|
|
|
|
the potential negative impact on ECCs credit
ratings as a result of the divestiture of assets that will be
contributed to us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility that either we or ECC may experience
disruptions in our respective businesses as a result of the
spin-off;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the combined trading prices of our
Class A common stock and ECCs Class A common
stock after the spin-off may be lower than the trading price of
ECCs Class A common stock before the spin-off;
|
|
|
|
|
|
actual or perceived conflicts of interest that may
arise between ECC and us in a number of areas relating to our
past and ongoing relationships, including: (i) cross
officerships, directorships and stock ownership,
(ii) intercompany transactions, (iii) intercompany
agreements and (iv) business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the loss of synergies from operating as one company;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the additional legal, accounting, administrative and
other costs that we would incur as a separate, publicly-traded
company.
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
In view of the variety of factors considered by the ECC board of
directors in connection with the evaluation of the spin-off and
the complexity of these matters, the ECC board of directors did
not find it useful to, and did not attempt to, quantify, rank or
otherwise assign relative weights to the factors considered. The
board of directors of ECC concluded that considered in the
aggregate the potential benefits of the spin-off outweigh the
potential negative factors, and that separating the non-core
business of ECC from ECC in the form of a tax-free distribution
to ECC shareholders is appropriate, advisable and in the best
interests of ECC and its shareholders. |
|
|
|
Conditions to the spin-off |
|
The spin-off is subject to the satisfaction or waiver by ECC
under the separation agreement of the following conditions, each
of which is waivable by ECC in its sole discretion (other than
the effectiveness of our registration statement on Form 10
and other required material regulatory approvals): |
|
|
|
|
|
the Securities and Exchange Commission shall have
declared effective our registration statement on Form 10
and no stop order shall be in effect;
|
|
|
|
all permits, registrations and consents required
under the securities or blue sky laws in connection with the
spin-off shall have been received;
|
|
|
|
ECC shall have received the opinion of
White & Case LLP confirming the tax-free status of the
spin-off and certain related transactions for U.S. federal
income tax purposes on the distribution date;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the listing of our Class A common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Market or Nasdaq Global Select Market shall have
been approved;
|
|
|
|
|
|
all material governmental approvals and other
consents necessary to consummate the distribution shall have
been received; and
|
|
|
|
no order, injunction or decree issued by any court
of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or
prohibition preventing consummation of the distribution or any
of the transactions related thereto shall be in effect.
|
|
|
|
The fulfillment of the foregoing conditions will not create any
obligation on ECCs part to effect the spin-off. ECC has
the right not to complete the spin-off if, at any time,
ECCs board of directors determines, in its sole
discretion, that the spin-off is not in the best interests of
ECC or its shareholders, or that market conditions are such that
it is not advisable to separate EHC from ECC. |
|
Securities to be Distributed |
|
Shares of EHC Class A common stock and Class B common
stock will constitute all of the outstanding shares of our
common stock immediately after the distribution. We expect the
shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common
stock to be distributed by ECC to you, based on the same class
of ECC common stock that you own, on or about January 1,
2008, which we refer to as the distribution date.
Charles Ergen, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
will, immediately after the distribution date, beneficially own
approximately 50.0% of our equity and possess approximately
80.0% of the total voting power represented by our common stock. |
10
|
|
|
Distribution Ratio |
|
For each share of ECC Class A common stock or ECC
Class B common stock held by you as of 5:00 p.m., New
York City time, on December 27, 2007, the record date for
the spin-off, you will receive 0.20 of a share of the same class
of our common stock. Please note that if you sell your shares of
Class A common stock of ECC after the record date but
before the distribution date, the buyer of those shares will be
entitled to receive the shares of our Class A common stock
issuable in respect of the shares sold. If as a result of the
foregoing ratio you would be entitled to receive a fraction of a
share of our Class A common stock, you will receive cash in
lieu of such fractional share interest. The distribution of
shares will be made in book-entry form. |
|
Record Date |
|
The record date is December 27, 2007. |
|
Distribution Date |
|
The distribution date is expected to be January 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
Trading Market and Symbol |
|
We have applied to list our Class A common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol
SATS. We anticipate that, on or prior to the
distribution date, a limited market for our Class A common
stock, commonly known as a when issued trading
market, will develop, and we expect regular way
trading of our Class A common stock will begin the first
trading day after the distribution date. |
|
|
|
Tax Consequences to Shareholders |
|
ECC shareholders are not expected to recognize any gain or loss
for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a result of the
spin-off, except for any gain or loss attributable to the
receipt of cash in lieu of a fractional share of our
Class A common stock. See The Spin-Off
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Spin-Off for a more detailed description of the U.S.
federal income tax consequences of the spin-off. |
|
|
|
Each shareholder is urged to consult his, her or its tax
advisor as to the specific tax consequences of the spin-off to
that shareholder, including the effect of any state, local or
U.S. tax laws and of changes in applicable tax laws. |
|
Relationship with ECC after the Separation |
|
We will enter into a separation agreement and other agreements
with ECC to effect the spin-off and provide a framework for our
relationship with ECC after the distribution. These agreements
generally expire after two years and will govern our
relationship with ECC subsequent to the completion of the
spin-off and provide for the allocation between us and ECC of
certain of ECCs assets, liabilities and obligations
attributable to the period prior to our separation from ECC. The
separation agreement, in particular, establishes the amount of
cash and indebtedness that each company initially will retain
and incur. For a discussion of these arrangements, see
Certain Intercompany Agreements Agreements
with ECC, included elsewhere in this information statement. |
|
Dividend Policy |
|
We presently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to
finance the expansion of our businesses and to conduct a
possible stock-buyback of up to $1.0 billion. As a result,
we do not expect to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable
future. All decisions regarding the payment of dividends by our
company will be made by our board of directors from time to time
in accordance with applicable law. |
11
Questions
and Answers about the Spin-Off
The following is a brief summary of the terms of the spin-off.
Please see The Spin-Off for a more detailed
description of the matters described below.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
The spin-off is the method by which ECC will separate its
existing business segments into two independent, publicly-traded
companies. In the spin-off, ECC will distribute to its
shareholders as of the distribution date all of the shares of
our Class A common stock and Class B common stock that
it owns. Following the spin-off, we will be a separate company
from ECC, and ECC will not retain any ownership interest in us.
The number of shares of ECC common stock you own will not change
as a result of the spin-off. |
|
Q: |
|
What is being distributed in the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
Approximately 42.0 million shares of our Class A
common stock and 47.7 million shares of our Class B
common stock will be distributed in the spin-off, based upon the
number of shares of ECC Class A common stock and ECC
Class B common stock outstanding on the record date. The
shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common
stock to be distributed by ECC will constitute all of the issued
and outstanding shares of our Class A common stock and
Class B common stock immediately after the distribution.
For more information on the shares being distributed in the
spin-off, see Description of Our Capital Stock
Our Class A Common Stock and Description of Our
Capital Stock Our Class B Common Stock
beginning on page 116 of this information statement. |
|
Q: |
|
What will I receive in the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
Holders of ECC Class A common stock will receive a dividend
of 0.20 of a share of our Class A common stock for each
share of ECC Class A common stock held by them on the
record date, and holders of ECC Class B common stock will
receive a dividend of 0.20 of a share of our Class B common
stock for every share of ECC Class B common stock held by
them on the record date. As a result of the spin-off, your
proportionate interest in ECC will not change and you will own
the same percentage of equity securities and voting power in EHC
as you previously did in ECC. For a more detailed description,
see The Spin-Off. |
|
Q: |
|
What is the record date for the distribution? |
|
A: |
|
Record ownership will be determined as of 5:00 p.m., New
York City time on December 27, 2007 which we refer to as
the record date. |
|
Q: |
|
When will the distribution occur? |
|
A: |
|
We expect that shares of our Class A common stock and
Class B common stock will be distributed by the
distribution agent, on behalf of ECC, on or about
January 1, 2008, which we refer to as the distribution date. |
|
Q: |
|
What will the relationship between EchoStar Communications
Corporation and EchoStar Holding Corporation be following the
spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
After the spin-off, ECC will not own any shares of our common
stock and we will not own any shares of ECC common stock. Five
of our directors after the distribution will also be directors
of ECC, and our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will
continue to serve as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
ECC. In addition, in connection with the spin-off, we and ECC
are entering into a number of agreements that will govern our
spin-off from ECC and our future relationship. We cannot assure
you that these agreements will be on terms as favorable to us as
agreements with unaffiliated parties. See Certain
Intercompany Agreements. In addition, if we acquire
knowledge of a potential transaction or matter which may be a
corporate opportunity for both us and ECC, our mutual officers
and directors are only required to first present the opportunity
to us if (A) we have expressed an interest in such
corporate opportunity as evidenced by resolutions appearing in
the minutes of our board of directors; (B) such |
12
|
|
|
|
|
potential corporate opportunity was expressly offered to one of
our directors or officers solely in his or her capacity as a
director or officer of us or as a director or officer of any
subsidiary of us; and (C) such opportunity relates to a
line of business in which we or any subsidiary of us is then
directly engaged. See Description of Our Capital
Stock Provisions of Our Articles of Incorporation
Relating to Related-Party Transactions and Corporate
Opportunities. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I have to do to participate in the
spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
No action is required on your part. Shareholders of ECC on the
record date for the distribution are not required to pay any
cash or deliver any other consideration, including any shares of
ECC common stock, for the shares of our common stock
distributable to them in the spin-off. |
|
Q: |
|
If I sell, on or before the distribution date, shares of
ECC Class A common stock that I held on the record date, am
I still entitled to receive shares of EHC Class A common
stock distributable with respect to the shares of ECC
Class A common stock I sold? |
|
A: |
|
No. No ex-dividend market will be established for our
Class A common stock until the first trading day following
the distribution date. Therefore, if you own shares of ECC
Class A common stock on the record date and thereafter sell
those shares on or prior to the distribution date, you will also
be selling the shares of our Class A common stock that
would have been distributed to you in the spin-off with respect
to the shares of ECC Class A common stock you sell. |
|
Q: |
|
How will fractional shares be treated in the
spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
If you would be entitled to receive a fractional share of
Class A common stock in the spin-off, you will instead
receive a cash payment. See The Spin-Off
Treatment of Fractional Shares for an explanation of how
the cash payments will be determined. |
|
Q: |
|
How will ECC distribute shares of EHC common stock to
me? |
|
A: |
|
Holders of shares of ECCs Class A or Class B
common stock on the record date will receive shares of the same
class of our common stock, in book-entry form. See The
Spin-Off Manner of Effecting the Spin-Off for
a more detailed explanation. |
|
Q: |
|
What is the reason for the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
The potential benefits considered by ECCs board of
directors in making the determination to consummate the spin-off
included the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
The spin-off is expected to allow the creation of effective
management incentives tied to each of EHCs and ECCs
respective performance, increasing the ability to attract and
retain personnel.
|
|
|
|
The spin-off is expected to create opportunities to effectively
develop and finance expansion plans of each independent company.
|
|
|
|
The spin-off is expected to allow the creation of separate
companies that have different financial characteristics, which
may appeal to different investor bases, which could enhance the
ability of each company to raise capital to fund its growth
plans and initiatives.
|
|
|
|
The spin-off is expected to allow each company to separately
pursue the business strategies that best suit its long-term
interests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The board of directors of ECC also considered the costs and
risks associated with the spin-off. The board of directors of
ECC considered, among other factors, the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
The potential negative impact on ECCs credit ratings as a
result of the divestiture of assets that will be contributed to
us.
|
|
|
|
The possibility that either we or ECC may experience disruptions
in our respective businesses as a result of the spin-off.
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
The risk that the combined trading prices of our Class A
common stock and ECCs Class A common stock after the
spin-off may be lower than the trading price of ECCs
Class A common stock before the spin-off.
|
|
|
|
Actual or perceived conflicts of interest that may arise between
ECC and us in a number of areas relating to our past and ongoing
relationships, including: (i) cross officerships,
directorships and stock ownership, (ii) intercompany
transactions, (iii) intercompany agreements and
(iv) business opportunities.
|
|
|
|
The loss of synergies from operating as one company.
|
|
|
|
The additional legal, accounting, administrative and other costs
that would be incurred by us as a separate, publicly-traded
company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In view of the variety of factors considered by the ECC board of
directors in connection with the evaluation of the spin-off and
the complexity of these matters, the ECC board of directors did
not find it useful to, and did not attempt to, quantify, rank or
otherwise assign relative weights to the factors considered. The
board of directors of ECC concluded that considered in the
aggregate, the potential benefits of the spin-off outweigh the
potential negative factors, and that separating the non-core
business of ECC from ECC in the form of a tax-free distribution
to ECC shareholders is appropriate, advisable and in the best
interests of ECC and its shareholders. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the federal income tax consequences to me of the
spin-off? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
ECC has received a private letter ruling from the IRS, and the
spin-off is conditioned upon the receipt by ECC of the opinion
of White & Case LLP on the distribution date (which
condition ECC may waive in its sole discretion), in each case,
substantially to the effect that the spin-off, together with
certain related transactions, will qualify as reorganizations
under Sections 355 and 368(a)(l)(D) of the Code and that,
accordingly, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, no gain or
loss will be recognized by, and no amount will be included in
the income of, a holder of ECC common stock upon the receipt of
shares of our common stock pursuant to the spin-off. A holder of
ECC common stock will generally recognize gain or loss with
respect to cash received in lieu of a fractional share of our
common stock. |
Please see The Spin-Off Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off and
Risk Factors Risks Relating to the
Spin-Off The spin-off could result in significant
tax liability for more information regarding the private
letter ruling and the tax opinion and the potential tax
consequences to you of the spin-off.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Does EHC intend to pay cash dividends? |
|
A: |
|
No. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any,
to finance the expansion of our businesses. As a result, we do
not expect to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future.
All decisions regarding the payment of dividends by our company
will be made by our board of directors from time to time in
accordance with applicable law. |
|
Q: |
|
How will EHC common stock trade? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Currently, there is no public market for our common stock. We
have applied to list our Class A common stock on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market under the symbol SATS. |
We anticipate that trading will commence on a when-issued basis
shortly before the record date. When-issued trading in the
context of a spin-off refers to a transaction effected on or
before the distribution date and made conditionally because the
securities of the spun off entity have not yet been distributed.
When-issued trades generally settle within three days after the
distribution date. On the first trading day following the
distribution date, any when-issued trading in respect of our
Class A common stock will end and regular way trading will
begin. Regular way trading refers to trading after the security
has been distributed and typically involves a trade that settles
on the third full trading day following the date of the sale
transaction. We cannot predict the trading prices for our common
stock before or after the distribution date.
14
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Will the spin-off and distribution affect the trading
price of my ECC Class A common stock? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. After the distribution of EHC Class A common stock,
the trading price of ECC Class A common stock may be lower
than the trading price of the ECC Class A common stock
immediately prior to the distribution. Moreover, until the
market has evaluated the operations of ECC without the
operations of EHC, the trading price of ECC Class A common
stock may fluctuate significantly. ECC believes the separation
of EHC from ECC offers its shareholders the greatest long-term
value. However, the combined trading prices of ECC Class A
common stock and EHC Class A common stock after the
spin-off may be lower than the trading price of ECC Class A
common stock prior to the spin-off. See Risk Factors
beginning on page 16. |
|
Q: |
|
Do I have appraisal rights? |
|
A: |
|
No. Holders of ECC common stock are not entitled to
appraisal rights in connection with the spin-off. |
|
Q: |
|
Who is the transfer agent for your common stock? |
|
A: |
|
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
250 Royall Street
Canton, MA 02021 |
|
Q: |
|
Where can I get more information? |
|
A: |
|
If you have questions relating to the mechanics of the
distribution of shares of EHC common stock, you should contact
the distribution agent: |
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
250 Royall Street
Canton, MA 02021
Tel: 877-437-8901
Before the spin-off, if you have questions relating to the
spin-off, you should contact:
EchoStar Communications Corporation
Attn: Corporate Communications
9601 S. Meridian Boulevard
Englewood, Colorado 80112
Tel:
720-514-5351
After the spin-off, if you have questions relating to EHC, you
should contact:
EchoStar Holding Corporation
Attn: Corporate Communications
90 Inverness Circle E.
Englewood, Colorado 80112
Tel:
303-723-1000
15
The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only
ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are
unaware of or that we currently believe to be immaterial also
may become important factors that affect us. This
information statement also contains forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties. See Cautionary
Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements.
If any of the following events occur, our business, financial
condition or results of operation could be materially and
adversely affected.
General
Risks Affecting Our Business
We may
not realize the potential benefits from the
spin-off.
We may not realize the potential benefits that we expect from
the spin-off which are described elsewhere in this information
statement. Certain of these benefits depend upon market
acceptance of our separation from ECC which we cannot predict
and which may be affected by the significant common stock
ownership by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as well
as interlocks between our management and board of directors. In
addition, we will incur significant costs, including those
described elsewhere in this information statement, which may
exceed our estimates. We will also incur some negative effects
from our separation from ECC, including loss of access to
ECCs financial resources.
We
currently depend on ECC and Bell ExpressVu for substantially all
of our revenue and ECC accounted for over 80% of our revenue in
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and each of 2006,
2005 and 2004; the loss of, or a significant reduction in orders
from, either of ECC or Bell ExpressVu would significantly reduce
our revenue and adversely impact our operating
results.
ECC accounted for approximately 86.2%, 84.5%, 85.6% and 89.7% of
our revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In addition, Bell
ExpressVu accounted for approximately 10.0%, 12.2%, 11.4% and
7.3% of our revenue in the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Any reduction in
sales to ECC or Bell ExpressVu or in the prices they pay for the
products and services they purchase from us would have a
significant negative impact on our business. Moreover, because
our sales to these customers are made pursuant to standard
purchase orders, these customers have no future obligation to
purchase set-top boxes from us and existing orders may be
cancelled or reduced on short notice. Cancellations or
reductions may be more frequent once we are separated from ECC.
Cancellations or reductions of customer orders could result in
the loss of anticipated sales without allowing us sufficient
time to reduce our inventory and operating expenses. In
addition, the timing of orders from these two customers could
vary significantly depending on equipment promotions these
customers offer to their subscribers, changes in technology, and
their use of remanufactured set-top boxes, which may cause our
revenue to vary significantly quarter over quarter and could
expose us to the risks of inventory shortages or excess
inventory. These inventory risks are particularly acute during
end product transitions in which a new generation of set-top
boxes is being deployed and inventory of older generation
set-top boxes is at a higher risk of obsolescence. This in turn
could cause our operating results to fluctuate significantly.
In addition, because substantially all of our revenue is tied to
ECC and Bell ExpressVu, our success also depends to a
significant degree on the continued success of ECC and Bell
ExpressVu in attracting new subscribers or in marketing
programming packages to subscribers that will require the
purchase of new set-top boxes.
There is a relatively small number of potential new customers
for our set-top boxes and fixed satellite services, and we
expect this customer concentration to continue for the
foreseeable future. Therefore, our operating results will likely
continue to depend on sales to a relatively small number of
customers, as well as the continued success of these customers.
In addition, we may from time to time enter into customer
agreements providing for exclusivity periods during which we may
sell a specified product only to that customer. If we do not
develop relationships with new customers, we may not be able to
expand our customer base or maintain or increase our revenue.
16
We
currently have substantial unused satellite capacity; our
results of operations could be materially adversely affected if
we are not able to utilize all of this capacity.
While we are currently evaluating various opportunities to make
profitable use of our satellite capacity (including, but not
limited to, supplying satellite capacity for new international
ventures), we do not have firm plans to utilize all of our
satellite capacity. In addition, there can be no assurance that
we can successfully develop the business opportunities we
currently plan to pursue with this capacity. Future costs
associated with our excess satellite capacity will negatively
impact our margins if we do not generate revenue to offset the
costs of this capacity.
In addition, we currently have leased minimal capacity on our
two leased satellites, AMC-15 and AMC-16, and have substantial
unleased capacity on one of our owned satellites,
EchoStar IX. Each of our satellites must be reviewed for
possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. In
the event that we are unsuccessful in marketing capacity on
these satellite assets and do not achieve sufficient utilization
and prices, in addition to reporting lower than expected
revenues and profitability, we will be required to record a
substantial impairment charge relating to one or more of these
satellites. We currently estimate that these potential charges
could aggregate up to $250 million, which, if incurred
would have a material adverse effect on our reported operating
results and financial position. Furthermore, it is possible that
in 2008 ECC will discontinue the use of some or all of the
capacity on one or more other satellites that it will initially
lease from us. To the extent that this occurs and we are unable
to lease this additional excess capacity, we may be required to
record substantial additional impairment charges that we
currently estimate could aggregate up to $100 million. We
performed a preliminary assessment of the recoverability of the
satellites to be contributed by ECC as if the spin-off had been
consummated and preliminarily concluded that the recoverability
of the satellites will not be impaired as of the distribution
date.
Our
historical combined and pro forma financial information included
in this information statement are not necessarily indicative of
our future financial position, future results of operations or
future cash flows nor do they reflect what our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows would have been as
a stand-alone company during the periods
presented.
The historical and pro forma combined financial information
included in this information statement do not reflect the
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows we
would have achieved as an independent publicly-traded company
during the periods presented or those results we will achieve in
the future. This is primarily a result of the following factors:
|
|
|
We have never been profitable as the majority of our operations
have historically been in support of ECC and we provided our
products and services to ECC at cost. We cannot assure you that
we can achieve or sustain profitability, or that we can grow our
business profitably or at all.
|
|
|
The financial condition and results of operations of our fixed
satellite services business are reflected only in our pro forma
combined financial information included herein, and not in our
historical combined financial information included herein,
because our fixed satellite services business was operated as an
integral part of ECCs subscription television business and
did not constitute a business in the historical
financial statements of ECC.
|
|
|
Our plans with respect to the fixed satellite services business
are being developed.
|
|
|
Sling Media is a recent acquisition and we have never operated
that business.
|
|
|
Our historical and pro forma combined financial results reflect
allocations of corporate expenses from ECC. Those allocations
may be different from the comparable expenses we would have
incurred had we operated as an independent publicly-traded
company.
|
|
|
Our working capital requirements and capital required for our
general corporate purposes historically have been satisfied as
part of the corporate-wide cash management policies of ECC.
Subsequent to the spin-off, ECC will not be required to provide
us with funds to finance our working capital or other cash
|
17
requirements. Without the opportunity to obtain financing from
ECC, we may in the future need to obtain additional financing
from banks, or through public offerings or private placements of
debt or equity securities, strategic relationships or other
arrangements. Such financing may not be available to us on
acceptable terms, or at all. We may have a credit rating that is
lower than ECCs credit rating and may incur debt on terms
and at interest rates that will not be as favorable as those
historically enjoyed by ECC.
|
|
|
Significant changes may occur in our cost structure, management,
financing and business operations as a result of our operating
as an independent public company.
|
The
acquisition of EchoStar Communication Corporation by a third
party could have a material adverse effect on our business and
financial position.
Our sales to ECC accounted for approximately 86.2%, 84.5%, 85.6%
and 89.7% of our revenue in the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Because sales to ECC following the spin-off will
primarily be made pursuant to short-term contracts, ECC will
have no obligation to continue to purchase our principal
products and services following the spin-off. Therefore, if ECC
enters into a business combination transaction, or
Mr. Ergen no longer controls a majority of the voting power
of ECC or of us, our relationship with ECC could be terminated
or substantially curtailed with little or no advance notice. Any
material reduction in our sales to ECC would have a significant
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial position.
Furthermore, because there are a relatively small number of
potential customers for our products and services, if we lose
ECC as a customer, it will be difficult for us to obtain
alternative customer relationships that would replace our
historical revenues from ECC.
We may
not be able to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms or
at all in order to grow and to increase earnings.
Our ability to increase earnings will depend in part on our
ability to grow our business. While we expect to satisfy our
need for funds to meet our growth plans to be satisfied from
cash and marketable investment securities to be contributed to
us in connection with the spin-off, cash we generate from
operations and future financings, we cannot assure you that we
will generate sufficient cash from operations or that additional
financing will be available on acceptable terms, or at all, if
needed in the future.
In addition, we currently have contracts to construct, and
conditional licenses and pending FCC applications for, a number
of Ku-band,
Ka-band and
extended Ku-band satellites. We may need to raise additional
capital to construct, launch, and insure these satellites.
Depending on market conditions and our results of operations and
financial condition we may not be able to raise such additional
capital on acceptable terms or at all. We also periodically
evaluate various strategic initiatives, the pursuit of which
also could require us to raise significant additional capital.
We may also use a significant portion of our existing cash to
fund a potential stock buyback program during 2008 of up to
$1 billion of our Class A common stock.
We also have substantial satellite-related payment obligations
under our various satellite service agreements.
We
could be exposed to significant financial losses if our
investments are unsuccessful.
We have entered into certain strategic transactions and
investments in Asia and elsewhere, and we expect to increase our
strategic investment activity in the United States and in
international markets. These investments, which we expect will
become substantial, involve a high degree of risk. These
investments could also expose us to significant financial
losses, and may restrict our ability to make other investments
or limit alternative uses of our capital resources, particularly
if the underlying ventures are not successful. In particular,
the laws, regulations and practices of certain countries may
make it harder for our investments to be successful.
In addition, the companies in which we invest or with whom we
partner may not be able to compete effectively or there may be
insufficient demand for the services and products offered by
these companies.
18
We may
pursue new acquisitions, joint ventures and other transactions
to complement or expand our business which may not be
successful.
We may not be able to complete such transactions and such
transactions, if executed, pose significant risks and could have
a negative effect on our operations. Our future success may
depend on opportunities to buy other businesses or technologies
that could complement, enhance or expand our current business or
products or that might otherwise offer us growth opportunities.
Any transactions that we are able to identify and complete may
involve a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
the diversion of our managements attention from our
existing business to integrate the operations and personnel of
the acquired or combined business or joint venture;
|
|
|
possible adverse effects on our operating results during the
integration process; and
|
|
|
our possible inability to achieve the intended objectives of the
transaction.
|
In addition, we may not be able to successfully or profitably
integrate, operate, maintain and manage our newly acquired
operations or employees. We may not be able to maintain uniform
standards, controls, procedures and policies, and this may lead
to operational inefficiencies.
New acquisitions, joint ventures and other transactions may
require the commitment of significant capital that would
otherwise be directed to investments in our existing businesses
or be distributed to shareholders. Commitment of this capital
may cause us to defer or suspend any share repurchases that we
otherwise may have made.
Our
business relies on intellectual property, some of which is owned
by third parties, and we may inadvertently infringe their
patents and proprietary rights.
Many entities, including some of our competitors, have or may in
the future obtain patents and other intellectual property rights
that cover or affect products or services related to those that
we offer. In general, if a court determines that one or more of
our products infringes on intellectual property held by others,
we may be required to cease developing or marketing those
products, to obtain licenses from the holders of intellectual
property or to redesign those products in such a way as to avoid
infringing the patent claims, each of which may require material
expenditures by us. If those intellectual property rights are
held by a competitor, we may be unable to obtain the
intellectual property at any price, which could adversely affect
our competitive position.
If we
fail to protect our intellectual property rights, it could harm
our business and competitive position.
Our business relies on intellectual property rights to stay
competitive in the market place. We rely on a combination of
patent, trademark and copyright laws, trade secrets,
confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect
our intellectual property rights and the obligations we have to
third parties from whom we license intellectual property rights.
Nevertheless, these afford only limited protection and policing
unauthorized use of proprietary technology can be difficult and
expensive. We may not be able to take appropriate steps to
enforce our intellectual property rights and this could have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results and
financial condition.
Our
accounting and other management systems and resources may not be
adequately prepared to meet the financial reporting and other
requirements to which we will be subject following the spin-off.
If we are unable to achieve and maintain effective internal
controls, our business, financial position and results of
operations could be adversely affected.
Our financial results previously were included within the
consolidated results of ECC, and our reporting and control
systems were appropriate for those of subsidiaries of a public
company. However, we were not directly subject to reporting and
other requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, which we refer to as the Exchange Act. As a result of
the spin-off, we will be directly subject to these requirements,
including the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which will require annual management
assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting and a report by
19
our independent registered public accounting firm addressing
these controls. These reporting and other obligations will place
significant demands on our management and administrative and
operational resources, including accounting resources. To comply
with these requirements, we anticipate that we will need to
upgrade our systems, including information technology, implement
additional financial and management controls, reporting systems
and procedures and hire additional accounting and finance staff.
If we are unable to upgrade our financial and management
controls, reporting systems, information technology and
procedures in a timely and effective fashion, our ability to
comply with our financial reporting requirements and other rules
that apply to reporting companies could be impaired.
Prior
to the spin-off, we will not have been an independent company
and we may be unable to make, on a timely or cost-effective
basis, the changes necessary to operate as an independent
company.
Prior to the spin-off, our business was operated by ECC as part
of its broader corporate organization, rather than as an
independent company. ECCs senior management oversaw the
strategic direction of our businesses and ECC performed various
corporate functions for us, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
selected human resources related functions;
|
|
|
accounting;
|
|
|
tax administration;
|
|
|
selected legal functions, as well as external reporting;
|
|
|
treasury administration, investor relations, internal audit and
insurance functions; and
|
|
|
selected information technology and telecommunications services.
|
Following the spin-off, neither ECC nor any of its affiliates
will have any obligation to provide these functions to us other
than those services that will be provided for a limited period
of time by ECC pursuant to the services agreement between us and
ECC. See Certain Intercompany Agreements
Agreements with ECC Services Agreement. If,
once this services agreement terminates, we do not have in place
our own systems and business functions, we do not have
agreements with other providers of these services or we are not
able to make these changes cost effectively, we may not be able
to operate our business effectively and our profitability may
decline. If ECC does not continue to perform effectively the
services that are called for under the services agreement, we
may not be able to operate our business effectively after the
spin-off.
Changes
in existing technologies or the emergence of new products or
technologies could significantly harm our
business.
Our businesses change rapidly as new technologies are developed.
These new technologies may cause our services and products to
become obsolete. Changes in existing technologies could also
cause demand for our products and services to decline. For
example, if changes in technology allow digital television
subscribers to use devices such as personal computers, cable
ready televisions and network based digital video recording
services in place of set-top boxes, our customers may not need
to purchase our set-top boxes to provide their digital
television subscribers with digital video recording and other
set-top box features. One or more new technologies also could be
introduced that compete favorably with our set-top boxes or that
cause our set-top boxes to no longer be of significant benefit
to our customers.
We and our suppliers also may not be able to keep pace with
technological developments. Alternatively, if the new
technologies on which we intend to focus our research and
development investments fail to achieve acceptance in the
marketplace, we could suffer a material adverse effect on our
future competitive position that could cause a reduction in our
revenues and earnings. Our competitors could also obtain or
develop proprietary technologies that are perceived by the
market as being superior to ours. Further, after we have
incurred substantial research and development costs, one or more
of the technologies under our development, or under development
by one or more of our strategic partners, could become obsolete
prior to its introduction. Finally, delays in the delivery of
components or other unforeseen problems may occur that could
materially and adversely affect our ability to generate revenue,
offer new services and remain competitive.
20
Technological innovation is important to our success and
depends, to a significant degree, on the work of technically
skilled employees. Competition for the services of these types
of employees is intense. We may not be able to attract and
retain these employees. If we are unable to attract and maintain
technically skilled employees, our competitive position could be
materially and adversely affected.
We
intend to make significant investments in new products and
services that may not be profitable.
We have made and will continue to make significant investments
in research, development, and marketing for new products,
services, and technologies, including new set-top box designs
and entry into new business areas. Investments in new technology
are inherently speculative and commercial success depends on
many factors including novelty, service and support, and
effective sales and marketing. We may not achieve significant
revenue from new product and service investments for a number of
years, if at all. Moreover, new products and services may not be
profitable, and even if they are profitable, operating margins
for new products and businesses may be minimal.
We
rely on key personnel.
We believe that our future success will depend to a significant
extent upon the performance of Charles W. Ergen, our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and certain other
executives. Mr. Ergen and certain of these executives will
also continue to devote significant time to their employment at
ECC. The loss of Mr. Ergen or of certain other key
executives or their ability to devote sufficient time and effort
to our business could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Although all of our executives will execute agreements limiting
their ability to work for or consult with competitors if they
leave us, we do not have employment agreements with any of them.
Risks
Affecting Our Set-Top Business
We
depend on sales of set-top boxes for nearly all of our revenue,
and if sales of our set-top boxes decline, our business and
financial position will suffer.
Our historical revenues consist primarily of sales of our
set-top boxes. In addition, we currently derive, and expect to
continue to derive in the near term, nearly all of our revenue
from sales of our set-top boxes to ECC and Bell ExpressVu.
Continued market acceptance of our set-top boxes is critical to
our future success. If we are not able to expand sales of our
set-top boxes to other providers of digital television,
including cable operators, our growth prospects will be limited,
and our revenues will be substantially impacted if sales of our
set-top boxes to providers of satellite-delivered digital
television decline.
Our
business may suffer if direct-to-home satellite service
providers, who currently comprise our customer base, do not
compete successfully with existing and emerging alternative
platforms for delivering digital television, including
terrestrial networks, Internet protocol television and cable
television operators.
Our existing customers are direct-to-home satellite video
providers, which compete with cable television operators and
terrestrial broadcasters for the same pool of viewers. As
technologies develop, other means of delivering information and
entertainment to television viewers are evolving. For example,
some telecommunications companies, such as AT&T Inc. and
Verizon Communications, are seeking to compete with terrestrial
broadcasters, cable television network operators and
direct-to-home satellite services by offering IPTV, which allows
telecommunications companies to stream television programs
through telephone lines or fiber optic lines. To the extent that
the terrestrial television networks, telecommunications
companies and cable television network operators compete
successfully against direct-to-home satellite services for
viewers, the ability of our existing customer base to attract
and retain subscribers may be adversely affected. As a result,
demand for our satellite television set-top boxes could decline
and we may not be able to sustain our current revenue levels.
21
Our
future financial performance depends on our ability to penetrate
new markets for set-top boxes.
Our products were initially designed for, and have been deployed
mostly by, providers of satellite-delivered digital television.
To date, we have not made any sales of our set-top boxes to
cable operators. In addition, the cable set-top box market is
highly competitive and we expect competition to intensify in the
future. This competition may make it more difficult for us to
sell cable set-top boxes and may result in pricing pressure,
small profit margins, high sales and marketing expenses and
failure to obtain market share, any of which would likely
seriously harm our business, operating results and financial
condition.
Our
ability to sell our set-top boxes to cable television operators
depends on our ability to obtain licenses to use the conditional
access systems utilized by these cable television
operators.
Our commercial success in selling our set-top boxes to cable
television operators depends significantly on our ability to
obtain licenses to use the conditional access systems deployed
by these operators in our set-top boxes. In many cases, the
intellectual property rights to these conditional access systems
are owned by the set-top box manufacturer that currently
provides the cable television operator with its set-top boxes.
We cannot assure you that we will able to obtain any required
license on commercially favorable terms, if at all. If we do not
obtain the necessary licenses, we may be delayed or prevented
from pursuing the development of some potential products with
cable television operators. Our failure to obtain a license to
any technology that we may require to develop or commercialize
our set-top boxes with cable television operators will
significantly and negatively affect our business.
Growth
in our set-top box business likely requires expansion of our
sales to international customers; we may be unsuccessful in
expanding international sales.
We believe that in order to grow our set-top box revenue and
business and to build a large customer base, we must increase
sales of our set-top boxes in international markets. We have
limited experience selling our set-top boxes internationally. To
succeed in these sales efforts, we believe we must hire
additional sales personnel and develop and manage new
relationships with cable operators and other providers of
digital television in international markets. If we do not
succeed in our efforts to sell to these target markets and
customers, the size of our total addressable market may be
limited. This, in turn, would harm our ability to grow our
customer base and revenue.
The
set-top box business is extremely competitive.
Currently, there are many significant competitors in the set-top
box business including several established companies who have
sold set-top boxes to major cable operators in the United States
for many years. These competitors include companies such as
Motorola, Cisco Systems, which acquired Scientific Atlanta in
2006, and Pace. In addition, a number of rapidly growing
companies have recently entered the market, many of them with
set-top box offerings similar to our existing satellite set-top
box products. We also expect additional competition in the
future from new and existing companies who do not currently
compete in the market for set-top boxes. As the set-top box
business evolves, our current and potential competitors may
establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with
third parties, including software and hardware companies that
could acquire significant market share, which could adversely
affect our business. We also face competition from set-top boxes
that have been internally developed by digital video providers.
Any of these competitive threats, alone or in combination with
others, could seriously harm our business, operating results and
financial condition.
Our
set-top boxes are highly complex and may experience quality or
supply problems.
Our set-top boxes are extremely complex and can have defects in
design, manufacture or associated software. Set-top boxes often
contain bugs that can unexpectedly interfere with
their operation. Defects may also occur in components and
products that we purchase from third-parties. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to detect and fix all defects in
the set-top boxes that we sell. We could incur significant
expenses, lost
22
revenue, and harm to our reputation if we fail to detect or
effectively address such issues through design, testing or
warranty repairs.
The
average selling price of our set-top boxes may decrease, which
could negatively impact our operating results.
As a part of ECC, we have historically sold set-top boxes to ECC
at our cost. In order to operate a profitable business we will
be required to sell our set-top boxes to ECC at higher prices.
It is possible that our ability to increase the average selling
prices of our set-top boxes will be limited and that prices may
decrease in the future in response to competitive pricing
pressures, new product introductions by us or our competitors or
other factors. If we are unable to increase or at least maintain
the average selling prices of our set-top boxes, or if such
selling prices decline, and we are unable to respond in a timely
manner by developing and introducing new products and
continually reducing our product costs, our revenues and gross
margin may be negatively affected, which will harm our business
and results of operations.
If
significant numbers of television viewers are unwilling to pay
for premium programming packages that utilize set-top boxes, we
may not be able to sustain our current revenue
level.
Our revenues are derived entirely from direct-to-home satellite
service providers who purchase our set-top boxes for their
subscribers. Therefore, we are substantially dependent upon the
ability of these providers to promote the delivery of premium
programming packages that utilize technology incorporated into
our set-top boxes, such as DVR technology and IPTV, to generate
future revenues.
However, direct-to-home satellite service providers may be
unsuccessful in promoting value-added services. Subscribers of
direct-to-home satellite services have historically purchased
stand-alone satellite receivers without the advanced set-top box
functionality that we offer. If direct-to-home satellite service
providers are unable to develop compelling reasons for their
subscribers to purchase our more advanced set-top boxes, it will
be difficult for us to sustain our historical revenues.
Our
reliance on several key components used in our set-top boxes
could restrict production and result in higher set-top box
costs.
We obtain many components for our set-top boxes from a single
supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance on a
single or limited group of suppliers, particularly foreign
suppliers, and our increasing reliance on subcontractors,
involves several risks. These risks include a potential
inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components,
and reduced control over pricing, quality, and timely delivery
of these components. We do not generally maintain long-term
agreements with any of our suppliers or subcontractors. An
inability to obtain adequate deliveries or any other
circumstances requiring us to seek alternative sources of supply
could affect our ability to ship our set-top boxes on a timely
basis, which could damage our relationships with current and
prospective customers and harm our business, resulting in a loss
of market share, and reduce revenues and income.
We generally maintain low inventory levels and do not make
binding long-term commitments to suppliers. As a result, it may
be difficult in the future to obtain components required for our
products or to increase the volume of components if demand for
our products increases.
Our
future growth depends on market acceptance of
HDTV.
Future demand for our set-top boxes will depend significantly on
the growing market acceptance of high definition television, or
HDTV. The effective delivery of HDTV will depend on digital
television operators developing and building infrastructure to
provide wide-spread HDTV programming. If the introduction or
adoption of HDTV or the deployment of HDTV is not as widespread
or as rapid as we or our customers expect, our revenue growth
will be limited.
23
During
April 2006, a jury concluded that certain of our digital video
recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by Tivo. If the
verdict is upheld on appeal and we are not able to successfully
implement alternative technology, we could be prohibited from
distributing DVRs, or be required to modify or eliminate certain
user-friendly DVR features that we currently offer to
consumers.
If the Tivo jury verdict is upheld on appeal, to the extent that
ECC does not indemnify us, we will be required to pay
substantial damages
and/or
license fees, and if we were not able to successfully implement
alternative technology (including the successful defense of any
challenge that such technology infringes Tivos patent), we
could also be prohibited from distributing DVRs, or be required
to modify or eliminate certain user-friendly DVR features that
we currently offer to consumers. In that event we would be at a
significant disadvantage to our competitors who could offer this
functionality and, while we would attempt to provide that
functionality through other manufacturers, the adverse affect on
our business could be material.
Risks
Affecting Our Fixed Satellite Services Business
We
currently face competition from established competitors in the
fixed satellite service business and may face competition from
others in the future.
In our fixed satellite services business, we will compete
against larger, well-established fixed satellite service
companies, such as Intelsat, SES Americom and Telesat Canada.
Because the satellite services industry is relatively mature,
our growth strategy depends largely on our ability to displace
current incumbent providers, which often have the benefit of
long-term contracts with customers. These long-term contracts
and other factors result in relatively high switching costs for
customers, making it more difficult for us to displace customers
from their current relationships with our competitors. In
addition, the supply of satellite capacity has increased in
recent years, which will make it more difficult for us to sell
our services in certain markets and to price our capacity at
acceptable levels. Competition may cause downward pressure on
prices and further reduce the utilization of our fleet capacity,
both of which would have an adverse effect on our financial
performance. Our fixed satellite services business also competes
with fiber optic cable and other terrestrial delivery systems,
which may have a cost advantage, particularly in point-to-point
applications where such delivery systems have been installed.
Our
satellites are subject to significant operational
risks.
Satellites are subject to significant operational risks while in
orbit. These risks include malfunctions, commonly referred to as
anomalies, that have occurred in our satellites and the
satellites of other operators as a result of various factors,
such as satellite manufacturers errors, problems with the
power systems or control systems of the satellites and general
failures resulting from operating satellites in the harsh
environment of space.
Although we work closely with the satellite manufacturers to
determine and eliminate the cause of anomalies in new satellites
and provide for redundancies of many critical components in the
satellites, we may experience anomalies in the future, whether
of the types described above or arising from the failure of
other systems or components.
Any single anomaly or series of anomalies could materially and
adversely affect our operations and revenues and our
relationship with current customers, as well as our ability to
attract new customers for our satellite services. In particular,
future anomalies may result in the loss of individual
transponders on a satellite, a group of transponders on that
satellite or the entire satellite, depending on the nature of
the anomaly. Anomalies may also reduce the expected useful life
of a satellite, thereby reducing the revenue that could be
generated by that satellite, or create additional expenses due
to the need to provide replacement or
back-up
satellites.
Meteoroid events pose a potential threat to all in-orbit
satellites. The probability that meteoroids will damage those
satellites increases significantly when the Earth passes through
the particulate stream left behind by comets. Occasionally,
increased solar activity also poses a potential threat to all
in-orbit satellites.
Some decommissioned spacecraft are in uncontrolled orbits which
pass through the geostationary belt at various points, and
present hazards to operational spacecraft, including our
satellites. We may be required to
24
perform maneuvers to avoid collisions and these maneuvers may
prove unsuccessful or could reduce the useful life of the
satellite through the expenditure of fuel to perform these
maneuvers. The loss, damage or destruction of any of our
satellites as a result of an electrostatic storm, collision with
space debris, malfunction or other event could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Our
satellites have minimum design lives of 12 years, but could
fail or suffer reduced capacity before then.
Our ability to earn revenue depends on the usefulness of our
satellites. Each satellite has a limited useful life. A number
of factors affect the useful lives of the satellites, including,
among other things, the quality of their construction, the
durability of their component parts, the ability to continue to
maintain proper orbit and control over the satellites
functions, the efficiency of the launch vehicle used, and the
remaining on-board fuel following orbit insertion. Generally,
the minimum design life of each of our satellites is
12 years. We can provide no assurance, however, as to the
actual useful lives of the satellites.
In the event of a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we
may relocate another satellite and use it as a replacement for
the failed or lost satellite, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. Such a relocation would require FCC approval and,
among other things, a showing to the FCC that the replacement
satellite would not cause additional interference compared to
the failed or lost satellite. We cannot be certain that we could
obtain such FCC approval.
Our
satellites are subject to risks related to launch.
Satellite launches are subject to significant risks, including
launch failure, incorrect orbital placement or improper
commercial operation. Certain launch vehicles that may be used
by us have either unproven track records or have experienced
launch failures in the past. The risks of launch delay and
failure are usually greater when the launch vehicle does not
have a track record of previous successful flights. Launch
failures result in significant delays in the deployment of
satellites because of the need both to construct replacement
satellites, which can take more than two years, and to obtain
other launch opportunities. Such significant delays could
materially and adversely affect our ability to generate
revenues. If we were unable to obtain launch insurance, or
obtain launch insurance at rates we deem commercially
reasonable, and a significant launch failure were to occur, it
could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate
revenues and fund future satellite procurement and launch
opportunities. In addition, the occurrence of launch failures
whether on our satellites or those of others may significantly
reduce the availability of launch insurance on our satellites or
make launch insurance premiums uneconomical.
Our
fixed satellite services business is subject to risks of adverse
government regulation.
Our satellite services business is subject to varying degrees of
regulation in the United States by the FCC, and other entities,
and in foreign countries by similar entities. These regulations
are subject to the political process and have been in constant
flux over the past decade. Moreover, a substantial number of
foreign countries in which we have, or may in the future make,
an investment, regulate, in varying degrees, the ownership of
satellites and the distribution and ownership of programming
services and foreign investment in programming companies.
Further material changes in law and regulatory requirements must
be anticipated, and there can be no assurance that our business
and the business of our affiliates will not be adversely
affected by future legislation, new regulation or deregulation.
Our
business depends substantially on FCC licenses that can expire
or be revoked or modified and applications that may not be
granted.
If the FCC were to cancel, revoke, suspend or fail to renew any
of our licenses or authorizations, it could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. Specifically, loss of a frequency authorization
would reduce the amount of spectrum available to us, potentially
reducing the amount of services available to our customers. The
materiality of such a loss of authorizations would vary based
upon,
25
among other things, the location of the frequency used or the
availability of replacement spectrum. In addition, Congress
often considers and enacts legislation that could affect us, and
FCC proceedings to implement the Communications Act and enforce
its regulations are ongoing. We cannot predict the outcomes of
these legislative or regulatory proceedings or their effect on
our business.
We may
not be aware of certain foreign government
regulations.
Because regulatory schemes vary by country, we may be subject to
regulations in foreign countries of which we are not presently
aware. If that were to be the case, we could be subject to
sanctions by a foreign government that could materially and
adversely affect our ability to operate in that country. We
cannot assure you that any current regulatory approvals held by
us are, or will remain, sufficient in the view of foreign
regulatory authorities, or that any additional necessary
approvals will be granted on a timely basis or at all, in all
jurisdictions in which we wish to operate new satellites, or
that applicable restrictions in those jurisdictions will not be
unduly burdensome. The failure to obtain the authorizations
necessary to operate satellites internationally could have a
material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenue and
our overall competitive position.
We, our customers and companies with which we do business may be
required to have authority from each country in which we or they
provide services or provide our customers use of our satellites.
Because regulations in each country are different, we may not be
aware if some of our customers
and/or
companies with which we do business do not hold the requisite
licenses and approvals.
Our
dependence on outside contractors could result in delays related
to the design, manufacture and launch of our new satellites,
which could in turn adversely affect our operating
results.
There are a limited number of manufacturers that are able to
design and build satellites according to the technical
specifications and standards of quality we require, including
Astrium Satellites, Boeing Satellite Systems, Lockheed Martin,
Loral and Thales Alenia Space. There are also a limited number
of agencies able to launch such satellites, including
International Launch Services, Arianespace, Lockheed Martin
Launch Systems and Sea Launch Company. The loss of any of our
manufacturers or launch agencies could result in the delay of
the design, building or launch of our satellites. Even if
alternate suppliers for such services are available, we may have
difficulty identifying them in a timely manner, we may incur
significant additional expense in changing suppliers, and this
could result in difficulties or delays in the design,
manufacturing or launch of our satellites. Any delays in the
design, building or launch of our satellites could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We
currently have no commercial insurance coverage on the
satellites we own.
We do not insure our owned satellites against in-orbit or other
failures. The loss of a satellite or other satellite
malfunctions or anomalies could have a material adverse effect
on our financial performance which we may not be able to
mitigate by using available capacity on other satellites. In
addition, the loss of a satellite or other satellite
malfunctions or anomalies could affect our ability to comply
with FCC regulatory obligations and our ability to fund the
construction or acquisition of replacement satellites for our
in-orbit fleet in a timely fashion, or at all.
Risks
Relating to the Spin-Off
Our
agreements with ECC may not reflect what two unaffiliated
parties might have agreed to.
The allocation of assets, liabilities, rights, indemnifications
and other obligations between ECC and us under the separation
and ancillary agreements we will enter into with ECC do not
necessarily reflect what two unaffiliated parties might have
agreed to. Had these agreements been negotiated with
unaffiliated third parties, their terms may have been more
favorable, or less favorable, to us.
26
The
spin-off could result in significant tax
liability.
ECC has received a private letter ruling from the IRS to the
effect that, among other things, the spin-off, together with
certain related transactions, will qualify for tax-free
treatment under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code.
In addition, the spin-off is conditioned upon the receipt by ECC
of the opinion of White & Case LLP on the distribution
date (which condition ECC may waive in its sole discretion)
substantially to the effect that, among other things, the
spin-off, together with certain related transactions, will
qualify as reorganizations for U.S. federal income tax
purposes under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code,
and that, accordingly for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
no gain or loss will be recognized by, and no amount will be
included in the income of, a holder of ECC common stock upon the
receipt of shares of our common stock pursuant to the spin-off,
except to the extent such holder receives cash in lieu of
fractional shares of our common stock. See The
Spin-Off Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Spin-Off.
Although a private letter ruling from the IRS generally is
binding on the IRS, if the factual representations or
assumptions made in the letter ruling request are untrue or
incomplete in any material respect, we will not be able to rely
on the ruling. Furthermore, the IRS will not rule on whether a
distribution satisfies certain requirements necessary to obtain
tax-free treatment under Section 355 of the Code. Rather,
the ruling is based upon representations by ECC that these
conditions have been satisfied, and any inaccuracy in such
representations could invalidate the ruling. ECC has made it a
condition to the spin-off that ECC obtain the opinion of counsel
described above. The opinion will be based on, among other
things, certain assumptions and representations made by ECC and
us, which if incorrect or inaccurate in any material respect
would jeopardize the conclusions reached by counsel in its
opinion. The opinion will not be binding on the IRS or the
courts. See The Spin-Off Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off
for more information regarding the private letter ruling and the
tax opinion.
If the spin-off does not qualify for tax-free treatment for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, then, in general, ECC
would be subject to tax as if it had sold the common stock of
our company in a taxable sale for its fair market value.
ECCs shareholders would be subject to tax as if they had
received a distribution equal to the fair market value of our
common stock that was distributed to them, which would be
treated as a taxable dividend to the extent of ECCs
earnings and profits. It is expected that the amount of any such
taxes to ECCs shareholders and ECC would be substantial.
See The Spin-Off Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off.
A
potential indemnity liability to ECC if the spin-off is treated
as a taxable transaction could materially adversely affect our
company.
In the tax sharing agreement with ECC, we have agreed to
indemnify ECC for any losses, claims, and expenses (including
any resulting taxes) resulting from the spin-off or certain
related transactions failing to qualify as tax-free transactions
pursuant to any provision of Section 355 or
Section 361 of the Code because of (i) a direct or
indirect acquisition of any of our stock, stock options or
assets, (ii) any action that we take or fail to take or
(iii) any action that we take that is inconsistent with the
information and representations furnished to the IRS in
connection with the request for the private letter ruling, or to
counsel in connection with any opinion being delivered by
counsel with respect to the spin-off or certain related
transactions. For a more detailed discussion, see Certain
Intercompany Agreements Agreements with
ECC Tax Sharing Agreement. Our indemnification
obligations to ECC and its subsidiaries are not limited in
amount or subject to any cap. If we are required to indemnify
ECC and its subsidiaries under the circumstances set forth in
the tax sharing agreement, we may be subject to substantial
liabilities.
27
We
will have potential conflicts of interest with ECC after the
spin-off.
Questions relating to conflicts of interest may arise between
ECC and us in a number of areas relating to our past and ongoing
relationships. Areas in which conflicts of interest between ECC
and us could arise include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
|
|
Cross officerships, directorships and stock
ownership. We will continue to have significant
overlap in directors and executive officers with ECC, which may
lead to conflicting interests. At the time of the spin-off,
certain of our executive officers, including Charles W. Ergen,
our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, will continue to serve
as executive officers of ECC. Three of these individuals will
provide us services pursuant to a management services agreement
we will enter into with ECC. Our board of directors will include
persons who are members of the board of directors of ECC,
including Mr. Ergen, who will serve as the Chairman of ECC
and us. The executive officers and the members of our board of
directors who overlap with ECC will have fiduciary duties to
ECCs shareholders. Pursuant to the management services
agreement, three of these officers will be paid by ECC even if
their duties include work for EHC. Therefore, these individuals
may have actual or apparent conflicts of interest with respect
to matters involving or affecting each company. For example,
there will be the potential for a conflict of interest when we
or ECC look at acquisitions and other corporate opportunities
that may be suitable for both companies. In addition, after the
spin-off, many of our directors and officers will continue to
own ECC stock and options to purchase ECC stock, which they
acquired or were granted prior to the spin-off, including
Mr. Ergen, who will immediately following the spin-off
beneficially own approximately 50.0% of the total equity and
control approximately 80.0% of the voting power of ECC and us.
These ownership interests could create actual, apparent or
potential conflicts of interest when these individuals are faced
with decisions that could have different implications for our
company and ECC.
|
|
|
|
Intercompany agreements related to the
spin-off. We will enter into certain agreements
with ECC pursuant to which it will provide us certain
management, administrative, accounting, tax, legal and other
services, for which we will pay ECC its cost plus an additional
amount that is equal to a fixed percentage of ECCs cost.
In addition, we will enter into a number of intercompany
agreements covering matters such as tax sharing and our
responsibility for certain liabilities previously undertaken by
ECC for certain of our businesses. We will also enter into
certain commercial agreements with ECC pursuant to which we
will, among other things, be obligated to sell at specified
prices, set-top boxes and related equipment to ECC. The terms of
these agreements were established while we were a wholly-owned
subsidiary of ECC and were not the result of arms length
negotiations. In addition, conflicts could arise in the
interpretation or any extension or renegotiation of these
existing agreements after the completion of the spin-off.
|
|
|
|
Future intercompany transactions. In the
future, ECC or its affiliates may enter into transactions with
us or our subsidiaries or other affiliates. Although the terms
of any such transactions will be established based upon
negotiations between ECC and us and, when appropriate, subject
to the approval of the independent directors on our board or a
committee of disinterested directors, there can be no assurance
that the terms of any such transactions will be as favorable to
us or our subsidiaries or affiliates as may otherwise be
obtained in arms length negotiations.
|
|
|
Business Opportunities. ECC will retain its
interests in various U.S. and international companies that
have subsidiaries or controlled affiliates that own or operate
domestic or foreign services that may compete with services
offered by our businesses. We may also compete with ECC when we
participate in auctions for spectrum or orbital slots for our
satellites.
|
We may not be able to resolve any potential conflicts, and, even
if we do so, the resolution may be less favorable to us than if
we were dealing with an unaffiliated party.
We do not have any agreements with ECC that restrict us from
selling our products to competitors of ECC. We also do not have
any agreements with ECC that would prevent us from competing
with each other.
In addition, the corporate opportunity policy set forth in our
articles of incorporation addresses potential conflicts of
interest for officers and directors of ECC who are also officers
or directors of us. This policy could restrict our ability to
take advantage of certain corporate opportunities. The
principles for resolving such
28
potential conflicts of interest are described under
Description of Our Capital Stock Provisions of
Our Articles of Incorporation Relating to Related-Party
Transactions and Corporate Opportunities.
We may
incur material costs and expenses as a result of our separation
from ECC.
We may incur costs and expenses greater than those we currently
incur as a result of our separation from ECC. These increased
costs and expenses may arise from various factors, including
financial reporting, costs associated with complying with
federal securities laws (including compliance with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), tax administration and human
resources related functions. Although ECC will continue to
provide many of these services to us under the services
agreement, such services are for a limited period of time. We
cannot assure you that these costs will not be material to our
business.
Substantial
sales of our common stock may occur in connection with or
following the spin-off, which could cause our share price to
decline.
The EHC Class A common stock that is distributed in the
spin-off generally may be sold immediately in the public market.
We expect that some of our shareholders, including possibly some
of our larger shareholders, will sell the Class A common
stock that they receive in the spin-off because, among other
reasons, our business profile or market capitalization as an
independent, publicly-traded company do not fit their investment
objectives. Moreover, index funds hold ECC Class A common
stock. Unless we are included in these indices from the date of
the spin-off, these index funds will be required to sell our
Class A common stock that they receive in the distribution.
The sales of significant amounts of our Class A common
stock or the perception in the market that these sales will
occur could adversely affect the market price of our
Class A common stock.
Risks
Relating to our Common Stock and the Securities Market
We
cannot be certain that an active trading market will develop or
be sustained after the spin-off, and following the spin-off our
stock price may fluctuate significantly.
We cannot assure you that an active trading market will develop
or be sustained for our common stock after the spin-off. Nor can
we predict the prices at which classes of our common stock may
trade after the spin-off. Similarly, we cannot predict the
effect of the spin-off on the trading prices of ECCs
common stock or whether the market value of the shares of a
class of our common stock and the shares of the same class of
ECCs common stock held by a shareholder after the spin-off
will be less than, equal to or greater than the market value of
the shares of that class of ECCs common stock held by such
shareholder prior to the spin-off.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly
due to a number of factors, some of which may be beyond our
control, including:
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimated by securities analysts or our
ability to meet those estimates;
|
|
|
the operating and stock price performance of comparable
companies; and
|
|
|
domestic and foreign economic conditions.
|
If,
following the spin-off, we are unable to satisfy the
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, or our internal control over financial reporting is not
effective, the reliability of our financial statements may be
questioned and our stock price may suffer.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires any
company subject to the reporting requirements of the
U.S. securities laws to do a comprehensive evaluation of
its and its consolidated subsidiaries internal control
over financial reporting. To comply with this statute, we will
eventually be required to document and test our internal control
procedures, our management will be required to assess and issue
a report concerning our internal control over financial
reporting, and our independent auditors will be required to
issue an opinion on managements assessment of those
matters. The rules governing the standards that must be met for
29
management to assess our internal control over financial
reporting are complex and require significant documentation,
testing and possible remediation to meet the detailed standards
under the rules. During the course of its testing, our
management may identify material weaknesses or deficiencies
which may not be remedied in time to meet the deadline imposed
by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If our management cannot favorably
assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting or our auditors identify material weaknesses in our
internal controls, investor confidence in our financial results
may weaken, and our stock price may suffer.
It may
be difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so
may be beneficial to our shareholders.
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of
our company that a shareholder may consider favorable. These
provisions include the following:
|
|
|
authorizing a capital structure with multiple classes of common
stock: a Class A that entitles the holders to one vote per
share, a Class B that entitles the holders to ten votes per
share, a Class C that entitles the holders to one vote per
share, except upon a change in control of our company in which
case the holders of Class C are entitled to ten votes per
share and a non-voting Class D;
|
|
|
authorizing the issuance of blank check preferred
stock, which could be issued by our board of directors to
increase the number of outstanding shares and thwart a takeover
attempt;
|
|
|
limiting who may call special meetings of shareholders;
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of
candidates for election to our board of directors or for
proposing matters that can be acted upon by shareholders at
shareholder meetings;
|
|
|
the existence of authorized and unissued stock which would allow
our board of directors to issue shares to persons friendly to
current management, thereby protecting the continuity of its
management, or which could be used to dilute the stock ownership
of persons seeking to obtain control of us.
|
After
the spin-off, we will be controlled by one principal
shareholder.
Immediately after the spin-off, Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, will beneficially own approximately
80.0% of our total equity securities and possess approximately
50.0% of the total voting power. Thus, Mr. Ergen will have
the ability to elect a majority of our directors and to control
all other matters requiring the approval of our shareholders. As
a result of Mr. Ergens voting power, we will be a
controlled company as defined in the Nasdaq listing
rules and, therefore, will not be subject to Nasdaq requirements
that would otherwise require us to have (i) a majority of
independent directors; (ii) a nominating committee composed
solely of independent directors; (iii) compensation of our
executive officers determined by a majority of the independent
directors or a compensation committee composed solely of
independent directors; and (iv) director nominees selected,
or recommended for the Boards selection, either by a
majority of the independent directors or a nominating committee
composed solely of independent directors. Mr. Ergen will
also beneficially own approximately 50.0% of the total equity
and 80.0% of the total voting power of ECC and will continue to
be the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ECC, which will
directly and through its subsidiaries continue to be our largest
customer, accounting for a substantial majority of our revenues.
Holders
of any single class of our common stock may not have any
remedies if any action by our directors or officers has an
adverse effect on only that series of our common
stock.
Principles of Nevada law and the provisions of our certificate
of incorporation may protect decisions of our board of directors
that have a disparate impact upon holders of any single class of
our common stock. Under Nevada law, the board of directors has a
duty to act with due care and in the best interests of all of
our shareholders, including the holders of all classes of our
common stock. Principles of Nevada law established in cases
involving differing treatment of multiple classes or series of
stock provide that a board of directors owes an equal duty to
all common shareholders regardless of class or series and does
not have separate or additional duties to any group of
shareholders. As a result, in some circumstances, our directors
may be
30
required to make a decision that is adverse to the holders of
one class of our common stock. Under the principles of Nevada
law referred to above, you may not be able to challenge these
decisions if our board of directors is disinterested and
adequately informed with respect to these decisions and acts in
good faith and in the honest belief that it is acting in the
best interests of all of our shareholders.
We do
not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable
future.
We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common
stock. We intend to retain any earnings to finance the operation
and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying
any cash dividends in the future. As a result, you may only
receive a return on your investment in our common stock if the
market price of our common stock increases.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or
publish unfavorable research about our business, our stock price
and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on
any research reports that securities or industry analysts
publish about us or our business. After our separation from ECC,
if no securities or industry analysts initiate coverage of us,
the trading price for our stock may be negatively impacted. In
the event securities or industry analysts cover us and one or
more of these analysts downgrade our stock or publish
unfavorable reports about our business, our stock price would
likely decline. In addition, if any securities or industry
analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish
reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease,
which could cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.
31
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This information statement contains certain forward-looking
statements regarding business strategies, market potential,
future financial performance and other matters. In particular,
information included under the headings The
Spin-Off, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business contain forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements inherently involve many risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those projected in these statements. Where, in
any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or
belief as to future results or events, such expectation or
belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a
reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the
expectation or belief will result or be achieved or
accomplished. Please refer to Risk Factors for some
but not all of the factors that could cause actual results or
events to differ materially from those anticipated.
All cautionary statements made herein should be read as being
applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they
appear. In this connection, investors should consider the risks
described herein and should not place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements and such risks, uncertainties
and other factors speak only as of the date of this information
statement, and we expressly disclaim any obligation or
undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any
forward-looking statement contained herein, or to reflect any
change in our expectations with regard thereto or any other
change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such
statement is based.
32
Background
The board of directors of ECC has approved the spin-off of
EchoStar Holding Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of ECC.
EHC will hold the technology and certain infrastructure assets
of ECC. ECC will retain its consumer business, including DISH
Network, its U.S. consumer pay-TV business. In making its
determination, the ECC board of directors met numerous times and
considered, among other things, the continuation of ECCs
current operating strategy, and concluded that we and ECC would
be able to compete more effectively and have the opportunity to
achieve better revenue growth and profitability as a result of
the spin-off.
Prior to the spin-off, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of ECC.
Following a series of distributions and contributions from ECC
and its subsidiaries to us, we and the companies that will be
our subsidiaries after the spin-off, which we refer to as
EchoStar Holding Corporation, or EHC, will be engaged in the
digital set-top box business and the fixed satellite services
business.
To accomplish the spin-off, ECC will distribute all of its
equity interest in us, consisting of shares of our Class A
common stock and our Class B common stock, to ECCs
shareholders on a pro rata basis based on the class of ECC
common stock held by each such shareholder. Following the
spin-off, ECC will cease to own any equity interest in us, and
we will operate independently from ECC. No vote of ECCs
shareholders is required or being sought in connection with the
spin-off, and ECCs shareholders will not have any
appraisal rights in connection with the spin-off.
The distribution of our common stock as described in this
information statement is subject to the satisfaction or waiver
of certain conditions. For a more detailed description of these
conditions, see Conditions to the
Spin-Off.
Reasons
for the Spin-off
The ECC board of directors regularly reviews the operations that
ECC conducts to ensure that ECCs resources are being put
to use in a manner that is in the best interests of ECC and its
shareholders. As a result of this ongoing evaluation, ECC
concluded that some of its existing non-core businesses were
being undervalued by analysts and the market generally, and that
these businesses would be in a better competitive position if
they were operated as a separate entity from DISH Network.
Neither we nor ECC can assure you that, following the spin-off,
any benefits will be realized to the extent we anticipate or at
all. The board of directors of ECC considered the following
potential benefits in making its determination to consummate the
spin-off:
|
|
|
Creating effective management incentives tied to each of
EHCs and ECCs performance and increasing the ability
to attract and retain personnel. The separation
will permit the creation of equity securities, including options
and restricted share units, for each of ECC and our company with
a value that is expected to reflect more closely the efforts and
performance of each companys management. These equity
securities will enable each separate, publicly-traded company to
provide incentive compensation arrangements for its specific
employee base that are directly related to the market
performance of each company. ECC believes these equity-based
compensation arrangements will provide enhanced incentives for
performance and improve the ability of each of EHC and ECC to
attract, retain and motivate qualified employees. Equity based
compensation is believed to be particularly important in the
case of emerging opportunities in our fixed satellite services
and international opportunities divisions, which are young
businesses in dynamic markets with high potential, the
achievements of which we believe can be enhanced greatly through
incentive compensation arrangements.
|
|
|
|
Creating opportunities to effectively develop and finance
expansion plans. The spin-off will allow each of
ECC and our company to develop financing strategies and capital
structures designed to correspond better to the underlying
fundamentals of its businesses and the industry in which it
operates. As a separate, publicly-traded company, our capital
structure is expected to facilitate selective acquisitions,
joint ventures, investments and financings, possibly using our
common stock as currency, as well as to facilitate strategic
alliances and internal expansion that are important for us to
remain competitive in our industry. Moreover,
|
33
|
|
|
the spin-off may provide both ECC and EHC with greater
flexibility in raising capital and responding to strategic
opportunities and to avoid competing demands for capital.
|
|
|
|
Increasing the market value of the
companies. Although there can be no assurance,
ECC believes that, over time, following the separation, the
common stock of the separate, publicly-traded companies should
have a higher aggregate market value, on a fully distributed
basis and assuming the same market conditions, than if ECC were
not to complete the separation. The ECC board of directors
believes that this increase in the market value of the common
stock, if achieved, should permit each separate, publicly-traded
company to effect acquisitions, joint ventures and investments
with common stock in a manner that preserves capital with less
dilution of the existing shareholders interests than would
occur by issuing pre-distribution ECC common stock.
|
|
|
Allowing each company to separately pursue the business
strategies that best suit its long-term
interest. Each of ECC and EHC will be able to
focus its efforts on its strategic priorities, its businesses
and growth opportunities, which will allow each company to
respond more quickly and efficiently to developments in the
industry or industries in which it operates and which may
facilitate the potential expansion and growth of each company.
As a separate, publicly-traded company, the separation will
permit us to focus on, among other things, our set-top box
business, our international opportunities and investments, and
particularly our fixed satellite services business, without the
need to consider the strategic direction of ECC.
|
|
|
Creating separate companies that have different financial
characteristics, which may appeal to different investor
bases. Establishing separate, publicly-traded
companies will allow investors to make independent investment
decisions with respect to ECC and us. Investment in one or the
other company may appeal to investors with different goals,
interests and concerns.
|
The board of directors of ECC also considered the costs and
risks associated with the spin-off. The board of directors of
ECC considered, among other factors, any potential negative
impact on ECCs credit ratings as a result of the
divestiture of assets that will be contributed to us; the
possibility that either we or ECC may experience disruptions in
our respective businesses as a result of the spin-off; actual or
perceived conflicts of interest that may arise between ECC and
us in a number of areas relating to our past and ongoing
relationships, including: (i) cross officerships,
directorships and stock ownership, (ii) intercompany
transactions, (iii) intercompany agreements and
(iv) business opportunities; the risk that the combined
trading prices of our common stock and ECCs common stock
after the spin-off may be lower than the trading price of
ECCs common stock before the spin-off; the loss of
synergies from operating as one company; and the additional
legal, accounting and administrative costs associated with our
becoming a separate, publicly-traded company. In view of the
wide variety of factors considered in connection with the
evaluation of the spin-off and the complexity of these matters,
the ECC board of directors did not find it useful to, and did
not attempt to quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative
weights to the factors considered. The board of directors of ECC
concluded, however, that the potential benefits of the spin-off
outweigh the potential negative factors, and that separating the
non-core business of ECC from ECC in the form of a tax-free
distribution to ECC shareholders is appropriate and advisable
for ECC and its shareholders.
Manner of
Effecting the Spin-Off
ECC will effect the spin-off by distributing to its shareholders
as a dividend:
|
|
|
One share of our Class A common stock for every five shares
of ECC Class A common stock,
|
and
|
|
|
One share of our Class B common stock for every five shares
of ECC Class B common stock,
|
in each case, owned of record by each shareholder on the record
date.
Prior to the spin-off, ECC will deliver all of the issued and
outstanding shares of our Class A common stock and
Class B common stock to the distribution agent. On or about
January 1, 2008, which we refer to as the distribution
date, the distribution agent will effect delivery of the shares
of our common stock issuable in the spin-off electronically, as
of the distribution date, to you or to your bank or brokerage
firm on your behalf by
34
way of direct registration in book-entry form. Registration in
book-entry form refers to a method of recording share ownership
when no physical share certificates are issued to shareholders,
as is the case in this distribution.
Commencing on or shortly after the distribution date, if you
hold physical share certificates that represent your common
stock of ECC and you are the registered holder of the ECC shares
represented by those certificates, the distribution agent will
mail to you an account statement that indicates the number of
shares of our common stock that have been registered in
book-entry form in your name.
Please note that if any shareholder of ECC on the record date
sells shares of ECC common stock after the record date but on or
before the distribution date, the buyer of those shares, and not
the seller, will become entitled to receive the shares of our
common stock issuable in respect of the shares sold. See
Trading Between the Record Date and
Distribution Date below for more information.
Most ECC shareholders hold their common stock of ECC through a
bank or brokerage firm. In such cases, the bank or brokerage
firm would be said to hold the shares in street name
and ownership would be recorded on the bank or brokerage
firms books. If you hold your ECC common stock through a
bank or brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will credit
your account for the common stock of our company that you are
entitled to receive in the spin-off. If you have any questions
concerning the mechanics of having shares held in street
name, we encourage you to contact your bank or brokerage
firm.
Shareholders of ECC are not being asked to take any action in
connection with the spin-off. No shareholder approval of the
spin-off is required or being sought. We are not asking you for
a proxy, and you are requested not to send us a proxy. You are
also not being asked to surrender any of your shares of ECC
common stock for shares of our common stock. The number of
outstanding shares of ECC common stock will not change as a
result of the spin-off.
Interests
of EHC directors and officers in the spin-off
In connection with the spin-off, EHC directors and executive
officers have interests in the spin-off that are different from,
or in addition to, your interests as a shareholder, and that may
present actual or potential conflicts of interest. These
interests include:
|
|
|
vesting of EHC stock options and restricted stock unit awards
held by EHC directors and executive officers;
|
|
|
payment of base compensation and annual bonuses to EHC executive
officers;
|
|
|
indemnification of EHC directors and executive officers pursuant
to EHCs articles of incorporation and bylaws;
|
|
|
Charles W. Ergen, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
ECC, will also be the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
EHC following the spin-off; and
|
|
|
five directors from ECCs board of directors after the
distribution, currently expected to be Charles W. Ergen, Steven
R. Goodbarn, David K. Moskowitz, Tom A. Ortloff and Carl Vogel,
will be designated by EHC to serve on its board of directors. In
addition, two EHC directors, Michael T. Dugan and
C. Michael Schroeder, will resign from the board of
directors of ECC on or prior to the distribution date.
|
Treatment
of Fractional Shares
The distribution agent will not distribute any fractional shares
in connection with the spin-off. Instead, any shareholder who
would be entitled to receive a fractional share of our
Class A common stock will instead receive a cash payment in
lieu of such fractional share. The distribution agent will
aggregate all fractional shares into whole shares and sell the
whole shares in the open market at prevailing market prices. The
distribution agent will then distribute the aggregate net cash
proceeds of the sales pro rata to each holder who otherwise
would have been entitled to receive a fractional share. The
distribution agent, in its sole discretion, without any
influence by ECC or us, will determine when, how, through which
broker-dealer and at what price to sell the whole shares. We
will reimburse the distribution agent for the cost of any
brokerage fees incurred
35
by the distribution agent in connection with these sales, which
we expect to be reasonable and customary for transactions of
this type. The distribution agent and any broker-dealer used by
the distribution agent will not be an affiliate of either ECC or
us. Any shareholder who would be entitled to receive a
fractional share of our Class B common stock will have such
fractional share rounded off and will instead receive the number
of whole shares they are entitled to receive without regard to
any fractional share. The elimination of fractional shares of
our Class B common stock is due the limited number of
Class B shareholders and the small number of fractional
shares that would therefore result from the spin-off, making an
aggregation and public sale of such fractional shares
impractical.
The distribution agent will distribute a check to each record
holder of Class A shares representing the cash amount
deliverable in lieu of the record holders fractional share
interest as soon as practicable following the calculation of
these cash amounts. If you hold your shares through a bank or
brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will receive, on
your behalf, your pro rata share of the aggregate net cash
proceeds of the sales and will electronically credit your
account for your share of such proceeds. No interest will be
paid on any cash distributed in lieu of fractional shares. The
receipt of cash in lieu of fractional shares will generally be
taxable to the recipient shareholders. See
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Spin-Off below for more information.
Treatment
of ECC Stock Incentive Awards
Options to purchase shares of ECC Class A common stock,
which we refer to as ECC Options, and restricted stock units
with respect to shares of ECC Class A common stock, which
we refer to as ECC RSUs have been granted to various directors,
officers and employees of ECC and certain of its subsidiaries
pursuant to the EchoStar Communications Corporation 1995 Stock
Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated EchoStar Communications
Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated
EchoStar Communications 2001 Nonemployee Director Stock Option
Plan and the EchoStar Communications Corporation 1995
Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan and various other stock
incentive plans administered by the compensation committee of
ECCs board of directors. Under the anti-dilution
provisions of the applicable plans, the ECC compensation
committee has the authority to make equitable adjustments to
outstanding ECC Options and ECC RSUs in the event of certain
transactions, including the distribution of our common stock in
connection with the spin-off. The ECC compensation committee has
determined to make various adjustments to outstanding ECC
Options and ECC RSUs, as described below, to preserve the
economic benefits of the original award following the spin-off.
These adjustments will be made in the same manner for all
holders of ECC options and other stock-based awards of ECC,
including ECCs executive officers and directors. Any
options to purchase, or awards relating to, shares of our common
stock issued in connection with such adjustments will be
obligations of our company. All options exercisable for, and all
awards relating to, shares of ECC Class A common stock,
regardless of any adjustment, will remain obligations of ECC.
We intend to file a registration statement with respect to
shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise, or vesting,
of the equity awards that we issue, as soon as practicable
following the effective date of this registration statement.
Option
Awards
As of the distribution date, each ECC Option will be divided
into two options as follows:
|
|
|
an option (which we refer to as an EHC Option) to purchase
shares of our Class A common stock, exercisable for the
number of shares of our Class A common stock that would
have been issued in the spin-off in respect of the shares of ECC
Class A common stock subject to the applicable ECC Option,
if such ECC Option had been exercised in full immediately prior
to the record date, rounded down to the nearest
whole-share; and
|
|
|
|
an option (which we refer to as an Adjusted ECC option) to
purchase shares of ECC Class A common stock, exercisable
for the same number of shares of ECC Class A common stock
that are exercisable with respect to the outstanding ECC Option,
rounded down to the nearest whole-share.
|
36
The aggregate exercise price of each outstanding ECC option will
be allocated between the EHC Option and the Adjusted ECC Option
as follows:
|
|
|
each EHC Option will have an exercise price equal to
(A) the exercise price of the ECC option prior to the
distribution date multiplied by (B) (i) the closing trading
price of EHC Class A common stock on the first regular
trading day after the distribution date divided by (ii) the
sum of (a) the closing trading price of ECC Class A
common stock on the first regular trading day after the
distribution date and (b) the closing trading price of EHC
Class A common stock on the first regular trading day after
the distribution date multiplied by 0.20, which we refer to as
the dividend ratio for EHC Class A common stock distributed
in the spin-off, rounded up to the nearest whole-cent.
|
|
|
|
each Adjusted ECC Option will have an exercise price equal to
(A) the exercise price of the ECC option prior to the
distribution date multiplied by (B) (i) the closing trading
price of ECC Class A common stock on the first regular
trading day after to the distribution date divided by
(ii) the sum of (a) the closing trading price of ECC
Class A common stock on the first regular trading day after
to the distribution date and (b) the closing trading price
of EHC Class A common stock on the first regular trading
day after the distribution date multiplied by the dividend
ratio, rounded up to the nearest whole-cent.
|
Set forth below is an example of how the allocation would work.
Assume that a current employee, executive officer or director of
ECC holds an option to purchase 100 shares of ECC
Class A common stock with an exercise price of $10.00 per
share. Also assume that the closing trading price of ECC common
stock on the first regular trading day after the distribution
date is $35.00, the closing trading price of EHC common stock on
the first regular trading day after the distribution date is
$25.00 and 0.20 of a share of EHC Class A common stock has
been issued for every share of ECC Class A common stock
held by a shareholder of ECC. The EHC Option would be an option
to purchase 20 shares of EHC Class A common stock
(i.e., 100 x 0.20) with an exercise price of $6.25 per
share (i.e., $10 * ($25 / ($35 + $5))). The
Adjusted ECC Option would be an option to purchase
100 shares of ECC Class A common stock with an
exercise price of $8.75 per share (i.e., $10 *
($35 / ($35 + $5))). Assuming that the value of ECC
immediately prior to the allocation was equal to the combined
value of ECC and EHC following the spin-off (i.e., ($35 +
($25 * 0.2)), or $40), the intrinsic value of the ECC stock
option prior to the allocation was $3,000 (i.e.,
($40 − $10) * 100), and after the allocation, the
intrinsic value of the EHC Option and Adjusted ECC Option, taken
together, would still be $3,000 (i.e., ($25 −
$6.25) * 20, or $375) plus (i.e.,
($35 − $8.75) * 100, or $2,625).
Each Adjusted ECC Option and EHC Option will take into account
all employment with both ECC and EHC for purposes of determining
when the option vests and terminates. Fractional shares will be
adjusted or compensated by ECC as appropriate in the sole
discretion of the ECC compensation committee. All other terms
and conditions of the EHC Option and the Adjusted ECC Option
will generally be the same as the outstanding ECC Option, in all
material respects.
As a result of these adjustments, certain persons who are
employed by or associated with ECC immediately following the
distribution date will hold EHC Options, and certain persons who
will be employed by or associated with our company immediately
following the distribution date may hold Adjusted ECC Options.
Regardless of these employment or other relationships, ECC will
not be responsible for the exercise or settlement of any EHC
Option, and we will not be responsible for the exercise or
settlement of any option to purchase ECC common stock (including
an Adjusted ECC Option). Any exercising holder of an EHC Option
must exercise the security directly with us. Similarly, any
exercising holder of an option to purchase ECC common stock must
exercise the security directly with ECC. In this regard, we will
enter into an option agreement with each holder of an EHC
Option, and, if necessary, ECC will amend its existing option
agreement with each holder of an outstanding ECC Option, in each
case to reflect the provisions described above.
Restricted
Stock Unit Awards
For each ECC RSU outstanding as of the distribution date, the
holder of such ECC RSU will be entitled to receive, for each
share of ECC Class A common stock subject thereto, an EHC
RSU with respect to the
37
number of shares our Class A common stock that would have
been issued in the spin-off in respect of the shares of ECC
Class A common stock subject to the applicable ECC RSU.
The distribution will not have any other effect on the
outstanding ECC RSUs, and the RSUs relating to our common stock
will be subject to the same terms and conditions as apply to the
ECC awards with respect to which the adjustment, or
distribution, as applicable, is made. Each such award will take
into account all employment with both ECC and EHC for purposes
of determining when the award vests or the restrictions on the
award lapse, as applicable. Fractional shares will be adjusted
or compensated by ECC as appropriate in the sole discretion of
the ECC compensation committee.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off
The following is a summary of certain material U.S. federal
income tax consequences to the holders of ECC common stock in
connection with the spin-off. The summary is based on the Code,
the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder and judicial and
administrative interpretations thereof, in each case as in
effect and available as of the date of this document and all of
which are subject to change at any time, possibly with
retroactive effect. Any such change could affect the tax
consequences described below.
This summary does not discuss all tax considerations that may be
relevant to shareholders in light of their particular
circumstances, nor does it address the consequences to
shareholders subject to special treatment under the
U.S. federal income tax laws, such as:
|
|
|
dealers or traders in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
tax-exempt entities;
|
|
|
banks, financial institutions or insurance companies;
|
|
|
real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies or
grantor trusts;
|
|
|
persons who acquired ECC common stock pursuant to the exercise
of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation;
|
|
|
shareholders who own, or are deemed to own, at least 10% or
more, by voting power or value, of ECCs equity;
|
|
|
holders owning ECC common stock as part of a position in a
straddle or as part of a hedging, conversion or other risk
reduction transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United
States;
|
|
|
holders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax;
|
|
|
persons that own ECC common stock through partnerships or other
pass through entities; or
|
|
|
holders of ECC common stock who are neither citizens nor
residents of the United States, or that are foreign
corporations, foreign partnerships or foreign estates or trusts
for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
|
This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax
consequences to ECC shareholders who do not hold ECC common
stock as a capital asset. Moreover, this summary does not
address any state, local or foreign tax consequences.
If a partnership (or any other entity treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds ECC common
stock, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will
generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities
of the partnership. Such a partner or partnership should consult
its own tax advisor as to its tax consequences.
38
You
should consult your own tax advisor with respect to the U.S.
federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of the
distribution.
The spin-off is conditioned upon ECCs receipt of an
opinion of White & Case LLP to be delivered on the
distribution date (which condition ECC may waive in its sole
discretion), substantially to the effect that the spin-off,
together with certain related transactions, will qualify as
reorganizations under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the
Code. In addition, ECC has received a private letter ruling from
the IRS that the distribution will so qualify. Assuming the
spin-off so qualifies for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
except with respect to gain or loss recognized under the
applicable Treasury Regulations governing consolidated tax
returns, the spin-off will not result in any taxable income,
gain or loss to ECC;
|
|
|
no gain or loss will be recognized by, or be includible in the
income of, a shareholder of ECC common stock solely as the
result of the receipt of our common stock in the spin-off,
except, as described below, in connection with cash received in
lieu of fractional shares of our Class A common stock;
|
|
|
the basis of the ECC common stock and our common stock in the
hands of ECCs shareholders immediately after the spin-off
will be the same as the basis of the ECC common stock
immediately before the spin-off, allocated between the common
stock of ECC and us in proportion to their relative fair market
values on the date of the distribution; and
|
|
|
the holding period of our common stock received by ECC
shareholders will include the holding period of their ECC common
stock, provided that such ECC common stock is held as a capital
asset on the date of the spin-off.
|
ECC shareholders that have acquired different blocks of ECC
common stock at different times or at different prices should
consult their tax advisors regarding the allocation of their
aggregate adjusted basis among, and their holding period of,
shares of our common stock distributed with respect to such
blocks of ECC common stock.
If you receive cash in lieu of a fractional share of
Class A common stock as part of the spin-off, you will be
treated as though you first received a distribution of the
fractional share in the spin-off and then sold it for the amount
of such cash. You will generally recognize capital gain or loss,
provided that the fractional share is considered to be held as a
capital asset, measured by the difference between the cash you
receive for such fractional share and your tax basis in that
fractional share, as determined above. Such capital gain or loss
will be a long-term capital gain or loss if your holding period
for your ECC common stock is more than one year on the
distribution date.
Although a private letter ruling relating to the qualification
of the spin-off and certain related transactions under
Sections 355 and 368(a)(l)(D) of the Code will generally be
binding on the IRS, the continuing validity of such ruling, if
obtained, will be subject to the accuracy of factual
representations and assumptions made in the ruling request.
Also, as part of the IRSs general policy with respect to
rulings on spin-off transactions under Section 355 of the
Code, any private letter ruling obtained by ECC will not be
based upon a determination by the IRS that certain conditions
which are necessary to obtain tax-free treatment under
Section 355 of the Code have been satisfied. Rather, such
private letter ruling will be based upon representations by ECC
that these conditions have been satisfied, and any inaccuracy in
such representations could invalidate the private letter ruling.
As a result of this IRS policy, ECC has made it a condition to
the spin-off that ECC obtain an opinion of White &
Case LLP on the distribution date substantially to the effect
that the spin-off, together with certain related transactions,
will qualify as reorganizations under Sections 355 and
368(a)(1)(D) of the Code (which condition ECC may waive in its
sole discretion). The opinion will be based upon various factual
representations and assumptions, as well as certain undertakings
made by ECC and us. If any of those factual representations or
assumptions were untrue or incomplete in any material respect,
any undertaking was not complied with, or the facts upon which
the opinion is based were materially different from the facts at
the time of the spin-off, the spin-off may not qualify for
tax-free treatment. Opinions of counsel are not binding on the
IRS. As a result, the conclusions expressed in the opinion of
counsel could be challenged by the IRS, and if the IRS prevails
in such challenge, the tax consequences to you could be
materially less favorable.
39
The
Spin-off
If the spin-off were not to qualify as a tax-free transaction,
ECC would recognize taxable gain equal to the excess of the fair
market value of our common stock distributed to ECC shareholders
over ECCs tax basis in our common stock. In addition, each
shareholder who receives our common stock in the spin-off would
generally be treated as receiving a distribution in an amount
equal to the fair market value of our common stock received,
which would generally result in:
|
|
|
a taxable dividend to the extent of such shareholders pro
rata share of ECCs current and accumulated earnings and
profits;
|
|
|
a reduction in such shareholders basis (but not below
zero) in ECC common stock to the extent the amount received
exceeds such shareholders share of ECCs earnings and
profits; and
|
|
|
a taxable gain from the exchange of ECC common stock to the
extent the amount received exceeds both such shareholders
share of ECCs earnings and profits and such
shareholders basis in ECC common stock.
|
Even if the spin-off otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment
under Section 355 of the Code, it may be disqualified as
tax-free to ECC under Section 355(e) of the Code if 50% or
more of the stock of either ECC or us is acquired as part of a
plan or series of related transactions that include the
distribution. For this purpose, any acquisitions of our stock or
ECCs stock within two years before or after the
distribution are presumed to be part of such a plan, although
ECC or we may be able to rebut that presumption. If such an
acquisition of our stock or ECCs stock triggers the application
of Section 355(e) of the Code, ECC would recognize taxable
gain as described above with respect to the spin-off, but the
spin-off would generally be tax-free to each ECC shareholder.
Under the tax sharing agreement between ECC and us, we would be
required to indemnify ECC against that taxable gain if it were
triggered by an acquisition of our stock, stock options or
assets. Additionally, pursuant to the tax sharing agreement
between ECC and us, we would be required to indemnify ECC
against any taxes, losses, claims and expenses resulting from
the spin-off and certain related transactions failing to qualify
as tax-free distributions pursuant to any provision of
Section 355 or Section 361 of the Code in certain
other circumstances.
ECC may incur some tax cost in connection with the spin-off (as
a result of certain intercompany transactions or as a result of
certain differences between federal, on the one hand, and
foreign or state tax rules, on the other), whether or not the
spin-off qualifies for tax-free treatment under
Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code.
Information
Statement
U.S. Treasury Regulations require each ECC shareholder that
(i) receives shares of our stock in the spin-off and
(ii) immediately before the spin-off owned five percent or
more (by vote or value) of the total outstanding stock of ECC,
to attach to such shareholders U.S. federal income
tax return for the year in which such stock is received a
statement setting forth certain information related to the
spin-off.
THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION IS NOT INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE A
COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF ALL TAX CONSEQUENCES RELATING TO THE
SPIN-OFF. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR OWN TAX ADVISOR CONCERNING THE
TAX CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR PARTICULAR SITUATION.
Results
of the Spin-Off
After the spin-off, we will be an independent, publicly-traded
company. Immediately following the spin-off, we expect to have
outstanding approximately 42.0 million shares of our
Class A common stock and approximately 47.7 million
shares of our Class B common stock, based upon the number
of shares of ECC Class A common stock and ECC Class B
common stock outstanding as of November 30, 2007. The
actual number of shares of our Class A common stock and
Class B common stock to be distributed in the spin-off will
depend upon the actual number of shares of ECC Class A
common stock and ECC Class B common stock outstanding on
the record date and will reflect any exercise of ECC options
between the date the ECC
40
board of directors declares the dividend for the spin-off and
the record date of the spin-off. In addition, no shares of our
Class C common stock or Class D common stock will be
outstanding immediately following the spin-off. The spin-off
will not affect the number of outstanding shares of ECC common
stock or any rights of ECC shareholders, although it will affect
the market value of each outstanding share of ECC common stock.
Immediately following the spin-off, we expect to have
approximately 11,500 holders of record of shares of our
Class A common stock. Mr. Ergen and entities related
to Mr. Ergen will be the only holders of record of our
Class B common stock following the spin-off.
Before the spin-off, we will enter into a Separation Agreement
and other agreements with ECC to effect the spin-off and provide
a framework for our relationship with ECC after the spin-off.
These agreements will govern the relationships among ECC and us
subsequent to the completion of the spin-off and provide for the
allocation among ECC and us of ECCs assets, liabilities
and obligations attributable to periods prior to our separation
from ECC. The Separation Agreement, in particular, requires ECC
to assume certain of ECCs contingent corporate liabilities
and debt.
Listing
and Trading of our Common Stock
On the date of this information statement, we are a wholly-owned
subsidiary of ECC. Accordingly, there is currently no public
market for our common stock; although a when-issued
market in our Class A common stock may develop. See
Trading Between the Record Date and
Distribution Date below for an explanation of a
when-issued market. We have applied to list our
shares of Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select
Market under the symbol SATS. Following the
spin-off, ECC Class A common stock will continue to trade
on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol
DISH.
Neither we nor ECC can assure you as to the trading price of ECC
Class A common stock or our Class A common stock after
the spin-off or as to whether the combined trading prices of our
Class A common stock and the ECC Class A common stock
after the spin-off will be less than, equal to or greater than
the trading prices of ECC Class A common stock prior to the
spin-off. The trading price of our Class A common stock may
fluctuate significantly following the spin-off. See Risk
Factors Risks Relating to Our Common Stock and the
Securities Market.
The shares of our common stock distributed to ECCs
shareholders will be freely transferable, except for shares
received by individuals who are our affiliates and any shares
distributed in respect of any ECC RSUs. Individuals who may be
considered our affiliates after the spin-off include individuals
who control, are controlled by or are under common control with
us, as those terms generally are interpreted for federal
securities law purposes. This may include some or all of our
executive officers and directors. Individuals who are our
affiliates will be permitted to sell their shares of our common
stock only pursuant to an effective registration statement under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or an exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act, such as the
exemptions afforded by Section 4(1) of the Securities Act
or Rule 144 thereunder. Our affiliates will not be
permitted to sell shares of our common stock under Rule 144
until 90 days after the date on which the registration
statement of which this information statement forms a part is
declared effective.
Trading
Between the Record Date and Distribution Date
Between the record date and the distribution date, ECC
Class A common stock will continue to trade on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market in the regular way market. During this
time, shares of ECC Class A common stock that trade on the
regular way market will trade with an entitlement to receive
shares of our Class A common stock distributable in the
spin-off. No ex-dividend market will be established for any
class of our common stock until the first trading day following
the distribution date. Therefore, if you own shares of ECC
common stock on the record date and thereafter sell those shares
on or prior to the distribution date, you will also be selling
the shares of our common stock that would have been distributed
to you in the spin-off with respect to the shares of ECC common
stock you sell. On the first trading day following the
distribution date, shares of ECC Class A common stock will
begin trading without any entitlement to receive shares of our
common stock. Shares of ECC Class A common stock trade
under the symbol DISH.
41
Between the record date and the distribution date, a when-issued
trading market in our Class A common stock may develop. Our
Class A common stock is expected to be listed for trading
on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The when-issued trading
market would be a market for the shares of our Class A
common stock that will be distributed in the spin-off. If you
own shares of ECC common stock on the record date (and do not
sell those shares of ECC common stock on or before the
distribution date), then you are entitled to a number of shares
of the same class of our common stock based upon the number of
shares of such class of ECC common stock you held at that time.
If you own ECC Class A common stock, you may trade this
entitlement to receive shares of our common stock, without the
shares of ECC Class A common stock you own, on the
when-issued trading market. We expect when-issued trades of our
Class A common stock to settle within three trading days
after the distribution date. On the first trading day following
the distribution date, any when-issued trading with respect to
our Class A common stock will end and regular way trading
will begin. If when-issued trading occurs, the listing for our
Class A common stock is expected to be under trading
symbols different from our regular way trading symbols.
Following the distribution date, shares of our Class A
common stock are expected to be listed on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market under the trading symbol SATS. If the
spin-off does not occur, all when-issued trading will be null
and void.
Conditions
to the Spin-Off
We expect that the spin-off will be effective on the
distribution date, provided, that among other conditions
described in this information statement, the following
conditions shall have been satisfied or waived by ECC under the
Separation Agreement, each of which conditions may be waived by
ECC in its sole discretion (other than the effectiveness of our
registration statement on Form 10 and other required
material regulatory approvals):
|
|
|
the Securities and Exchange Commission shall have declared
effective our registration statement on Form 10, of which
this information statement is a part, under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, no stop order relating to the registration
statement shall be in effect and this information statement
shall have been mailed to holders of ECC common stock;
|
|
|
all permits, registrations and consents required under the
securities or blue sky laws in connection with the spin-off
shall have been received;
|
|
|
ECC shall have received the opinion of White & Case
LLP confirming the tax-free status of the spin-off and certain
related transactions for U.S. federal income tax purposes
on the distribution date;
|
|
|
|
the listing of our common shares on the Nasdaq Global Market or
Nasdaq Global Select Market shall have been approved;
|
|
|
|
all material governmental approvals and other consents necessary
to consummate the distribution, including without limitation FCC
approvals, shall have been received; and
|
|
|
no order, injunction or decree issued by any court of competent
jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing
consummation of the distribution or any of the transactions
related thereto shall be in effect.
|
The fulfillment of the foregoing conditions will not create any
obligation on ECCs part to effect the spin-off. ECC has
the right not to complete the spin-off if, at any time,
ECCs board of directors determines, in its sole
discretion, that the distribution is not in the best interests
of ECC or its stockholders or that market conditions are such
that it is not advisable to separate EHC from ECC.
Reasons
for Furnishing this Information Statement
This information statement is being furnished solely to provide
information to ECC shareholders who will receive shares of our
common stock in the spin-off. It is not to be construed as an
inducement or encouragement to buy or sell any of our securities
or any securities of ECC. We believe that the information
contained in this information statement is accurate as of the
date set forth on the cover. Changes to the information
contained in this information statement may occur after that
date, and neither our company nor ECC undertakes any obligation
to update the information except in the normal course of our
respective public disclosure obligations and practices.
42
SELECTED
HISTORICAL AND UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED
AND ADJUSTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables present selected historical information
relating to our combined financial condition and results of
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006 and the past five years. The financial data for the three
years ended December 31, 2006 has been derived from our
audited combined financial statements for the corresponding
periods. Data for the other periods presented has been derived
from unaudited information. The data should be read in
conjunction with our combined financial statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere
herein. Our historical and pro forma financial data included in
this information statement may not be indicative of our future
performance and does not necessarily reflect what our financial
condition and results of operations would have been had we
operated as a separate, stand-alone entity during the periods
presented, particularly since changes will occur in our
operations and capitalization as a result of our spin-off from
ECC. Our audited combined financial statements reflect the
historical financial position and results of operations of
entities included in consolidated financial statements of ECC,
representing almost exclusively ECCs set-top box business,
using the historical results of operations and historical bases
of assets and liabilities of this business. Our historical
combined financial statements reflect sales to ECC at cost and
do not include certain satellites, uplink and satellite
transmission assets, real estate and other assets and related
liabilities that will be contributed to us by ECC in the
spin-off. These assets and liabilities, which will primarily
comprise our fixed satellite services business, have been
separately audited and are included in the Statement of Net
Assets to be Contributed by ECC and Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
and Adjusted Financial Information included herein. The
financial condition and results of operations of our fixed
satellite services business have not been included in our
historical combined financial statements because our fixed
satellite services business was operated as an integral part of
ECCs subscription television business and did not
constitute a business in the historical financial
statements of ECC. Our historical financial data also does not
include financial information of Sling Media, Inc., which was
recently acquired by ECC and will be contributed to us in the
spin-off. Sling Medias audited consolidated financial
statements are included elsewhere in this information statement,
and its historical financial information also has been included
in our Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Adjusted
Financial Information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Statements of
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations Data:
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,592,381
|
|
|
$
|
1,182,768
|
|
|
$
|
1,132,899
|
|
|
$
|
2,080,259
|
|
|
$
|
1,525,320
|
|
|
$
|
1,513,691
|
|
|
$
|
1,720,091
|
|
|
$
|
976,636
|
|
|
$
|
1,037,862
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
1,247,536
|
|
|
|
1,121,067
|
|
|
|
1,065,216
|
|
|
|
1,609,571
|
|
|
|
1,440,178
|
|
|
|
1,438,629
|
|
|
|
1,650,775
|
|
|
|
886,665
|
|
|
|
934,997
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
53,712
|
|
|
|
40,634
|
|
|
|
39,093
|
|
|
|
62,966
|
|
|
|
56,451
|
|
|
|
45,928
|
|
|
|
39,809
|
|
|
|
32,361
|
|
|
|
32,966
|
|
General and administrative, including sales and marketing
|
|
|
93,962
|
|
|
|
56,844
|
|
|
|
43,973
|
|
|
|
100,400
|
|
|
|
60,106
|
|
|
|
56,366
|
|
|
|
65,059
|
|
|
|
50,472
|
|
|
|
72,366
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
211,499
|
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
285,987
|
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
5,071
|
|
|
|
5,511
|
|
|
|
6,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,606,709
|
|
|
|
1,222,936
|
|
|
|
1,152,875
|
|
|
|
2,058,924
|
|
|
|
1,562,767
|
|
|
|
1,546,755
|
|
|
|
1,760,714
|
|
|
|
975,009
|
|
|
|
1,046,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(14,328
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,976
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,335
|
|
|
$
|
(37,447
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33,064
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,623
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,627
|
|
|
$
|
(9,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(9,296
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39,943
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,486
|
)
|
|
$
|
104,835
|
|
|
$
|
(34,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,237
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,329
|
|
|
$
|
(97,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
89,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
90,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
$
|
1,538,516
|
|
|
$
|
530,753
|
|
|
$
|
323,576
|
|
|
$
|
106,109
|
|
|
$
|
143,437
|
|
|
$
|
156,814
|
|
|
$
|
52,148
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,581
|
|
|
$
|
1,699
|
|
|
$
|
1,523
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,837,454
|
|
|
$
|
919,624
|
|
|
$
|
517,821
|
|
|
$
|
229,392
|
|
|
$
|
277,843
|
|
|
$
|
248,811
|
|
|
$
|
228,191
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
$
|
389,137
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
$
|
647
|
|
|
$
|
2,214
|
|
|
$
|
756
|
|
Net investment in EHC
|
|
$
|
3,242,225
|
|
|
$
|
863,768
|
|
|
$
|
502,283
|
|
|
$
|
217,132
|
|
|
$
|
258,452
|
|
|
$
|
230,023
|
|
|
$
|
68,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash flows from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(34,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,374
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,193
|
)
|
|
$
|
(78,916
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,463
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,796
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
$
|
(160,236
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,953
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,781
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,619
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,814
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
$
|
198,625
|
|
|
$
|
91,176
|
|
|
$
|
104,534
|
|
|
$
|
39,782
|
|
|
$
|
69,715
|
|
|
$
|
74,899
|
|
|
$
|
35,390
|
|
44
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA COMBINED AND ADJUSTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Our audited historical combined financial statements reflect the
historical financial position and results of operations of
entities included in the consolidated financial statements of
ECC, principally representing only the digital set-top box
business, using the historical results of operations and
historical bases of assets and liabilities of this business. Our
historical combined financial statements reflect sales to ECC at
cost and do not include certain satellites, uplink and satellite
transmission assets, real estate and other assets and related
liabilities that will be contributed to us by ECC in the
spin-off. These assets and liabilities, which will primarily
comprise our fixed satellite services business, have been
separately audited and are included in the Statement of Net
Assets to be Contributed by ECC and Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
and Adjusted Financial Information included herein. Our
historical financial data also does not include financial
information of Sling Media, Inc., which was recently acquired by
ECC and will be contributed to us in the spin-off. Sling
Medias audited consolidated financial statements are
included elsewhere in this information statement, and its
historical financial information also has been included in our
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Adjusted Financial Information
included herein.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Adjusted Financial
Information give effect to:
|
|
|
the contribution by ECC to us of the net assets to primarily be
used in our fixed satellite services business, including
$1 billion in cash;
|
|
|
the results of operations and other expenses, including
depreciation expenses, related to the assets contributed to us
by ECC to be used in our fixed satellite services business;
|
|
|
the impact of the transition services and commercial agreements
between us and ECC;
|
|
|
|
the distribution of approximately 89.7 million shares of
our common stock to holders of ECC stock; and
|
|
|
|
the contribution of Sling Media to us.
|
The share numbers are based on ECC share numbers as of
September 30, 2007, and the settlement amount is based on
our balances as of September 30, 2007.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements of EHC
presented below have been derived in part from our audited
combined financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and from our unaudited combined financial
statements as of and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
These unaudited pro forma combined financial statements should
be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our combined financial statements and the
notes to those statements included elsewhere in this information
statement.
The unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and for the year
ended December 31, 2006 have been prepared as if the
transactions described above occurred as of January 1,
2006. The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of
September 30, 2007 has been prepared as if these
transactions occurred as of September 30, 2007. The pro
forma adjustments are based upon available information and
assumptions that management believes are reasonable based on our
current plans and expectations. However, such adjustments are
subject to change based on the final valuation of Sling Media
and the final terms of the spin-off and the transaction
agreements. Our historical financial, pro forma and other data
included in this information statement are not necessarily
indicative of our future financial position, future results of
operations or future cash flows, nor do they reflect what our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows would
have been as a stand-alone company during the periods presented.
45
The preliminary allocation of the purchase price for Sling Media
used in the unaudited pro forma combined financial information
is based on preliminary estimates and currently available
information. These assumptions and estimates will be revised as
additional information becomes available upon final valuation of
Sling Medias assets and liabilities. The final
determination of the allocation of the purchase price will be
based on the actual intangible assets, and net tangible assets
of Sling Media existing as of the date of the acquisition.
Our unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations do not
give effect to initial expenses directly attributable to the
spin-off because of their non-recurring nature. A significant
portion of these non-recurring charges to effect the separation
will be incurred by ECC, such as investment banker fees, outside
legal and accounting fees relating to the spin-off, office move
costs, costs to separate information systems and temporary
consulting costs. We will incur separation costs that have a
future benefit to our company such as employee compensation
expenses and temporary labor used to develop ongoing processes.
See Certain Intercompany Agreements.
46
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA COMBINED AND ADJUSTED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
Spin
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Sling Media
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Combined and
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and other sales ECC
|
|
$
|
1,288,691
|
|
|
$
|
172,418
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
1,461,109
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,461,109
|
|
Equipment sales
|
|
|
236,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,629
|
|
|
|
29,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265,684
|
|
FSS ECC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,434
|
(b)
|
|
|
331,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,434
|
|
FSS other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,557
|
(c)
|
|
|
8,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,557
|
|
Other ECC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,475
|
(d)
|
|
|
13,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
1,525,320
|
|
|
|
525,884
|
|
|
|
2,051,204
|
|
|
|
29,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,080,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment and other sales
|
|
|
1,440,178
|
|
|
|
2,876
|
(e)
|
|
|
1,443,054
|
|
|
|
20,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,463,245
|
|
FSS cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization(f))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,326
|
(f)
|
|
|
146,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,326
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
56,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,451
|
|
|
|
6,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,966
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
60,106
|
|
|
|
16,166
|
(g)
|
|
|
76,272
|
|
|
|
5,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,845
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,555
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
231,823
|
(h)
|
|
|
237,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,132
|
(q)
|
|
|
285,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,562,767
|
|
|
|
397,191
|
|
|
|
1,959,958
|
|
|
|
50,834
|
|
|
|
48,132
|
|
|
|
2,058,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(37,447
|
)
|
|
|
128,693
|
|
|
|
91,246
|
|
|
|
(21,779
|
)
|
|
|
(48,132
|
)
|
|
|
21,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
52,259
|
(i)
|
|
|
53,090
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,568
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(1,059
|
)
|
|
|
(36,677
|
)(j)
|
|
|
(37,736
|
)
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,248
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
|
|
(2,160
|
)
|
|
|
4,428
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
6,360
|
|
|
|
13,422
|
|
|
|
19,782
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(31,087
|
)
|
|
|
142,115
|
|
|
|
111,028
|
|
|
|
(20,858
|
)
|
|
|
(48,132
|
)
|
|
|
42,038
|
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net
|
|
|
(3,075
|
)
|
|
|
53,616
|
(k)
|
|
|
50,541
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
12,330
|
(l)
|
|
|
62,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(34,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
195,731
|
|
|
$
|
161,569
|
|
|
$
|
(20,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35,802
|
)
|
|
$
|
104,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
Diluted(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
Pro forma shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,699
|
|
Diluted(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,056
|
|
See accompanying notes.
47
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA COMBINED AND ADJUSTED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
Spin
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
Sling Media
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Combined and
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and other sales ECC
|
|
$
|
1,019,729
|
|
|
$
|
135,720
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
1,155,449
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,155,449
|
|
Equipment sales
|
|
|
163,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,039
|
|
|
|
21,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,272
|
|
FSS ECC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,619
|
(b)
|
|
|
227,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,619
|
|
FSS other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,871
|
(c)
|
|
|
14,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,871
|
|
Other ECC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,170
|
(d)
|
|
|
10,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
1,182,768
|
|
|
|
388,380
|
|
|
|
1,571,148
|
|
|
|
21,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,592,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment and other sales
|
|
|
1,121,067
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
(e)
|
|
|
1,123,077
|
|
|
|
15,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,138,485
|
|
FSS cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization(f))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,051
|
(f)
|
|
|
109,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,051
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
40,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,634
|
|
|
|
13,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,712
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
56,844
|
|
|
|
13,491
|
(g)
|
|
|
70,335
|
|
|
|
3,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,267
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,695
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
171,009
|
(h)
|
|
|
175,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,099
|
(q)
|
|
|
211,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,222,936
|
|
|
|
295,561
|
|
|
|
1,518,497
|
|
|
|
52,113
|
|
|
|
36,099
|
|
|
|
1,606,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(40,168
|
)
|
|
|
92,819
|
|
|
|
52,651
|
|
|
|
(30,880
|
)
|
|
|
(36,099
|
)
|
|
|
(14,328
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
42,981
|
(i)
|
|
|
45,842
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,220
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
|
|
(25,557
|
)(j)
|
|
|
(26,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,342
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
2,858
|
|
|
|
17,386
|
|
|
|
20,244
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(37,310
|
)
|
|
|
110,205
|
|
|
|
72,895
|
|
|
|
(30,995
|
)
|
|
|
(36,099
|
)
|
|
|
5,801
|
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net
|
|
|
(2,633
|
)
|
|
|
(26,294
|
)(k)
|
|
|
(28,927
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
13,933
|
(l)
|
|
|
(15,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(39,943
|
)
|
|
$
|
83,911
|
|
|
$
|
43,968
|
|
|
$
|
(31,098
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,166
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,296
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
Diluted(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
Pro forma shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,699
|
|
Diluted(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,056
|
|
See accompanying notes.
48
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA COMBINED AND ADJUSTED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
to be
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Spin
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Sling Media
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Combined and
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Contributed
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
33,734
|
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,033,734
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,033,734
|
|
|
$
|
7,763
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,041,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable investment securities
|
|
|
497,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
38,511
|
|
|
|
2,692
|
|
|
|
41,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,203
|
|
|
|
7,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
13,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,055
|
|
|
|
6,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
(n)
|
|
|
5,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,202
|
(l)
|
|
|
13,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
10,215
|
|
|
|
6,025
|
|
|
|
16,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,240
|
|
|
|
2,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
592,534
|
|
|
|
1,013,533
|
|
|
|
1,606,067
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
1,607,213
|
|
|
|
23,592
|
|
|
|
7,202
|
|
|
|
1,638,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
187,217
|
|
|
|
1,281,682
|
|
|
|
1,468,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,468,899
|
|
|
|
3,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,472,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FCC authorizations
|
|
|
42,873
|
|
|
|
83,121
|
|
|
|
125,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
11,037
|
|
|
|
147,374
|
|
|
|
158,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,411
|
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
328,174
|
(q)
|
|
|
489,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in affiliates
|
|
|
81,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets, net
|
|
|
4,572
|
|
|
|
21,254
|
|
|
|
25,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,826
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
919,624
|
|
|
$
|
2,550,114
|
|
|
$
|
3,469,738
|
|
|
$
|
1,146
|
|
|
$
|
3,470,884
|
|
|
$
|
31,194
|
|
|
$
|
335,376
|
|
|
$
|
3,837,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND OWNERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$
|
31,384
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,384
|
|
|
$
|
(28,566
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,818
|
|
|
$
|
3,643
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
24,171
|
|
|
|
14,535
|
|
|
|
38,706
|
|
|
|
(10,932
|
)
|
|
|
27,774
|
|
|
|
5,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,167
|
|
|
|
38,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,167
|
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
55,555
|
|
|
|
52,702
|
|
|
|
108,257
|
|
|
|
(39,498
|
)
|
|
|
68,759
|
|
|
|
10,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, net of current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,590
|
|
|
|
349,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
237,079
|
|
|
|
237,380
|
|
|
|
(58,467
|
)(n)
|
|
|
178,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,061
|
)(l)
|
|
|
159,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
586,669
|
|
|
|
586,970
|
|
|
|
(58,467
|
)
|
|
|
528,503
|
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
(19,061
|
)
|
|
|
516,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
55,856
|
|
|
|
639,371
|
|
|
|
695,227
|
|
|
|
(97,965
|
)
|
|
|
597,262
|
|
|
|
17,028
|
|
|
|
(19,061
|
)
|
|
|
595,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA COMBINED AND ADJUSTED BALANCE SHEET
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
|
to be
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Spin
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Sling Media
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Combined and
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Contributed
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in EHC (Owners Equity (Deficit)):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Series A Preferred Stock of Sling Media
$.0001 par value, 8,400,000 shares authorized,
7,759,082 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)(r)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Series B Preferred Stock of Sling Media
$.0001 par value, 7,930,000 shares authorized,
7,694,271 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)(r)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sling Media common stock, warrants and additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,832
|
|
|
|
(70,832
|
)(r)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock of EHC, $.001 par value,
20,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EHC Class A common stock, $.001 par value,
1,600,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
(o)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EHC Class B common stock, $.001 par value,
800,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
(o)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
103,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,863
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)(r)
|
|
|
103,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners net investment
|
|
|
759,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
759,905
|
|
|
|
2,009,764
|
(p)
|
|
|
2,769,669
|
|
|
|
(56,763
|
)
|
|
|
56,763
|
(r)
|
|
|
3,138,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,340
|
(q)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,263
|
(l)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets to be contributed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,910,743
|
|
|
|
1,910,743
|
|
|
|
(1,910,743
|
)(p)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment in EHC (Owners equity)
|
|
|
863,768
|
|
|
|
1,910,743
|
|
|
|
2,774,511
|
|
|
|
99,111
|
|
|
|
2,873,622
|
|
|
|
14,166
|
|
|
|
354,437
|
|
|
|
3,242,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and net investment in EHC (Owners equity)
|
|
$
|
919,624
|
|
|
$
|
2,550,114
|
|
|
$
|
3,469,738
|
|
|
$
|
1,146
|
|
|
$
|
3,470,884
|
|
|
$
|
31,194
|
|
|
$
|
335,376
|
|
|
$
|
3,837,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
50
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA
Adjustments
to Pro Forma Combined Statements of Operations:
The pro forma adjustments for the spin-off represent the
estimated incremental revenue and expenses of EHC associated
with operating as a stand-alone company, primarily consisting of
the results of operations and other expenses, including
depreciation expenses, associated with the net assets
contributed to us by ECC to primarily be used in our fixed
satellite services business and our commercial agreements with
ECC (see Certain Intercompany Agreements).
(a) Represents incremental revenue on equipment sales to
ECC at cost plus an additional amount that is equal to a fixed
percentage of our cost.
(b) Represents revenue for sales of services to ECC related
to the satellites, uplink and satellite transmission assets to
be contributed to us by ECC, including uplink, telemetry,
tracking and control, and professional engineering services.
(c) Represents revenue for sales of services to
third-parties related to the satellites, uplink and satellite
transmission assets to be contributed to us by ECC.
(d) Primarily represents rental revenue related to
buildings contributed to us by ECC, and leased back to ECC.
(e) Represents incremental cost of sales related to the
purchase of remanufactured receivers from ECC, which are resold
to third parties, pursuant to our receiver agreement with ECC.
(f) Represents cost of sales related to services sold to
ECC and other third-parties related to the satellites, uplink
and satellite transmission assets to be contributed to us by
ECC, including satellite leasing, uplink, telemetry, tracking
and control services. These amounts are exclusive of
depreciation and amortization expense.
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Satellites
|
|
$
|
104,451
|
|
|
$
|
139,427
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
|
|
|
52,818
|
|
|
|
75,240
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization
|
|
|
14,311
|
|
|
|
18,781
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
3,820
|
|
|
|
4,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
175,400
|
|
|
$
|
237,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) Represents additional general and administrative
expenses primarily related to corporate overhead expenses and
related employee benefits charged to us by ECC.
(h) Represents additional depreciation and amortization
expense primarily associated with the satellites, uplink and
satellite transmission assets and certain other real estate
assets to be contributed to us by ECC.
(i) Represents interest income primarily related to the
$1.0 billion of cash to be contributed to us by ECC. The
amount of interest income was calculated assuming that
$1 billion was contributed on January 1, 2006 and was
invested in marketable instruments similar to those held by ECC
in its marketable investment securities portfolio, using
ECCs weighted-average interest rate earned on that
portfolio of approximately 5.1% and 5.3% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively. We intend to use this
cash for, among other things,
51
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
DATA (Continued)
satellite construction, strategic investments and other
initiatives. We may also use a portion of these funds to
repurchase shares of our Class A common stock.
(j) Primarily represents the reversal of interest expense
for a note payable to ECC that will be contributed to us as
capital by ECC.
(k) Represents the tax effect of pro forma adjustments
using our blended Federal, state and international statutory tax
rate adjusted for permanent differences and the release of our
valuation allowance of $93.8 million in 2006. The release
of the valuation allowance based on our commercial agreements
with ECC, which, together with existing third-party contracts,
are expected to result in EHC having taxable income for the
foreseeable future. As a result, we expect to use all of our
federal net operating losses before they expire. Additionally,
we expect sufficient capital gains to offset any realized
capital losses within the statutory period as related to the
impairments included in the deferred tax assets.
The pro forma adjustments for the acquisition of Sling Media are
as follows:
(l) Represents the reversal of Sling Medias deferred
tax asset valuation allowance. The release of the valuation
allowance based on our commercial agreements with ECC, which,
together with existing third-party contracts, are expected to
result in EHC having taxable income for the foreseeable future.
As a result, we expect to use all of our federal net operating
losses before they expire, including those attributable to Sling
Media.
(m) The calculation of pro forma basic earnings per share
and shares outstanding is based on the number of shares of ECC
common stock outstanding as of November 30, 2007 adjusted
for the distribution ratio of one share of EHC common stock for
every five shares of ECC common stock. The calculation of pro
forma diluted earnings per share and shares outstanding for the
periods presented is based on the number of shares of ECC common
stock outstanding as of November 30, 2007 and diluted
shares of common stock outstanding as of November 30, 2007
adjusted for the same distribution ratio. This calculation may
not be indicative of the dilutive effect that will actually
result from the replacement of ECC stock-based awards held by
our employees and employees of ECC or the grant of new
stock-based awards. The actual number of dilutive shares of our
common stock that will result from ECC stock options and
restricted stock units held by our employees will not be
determined until immediately after the spin-off.
Adjustments
to Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet:
Further information regarding the Net Assets to be Contributed
can be found in the audited Statement of Net Assets included in
this information statement.
The pro forma balance sheet adjustments for the spin-off
represent the following:
(n) Represents the tax effect of pro forma adjustments
using our pro forma blended Federal and state statutory tax
rate, the reduction of net operating losses and credits not
transferred to EHC as part of the transaction and the release of
our valuation allowance. The release of the valuation allowance
based on our commercial agreements with ECC, which, together
with existing third-party contracts, are expected to result in
EHC having taxable income for the foreseeable future. As a
result, we expect to use all of our federal net operating losses
before they expire. Additionally, we expect sufficient capital
gains to offset any realized capital losses within the statutory
period as related to the impairments included in the deferred
tax assets.
(o) The distribution of approximately 89.7 million
shares of our common stock to holders of ECC common stock.
52
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL
DATA (Continued)
(p) Represents the elimination of ECCs net investment
in us and the contribution of $1.0 billion of cash and
other net assets by ECC to us.
The pro forma adjustments for the acquisition of Sling Media are
as follows:
(q) Based on information currently available, the purchase
price (including cash paid and estimated transaction costs to
us) has been preliminarily allocated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
341,715
|
|
Estimated transaction costs
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
|
342,340
|
|
Less: Sling Media net assets
|
|
|
(14,166
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary excess purchase price over book value of net assets
acquired
|
|
$
|
328,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have not yet completed an analysis of the estimated fair
value of Sling Media in order to determine a preliminary
allocation of the purchase price to the net assets to be
acquired. The final appraisal and purchase price allocation is
expected to be finalized within one year after the
October 19, 2007 acquisition date. Accordingly, the excess
of the purchase price over the carrying value of Sling
Medias net assets has been presented as an adjustment to
total intangible assets in the accompanying unaudited pro forma
combined and adjusted balance sheet. For purposes of the
unaudited pro forma financial statements, we have estimated that
approximately 44% of the excess of the purchase price over the
carrying value of Sling Medias net assets will be
allocated to intangible assets with a weighted-average composite
life of approximately 3 years. We have also estimated that
approximately 56% of the excess of the purchase price over the
carrying value of Sling Medias net assets will be
allocated to goodwill, which has an indefinite life. In the
event that final appraisals determine that other material
amortizable intangibles exist, actual annual amortization could
be substantially higher than amounts presented in the unaudited
pro forma combined and adjusted statements of operations.
(r) Adjustment to reflect elimination of Sling Medias
historical stockholders equity.
53
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion of our financial
condition and results of operations together with the audited
and unaudited combined financial statements and notes to the
financial statements included elsewhere in this information
statement. This discussion contains forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking
statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on
current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections
about our industry, business and future financial results. Our
actual results could differ materially from the results
contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number
of factors, including those discussed in the sections of this
information statement entitled Risk Factors
andCautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements and other sections in this information
statement. To facilitate your understanding of our financial
performance we also discuss certain pro forma financial data in
this section. Our pro forma financial information is set out in
more detail under the caption Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
and Adjusted Financial Information elsewhere in this
information statement.
Executive
Overview
Business
Summary
In September 2007, the board of directors of ECC authorized
management to pursue a plan to create two separate
publicly-traded companies by spinning off certain of ECCs
assets to its shareholders. The new company, which ECC has named
EchoStar Holding Corporation, principally consists of the
technology and certain infrastructure assets of ECC, including
ECCs historical set-top box business and certain of
ECCs satellites.
Our historical revenue was $1.183 billion,
$1.525 billion, $1.514 billion and $1.720 billion
during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and during
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Historically, ECC and one
third party customer, Bell ExpressVu, have accounted for a
significant portion of our revenue. ECC accounted for
approximately 86.2%, 84.5%, 85.6% and 89.7% of our revenue
during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and during
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Bell ExpressVu accounted for
approximately 10.0%, 12.2%, 11.4% and 7.3% of our revenue during
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and during 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively. Our historical net losses were
$39.9 million, $34.2 million, $44.9 million and
$43.2 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and during 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Historically, substantially all of our reported revenues were
derived from equipment sales. Following completion of the
spin-off, we will also operate a fixed satellite services
business. This business is being formed using the six owned and
three leased in-orbit satellites being contributed to us by ECC,
the one owned and one leased satellite currently under
construction, as well as a number of digital broadcast centers
in the United States. While our principal customer for satellite
capacity will be ECC initially, we expect to lease satellite
capacity and provide other satellite services to other customers
for digital video distribution, satellite-delivered IP,
corporate communications and government services. We believe
that our separation from ECC will enable us to compete more
effectively for business from customers that may historically
have been reluctant to purchase satellite services from ECC,
particularly in light of ECCs operation of its satellites
as an integral part of its consumer
pay-TV
business. Our commercial agreements with ECC will obligate us to
provide satellite services to ECC for a two year term but will
be terminable by ECC on sixty days notice. Our other satellite
service sales to date have been minimal and are generally
characterized by short term contracts or spot-market sales;
however we will seek to enter into longer term contracts with
our customers, to the extent feasible, in order to develop a
more predictable source of revenues within our fixed satellite
services business.
As a consequence of the rapidly evolving nature of our business,
and in light of the fact that we have historically sold set-top
boxes to ECC at cost, period-to-period comparisons of revenue
and income are not necessarily meaningful and should not be
relied upon as indications of future performance. Following the
spin-off, we will sell set-top boxes to ECC at cost plus an
additional amount that is equal to a fixed percentage of
54
our cost. As a result, we expect that our revenues and net
income will improve over those reflected in our financial
statements for our historical periods. See Unaudited Pro
Forma Combined and Adjusted Financial Information. Under
our agreement with ECC related to set-top box sales, ECC will
have the right but not the obligation to purchase set-top boxes
and related accessories from us for a two-year period and will
be entitled to terminate the agreement upon sixty days notice.
We expect performance in international markets to be a
significant factor contributing to our ability to generate
revenue and income growth in future periods. However, there can
be no assurance that we will be able to sustain or grow our
international business. A substantial majority of our
international revenue during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and the year ended December 31,
2006, respectively, was attributable to sales of set-top boxes
that we made to Bell ExpressVu. We can not assure that we will
continue to make sales to Bell ExpressVu at historical levels,
or at all.
Challenges
In 2005 and 2006, sales of our set-top boxes declined. Growth
and maintenance of our revenue will depend on our ability to
attract new customers and on additional sales to existing
customers, including ECC and Bell ExpressVu. The growth and
maintenance of our revenue will also depend on our ability to
introduce, and the market acceptance of, new set-top boxes that
we develop, as well as our ability to penetrate the market for
fixed satellite services.
The number of potential new customers for our set-top boxes and
fixed satellite services is small, and we expect our current
customer concentration will therefore continue for the
foreseeable future. Our operating results will consequently
likely continue to depend on sales to a relatively small number
of customers and on the continued success of these customers
relative to their competitors. If we do not develop
relationships with new customers, we may not be able to expand
our customer base and our ability to increase or even maintain
our revenue will be impacted.
We expect to face significant challenges in developing our fixed
satellite services business. Historically, our satellites have
been operated as an integral part of ECCs satellite
television business. While we expect to provide satellite
services to ECC after the spin-off, changes in ECCs
satellite capacity requirements, as well as ECCs ability
to launch its own satellites, may cause our excess capacity to
increase, which would require that we aggressively pursue
alternative sources of revenue for this business. In addition,
there can be no assurance that we would be able to develop
successful alternative services or the sales and marketing
expertise necessary to sell these services profitably. Our
ability to expand revenues in the fixed satellite services
business will depend largely on our ability to displace
incumbent suppliers that, in addition to having well established
business models, also often benefit from long term contracts
with customers. As a result, our growth may require that we
develop or otherwise acquire access to new satellite-delivered
services we may offer to customers or compete more aggressively
on the basis of pricing which may affect our profitability.
In addition, unfavorable events in the economy, including the
current downturn in real estate mortgage and credit markets,
could cause consumer demand for our set-top boxes to materially
decline because consumers may delay purchasing decisions or
change or reduce their discretionary spending.
Our ability to sustain or increase profitability will depend in
large part on our ability to control or reduce our costs of
production. The market for our set-top boxes, like other
electronic products, has been characterized by regular
reductions in selling prices and production costs. Therefore, we
will likely be required to reduce production costs in order to
maintain the profitability of our set top box business. Our
profitability will also be affected by costs associated with our
efforts to expand our sales, marketing, product development and
general and administrative capabilities, as well as expenses
that we incur as a separate publicly-traded company. These costs
include costs associated with, among other things, financial
reporting, information technology, complying with federal
securities laws (including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002), tax administration and human resources related
functions. As we expand internationally, we may also incur
additional costs to conform our set-top boxes to comply with
local laws or local specifications and to ship our set-top boxes
to our international customers.
55
We currently have substantial unused satellite capacity. Future
costs associated with this excess capacity will negatively
impact our margins if we do not generate revenue to offset these
costs. In addition, because a substantial portion of the
capacity of each of our AMC-15, AMC-16 and EchoStar IX
satellites remains unused, there is a significant risk that in
the future, in addition to reporting lower than expected
revenues and profitability, we will be required to record a
substantial impairment charge relating to one or more of these
satellites. We currently estimate that these potential charges
could aggregate up to $250 million, which, if incurred
would have a material adverse effect on our reported operating
results and financial position. Furthermore, it is possible that
in 2008 ECC will discontinue the use of some or all of the
capacity on one or more other satellites that it will initially
lease from us. To the extent that this occurs and we are unable
to find other customers to lease this additional excess
capacity, we may be required to record substantial additional
impairment charges that we currently estimate could aggregate up
to $100 million. We performed a preliminary assessment of
the recoverability of the satellites to be contributed by ECC as
if the spin-off had been consummated and preliminarily concluded
that the recoverability of the satellites will not be impaired
as of the distribution date.
Our businesses change rapidly as new technologies are developed.
These new technologies may cause our services and products to
become obsolete. Changes in existing technologies could also
cause demand for our products and services to decline. For
example, if changes in technology allow digital television
subscribers to use devices such as personal computers, cable
ready televisions and network-based digital video recording
services in place of set-top boxes, our customers may not need
to purchase our set-top boxes to provide their digital
television subscribers with digital video recording and other
set-top box features. One or more new technologies also could be
introduced that compete favorably with our set-top boxes or that
cause our set-top boxes to be less attractive to our customers.
Basis of
Presentation
The combined financial statements, which are discussed below,
reflect the historical financial position, results of operations
and cash flows of the entities included in the consolidated
financial statements and accounting records of ECC, principally
representing the set-top box business, using the historical
results of operations and the historical bases of assets and
liabilities of this segment.
The historical combined financial statements reflect sales of
set-top boxes and related components to ECC at cost. Our
historical combined financial statements do not include certain
satellites, uplink and satellite transmission assets, real
estate and other assets and related liabilities that will be
contributed to us by ECC in the spin-off. These assets and
liabilities, which will primarily comprise our fixed satellite
services business, have been separately audited and are included
in the Statement of Net Assets to be Contributed by ECC and
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Adjusted Financial Information
included herein. Our historical financial data also does not
include financial information of Sling Media, Inc., which was
recently acquired by ECC and will be contributed to us in the
spin-off. Sling Medias audited consolidated financial
statements are included elsewhere in this information statement,
and its historical financial information also has been included
in our Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and Adjusted Financial
Information. We have prepared unaudited pro forma combined
financial statements to make adjustments for and give effect to
the spin-off. See Unaudited Pro Forma Combined and
Adjusted Financial Information above.
In addition, the combined statements of operations include
expense allocations for certain corporate functions historically
provided to us by ECC, including, among other things, treasury,
tax, accounting and reporting, risk management, legal, internal
audit, human resources, investor relations and information
technology. In certain cases, these allocations were made on a
specific identification basis. Otherwise, the expenses related
to services provided to us by ECC were allocated to us based on
the relative percentages, as compared to ECCs other
businesses, of headcount or other appropriate methods depending
on the nature of each item of cost to be allocated. Pursuant to
transition services agreements we will enter into with ECC prior
to the spin-off, ECC will continue to provide us with certain of
these services at prices agreed upon by ECC and us for a period
of two years from the date of the spin-off at cost plus an
additional amount that is equal to a fixed percentage of
ECCs cost. We will arrange to procure other services
pursuant to arrangements with third parties. See Certain
Intercompany Agreements for a description of the
transition services agreements. The costs
56
historically allocated to us by ECC may not be indicative of the
costs that we will incur following the spin-off, nor are they
necessarily indicative of costs that we will be charged or incur
in the future. Following the spin-off, we will perform these
functions using our own resources or purchased services,
however, for an interim period, some of these functions will
continue to be provided by ECC under the transition services
agreement. In addition to the transition services agreement, we
will enter into a number of commercial agreements with ECC in
connection with the spin-off, many of which are expected to have
terms longer than one year. See Certain Intercompany
Agreements.
We will incur increased costs as a result of becoming an
independent publicly traded company, primarily from audit fees
paid to our independent public accounting firm, Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board fees, Nasdaq listing fees, legal fees
and stockholder communications fees. We will also bear directly
the costs of certain services currently provided to us by ECC,
which may be higher than the allocated cost to us as described
above.
We believe the assumptions underlying the combined financial
statements are reasonable. However, for the reasons discussed
above, the combined financial statements included herein will
not reflect our future results of operations, financial position
and cash flows or reflect what our results of operations,
financial position and cash flows would have been had we been a
separate, stand-alone company during the periods presented.
Introduction
Managements discussion and analysis, or
MD&A, of our results of operations and
financial condition is provided as a supplement to the audited
annual financial statements and unaudited interim financial
statements and footnotes thereto included elsewhere herein to
help provide an understanding of our financial condition,
changes in financial condition and results of our operations.
The information included in MD&A should be read in
conjunction with the annual and interim financial statements.
Explanation
of Key Metrics and Other Items.
Equipment and other sales
ECC. Equipment and other sales
ECC primarily includes sales of set-top boxes and related
components to ECC at cost as discussed in Basis of
Presentation above and other services provided to ECC.
Equipment sales. Equipment sales
primarily includes sales of set-top boxes and related components
to Bell ExpressVu and other international customers.
Cost of equipment and other sales. Cost
of equipment and other sales principally includes costs
associated with set-top boxes and related components sold to
ECC, Bell ExpressVu and to other international customers.
Research and development
expenses. Research and development
expenses consist primarily of all costs associated with
the design and development of our set-top boxes and related
components including, among other things, salaries and
consulting fees.
General and administrative
expenses. General and administrative
expenses consists primarily of all other employee-related
costs associated with administrative services such as legal,
information systems and accounting and finance, including
non-cash, stock-based compensation expense directly incurred by
us. It also includes outside professional fees (i.e. legal,
information systems and accounting services) and other items
associated with facilities and administration. In addition,
General and administrative expenses includes
administrative support services, as discussed above, provided by
ECC and charged to us as discussed in Basis of
Presentation above.
Other income (expense). The main
components of Other income and expense are gains and
losses realized on the sale of investments, equity in earnings
and losses of our affiliates, and impairment of marketable and
non-marketable investment securities.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA). EBITDA is
defined as Net income (loss) plus Interest
expense net of Interest income, Income
taxes and Depreciation and
57
amortization. This non-GAAP measure is
reconciled to net income in our discussion of Results of
Operations below.
Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as
Net cash flows from operating activities less
Purchases of property and equipment, as shown on our
Combined Statements of Cash Flows.
Results
of Operations
The following discussion of combined results of operations
refers to the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared
to the same period in 2006, the year ended December 31,
2006 compared to the same period in 2005, and the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to the Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and other sales ECC
|
|
$
|
1,019,729
|
|
|
$
|
948,683
|
|
|
$
|
71,046
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Equipment sales
|
|
|
163,039
|
|
|
|
184,216
|
|
|
|
(21,177
|
)
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
1,182,768
|
|
|
$
|
1,132,899
|
|
|
$
|
49,869
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment and other sales
|
|
|
1,121,067
|
|
|
|
1,065,216
|
|
|
|
55,851
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
% of Total revenue
|
|
|
94.8
|
%
|
|
|
94.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
40,634
|
|
|
|
39,093
|
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
% of Total revenue
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
56,844
|
|
|
|
43,973
|
|
|
|
12,871
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
|
% of Total revenue
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,222,936
|
|
|
|
1,152,875
|
|
|
|
70,061
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(40,168
|
)
|
|
|
(19,976
|
)
|
|
|
(20,192
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
2,858
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
2,887
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(37,310
|
)
|
|
|
(20,005
|
)
|
|
|
(17,305
|
)
|
|
|
(86.5
|
)
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net
|
|
|
(2,633
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(2,152
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(39,943
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,486
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,457
|
)
|
|
|
(95.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(34,995
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,800
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and other sales ECC. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2007, revenue from
Equipment and other sales ECC totaled
$1.020 billion, an increase of $71.0 million or 7.5%
compared to the same period during 2006. This change resulted
from an increase in sales of set-top boxes and related
components to ECC, and an increase in the average sales price
per unit. As discussed in Note 2 in the Notes
58
to Combined Financial Statements of EchoStar Holding
Corporation, set-top boxes and related components were
historically sold to ECC at cost.
In the near term, we expect ECC to remain the primary customer
of our set-top box business and the primary source of our total
revenue. Pursuant to the commercial agreements we will enter
into with ECC prior to the spin-off, we will continue to be
obligated to sell set-top boxes to ECC at cost plus an
additional amount that is equal to a fixed percentage of our
cost for a period of two years from the date of the spin-off,
although ECC will have no obligations to purchase set-top boxes
from us during or after this two year period.
Equipment sales. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, Equipment sales totaled
$163.0 million, a decrease of $21.2 million or 11.5%
compared to the same period during 2006. This decrease
principally resulted from a decline in sales of set-top boxes
and related components to international customers.
While we currently have certain binding purchase orders from
Bell ExpressVu through the beginning of 2008, the availability
of new compression technology could impact our relationship with
Bell ExpressVu, depending on its strategy to upgrade customers.
There can be no assurance that Bell ExpressVu will continue to
purchase set-top boxes from us.
Cost of equipment and other sales. Cost
of equipment and other sales totaled $1.121 billion
during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an
increase of $55.9 million or 5.2% compared to the same
period in 2006. This change resulted from an increase in sales
of set-top boxes and related components to ECC, partially offset
by a decline in the sale of set-top boxes and related components
to international customers. As discussed above, set-top boxes
and related components were historically sold to ECC at cost.
Cost of equipment and other sales represented 94.8%
and 94.0% of Total revenue during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
increase in the expense to revenue ratio principally related to
an increase from 2006 to 2007 in the relative percentage of
equipment sales to ECC at cost versus sales to international
customers. Additionally, this was partially offset by an
increase in margins on sales of set-top boxes and related
components sold to international customers.
General and administrative
expenses. General and administrative
expenses totaled $56.8 million during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007, an increase of $12.9 million
or 29.3% compared to the same period in 2006. This increase was
primarily attributable to increased personnel and related costs,
including non-cash, stock-based compensation expense, and
increased administrative support from ECC. General and
administrative expenses represented 4.8% and 3.9% of
Total revenue during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in
the ratio of those expenses to Total revenue was
primarily attributable to the increases in General and
administrative expenses discussed above.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization. EBITDA was negative
$35.0 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, a decrease of $19.8 million
compared to the same period in 2006. The following table
reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(34,995
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,195
|
)
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(2,076
|
)
|
|
|
217
|
|
Income tax provision, net
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(39,943
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and
should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net
income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP.
Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated
each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and
fund capital expenditures. EBITDA
59
should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA is used by our management as a measure of operating
efficiency and overall financial performance for benchmarking
against our peers and competitors. Management believes EBITDA
provides meaningful supplemental information regarding liquidity
and the underlying operating performance of our business.
Management also believes that EBITDA is useful to investors
because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors
and other interested parties to evaluate companies in the
digital set top box industry.
Income tax (provision) benefit, net. Our
income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects
of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and
liabilities and amounts reported in our accompanying combined
balance sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards. We follow the guidelines set forth in Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes, or SFAS 109, regarding the
recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the balance sheet
and provide any necessary allowances as required. Determining
necessary allowances requires us to make assessments about the
timing of future events, including the probability of expected
future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities.
We currently have an approximate $67.8 million valuation
allowance recorded as an offset against all of our net deferred
tax assets. In accordance with SFAS 109, we have evaluated
our need for a valuation allowance based on historical evidence,
including trends. All or a portion of the current valuation
allowance is expected to be reversed on the effective date of
the spin-off since we are expected to realize sufficient profit
to utilize our deferred tax benefits as a result of the
commercial and transitional agreements with ECC.
Net income (loss). Net loss was
$39.9 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, an increase in net loss of
$19.5 million compared to the same period in 2006. The
increase in losses was primarily attributable to the changes in
revenue and expenses discussed above.
60
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and other sales ECC
|
|
$
|
1,288,691
|
|
|
$
|
1,295,861
|
|
|
$
|
(7,170
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Equipment sales
|
|
|
236,629
|
|
|
|
217,830
|
|
|
|
18,799
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
1,525,320
|
|
|
|
1,513,691
|
|
|
|
11,629
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment and other sales
|
|
|
1,440,178
|
|
|
|
1,438,629
|
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
% of Total revenue
|
|
|
94.4
|
%
|
|
|
95.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
56,451
|
|
|
|
45,928
|
|
|
|
10,523
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
% of Total revenue
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
60,106
|
|
|
|
56,366
|
|
|
|
3,740
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
% of Total revenue
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,562,767
|
|
|
|
1,546,755
|
|
|
|
16,012
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(37,447
|
)
|
|
|
(33,064
|
)
|
|
|
(4,383
|
)
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(1,059
|
)
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
|
|
(10,109
|
)
|
|
|
16,697
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
6,360
|
|
|
|
(10,945
|
)
|
|
|
17,305
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(31,087
|
)
|
|
|
(44,009
|
)
|
|
|
12,922
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net
|
|
|
(3,075
|
)
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
|
|
(2,144
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(34,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,778
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(24,827
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,514
|
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and other sales ECC. For
the year ended December 31, 2006, revenue from
Equipment and other sales ECC totaled
$1.289 billion, a decrease of $7.2 million or 0.6%
compared to the same period during 2005. This change resulted
from a decline in sales of set-top boxes and related components
to ECC, partially offset by an increase in the average sales
price per set-top box as a result of increased sales of advanced
products, such as receivers with multiple tuners, DVRs and HD
receivers.
Equipment sales. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, Equipment sales totaled
$236.6 million, an increase of $18.8 million or 8.6%
compared to the same period during 2005. This increase
principally resulted from an increase in sales of set-top boxes
and related components to international customers.
Cost of equipment and other sales. Cost
of equipment and other sales totaled $1.440 billion
during the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of
$1.5 million or 0.1% compared to the same period in 2005.
This increase primarily resulted from an increase in the sale of
set-top boxes and related components to international customers,
partially offset by a decrease in sales to ECC. Cost of
equipment and other sales represented 94.4% and 95.0% of
Total revenue during the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease in
the expense to revenue ratio principally related to an
improvement in margins on sales to international customers. As
previously discussed, set-top boxes and related components were
historically sold to ECC at cost.
61
Research and development
expenses. Research and development
expenses totaled $56.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 2006, an increase of $10.5 million or
22.9% compared to the same period in 2005. This increase was
primarily attributable to increases in personnel costs and
consulting fees. Research and development expenses
represented 3.7% and 3.0% of Total revenue during
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
increase in the ratio of those expenses to Total
revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in
expenses, discussed above.
General and administrative
expenses. General and administrative
expenses totaled $60.1 million during the year ended
December 31, 2006, an increase of $3.7 million or 6.6%
compared to 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to
increased personnel and related costs including, among other
things, non-cash, stock-based compensation expense recorded
related to the adoption of SFAS 123R, outside professional
fees, and administrative support from ECC. General and
administrative expenses represented 3.9% and 3.7% of
Total revenue during the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in
the ratio of those expenses to Total revenue was
primarily attributable to an increase in expenses, discussed
above.
Other. Other income totaled
$6.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2006
compared to Other expense of $10.1 million
during 2005. The increase of $16.7 million primarily
resulted from a loss in 2005 related to a $25.4 million
charge to earnings for other than temporary declines in the fair
value of an investment in the marketable common stock of a
company in the home entertainment industry, partially offset by
a $16.9 million gain related to the conversion of certain
bond instruments into common stock. The increase also includes
larger gains from the sale of investments in 2006 as compared to
2005.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization. EBITDA was negative
$24.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2006,
an improvement of $12.5 million compared to the same period
in 2006. The following table reconciles EBITDA to the
accompanying financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(24,827
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,341
|
)
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
Income tax provision, net
|
|
|
3,075
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(34,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and
should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net
income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA is used as a measurement of operating efficiency and
overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful
measure for those evaluating companies in our industries.
Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated
each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and
fund capital expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance
prepared in accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA is used by our management as a measure of operating
efficiency and overall financial performance for benchmarking
against our peers and competitors. Management believes EBITDA
provides meaningful supplemental information regarding liquidity
and the underlying operating performance of our business.
Management also believes that EBITDA is useful to investors
because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors
and other interested parties to evaluate companies in the
digital set top box industry.
Net income (loss). Net loss was
$34.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2006,
compared to a $44.9 million loss in 2005. The larger loss
was primarily attributable to the changes in revenue and
expenses discussed above.
62
Year
Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and other sales ECC
|
|
$
|
1,295,861
|
|
|
$
|
1,543,513
|
|
|
$
|
(247,652
|
)
|
|
|
(16.0
|
)
|
Equipment sales
|
|
|
217,830
|
|
|
|
176,578
|
|
|
|
41,252
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
1,513,691
|
|
|
|
1,720,091
|
|
|
|
(206,400
|
)
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment and other sales
|
|
|
1,438,629
|
|
|
|
1,650,775
|
|
|
|
(212,146
|
)
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
% of Total revenue
|
|
|
95.0
|
%
|
|
|
96.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
45,928
|
|
|
|
39,809
|
|
|
|
6,119
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
% of Total revenue
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
56,366
|
|
|
|
65,059
|
|
|
|
(8,693
|
)
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)
|
% of Total revenue
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
5,071
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,546,755
|
|
|
|
1,760,714
|
|
|
|
(213,959
|
)
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(33,064
|
)
|
|
|
(40,623
|
)
|
|
|
7,559
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(27.8
|
)
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
(1,123
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(10,109
|
)
|
|
|
(1,412
|
)
|
|
|
(8,697
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(10,945
|
)
|
|
|
(2,186
|
)
|
|
|
(8,759
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(44,009
|
)
|
|
|
(42,809
|
)
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(44,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,237
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,703
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(37,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,964
|
)
|
|
$
|
(377
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and other sales ECC. For
the year ended December 31, 2005, revenue from
Equipment and other sales ECC totaled
$1.296 billion, a decrease of $247.7 million or 16.0%
compared to the same period during 2004. This change resulted
from a significant decline in sales of set-top boxes and related
components to ECC, partially offset by an increase in the
average sales price per set-top box as a result of increased
sales of advanced products, such as receivers with multiple
tuners, DVRs and HD receivers.
Equipment sales. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, Equipment and other sales
totaled $217.8 million, an increase of $41.3 million
or 23.4% compared to the same period during 2004. This increase
principally resulted from an increase in sales of set-top boxes
and related components to international customers.
Cost of equipment and other sales. Cost
of equipment and other sales totaled $1.439 billion
during the year ended December 31, 2005, a decrease of
$212.1 million or 12.9% compared to the same period in
2004. This change resulted from a decline in sales of set-top
boxes and related components to ECC, partially offset by an
increase in the sale of set-top boxes and related components to
international customers. Cost of equipment and other
sales represented 95.0% and 96.0% of Total
revenue during the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively. As previously discussed, set-top boxes and
related components were historically sold to ECC at cost. The
decrease in the expense to revenue ratio principally resulted
from a
63
decrease from 2004 to 2005 in the relative percentage of
equipment sales to ECC at cost versus sales to international
customers.
Research and development
expenses. Research and development
expenses totaled $45.9 million during the year ended
December 31, 2005, an increase of $6.1 million or
15.4% compared to the same period in 2004. This increase was
primarily attributable to increases in personnel costs and
consulting fees. Research and development expenses
represented 3.0% and 2.3% of Total revenue during
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
increase in the ratio of those expenses to Total
revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in
expenses, discussed above.
General and administrative
expenses. General and administrative
expenses totaled $56.4 million during the year ended
December 31, 2005, a decrease of $8.7 million or 13.4%
compared to 2004. The decrease in General and
administrative expenses was primarily attributable to a
decrease in administrative support from ECC, partially offset by
an increase in personnel costs. General and administrative
expenses represented 3.7% and 3.8% of Total
revenue during the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
Other. Other expense totaled
$10.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to $1.4 million during 2004. The decrease in
income of $8.7 million primarily resulted from a loss in
2005 related to a $25.4 million charge to earnings for
other than temporary declines in the fair value of an investment
in the marketable common stock of a company in the home
entertainment industry, partially offset by a $16.9 million
gain related to the conversion of certain bond instruments into
common stock.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization. EBITDA was negative
$37.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2005,
a decrease of $0.4 million compared to the same period in
2004. The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(37,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,964
|
)
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit), net
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
5,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(44,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and
should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net
income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA is used as a measurement of operating efficiency and
overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful
measure for those evaluating companies in our industries.
Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated
each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and
fund capital expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance
prepared in accordance with GAAP.
EBITDA is used by our management as a measure of operating
efficiency and overall financial performance for benchmarking
against our peers and competitors. Management believes EBITDA
provides meaningful supplemental information regarding liquidity
and the underlying operating performance of our business.
Management also believes that EBITDA is useful to investors
because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors
and other interested parties to evaluate companies in the
digital set top box industry.
Net income (loss). Net loss was
$44.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2005,
compared to a $43.2 million loss in 2004. The increase was
primarily attributable to the changes in revenue and expenses
discussed above.
64
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2007, our cash, cash equivalents and
marketable investment securities totaled $530.8 million,
compared to $323.6 million as of December 31, 2006. As
discussed in Note 12 to our Combined Financial Statements,
ECC has historically funded our working capital requirements. As
of the effective date of the spin-off, this amount will be
contributed to us as capital. In addition, in connection with
the spin-off, ECC will distribute $1.0 billion in cash to
us. We intend to use this cash for, among other things,
satellite construction as well as strategic investments and
other initiatives. These investments may include partnerships,
joint ventures and strategic acquisition opportunities we may
pursue to increase market share, expand into new markets,
particularly internationally, broaden our portfolio of products
or services, particularly through development of new satellite
delivered services or deepen our pool of intellectual property.
We may also repurchase shares of our Class A common stock
pursuant to the authorization from our Board of Directors to
repurchase up to $1.0 billion of our Class A common
stock.
Following the spin-off, we expect that our future working
capital and capital expenditure and debt service requirements
will be satisfied primarily from existing cash and marketable
investment securities, cash generated from operations and future
financings. Our ability to generate positive future operating
and net cash flows is dependent upon, among other things, our
ability to retain existing customers and generate new business.
There can be no assurance we will be successful in executing our
business plan.
From time to time we evaluate opportunities for strategic
investments or acquisitions that may complement our current
services and products, enhance our technical capabilities,
improve or sustain our competitive position, or otherwise offer
growth opportunities. We may make investments in or partner with
others to expand our business. Future material investments or
acquisitions may require that we obtain additional capital,
assume third party debt or other long-term obligations. There
can be no assurance that we could raise all required capital or
that required capital would be available on acceptable terms.
Capital
Requirements
We have incurred losses during each of the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, including a net loss of $39.9 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. These
historical losses arose primarily as a result of the fact that
we have historically sold set-top boxes to ECC at cost. We
expect to have net income in future periods primarily because
following the completion of the spin-off we will sell set-top
boxes to ECC at cost plus an additional amount that is equal to
a fixed percentage of our cost. We anticipate that our current
cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and cash from
operations, will enable us to maintain our operations for a
period of at least 12 months following the completion of
the spin-off. However, we expect that our business may have
substantial future capital requirements for a number of reasons,
including:
|
|
|
investment we may make from time to time to support our fixed
satellite services business, including construction or leasing
of new satellites to expand our capacity or to replace any
significant satellite failures,
|
|
|
|
strategic investments, and research and development related to
our set-top box and related component business; and
|
|
|
|
acquisitions of or investments in businesses, products and
technologies, including investments necessary to develop or
otherwise acquire access to new satellite-delivered services or
access to new satellite television and entertainment platforms,
particularly internationally.
|
The amount of capital we will need to fund these requirements
will depend on many factors, certain of which may limit the
amount of capital resources we would otherwise have available.
These factors include:
|
|
|
the level of revenue that we earn from sales to ECC and Bell
ExpressVu;
|
|
|
|
the level of purchases that we make pursuant to our stock
buyback program of up to $1.0 billion;
|
|
|
|
losses in connection with any acquisitions of or investments in
businesses, products and technologies;
|
|
|
|
the effect of competing technological and market developments;
|
65
|
|
|
the effect of a general economic downturn;
|
|
|
|
the filing, maintenance, prosecution, defense and enforcement of
patent claims and other intellectual property rights; and
|
|
|
the cost and timing of establishing or contracting for sales,
marketing and distribution capabilities.
|
If our capital resources are insufficient to meet future capital
requirements, we will have to raise additional funds. We have no
experience as a separate entity in raising capital and we may be
unable to raise sufficient additional capital when we need it,
on favorable terms or at all. The sale of equity or convertible
debt securities in the future may be dilutive to our
shareholders, and debt-financing arrangements may require us to
pledge certain assets and enter into covenants that would
restrict certain business activities or our ability to incur
further indebtedness and may contain other terms that are not
favorable to our shareholders or us. If we are unable to obtain
adequate funds on reasonable terms, we may be required to
curtail operations significantly or obtain funds by entering
into financing, supply or joint venture agreements on
unattractive terms.
Cash,
Cash Equivalents and Marketable Investment
Securities
We consider all liquid investments purchased within 90 days
of their maturity to be cash equivalents. See
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk for further discussion regarding our
marketable investment securities. As of September 30, 2007,
our cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities
totaled $530.8 million compared to $323.6 million as
of December 31, 2006.
The following discussion highlights our free cash flow and cash
flow activities during the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Free
Cash Flow
We define free cash flow as Net cash flows from operating
activities less Purchases of property and
equipment, as shown on our Combined Statements of Cash
Flows. We believe free cash flow is an important liquidity
metric because it measures, during a given period, the amount of
cash generated that is available to repay debt obligations, make
investments, fund acquisitions and for certain other activities.
Free cash flow is not a measure determined in accordance with
GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for
Operating income, Net income, Net
cash flows from operating activities or any other measure
determined in accordance with GAAP. Since free cash flow
includes investments in operating assets, we believe this
non-GAAP liquidity measure is useful in addition to the most
directly comparable GAAP measure Net cash
flows from operating activities.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, free cash flow was
significantly impacted by changes in operating assets and
liabilities as shown in the Net cash flows from operating
activities section of our Combined Statements of Cash
Flows included herein. Operating asset and liability balances
can fluctuate significantly from period to period and there can
be no assurance that free cash flow will not be negatively
impacted by material changes in operating assets and liabilities
in future periods, since these changes depend upon, among other
things, managements timing of payments and control of
inventory levels, and cash receipts. In addition to fluctuations
resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities, free
cash flow can vary significantly from period to period depending
upon, among other things, operating efficiencies, increases or
decreases in purchases of property and equipment and other
factors.
66
The following table reconciles free cash flow to Net cash
flows from operating activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
(154,352
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,366
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,443
|
)
|
|
$
|
(84,851
|
)
|
Add back:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
120,076
|
|
|
|
19,586
|
|
|
|
32,769
|
|
|
|
4,250
|
|
|
|
5,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities
|
|
$
|
(34,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,374
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,193
|
)
|
|
$
|
(78,916
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow was negative $154.4 million and negative
$23.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Free cash flow was negative
$69.1 million, negative $18.4 million and negative
$84.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
The decline in free cash flow during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 of
$131.0 million resulted from an increase in Purchases
of property and equipment of $100.5 million primarily
related to construction of the CMBStar satellite, discussed
below, and a decrease in Net cash flows from operating
activities of $30.5 million principally attributable
to an increase in net loss. CMBStar is scheduled to be completed
during the second quarter of 2008. Based on the expected
satellite obligations included in the schedule of obligations
and future capital requirement, which includes CMBStar, we
expect 2008 purchases of property and equipment to decrease from
the 2007 levels.
The $50.7 million decline in free cash flow during 2006
compared to 2005 resulted from an increase in Purchases of
property and equipment of $28.5 million primarily
related to satellite construction and a decrease in Net
cash flows from operating activities of $22.2 million
principally attributable to a decrease in cash resulting from
changes in operating assets and liabilities and an increase in
net loss.
The $66.4 million improvement in free cash flow during 2005
compared to 2004 resulted from an increase in Net cash
flows from operating activities of $64.7 million and
a decrease in Purchases of property and equipment of
$1.7 million. The increase in Net cash flows from
operating activities was primarily attributable to an
increase in cash resulting from changes in operating assets and
liabilities, together with, a decline net loss.
Our future capital expenditures are likely to increase if we
make additional investments in infrastructure necessary to
support and expand our fixed satellite services business, if we
increase the number of set-top boxes that we produce as a result
of the expansion of our business because of improvements in the
economy or otherwise, if we make additional investments in new
businesses, products and technologies, and if we decide to
purchase one or more additional satellites. Conversely, our
future capital expenditures are likely to decrease if we are
unable to successfully compete in the market for fixed satellite
services, if we produce fewer set-top boxes as a result of a
decrease in actual or anticipated set-top box revenues, and if
we do not make material investments in new businesses, products
and technology.
67
Other
Liquidity Items Obligations and Future Capital
Requirements
Contractual
Obligations and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
Historical
In general, we do not engage in off-balance sheet financing
activities. Our contractual obligations as of December 31,
2006 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Satellite-related obligations
|
|
$
|
98,270
|
|
|
$
|
79,530
|
|
|
$
|
18,740
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
4,003
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
614,978
|
|
|
|
614,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
717,251
|
|
|
$
|
695,387
|
|
|
$
|
19,646
|
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
$
|
961
|
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future commitments related to satellites on the historical
balance sheets are included in the table above under
Satellite-related obligations. CMBStar, an S-band
satellite, is scheduled to be completed during the second
quarter of 2008. If the required regulatory approvals are
obtained and contractual conditions are satisfied, the
transponder capacity of that satellite will be leased to a Hong
Kong joint venture, which in turn will sublease a portion of the
transponder capacity to an affiliate of a Chinese regulatory
entity.
Contractual
Obligations and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements Pro
Forma Adjustments (excludes acquisition of Sling Media,
Inc.)
As of the effective date of the spin-off, ECC will contribute
additional contracts for satellites under construction, capital
leases and other long-term obligations related to our fixed
satellite services business. Commitments related to these
contracts are detailed in the tables below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite-related obligations
|
|
$
|
987,494
|
|
|
$
|
248,612
|
|
|
$
|
179,061
|
|
|
$
|
184,813
|
|
|
$
|
88,251
|
|
|
$
|
57,763
|
|
|
$
|
228,994
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
6,077
|
|
|
|
6,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
993,571
|
|
|
$
|
254,689
|
|
|
$
|
179,061
|
|
|
$
|
184,813
|
|
|
$
|
88,251
|
|
|
$
|
57,763
|
|
|
$
|
228,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In certain circumstances the dates on which we are obligated to
make these payments could be delayed. These amounts will
increase to the extent we procure insurance for our satellites
or contract for the construction, launch or lease of additional
satellites.
Interest
on Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
160,527
|
|
|
$
|
33,843
|
|
|
$
|
30,707
|
|
|
$
|
27,216
|
|
|
$
|
23,337
|
|
|
$
|
19,032
|
|
|
$
|
26,392
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
4,842
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
1,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
165,369
|
|
|
$
|
34,565
|
|
|
$
|
31,385
|
|
|
$
|
27,846
|
|
|
$
|
23,916
|
|
|
$
|
19,556
|
|
|
$
|
28,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite-Related
Obligations
Satellites under Construction. As part of the
spin-off, ECC will contribute several of its contracts to
construct new satellites, described below, which are
contractually scheduled to be completed within the next three
years. Future commitments related to these satellites are
included in the table above under Satellite-related
obligations.
68
ECC has entered into contracts for the construction of three
additional SSL Ka
and/or Ku
expanded band satellites which are expected to be completed
during 2009 and 2010. ECC will contribute these to us as part of
the spin-off. ECC has not yet procured launches for these
satellites.
Leased Satellites. In addition to its lease of
the AMC-15 and AMC-16 satellites discussed below under
Capital Lease Obligations, ECC will also
contribute satellite service agreements to lease all of the
capacity on other satellites discussed below. Future commitments
related to these satellites are included in the table above
under Satellite-related obligations.
AMC-2. AMC-2 is a fixed satellite services
satellite positioned at the 85 degree orbital location. Our
lease of this satellite is expected to continue through 2007 and
has been accounted for as an operating lease.
AMC-14. AMC-14 is a DBS satellite, which is
currently expected to launch early in 2008 and commence
commercial operation at an orbital location to be determined at
a future date. The initial ten-year lease for all of the
capacity on the satellite will be accounted for as a capital
lease.
Capital
Lease Obligations
As part of the spin-off, ECC will also contribute to us two
ten-year satellite service agreements with SES Americom to lease
all the capacity on the following satellites:
AMC-15. AMC-15, a fixed satellite services
satellite, commenced commercial operation during January 2005.
This lease will be renewable by us on a year to year basis
following the initial term, and will provide us with certain
rights to replacement satellites.
AMC-16. AMC 16, a fixed satellite services
satellite, commenced commercial operation during February 2005.
This lease is renewable by us on a year to year basis following
the initial term, and will provide us with certain rights to
replacement satellites.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 13, Accounting for Leases
(SFAS 13), we will account for the satellite
component of these agreements as a capital lease. The commitment
related to the present value of the net future minimum lease
payments for the satellite component of the agreement is
included under Capital Lease Obligations in the
table above. The commitment related to future minimum payments
designated for the lease of the orbital slots and other
executory costs is included under Satellite-Related
Obligations in the table above. The commitment related to
the amount representing interest is included under Interest on
Long-Term Debt in the table above.
Purchase
Obligations
Our purchase obligations primarily consist of binding purchase
orders for set-top boxes and related components. Our purchase
obligations can fluctuate significantly from period to period
due to, among other things, managements control of
inventory levels, and can materially impact our future operating
asset and liability balances, and our future working capital
requirements.
Satellite
Insurance
We do not anticipate carrying insurance for any of the in-orbit
satellites that we will own because we believe that the premium
costs are uneconomic relative to the risk of satellite failure.
The loss of a satellite or other satellite malfunctions or
anomalies could have a material adverse effect on our financial
performance which we may not be able to mitigate by using
available capacity on other satellites. There can be no
assurance that we can recover critical transmission capacity in
the event one or more of our in-orbit satellites were to fail.
In addition, the loss of a satellite or other satellite
malfunctions or anomalies could affect our ability to comply
with FCC regulatory obligations and our ability to fund the
construction or acquisition of replacement satellites for our
in-orbit fleet in a timely fashion, or at all.
69
Future
Capital Requirements
From time to time we evaluate opportunities for strategic
investments or acquisitions that would complement our current
services and products, enhance our technical capabilities or
otherwise offer growth opportunities. For example, we are
exploring business plans for extended Ku-band and
Ka-band
satellite systems, including licenses to operate at the 86.5, 97
and 113 degree orbital locations. Future material investments or
acquisitions may require that we obtain additional capital.
There can be no assurance that we could raise all required
capital or that required capital would be available on
acceptable terms, or at all.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the combined financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates,
judgments and assumptions that affect amounts reported therein.
Management bases its estimates, judgments and assumptions on
historical experience and on various other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Due to the
inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual
results reported in future periods may be affected by changes in
those estimates. The following represent what we believe are the
critical accounting policies that may involve a high degree of
estimation, judgment and complexity. For a summary of our
significant accounting policies, including those discussed
below, see Note 2 in the Notes to Combined Financial
Statements for EchoStar Holding Corporation.
Accounting for investments in publicly-traded
securities. We hold debt and equity interests in
companies, some of which are publicly traded and have highly
volatile prices. We record an investment impairment charge when
we believe an investment has experienced a decline in value that
is judged to be other than temporary. We monitor our investments
for impairment by considering current factors including economic
environment, market conditions and the operational performance
and other specific factors relating to the business underlying
the investment. Future adverse changes in these factors could
result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value
of the investments that may not be reflected in an
investments current carrying value, thereby possibly
requiring an impairment charge in the future.
Valuation of investments in non-marketable investment
securities. We calculate the fair value of our
interest in non-marketable investment securities either at
consideration given, or for non-cash acquisitions, based on the
results of valuation analyses utilizing a discounted cash flow
or DCF model. The DCF methodology involves the use of various
estimates relating to future cash flow projections and discount
rates for which significant judgments are required.
Valuation of long-lived assets. We evaluate
the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used,
other than goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives,
when events and circumstances warrant such a review. The
carrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is
considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow
from such asset or asset group is less than its carrying value.
In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which
the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived
asset or asset group. Fair value is determined primarily using
the estimated cash flows associated with the asset or asset
group under review, discounted at a rate commensurate with the
risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of by
sale are determined in a similar manner, except that fair values
are reduced for estimated selling costs. Changes in estimates of
future cash flows could result in a write-down of the asset in a
future period.
Valuation of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite
lives. We evaluate the carrying value of
goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives annually,
and also when events and circumstances warrant. We use estimates
of fair value to determine the amount of impairment, if any, of
recorded goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives.
Fair value is determined primarily using the estimated future
cash flows, discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk
involved. Changes in our estimates of future cash flows could
result in a write-down of goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives in a future period, which could be material to
our combined results of operations and financial position.
Allowance for doubtful accounts. Management
estimates the amount of required allowances for the potential
non-collectibility of accounts receivable based upon past
collection experience and consideration of other
70
relevant factors. However, past experience may not be indicative
of future collections and therefore additional charges could be
incurred in the future to reflect differences between estimated
and actual collections.
Inventory reserve. Management estimates the
amount of reserve required for potential obsolete inventory
based upon past experience, the introduction of new technology
and consideration of other relevant factors. However, past
experience may not be indicative of future reserve requirements
and therefore additional charges could be incurred in the future
to reflect differences between estimated and actual reserve
requirements.
Stock-based compensation. We account for
stock-based compensation in accordance with the
fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R. We use the
Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the input of
subjective assumptions. These assumptions include, among other
things, estimating the length of time employees will retain
their vested stock options before exercising them (expected
term); the estimated volatility of our common stock price over
the expected term (volatility), and the number of options that
will ultimately not complete their vesting requirements
(forfeitures), see Note 3 in the Notes to our Combined
Financial Statements of EchoStar Holding Corporation. Changes in
these assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair
value of stock-based compensation.
Income taxes. Our income tax policy is to
record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences
between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts
reported in the accompanying combined balance sheets, as well as
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We follow the
guidelines set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
or SFAS 109, regarding the recoverability of any tax assets
recorded on the balance sheet and provide any necessary
valuation allowances as required. Determining necessary
valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about the
timing of future events, including the probability of expected
future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities.
In accordance with SFAS 109, we periodically evaluate our
need for a valuation allowance based on both historical
evidence, including trends, and future expectations in each
reporting period. Future performance could have a significant
effect on the realization of tax benefits, or reversals of
valuation allowances, as reported in our results of operations.
Contingent liabilities. A significant amount
of management judgment is required in determining when, or if,
an accrual should be recorded for a contingency and the amount
of such accrual. Estimates generally are developed in
consultation with outside counsel and are based on an analysis
of potential outcomes. Due to the uncertainty of determining the
likelihood of a future event occurring and the potential
financial statement impact of such an event, it is possible that
upon further development or resolution of a contingency matter,
a charge could be recorded in a future period that would be
material to our consolidated results of operations and financial
position.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, or
FIN 48, on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, and prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement process for financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, or SFAS 157, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This pronouncement
applies to other accounting standards that require or permit
fair value measurements. Accordingly, this statement does not
require any new fair value measurement. This statement is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, and interim periods within that fiscal year. We
71
are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of
SFAS 157 will have on our financial position and results of
operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, or
SFAS 159, which permits entities to choose to measure
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.
This statement is effective as of the beginning of an
entitys first fiscal year that begins after
November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact
the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on our financial
position and results of operations.
Seasonality
Our revenues vary throughout the year depending upon the
seasonality of our customers in the subscription television
service industry. As is typical for our customers, the first
half of the year generally produces fewer new subscribers than
the second half of the year.
Inflation
Inflation has not materially affected our operations during the
past three years. We believe that our ability to increase the
prices charged for our products and services in future periods
will depend primarily on competitive pressures. We do not have
any material backlog of our products.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market
Risks Associated With Financial Instruments
As of September 30, 2007, our cash, cash equivalents and
marketable investment securities had a fair value of
$530.8 million. Of that amount, a total of
$33.7 million was invested in fixed or variable rate
instruments or money market type accounts. The primary purpose
of these investing activities has been to preserve principal
until the cash is required to, among other things, fund
operations, make strategic investments and expand the business.
Consequently, the size of this portfolio fluctuates
significantly as cash is received and used in our business.
Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities
had an average annual return for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 of 5.3%. A hypothetical 10% decrease in
interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately
$0.2 million in annual interest income. The value of
certain of the investments in this portfolio can be impacted by,
among other things, the risk of adverse changes in securities
and economic markets, as well as the risks related to the
performance of the companies whose commercial paper and other
instruments we hold. However, the high quality of these
investments (as assessed by independent rating agencies) reduces
these risks. The value of these investments can also be impacted
by interest rate fluctuations.
Included in our marketable investment securities portfolio
balance is debt and equity of public companies we hold for
strategic and financial purposes. As of September 30, 2007,
we held strategic and financial debt and equity investments of
public companies with a fair value of $497.0 million. These
investments are highly speculative and are concentrated in a
small number of companies. We may make additional strategic and
financial investments in debt and other equity securities in the
future. The fair value of our strategic and financial debt and
equity investments can be significantly impacted by the risk of
adverse changes in securities markets generally, as well as
risks related to the performance of the companies whose
securities we have invested in, risks associated with specific
industries, and other factors. These investments are subject to
significant fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of
the securities markets and of the underlying businesses. A
hypothetical 10.0% adverse change in the price of our public
strategic debt and equity investments would result in
approximately a $49.7 million decrease in the fair value of
that portfolio. The fair value of our strategic debt investments
are currently not materially impacted by interest rate
fluctuations due to the nature of these investments.
72
We currently classify all marketable investment securities as
available-for-sale. We adjust the carrying value of our
available-for-sale securities to fair value and report the
related temporary unrealized gains and losses as a separate
component of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) within Total owners equity
(deficit), net of related deferred income tax. Declines in
the fair value of a marketable investment security which are
estimated to be other than temporary are recognized
in the Combined Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income (Loss), thus establishing a new cost basis for such
investment. We evaluate our marketable investment securities
portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether declines in
the fair value of these securities are other than temporary.
This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other
things, the fair value of our marketable investment securities
compared to the carrying amount, the historical volatility of
the price of each security and any market and company specific
factors related to each security. Generally, absent specific
factors to the contrary, declines in the fair value of
investments below cost basis for a continuous period of less
than six months are considered to be temporary. Declines in the
fair value of investments for a continuous period of six to nine
months are evaluated on a case by case basis to determine
whether any company or market-specific factors exist which would
indicate that such declines are other than temporary. Declines
in the fair value of investments below cost basis for a
continuous period greater than nine months are considered other
than temporary and are recorded as charges to earnings, absent
specific factors to the contrary.
As of September 30, 2007, we had gains net of related tax
effect of $104.5 million as a part of Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) within Total
owners equity (deficit). During the nine months
ended September 30, 2007, we did not record any charge to
earnings for other than temporary declines in the fair value of
our marketable investment securities. In addition, during the
nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized in our
Combined Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Loss) realized and net gains on marketable investment
securities of $5.0 million. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, our strategic investments have
experienced and continue to experience volatility. If the fair
value of our strategic marketable investment securities
portfolio does not remain above cost basis or if we become aware
of any market or company specific factors that indicate that the
carrying value of certain of our securities is impaired, we may
be required to record charges to earnings in future periods
equal to the amount of the decline in fair value.
We have several strategic investments in certain non-marketable
equity securities which are included in Investment in
affiliates on our Combined Balance Sheets. Generally, we
account for our unconsolidated equity investments under either
the equity method or cost method of accounting. Because these
equity securities are not publicly traded, it is not practical
to regularly estimate the fair value of the investments;
however, these investments are subject to an evaluation for
other than temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. This
quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things,
company business plans and current financial statements, if
available, for factors that may indicate an impairment of our
investment. Such factors may include, but are not limited to,
cash flow concerns, material litigation, violations of debt
covenants and changes in business strategy. The fair value of
these equity investments is not estimated unless there are
identified changes in circumstances that may indicate an
impairment exists and these changes are likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.
As of September 30, 2007, we had $81.4 million
aggregate carrying amount of non-marketable and unconsolidated
strategic equity investments, of which $60.4 million is
accounted for under the cost method. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2007, we did not record any impairment
charges with respect to these investments.
In general, we do not use derivative financial instruments for
hedging or speculative purposes, but we may do so in the future.
73
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
our principal properties. We operate various facilities in the
United States and abroad. We believe that our facilities are
well maintained and are sufficient to meet our current and
projected needs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
Owned or
|
|
|
|
|
Description/Use/Location
|
|
Footage
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate headquarters, Englewood, Colorado
|
|
|
476,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate facilities, Littleton, Colorado
|
|
|
202,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar Technologies Corporation engineering offices and
service center, Englewood, Colorado
|
|
|
144,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar Technologies Corporation engineering offices,
Englewood, Colorado
|
|
|
63,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar Data Networks engineering offices, Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital broadcast operations center, Cheyenne, Wyoming
|
|
|
143,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital broadcast operations center, Gilbert, Arizona
|
|
|
124,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional digital broadcast operations center, Monee, Illinois
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional digital broadcast operations center, New Braunsfels,
Texas
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional digital broadcast operations center, Quicksberg,
Virginia
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional digital broadcast operations center, Spokane, Washington
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering offices and warehouse, Almelo, The Netherlands
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering offices, Steeton, England
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of our separation from ECC, we will lease
portions of certain of our owned facilities to ECC. See
Certain Intercompany Agreements Agreements
with ECC Real Estate Lease Agreements.
74
Overview
We intend to operate two primary businesses, a digital set-top
box business and a fixed satellite services business.
Our set-top box business designs, develops and distributes
set-top boxes and related products for direct-to-home satellite
service providers. In 2006, our set-top box business shipped
over nine million set-top boxes. Most of these set-top boxes
were sold to ECC, but we also sold set-top boxes to Bell
ExpressVu and other international customers. We currently employ
over 700 engineers in our set-top box and related businesses.
Our fixed satellite services business will be developed using
our nine owned or leased in-orbit satellites and related FCC
licenses, a network of seven full service digital broadcast
centers, and leased fiber optic capacity with points of presence
in approximately 150 cities. All of these assets will be
contributed to us on the distribution date. We expect that our
primary customer initially will be ECC. However, we also expect
to lease capacity in the spot market and to government and
enterprise customers.
We will enter into commercial agreements with ECC pursuant to
which we will have the obligation to sell set-top boxes and
related products and provide fixed satellite services to ECC at
set prices for a period of two years. However, ECC is under no
obligation to purchase our set-top boxes and related products
during or after this two-year period and ECC may terminate the
agreements to receive fixed satellite services upon 60 days
notice.
As part of ECC, we competed with many of our potential
customers. We believe our separation from ECC may expand our
opportunities to enter into commercial relationships with these
and other new customers, although there can be no assurance that
we will be successful in entering into any of these commercial
relationships.
Products
and Services
Set-top
Boxes and Related Products
Our set-top boxes permit consumers to watch, control and record
television programming through digital video recorder, or DVR,
technology integrated with satellite receivers. Certain of our
set-top boxes are also capable of incorporating internet
protocol television, or IPTV, functionality, which allows
consumers to download movies, music and other content from the
internet through an Ethernet connection.
Our current set-top box lineup includes:
|
|
|
Standard-definition (SD) basic digital set-top
boxes: These devices allow consumers who
subscribe to television service from multi-channel video
distributors to access encrypted digital video and audio content
and make use of a variety of interactive applications. These
applications include an on-screen interactive program guide,
pay-per-view
offerings, the ability to support V-chip type technology, games
and shopping and parental control.
|
|
|
SD-DVR digital set-top boxes: In addition to
the functionality of a SD basic digital set-top box, these
devices enable subscribers to pause, stop, reverse, fast
forward, record and replay live or recorded digital television
content using a built-in hard drive capable of storing up to
200 hours of content. They also include the ability to
support
video-on-demand,
or VOD, services.
|
|
|
High-Definition (HD) digital set-top
boxes: These devices enable subscribers to access
the enhanced picture quality and sound of high-definition
content, in addition to the functionality of a SD digital
set-top box.
|
|
|
HD-DVR digital set-top boxes: These devices
combine the functionality of the HD set-top box and the DVR
digital set-top box into a single device. Our most-advanced
HD-DVR set-top boxes are capable of storing up to 350 hours
of SD, or 55 hours of HD, content, contain IPTV
functionality, and allow users to greatly increase their DVR
storage capacity through the use of external hard drives.
|
75
In addition to set-top boxes we also design and develop related
products such as satellite dishes, remote controls and other
devices and accessories.
Fixed
Satellite Services
Following the completion of the spin-off, we will operate six
owned and three leased in-orbit satellites. We will also have
one owned and one leased satellite under construction.
We will also operate a number of digital broadcast centers in
the United States. Our principal digital broadcast centers are
located in Cheyenne, Wyoming and Gilbert, Arizona. We also have
five regional digital broadcast centers that allow us to utilize
the spot beam capabilities of our satellites. Programming and
other data is received at these centers by fiber or satellite,
processed, and then uplinked to our satellites for
transmission to consumers. Equipment at our digital broadcast
centers also performs compression and encryption of our
customers programming signals.
Our transponder capacity is currently used for a variety of
applications:
|
|
|
Broadcasting Services. We lease satellite
transponder capacity to broadcasters and programmers who use our
satellites to deliver their programming to U.S. cable systems
and cable households. Our satellites are also used for the
transmission of live sporting events and satellite news
gathering services.
|
|
|
|
Government Services. We lease satellite
capacity and provide technical services to US government
agencies and contractors. We believe the U.S. government may
increase its use of commercial satellites for Homeland Security,
emergency response, continuing education, distance learning, and
training.
|
|
|
|
Network Services. We lease satellite
transponder capacity and provide terrestrial network services to
corporations. These networks are dedicated private networks that
allow delivery of video and data services for corporate
communications. Our satellites can be used for point to point or
point to multi-point one way or two way communications.
|
|
|
|
Satellite IP. We currently aggregate content
at our digital broadcast centers and offer transport services
for over 300 channels of MPEG IV IP encapsulated
standard-definition and high-definition programming from our
satellite located at the 85 degree orbital location. We intend
to offer these wholesale programming transport services to
telecommunication companies, rural cable operators, local
exchange carriers and wireless broadband providers.
|
Other
Business Opportunities
ECC has entered into agreements to construct and launch an
S-band satellite and to lease its transponder capacity to a Hong
Kong joint venture, which in turn will sublease a portion of
such transponder capacity to an affiliate of a Chinese
governmental entity to support the development of
satellite-delivered mobile video services in China. ECC also has
recently completed several other strategic investments, and we
intend to evaluate new strategic development opportunities both
in the United States and in other international markets. These
investments will be transferred to us as part of the spin-off,
and are part of our strategy to expand our business and support
the development of new satellite-delivered services, such as
mobile video services. The expertise we obtain through these
investments may also help us to improve and expand the services
that we provide to our existing customers.
However, these investments involve many significant risks,
including, among other things, the risks that required
regulatory approvals and other conditions may not be obtained or
satisfied, that we may not be able to enter into necessary
distribution and other relationships, and that the companies in
which we invest or with whom we partner may not be able to
compete effectively in their markets or that there may be
insufficient demand for the new services planned by these
companies.
During 2007 ECC participated in an FCC auction for licenses in
the 1.4 GHz band and was the winning bidder for several licenses
with total winning bids of $57.4 million. ECC intends to
transfer these licenses to us in the spin-off subject to receipt
of final FCC approvals. We are currently evaluating commercial
uses for this spectrum. While its propagation characteristics
are attractive, the small amount of spectrum limits its
76
potential commercial use. There can be no assurance that we will
be able to exploit these licenses or that we could raise all
capital required to develop these licenses.
Sling
Media
Sling Media, Inc. was acquired in October 2007 by ECC and will
be transferred to us as part of the spin-off. Sling Media is the
maker of the Slingbox, which allows consumers to watch and
control their television programming at any time, from any
location, using personal computers, personal digital assistants,
smartphones and other digital media devices. This information
statement includes historical financial statements and other
information regarding Sling Media.
Our
Business Strategy
Expand set-top box business to additional
customers. We believe our separation from ECC
could enhance our opportunities to sell set-top boxes to a
broader group of multi-channel video distributors. Historically,
many of our potential customers have perceived us as a
competitor due to our affiliation with ECC. After the spin-off,
we believe we could have opportunities to enter into commercial
relationships with other multi-channel video distributors. There
can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful in
entering into any of these commercial relationships
(particularly if we continue to be perceived as affiliated with
ECC as a result of common ownership and related management).
Leverage satellite capacity and related
infrastructure. Our fixed satellite services
business benefits from excess satellite and fiber capacity that
we believe was in large part created through innovation and
operational efficiencies at ECC. While we expect that ECC will
initially be our primary customer for fixed satellite services,
we believe market opportunities exist to utilize our capacity to
provide digital video distribution, satellite-delivered IP,
corporate communications and government services to a broader
customer base.
Offer comprehensive network infrastructure
solutions. We intend to leverage our over 700
engineers to customize infrastructure solutions for a broad base
of customers. For example, we could offer a customer the ability
to deliver a fully integrated video programming solution,
incorporating our satellite and backhaul capacity, customized
set-top boxes and network design and management.
Capitalize on change in regulations. Changes
in federal law and regulations applicable to the set-box
industry may create opportunities for us to expand our business.
|
|
|
Digital transition. Congress has mandated that
by February 2009 all network broadcasts be transmitted
digitally, which will require households that receive
over-the-air broadcast signals with an analog television to
obtain a digital converter device. This digital converter device
is a new product and we believe that we are in a position to
develop and market devices that could allow us to effectively
compete in this new market.
|
|
|
Removable security systems. The Federal
Communications Commission, or FCC, mandated that by July 2007
cable providers use removable security modules to provide
conditional access security for television content. The FCC
intends for this regulation to spur competition in the retail
set-top box market, providing an even playing field between
leased cable set-top boxes and retail-bought, cable-ready TVs
and set-top box equipment. We believe this new regulation may
create an opportunity for us to compete on a more level field in
the domestic market for cable set-top boxes.
|
Exploit international opportunities. We
believe that direct-to-home satellite service is particularly
well-suited for countries without extensive cable
infrastructure, and we intend to continue to try to secure new
customer relationships from international direct-to-home
satellite service providers.
Pursue strategic partnerships, joint ventures and
acquisitions. We intend to selectively pursue
partnerships, joint ventures and strategic acquisition
opportunities that we believe may allow us to increase our
existing market share, expand into new markets, broaden our
portfolio of products or intellectual property, or strengthen
our relationships with our customers.
77
Act on the set-top box replacement cycle. The
broader adoption of high definition television by consumers will
require more advanced compression (e.g., MPEG-4) and security
technologies within set-top boxes. This may launch a replacement
cycle, particularly among direct-to-home and cable providers
with substantial bases of legacy equipment, which may create
additional market opportunities for us.
Customers
Digital
Set-top Box Business
Historically the primary customer of our digital set-top box
business has been ECC. For the nine month period ended
September 30, 2007 and the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, ECC accounted for
approximately 86.2%, 84.5%, 85.6% and 89.7% of our total
historical revenue, respectively. In addition, Bell ExpressVu, a
direct-to-home satellite service provider in Canada, accounted
for 10.0%,12.2%, 11.4% and 7.3% respectively, of our historical
total revenue for the nine month period ended September 30,
2007 and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004. We also currently sell our set-top boxes to other
international direct-to-home satellite service providers,
although these customers do not account for a significant amount
of our total revenue.
In the near term, we expect to rely on ECC to remain the primary
customer of our set-top box business and the primary source of
our total revenue. We will enter into commercial agreements with
ECC pursuant to which we will be obligated to sell set-top boxes
and related products to ECC at set prices for a period of two
years. ECC is under no obligation to purchase our set-top boxes
or related products during or after this two- year period. In
addition, while we currently have certain binding purchase
orders from Bell ExpressVu through the beginning of 2008, the
availability of new compression technology could impact our
relationship with Bell ExpressVu, depending on its strategy to
upgrade customers. There can be no assurance that ECC or Bell
ExpressVu will continue to use our set-top boxes in the future
or that we will be successful in growing our set-top box
business.
Fixed
Satellite Services
We lease transponder capacity on our satellite fleet primarily
to ECC, but also to a small number of government and enterprise
customers, telecommunications companies and other users. In the
near term, due to our limited base of customers, we expect to
have a substantial amount of excess capacity. For the nine month
period ended September 30, 2007 and the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006, ECC accounted for approximately 93.9%
and 97.5% of our pro forma total fixed satellite services
revenue, respectively. We will enter into commercial agreements
with ECC pursuant to which we will be obligated to provide ECC
with fixed satellite services at fixed prices for up to two
years. However, ECC may terminate these agreements upon 60 days
notice. Our other fixed satellite service sales are generally
characterized by shorter-term contracts or spot market sales.
We currently have substantial unused satellite capacity. Future
costs associated with this excess capacity will negatively
impact our margins if we do not generate revenue to offset these
costs. In addition, because a substantial portion of the
capacity of each of our AMC-15, AMC-16 and EchoStar IX
satellites remains unused, there is a significant risk that in
the future, in addition to reporting lower than expected
revenues and profitability, we will be required to record a
substantial impairment charge relating to one or more of these
satellites. We currently estimate that these potential charges
could aggregate up to $250 million, which, if incurred
would have a material adverse effect on our reported operating
results and financial position. Furthermore, it is possible that
in 2008 ECC will discontinue the use of some or all of the
capacity on one or more other satellites that it will initially
lease from us. To the extent that this occurs and we are unable
to find other customers to lease this additional excess
capacity, we may be required to record substantial additional
impairment charges that we currently estimate could aggregate up
to $100 million. We performed a preliminary assessment of
the recoverability of the satellites to be contributed by ECC as
if the spin-off had been consummated and preliminarily concluded
that the recoverability of the satellites will not be impaired
as of the distribution date.
78
Marketing
and Sales
Historically, our sales and marketing efforts have been limited
in scope and focused on international opportunities because the
majority of our products and services were provided to ECC
pursuant to purchase orders and not long term contracts.
Therefore, to successfully implement our business strategy we
will need to significantly expand our marketing and sales
capabilities both domestically and internationally.
Manufacturing
and Material Sources
Although we design, engineer and distribute set-top boxes and
related products, we are not generally engaged in the
manufacturing process. Instead we outsource the manufacturing of
our set-top boxes and related products to third party
manufacturers who manufacture our products according to
specifications supplied by us. We depend on a few manufacturers,
and in some cases a single manufacturer, for the production of
set-top boxes and related products. Although there can be no
assurance, we do not believe that the loss of any single
manufacturer would materially impact our business. Sanmina-SCI
Corporation and Jabil Circuit, Inc. currently manufacture the
majority of our set-top boxes.
Research
and Development
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004, we have invested approximately $56.5 million,
$45.9 million and $39.8 million, respectively, in
research and development primarily related to our set-top box
business.
Competition
Digital
Set-top box Business
As we seek to establish ourselves in the digital set-top box
industry as an independent business we will face substantial
competition. Many of our primary competitors, such as Motorola
and Cisco, which recently acquired Scientific Atlanta, have
established longstanding relationships with their customers. For
instance, some of these competitors own the conditional access
technology deployed by their customers. We may not be able to
license this technology from these competitors on favorable
terms or at all. In addition, we may face competition from
international developers of set-top box systems who may be able
to develop and manufacture products and services at costs that
are substantially lower than ours. Our ability to compete in the
digital multi-media industry will also depend heavily on our
ability to successfully bring new technologies to market to keep
pace with our competitors.
Fixed
Satellite Services Business
We compete against larger, well-established fixed satellite
service companies, such as Intelsat, SES Americom and Telesat
Canada, in an industry that is characterized by long-term leases
and high switching costs. Therefore, it will be difficult to
displace customers from their current relationships with our
competitors. Intelsat and SES Americom maintain key North
American orbital slots which may further limit competition and
competitive pricing. In addition, our fixed satellite service
business could face significant competition from suppliers of
terrestrial communications capacity.
While we believe that there may be opportunities to capture new
business as a result of market trends such as the digital
transition and the increased communications demands of homeland
security initiatives, there can be no assurance that we will be
able to effectively compete against our competitors due to their
significant resources and operating history.
Satellite
Fleet Overview
As discussed above, we will have six owned and three leased
in-orbit satellites, and we will have one owned and one leased
satellite currently under construction. While we believe that
overall our satellite fleet is generally in good condition,
during 2007 and prior periods certain satellites in our fleet
have experienced anomalies, some of which have had a significant
adverse impact on their commercial operation. There can be
79
no assurance that we can recover critical transmission capacity
in the event one or more of our in-orbit satellites were to
fail. We do not anticipate carrying insurance for any of the
in-orbit satellites that we will own.
Owned
Satellites
EchoStar III. EchoStar III was launched
during October 1997 and currently operates at the 61.5 degree
orbital location. The satellite was originally designed to
operate a maximum of 32 transponders at approximately 120 watts
per channel, switchable to 16 transponders operating at over 230
watts per channel, and was equipped with a total of 44
transponders to provide redundancy. Prior to 2006, TWTA
anomalies caused 22 transponders to fail. During April and
October 2006, further TWTA anomalies caused the failure of four
additional transponders. As a result, a maximum of 18
transponders are currently available for use on EchoStar III,
but due to redundancy switching limitations and specific channel
authorizations, we can only operate on 15 of the 30 FCC
authorized frequencies we will have the right to utilize at the
61.5 degree location. While we do not expect a large number of
additional TWTAs to fail in any year, and the failures have not
reduced the original minimum
12-year
design life of the satellite, it is likely that additional TWTA
failures will occur from time to time in the future, and those
failures will further impact commercial operation of the
satellite.
EchoStar IV. EchoStar IV was launched
during May 1998 and currently operates at the 77 degree orbital
location. The satellite was originally designed to operate a
maximum of 32 transponders at approximately 120 watts per
channel, switchable to 16 transponders operating at over 230
watts per channel. As a result of past TWTA failures, only six
transponders are currently available for use and the satellite
has been fully depreciated on our books. There can be no
assurance that further material degradation, or total loss of
use, of EchoStar IV will not occur in the immediate future.
EchoStar VI. EchoStar VI was launched during
July 2000 and is currently stationed at the 110 degree orbital
location as an in-orbit spare. The satellite was originally
equipped with 108 solar array strings, approximately 102 of
which are required to assure full power availability for the
original minimum
12-year
design life of the satellite. Prior to 2006, EchoStar VI
experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of 15 solar array
strings. During 2006, two additional solar array strings failed,
reducing the number of functional solar array strings to 91.
While the design life of the satellite has not been affected,
commercial operability has been reduced. The satellite was
designed to operate 32 transponders at approximately 125 watts
per channel, switchable to 16 transponders operating at
approximately 225 watts per channel. The power reduction
resulting from the solar array failures limits us to operation
of a maximum of 26 transponders in standard power mode, or 13
transponders in high power mode currently. The number of
transponders to which power can be provided is expected to
continue to decline in the future at the rate of approximately
one transponder every three years. See discussion of evaluation
of impairment in Long-Lived Satellite Assets in
Note 2 in the Notes to Statement of Net Assets to be
Contributed by ECC.
EchoStar VIII. EchoStar VIII was launched
during August 2002 and currently operates at the 110 degree
orbital location. The satellite was designed to operate 32
transponders at approximately 120 watts per channel, switchable
to 16 transponders operating at approximately 240 watts per
channel. EchoStar VIII also includes spot-beam technology. This
satellite has experienced several anomalies since launch, but
none have reduced the
12-year
estimated useful life of the satellite. However, there can be no
assurance that future anomalies will not cause further losses
which could materially impact its commercial operation, or
result in a total loss of the satellite.
EchoStar IX. EchoStar IX was launched during
August 2003 and currently operates at the 121 degree orbital
location. The satellite was designed to operate 32 fixed
satellite services transponders operating at approximately 110
watts per channel, along with transponders that can provide
services in the
Ka-Band (a
Ka-band
payload). The satellite also includes a C-band payload
which is owned by a third party. During 2006, EchoStar IX
experienced the loss of one of its three momentum wheels, two of
which are utilized during normal operations. A spare wheel was
switched in at the time and the loss did not reduce the
12-year
estimated useful life of the satellite. During September 2007,
the satellite experienced anomalies resulting in
80
the loss of three solar array strings. An investigation of the
anomalies is continuing. The anomalies have not impacted
commercial operation of the satellite to date. The design life
of the satellite is not expected to be impacted since the
satellite is equipped with a total of 288 solar array strings,
only approximately 276 of which are required to assure full
power availability for the design life of the satellite.
However, there can be no assurance future anomalies will not
cause further losses, which could impact the remaining life or
commercial operation of the satellite.
EchoStar XII. EchoStar XII was launched during
July 2003 and currently operates at the 61.5 degree orbital
location. The satellite was designed to operate 13 transponders
at 270 watts per channel, in CONUS mode, or 22 spot beams
using a combination of 135 and 65 watt TWTAs. We currently
operate the satellite in CONUS mode. EchoStar XII has a total of
24 solar array circuits, approximately 22 of which are required
to assure full power for the original minimum
12-year
design life of the satellite. Since late 2004, eight solar array
circuits on EchoStar XII have experienced anomalous behavior
resulting in both temporary and permanent solar array circuit
failures. The cause of the failures is still being investigated.
The design life of the satellite has not been affected. However,
these temporary and permanent failures have resulted in a
reduction in power to the satellite which will preclude us from
using the full complement of transponders on EchoStar XII for
the 12-year
design life of the satellite. The exact extent of this impact
has not yet been determined. There can be no assurance future
anomalies will not cause further losses, which could further
impact commercial operation of the satellite or its useful life.
See discussion of evaluation of impairment in Long-Lived
Satellite Assets in Note 2 in the Notes to Statement
of Net Assets to be Contributed by ECC.
Leased
Satellites
We are currently leasing all of the capacity on an existing
in-orbit fixed satellite services satellite, AMC-2, at the 85
degree orbital location. Our lease of this satellite is expected
to continue through 2007 and has been accounted for as an
operating lease.
AMC-15. AMC-15 commenced commercial operation
during January 2005 and currently operates at the 105 degree
orbital location. This SES Americom fixed satellite services
satellite is equipped with 24 Ku fixed satellite services
transponders that operate at approximately 120 watts per channel
and a Ka fixed satellite services payload consisting of 12 spot
beams. As part of the spin-off, ECC will contribute to us a
ten-year satellite service agreement for this satellite which
will be renewable by us on a year to year basis following the
initial term, and provides us with certain rights to replacement
satellites.
AMC-16. AMC-16 commenced commercial operation
during February 2005 and currently operates at the 85 degree
orbital location. This SES Americom fixed satellite services
satellite is equipped with 24 Ku-band transponders that operate
at approximately 120 watts per channel and a
Ka-band
payload consisting of 12 spot beams. As part of the spin-off,
ECC will contribute to us a ten-year satellite service agreement
for this satellite which will be renewable by us on a year to
year basis following the initial term, and provides us with
certain rights to replacement satellites.
Satellites
Under Construction
CMBStar. The CMBStar satellite is an S-band
satellite intended to be used in our mobile video project in
China and is scheduled to be completed during the second quarter
of 2008. If the required regulatory approvals are obtained and
contractual conditions are satisfied, the transponder capacity
of that satellite will be leased to a Hong Kong joint venture,
which in turn will sublease a portion of the transponder
capacity to an affiliate of a Chinese regulatory entity.
AMC-14. AMC-14 will launch and commence
commercial operation in early 2008 at an orbital location to be
determined at a future date. The satellite is being equipped
with transmit antennas optimized for multiple orbital locations,
providing greater backup flexibility in the event certain other
in-orbit satellites fail.
ECC has entered into contracts for the construction of three
additional SSL Ka
and/or Ku
expanded band satellites which are expected to be completed
during 2009 and 2010. ECC will contribute these contracts to us
as part of the spin-off.
81
Government
Regulations
We are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FCC for our
domestic operations. We are also regulated by other federal
agencies, state and local authorities and the International
Telecommunication Union. Depending upon the circumstances,
noncompliance with legislation or regulations promulgated by
these entities could result in suspension or revocation of our
licenses or authorizations, the termination or loss of contracts
or the imposition of contractual damages, civil fines or
criminal penalties.
The following summary of regulatory developments and legislation
in the United States is not intended to describe all present and
proposed government regulation and legislation affecting the
satellite and set-top box equipment markets. Government
regulations that are currently the subject of judicial or
administrative proceedings, legislative hearings or
administrative proposals could change our industry to varying
degrees. We cannot predict either the outcome of these
proceedings or any potential impact they might have on the
industry or on our operations.
Regulations
Applicable to Satellite Operations
FCC Jurisdiction over our Satellite
Operations. The Communications Act gives the FCC
broad authority to regulate the operations of satellite
companies. Specifically, the Communications Act gives the FCC
regulatory jurisdiction over the following areas relating to
communications satellite operations:
|
|
|
the assignment of satellite radio frequencies and orbital
locations;
|
|
|
licensing of satellites, earth stations, the granting of related
authorizations, and evaluation of the fitness of a company to be
a licensee;
|
|
|
approval for the relocation of satellites to different orbital
locations or the replacement of an existing satellite with a new
satellite;
|
|
|
ensuring compliance with the terms and conditions of such
assignments and authorizations, including required timetables
for construction and operation of satellites and other due
diligence requirements;
|
|
|
avoiding interference with other radio frequency
emitters; and
|
|
|
ensuring compliance with other applicable provisions of the
Communications Act and FCC rules and regulations governing the
operations of satellite communications providers.
|
In order to obtain FCC satellite licenses and authorizations,
satellite operators must satisfy strict legal, technical and
financial qualification requirements. Once issued, these
licenses and authorizations are subject to a number of
conditions including, among other things, satisfaction of
ongoing due diligence obligations, construction milestones, and
various reporting requirements. Applications for new or modified
satellites and earth stations are necessary for further
development and expansion of satellites services. Necessary
federal approval of these applications may not be granted, or
may not be granted in a timely manner.
Overview of Our Satellites Licenses and
Authorizations. This overview describes the
satellite licenses and authorizations that will be contributed
to us in the spin-off, and it assumes for purposes of this
description the completion of these contributions. However,
transfer of these licenses and authorizations remains subject to
receipt of all required FCC and other governmental approvals.
Our satellites are located in orbital positions, or slots, that
are designated by their western longitude. An orbital position
describes both a physical location and an assignment of spectrum
in the applicable frequency band. Each transponder on our
satellites typically exploits one frequency channel. Through
digital compression technology, we can currently transmit up to
13 standard-definition digital video channels from each
transponder. Several of our satellites also include spot-beam
technology which enables us to provide services on a local or
regional basis, but reduces the number of video channels that
could otherwise be offered across the entire United States.
We have U.S. DBS licenses for 30 frequencies at the 61.5
degree orbital location, capable of providing service to the
Eastern and Central United States. We are also currently
operating on the two unassigned frequencies at
82
the 61.5 orbital location under a conditional special temporary
authorization. We recently sought renewal of that authority. The
licensing of those two channels is under FCC review, and also
subject to an FCC moratorium on new DBS applications. The FCC
has previously found that existing DBS providers will not be
eligible for the two unassigned channels at the 61.5 degree
orbital location. EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. has a pending
reconsideration petition of that decision.
Following the spin-off, we will have the right to use 32
frequencies at a Mexican DBS orbital slot at
the 77 degree orbital location, but it is likely to be
several years before a satellite is available to exploit all of
that spectrum.
We also hold licenses or have entered into agreements to lease
capacity on satellites at the following fixed satellite services
orbital locations including:
|
|
|
500 MHz of Ku spectrum divided into 32 frequencies at the
121 degree orbital location, capable of providing service to
CONUS, plus 500 MHz of Ka spectrum at the 121 degree
orbital location capable of providing service into select spot
beams;
|
|
|
500 MHz of Ku spectrum divided into 24 frequencies at the
105 degree orbital location, currently capable of providing
service to CONUS, Alaska and Hawaii, plus approximately
720 MHz of Ka spectrum capable of providing service through
spot beams to CONUS, Alaska and Hawaii; and
|
|
|
500 MHz of Ku spectrum divided into 24 frequencies at the
85 degree orbital location, currently capable of providing
service to CONUS, plus approximately 720 MHz of Ka spectrum
capable of providing service through spot beams to CONUS.
|
We also hold authorizations to construct additional satellites
at other orbital locations. Specifically, we hold
Ka-band
licenses at the 97 and 113 degree orbital locations. More
recently, we were granted authority for a tweener
DBS satellite at the 86.5 degree orbital location. That
authorization will be conditioned on final FCC licensing and
service rules in the tweener proceeding, in which
the FCC is examining permitting satellites to operate from
orbital locations 4.5 degrees (half of the usual 9 degrees) away
from traditional DBS satellites. The FCC has also granted
authorizations to Spectrum Five for a tweener satellite at the
114.5 degree orbital location. EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.
challenged the Spectrum Five authorization, and Telesat Canada,
a Canadian satellite operator, has challenged our license.
Use of these licenses and conditional authorizations is subject
to certain technical and due diligence requirements, including
the requirement to construct and launch satellites according to
specific milestones and deadlines. There can be no assurance
that we will develop acceptable plans to meet these deadlines,
or that we will be able to utilize these orbital slots.
Duration of our Satellite Licenses. Generally
speaking, all of our satellite licenses are subject to
expiration unless renewed by the FCC. The term of each of our
DBS licenses is 10 years; fixed satellite services licenses
generally are for 15 year terms. In addition, our special
temporary authorizations are granted for periods of only
180 days or less, subject again to possible renewal by the
FCC.
Opposition and other Risks to our
Licenses. Several third parties have opposed, and
we expect them to continue to oppose, some of our FCC satellite
authorizations and pending requests to the FCC for extensions,
modifications, waivers and approvals of our licenses. In
addition, we may not have fully complied with all of the FCC
reporting and filing requirements in connection with our
satellite authorizations. Consequently, it is possible the FCC
could revoke, terminate, condition or decline to extend or renew
certain of our authorizations or licenses.
FCC Rulemaking Affecting our Licenses and
Applications. A number of our other applications
have been denied or dismissed without prejudice by the FCC, or
remain pending. We cannot be sure that the FCC will grant any of
our satellite applications, or that the authorizations, if
granted, will not be subject to onerous conditions. Moreover,
the cost of building, launching and insuring a satellite can be
as much as $300 million or more, and we cannot be sure that
we will be able to construct and launch all of the satellites
for which we have requested authorizations. The FCC has also
imposed a $3.0 million bond requirement for our fixed
83
satellite services satellite licenses, all or part of which
would be forfeited by a licensee that does not meet its
diligence milestones for a particular satellite.
Reverse Band (17/24 GHz BSS)
Spectrum. The FCC has recently announced
licensing and service rules for the 17/24 GHz BSS or
reverse band spectrum, which could create
substantial additional capacity for satellite providers. It
could also result in additional satellite competition from new
entrants. Under FCC rules, we are eligible for up to 5 orbital
locations. We cannot predict when, or whether, the FCC will
grant our applications. Nor can we predict whether FCC action,
or other applicants selected orbital locations, will limit
the utility of this new spectrum for our operations.
Interference from Other Services Sharing Satellite
Spectrum. The FCC has adopted rules that allow
non-geostationary orbit fixed satellite services to operate on a
co-primary basis in the same frequency band as DBS and
Ku-band-based fixed satellite services. The FCC has also
authorized the use of terrestrial communication services (MVDDS)
in the DBS band. MVDDS licenses were auctioned in 2004. Despite
regulatory provisions to protect DBS operations from harmful
interference, there can be no assurance that operations by other
satellite or terrestrial communication services in the DBS band
will not interfere with our DBS operations and adversely affect
our business.
International Satellite Competition and
Interference. DIRECTV has obtained FCC authority
to provide service to the United States from a Canadian DBS
orbital slot. We have also received authority to do the same
from a Mexican orbital slot at 77 degrees. The possibility that
the FCC will allow service to the U.S. from additional
foreign slots may permit additional competition against us from
other satellite providers. It may also provide a means by which
to increase our available satellite capacity in the United
States. In addition, a number of administrations, such as Great
Britain and the Netherlands, have requested to add orbital
locations serving the U.S. close to our licensed slots.
Such operations could cause harmful interference into our
satellites and constrain our future operations at those slots if
such tweener operations are approved by the FCC. The
risk of harmful interference will depend upon the final rules
adopted in the FCCs tweener proceeding.
Emergency Alert System. The Emergency Alert
System (EAS) requires participants to interrupt
programming during nationally declared emergencies and to pass
through emergency-related information. The FCC requires
satellite carriers to participate in the national
portion of EAS, and is considering whether to mandate that
satellite carriers also interrupt programming for local
emergencies and weather events. We cannot be sure that this
requirement will not affect us adversely by requiring us to
devote additional resources to complying with EAS requirements.
The International Telecommunication Union. Our
satellites also must conform to the International
Telecommunication Union, or ITU, requirements and regulations.
We have cooperated, and continue to cooperate, with the FCC in
the preparation of ITU filings and responses. Requests for
modification that have been filed by the United States
government for our satellites are pending or in various stages
of completion. We cannot predict if all the required requests
will be made or when the ITU will act upon them.
Regulations
Applicable to Set-top box Operations
Plug and Play. Cable companies were required
to separate the security functionality from their set-top boxes
to increase competition and encourage the sale of set-top boxes
in the retail market by July 1, 2007. Traditionally, cable
service providers sold or leased set-top boxes with integrated
security functionality to subscribers. DBS providers are not
currently subject to the removable security requirements. The
development of a retail market for cable set-top boxes could
provide us with an opportunity to expand operations providing
set-top box equipment to non-DBS households. The FCC has an open
proceeding addressing the need to expand the scope of the cable
plug and play rules, and the need for all-video
provider set-top box solutions. If the FCC were to extend or
expand its separate security rules to include DBS providers,
sales of our set-top boxes to DBS providers may be negatively
impacted. Specifically, if a retail DBS set-top box market
develops capable of accepting the security modules, we risk
reduced sales if competitors produce DBS set-top boxes.
84
NTIA Digital Converter Box Program. The
Commerce Departments National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA) has established a coupon
program allowing U.S. households to request up to two
coupons, worth $40 each, to be used toward the purchase of up to
two, digital-to-analog converter boxes as part of the February
2009 digital television transition. This program is necessary to
ensure that consumers with analog televisions will continue to
be able to view over-the-air broadcast signals after the digital
transition. To be eligible for the coupons, converter boxes must
be approved by the NTIA, and we have submitted a converter box
for NTIA approval. We cannot predict when, or if, our box will
be approved for the coupon program.
Export
Control Regulation Applicable to Satellite and Set-top box
Equipment
We are required to obtain import and export licenses from the
United States government to receive and deliver components of
direct-to-home satellite TV systems. In addition, the delivery
of satellites and the supply of related ground control
equipment, technical data, and satellite
communication/control
services to destinations outside the United States is subject to
strict export control and prior approval requirements from the
United States government (including prohibitions on the sharing
of certain satellite-related goods and services with China).
Patents
And Trademarks
Many entities, including some of our competitors, have or may in
the future obtain patents and other intellectual property rights
that cover or affect products or services related to those that
EHC will offer. In general, if a court determines that one or
more of our products infringes on intellectual property held by
others, we may be required to cease developing or marketing
those products, to obtain licenses from the holders of the
intellectual property at a material cost, or to redesign those
products in such a way as to avoid infringing the patent claims.
If those intellectual property rights are held by a competitor,
we may be unable to obtain the intellectual property at any
price, which could adversely affect our competitive position.
We may not be aware of all intellectual property rights that our
products may potentially infringe. In addition, patent
applications in the United States are confidential until the
Patent and Trademark Office issues a patent and, accordingly,
our products may infringe claims contained in pending patent
applications of which we are not aware. Further, the process of
determining definitively whether a claim of infringement is
valid often involves expensive and protracted litigation, even
if we are ultimately successful on the merits.
We cannot estimate the extent to which we may be required in the
future to obtain intellectual property licenses or the
availability and cost of any such licenses. Those costs, and
their impact on our results of operations, could be material.
Damages in patent infringement cases may also include treble
damages in certain circumstances. To the extent that we are
required to pay unanticipated royalties to third parties, these
increased costs of doing business could negatively affect our
liquidity and operating results. EHC is currently defending
multiple patent infringement actions. We cannot be certain the
courts will conclude these companies do not own the rights they
claim, that our products do not infringe on these rights, that
we would be able to obtain licenses from these persons on
commercially reasonable terms or, if we were unable to obtain
such licenses, that we would be able to redesign our products to
avoid infringement. See Legal Proceedings.
Environmental
Regulations
We are subject to the requirements of federal, state, local and
foreign environmental and occupational safety and health laws
and regulations. These include laws regulating air emissions,
water discharge and waste management. We attempt to maintain
compliance with all such requirements. We do not expect capital
or other expenditures for environmental compliance to be
material in 2007 or 2008. Environmental requirements are
complex, change frequently and have become more stringent over
time. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurance that these
requirements will not change or become more stringent in the
future in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on
our business.
85
Geographic
Area Data and Transactions with Major Customers
For principal geographic area data and transactions with major
customers for 2006, 2005 and 2004, see Note 8 in the Notes
to the Combined Financial Statements of EchoStar Holding
Corporation.
Employees
Upon completion of the spin-off, we will have approximately
1,500 employees. We anticipate that subsequent to the
spin-off, ECC will provide us with certain management and
administrative services, which will include the services of
certain executive officers of ECC. See Certain
Intercompany Agreements Agreements with
ECC Management Services Agreement.
Legal
Proceedings
Separation
Agreement
In connection with the spin-off, we have entered into a
separation agreement with ECC, which provides for, among other
things, the division of liability resulting from litigation.
Under the terms of the separation agreement, we have assumed
liability for any acts or omissions that relate to our business
whether such acts or omissions occurred before or after the
spin-off. Certain exceptions are provided, including for
intellectual property related claims generally, whereby we will
only be liable for our acts or omissions that occurred following
the spin-off. In accordance with these terms of the separation
agreement, we may be partially or completely responsible for any
liability resulting from the legal proceedings described below.
Acacia
During 2004, Acacia Media Technologies, which we refer to as
Acacia filed a lawsuit against us and ECC in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit
also named DirecTV, Comcast, Charter, Cox and a number of
smaller cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an intellectual
property holding company which seeks to license the patent
portfolio that it has acquired. The suit alleges infringement of
United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992 (the 992 patent),
5,253,275 (the 275 patent), 5,550,863 (the 863
patent), 6,002,720 (the 720 patent) and 6,144,702 (the
702 patent). The 992, 863, 720 and
702 patents have been asserted against us.
The patents relate to various systems and methods related to the
transmission of digital data. The 992 and 702
patents have also been asserted against several Internet content
providers in the United States District Court for the Central
District of California. During 2004 and 2005, the Court issued
Markman rulings which found that the 992 and 702
patents were not as broad as Acacia had contended, and that
certain terms in the 702 patent were indefinite. In April
2006, ECC and other defendants asked the Court to rule that the
claims of the 702 patent are invalid and not infringed.
That motion is pending. In June and September 2006, the Court
held Markman hearings on the 992, 863, 720 and
275 patents, and issued a ruling during December 2006.
Acacias various patent infringement cases have been
consolidated for pre-trial purposes in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California.
We and ECC intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event
that a Court ultimately determines that we and ECC infringe any
of the patents, we may be subject to an injunction that could
require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features
that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified
by ECC for any potential liability or damages resulting from
this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of
the spin-off.
Broadcast
Innovation, L.L.C.
In 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C., which we refer to as
Broadcast Innovation, filed a lawsuit against ECC, DirecTV,
Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in Federal District
Court in Denver, Colorado. The suit alleges infringement of
United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (which we refer to as the
094 patent) and 4,992,066 (which we refer to as the
066 patent). The 094 patent relates to certain
methods and devices for transmitting and receiving data along
with specific formatting information for the data. The 066
patent relates
86
to certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling
circuitry for a pay television system on removable cards. We
examined these patents and believe that they are not infringed
by any of our products or services. Subsequently, DirecTV and
Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving us as the only
defendant.
During 2004, the judge issued an order finding the 066
patent invalid. Also in 2004, the Court ruled the 094
patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation
against Charter and Comcast. In 2005, the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the
094 patent finding of invalidity and remanded the case
back to the District Court. During June 2006, Charter filed a
reexamination request with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office. The Court has stayed the case pending
reexamination. Our case remains stayed pending resolution of the
Charter case.
We and ECC intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event
that a Court ultimately determines that we and ECC infringe any
of the patents, we may be subject to an injunction that could
require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features
that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified
by ECC for any potential liability or damages resulting from
this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of
the spin-off.
Finisar
Corporation
Finisar Corporation, which we refer to as Finisar, obtained a
$100 million verdict in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas against DirecTV for patent
infringement. Finisar alleged that DirecTVs electronic
program guide and other elements of its system infringe United
States Patent No. 5,404,505 (the 505 patent).
In July 2006, ECC, together with NagraStar LLC, filed a
Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in the United States District
Court for the District of Delaware against Finisar that asks the
Court to declare that they and we do not infringe, and have not
infringed, any valid claim of the 505 patent. Trial is not
currently scheduled. The District Court has stayed our action
until the Federal Circuit has resolved DirecTVs appeal.
We and ECC intend to vigorously prosecute this case. In the
event that a Court ultimately determines that we and ECC
infringe any of the patents, we may be subject to an injunction
that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly
features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being
indemnified by ECC for any potential liability or damages
resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the
effective date of the spin-off.
Global
Communications
On April 19, 2007, Global Communications, Inc., which we
refer to as Global, filed a patent infringement action against
ECC in the United States District Court for the Eastern District
of Texas. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent
No. 6,947,702 (which we refer to as the 702 patent).
This patent, which involves satellite reception, was issued in
September 2005. On October 24, 2007, the United States
Patent and Trademark Office granted ECCs request for
re-examination of the 702 patent and issued an Office
Action finding that all of the claims of the 702 patent
were invalid. Based on the PTOs decision, ECC has asked
the District Court to stay the litigation until the
re-examination proceeding is concluded.
We and ECC intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event
that a Court ultimately determines that we and ECC infringe any
of the patents, we may be subject to an injunction that could
require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features
that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified
by ECC for any potential liability or damages resulting from
this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of
the spin-off.
Superguide
During 2000, Superguide Corp., which we refer to as Superguide,
filed suit against ECC, DirecTV, Thomson and others in the
United States District Court for the Western District of North
Carolina, Asheville Division, alleging infringement of United
States Patent Nos. 5,038,211 (which we refer to as the 211
patent), 5,293,357 (which we refer to as the 357 patent)
and 4,751,578 (which we refer to as the 578 patent) which
relate to
87
certain electronic program guide functions, including the use of
electronic program guides to control VCRs. Superguide sought
injunctive and declaratory relief and damages in an unspecified
amount.
On summary judgment, the District Court ruled that none of the
asserted patents were infringed by us. These rulings were
appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit. During 2004, the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and
reversed in part the District Courts findings and remanded
the case back to the District Court for further proceedings. In
2005, Superguide indicated that it would no longer pursue
infringement allegations with respect to the 211 and
357 patents and those patents have now been dismissed from
the suit. The District Court subsequently entered judgment of
non-infringement in favor of all defendants as to the 211
and 357 patents and ordered briefing on Thomsons
license defense as to the 578 patent. During December
2006, the District Court found that there were disputed issues
of fact regarding Thomsons license defense, and ordered a
trial solely addressed to that issue. That trial took place in
March 2007. In July 2007, the District Court ruled in favor of
Superguide. As a result, Superguide will be able to proceed with
their infringement action against us, DirecTV and Thomson.
We and ECC intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event
that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe the
578 patent, we may be subject to a portion of the final
damages, which may include treble damages
and/or an
injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly electronic programming guide and related features
that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified
by ECC for any potential liability or damages resulting from
this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of
the spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the
outcome of the suit.
Tivo
Inc.
During April 2006, a Texas jury concluded that certain of our
digital video recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by
Tivo. The Texas court subsequently issued an injunction
prohibiting us from offering DVR functionality. A Court of
Appeals has stayed that injunction during the pendency of our
appeal.
We and ECC intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event
that a Court ultimately determines that we and ECC infringe any
of the patents, we may be subject to an injunction that could
require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features
that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified
by ECC for any potential liability or damages resulting from
this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of
the spin-off. We and ECC believe that we do not infringe any of
the claims asserted against us and ECC.
Trans
Video
In August 2006, Trans Video Electronic, Ltd., which we refer to
as Trans Video, filed a patent infringement action against ECC
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California. The suit alleges infringement of United States
Patent Nos. 5,903,621 (which we refer to as the 621
patent) and 5,991,801 (which we refer to as the 801
patent). The patents relate to various methods related to the
transmission of digital data by satellite. On May 14, 2007,
we and ECC reached a settlement which did not have a material
impact on our results of operations.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various
other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary
course of business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate
liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to
materially affect our financial position, results of operations
or liquidity.
88
Directors
and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information as of
December 26, 2007, concerning our directors and executive
officers, including a five-year employment history and any
directorships held in public companies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position With the Company
|
|
Charles W. Ergen
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
R. Stanton Dodge
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
Michael T. Dugan
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director
|
Steven R. Goodbarn
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Director
|
Bernard L. Han
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Mark W. Jackson
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
President
|
David K. Moskowitz
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Director
|
Tom A. Ortolf
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director
|
Steven B. Schaver
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
President -- EchoStar International Corporation
|
C. Michael Schroeder
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Director
|
Carl E. Vogel
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Director, Vice Chairman of the Board and Advisor
|
ECC elected our directors and appointed our executive officers
in October 2007. Each director was elected for a term expiring
at our annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2008 or
until such directors successor is duly elected and
qualified. At the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders and
thereafter, each director will be elected to a one-year term to
expire at the annual meeting of shareholders for the following
year or until such directors successor is duly elected and
qualified. Seven of our directors, Charles W. Ergen, Michael T.
Dugan, Stephen R. Goodbarn, David K. Moskowitz, Tom A. Ortolf,
C. Michael Schroeder and Carl E. Vogel, currently
serve on ECCs board of directors. Mr. Dugan and
Mr. Schroeder intend to resign from the board of directors
of ECC on the distribution date. In addition, Mr. Ergen and
Mr. Vogel currently serve as the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and Vice-Chairman and President of ECC,
respectively. We also expect to share three non-business
executives with ECC: Bernard L. Han, R. Stanton Dodge and Paul
W. Orban, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
and Senior Vice President and Controller, respectively.
The following sets forth the business experience of each of our
directors and executive officers over the last five years:
Charles W. Ergen. Mr. Ergen is our
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Ergen is also the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of ECC, positions he has held since its
formation. During the past five years he has also held various
executive officer and director positions with ECCs
subsidiaries.
R. Stanton Dodge. Mr. Dodge serves
as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.
Mr. Dodge also serves in the same capacity for ECC.
Mr. Dodge is responsible for all legal and regulatory
affairs of EHC and ECC. Since joining ECC in November 1996, he
has held various positions in ECCs legal department. Prior
to joining ECC, Mr. Dodge was a law clerk to the Hon. Jose
D.L. Marquez of the Colorado Court of Appeals. He received his
J.D., magna cum laude, from Suffolk University Law School in
1995 and his B.S. in accounting from the University of Vermont
in 1991.
Michael T. Dugan. Mr. Dugan serves as a
member of our board of directors. He is currently a senior
advisor to ECC and serves as a member of ECCs board of
directors. Until October 2006, Mr. Dugan was ECCs
Chief Technology Officer, and prior to 2004 was its President
and Chief Operating Officer. In that capacity, Mr. Dugan
had been responsible for, among other things, all operations
except legal, finance and accounting at ECC. Until April 2000,
Mr. Dugan had been President of EchoStar
89
Technologies Corporation. Previously, he was the Senior Vice
President of the Consumer Products Division of ECC.
Mr. Dugan has been employed with ECC since 1990.
Mr. Dugan has served as a director of Citizens
Communications Company since October 2006.
Steven R. Goodbarn. Mr. Goodbarn serves
as a member of our board of directors and is a member of our
Executive Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, and
Audit Committee, where he serves as our audit committee
financial expert. Mr. Goodbarn has also served as a
member of ECCs board of directors since December 2002, and
is a member of its Executive Compensation Committee, Nominating
Committee, and Audit Committee. Since July 2002,
Mr. Goodbarn has served as director and president of
Secure64 Software Corporation, a company he co-founded.
Mr. Goodbarn was chief financial officer of Janus Capital
Corporation from 1992 until late 2000. During that time, he was
a member of the executive committee and served on the board of
directors of many Janus corporate and investment entities. Until
September 2003, Mr. Goodbarn also served as a director of
Nighthawk Systems. Mr. Goodbarn is a CPA and spent
12 years at Price Waterhouse prior to joining Janus.
Bernard L. Han. Mr. Han serves as our
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and is
responsible for all accounting, finance and information
technology functions of the Company. Mr. Han also serves in
the same capacity for ECC, where he was named Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of ECC in September 2006.
From October 2002 to May 2005, Mr. Han served as Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Northwest
Airlines, Inc. Prior to October 2002, he held positions as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Senior
Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer at America West
Airlines, Inc.
Mark W. Jackson. Mr. Jackson serves as
our President. Until completion of the spin-off,
Mr. Jackson will also continue to serve as President of
EchoStar Technologies Corporation, a position he has held since
2004. Mr. Jackson served as Senior Vice President of ETC
from April 2000 until June 2004 and as Senior Vice President of
Satellite Services from December 1997 until April 2000.
David K. Moskowitz. Mr. Moskowitz serves
as a member of our board of directors. From March 1990 until
July 1, 2007, Mr. Moskowitz was an Executive Vice
President and the Secretary and General Counsel of ECC, where he
is currently a senior advisor and serves as a member of its
board of directors.
Tom A. Ortolf. Mr. Ortolf serves as a
member of the board of directors, and is a member of our
Executive Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, and
Audit Committee. Mr. Ortolf also serves as a member of the
board of directors of ECC, and is a member of its Executive
Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, and Audit
Committee. Mr. Ortolf has been the President of Colorado
Meadowlark Corp., a privately held investment management firm,
for more then ten years. From 1988 until 1991, Mr. Ortolf
served as ECCs President and Chief Operating Officer.
Steven B. Schaver. Mr. Schaver is
currently President of EchoStar International Corporation, which
is one of our subsidiaries. He has served in this role for ECC
since April 2000. Mr. Schaver served as ECCs Chief
Financial Officer from February 1996 through August 2000 and
served as ECCs Chief Operating Officer from November 1996
until April 2000.
C. Michael Schroeder. Mr. Schroeder
serves as a member of our board of directors, and serves on our
Executive Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, and
Audit Committee. Mr. Schroeder has served on the board of
directors of ECC since November 2003 and is a member of its
Executive Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, and
Audit Committee. In 1981, Mr. Schroeder founded Consumer
Satellite Systems, Inc. (CSS), which he grew to encompass a
10 state distribution system operating in a region ranging
from Wisconsin to Florida. CSS served retailers selling
satellite systems, televisions and a range of consumer
electronics products. Mr. Schroeder also founded a
programming division of CSS that grew to serve over 400,000
subscribers.
Carl E. Vogel. Mr. Vogel is currently
Vice-Chairman of our board of directors and is an advisor to us.
Mr. Vogel also serves as Vice-Chairman of ECCs board
of directors and President of ECC. From 2001 until 2005,
Mr. Vogel served as the President and CEO of Charter
Communications Inc., a publicly-traded company providing cable
television and broadband services to approximately six million
90
customers. Prior to joining Charter, Mr. Vogel worked as an
executive officer in various capacities for the companies
affiliated with Liberty Media Corporation. Mr. Vogel was
one of ECCs executive officers from 1994 until 1997,
including serving as ECCs President from 1995 until 1997.
Mr. Vogel has served as a director of Shaw Communications,
Inc. since June 2006.
During the past five years, none of the above persons has had
any involvement in legal proceedings that would be material to
an evaluation of his or her ability or integrity.
Board
Composition
Immediately after the spin-off, Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, will beneficially own approximately
50.0% of our total equity securities and possess approximately
80.0% of the total voting power. Please see Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
below. Thus, Mr. Ergen will have the ability to elect a
majority of our directors and to control all other matters
requiring the approval of our stockholders. As a result of
Mr. Ergens voting power, we will be a
controlled company as defined in the Nasdaq listing
rules. Therefore, we will not subject to the Nasdaq listing
requirements that would otherwise require us to have:
|
|
|
a board of directors comprised of a majority of independent
directors;
|
|
|
compensation of our executive officers determined by a majority
of the independent directors or a compensation committee
composed solely of independent directors; and
|
|
|
director nominees selected, or recommended for the Boards
selection, either by a majority of the independent directors or
a nominating committee composed solely of independent directors.
|
Nevertheless, we have created an Executive Compensation
Committee, which we refer to as the Compensation
Committee, and a Nominating Committee, in addition to an
Audit Committee, all of which are composed entirely of
independent directors.
Committees
of the Board
Our board of directors has established a Compensation Committee,
an Audit Committee and a Nominating Committee. The membership
and function of each committee is described below.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committee operates under a Compensation Committee Charter
adopted by the board. The principal functions of the
Compensation Committee are, to the extent the board deems
necessary or appropriate, to:
|
|
|
make and approve all option grants and other issuances of
EHCs equity securities to EHCs executive officers
and board members other than nonemployee directors;
|
|
|
approve all other option grants and issuances of EHCs
equity securities, and recommend that the full board make and
approve such grants and issuances;
|
|
|
|
establish in writing all performance goals for performance-based
compensation that together with other compensation to senior
executive officers could exceed $1 million annually, other
than standard stock incentive plan options that may be paid to
EHCs executive officers, and certify achievement of such
goals prior to payment; and
|
|
|
|
set the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
|
The current members of the Compensation Committee are
Mr. Goodbarn, Mr. Ortolf and Mr. Schroeder. The
board of directors has determined that each of these individuals
meets the independence requirements of Nasdaq and applicable SEC
rules and regulations.
Audit Committee. Our board of directors has
established a standing Audit Committee in accordance with Nasdaq
rules and Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. The Audit Committee operates
91
under an Audit Committee Charter adopted by the board. The
principal functions of the Audit Committee are to:
|
|
|
select the independent registered public accounting firm and set
its compensation;
|
|
|
select the internal auditor;
|
|
|
review and approve managements plan for engaging our
independent registered public accounting firm during the year to
perform non-audit services and consider what effect these
services will have on the independence of our independent
registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
review our annual financial statements and other financial
reports that require approval by our board of directors;
|
|
|
oversee the integrity of our financial statements, our systems
of disclosure and internal controls, and our compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
review the scope of our independent registered public accounting
firms audit plans and the results of their audits; and
|
|
|
evaluate the performance of our internal audit function and
independent registered public accounting firm.
|
The current members of the Audit Committee are
Mr. Goodbarn, Mr. Ortolf and Mr. Schroeder, with
Mr. Goodbarn serving as Chairman of the Committee. Each of
these individuals meets the independence requirements of Nasdaq
and applicable SEC rules and regulations. The board of directors
has determined that each member of our Audit Committee is
financially literate and that Mr. Goodbarn qualifies as an
audit committee financial expert as defined by
applicable SEC rules and regulations.
Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee
operates under a Nominating Committee Charter adopted by the
Board. The principal function of the Nominating Committee is to
recommend independent director nominees for selection by the
board of directors. The current members of the Nominating
Committee are Mr. Goodbarn, Mr. Ortolf and
Mr. Schroeder. The board of directors has determined that
each of these individuals meets the independence requirements of
Nasdaq and applicable SEC rules and regulations.
The Nominating Committee will consider candidates suggested by
its members, other directors, senior management and shareholders
as appropriate. No search firms or other advisors were retained
to identify nominees during the past fiscal year. The Nominating
Committee has not adopted a written policy with respect to the
consideration of candidates proposed by security holders or with
respect to nominating anyone to our board of directors other
than nonemployee directors. Director candidates, whether
recommended by the Nominating Committee, other directors, senior
management or shareholders are currently considered by the
Nominating Committee and the board of directors, as applicable,
in light of the entirety of their credentials, including but not
limited to the following factors: (i) their reputation and
character; (ii) their ability and willingness to devote
sufficient time to board duties; (iii) their educational
background; (iv) their business and professional
achievements, experience and industry background; (v) their
independence from management under listing standards and
EHCs governance guidelines; and (vi) the needs of our
board of directors and EHC.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A)
describes our expected compensation policy. In many instances,
the CD&A refers to the compensation policy applied by our
former parent company, ECC, to our named executive officers (the
NEOs) with respect to fiscal 2006, which is
substantially the same as our expected compensation policy. Our
NEOs include Messrs. Charles W. Ergen, Bernard L. Han, Mark
W. Jackson, Steven B. Schaver and R. Stanton Dodge. Of these
NEOs, Mr. Ergen and Mr. Han were NEOs of ECC in 2006.
Messrs. Jackson and Schaver will be employed by and will be
solely compensated by EHC. Mr. Ergen will be employed and
compensated by both EHC and ECC and each company expects to
follow the compensation policies described below with respect to
Mr. Ergens compensation. In addition, as two separately
traded-public companies, the compensation paid by one company
has no impact on the
92
compensation decisions of the other company. In respect of
EHCs remaining two NEOs, pursuant to the Management
Services Agreement, Mr. Han and Mr. Dodge, will be
employed by, and receive compensation from, ECC, and will not be
directly compensated by us. Furthermore, the compensation that
we will pay to Messrs. Ergen, Jackson and Schaver, who are
the only NEOs who will be compensated directly by us, has not
yet been determined and none of these NEOs will enter into an
employment agreement with us on or prior to the distribution
date. Although we expect to determine the compensation of these
NEOs based on policies similar to those of ECC as described
herein, the historical compensation of these NEOs in their roles
as ECC employees is not necessarily indicative of the
compensation that we will pay these NEOs in their capacity as
our employees. Under the Management Services Agreement, we will
make payments to ECC based upon a portion of ECCs
personnel costs for these two NEOs (taking into account salary
and fringe benefits) based upon the anticipated percentages of
time to be spent by these NEOs performing services for us.
Incentive compensation for Messrs. Han and Dodge will be
solely the responsibility of ECC. See Certain Intercompany
Agreements Agreements with ECC
Management Services Agreement. Other than as described
above with respect to Mr. Ergen and in relation to the payments
to be made by EHC to ECC in respect of Messrs. Han and Dodge
pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, there are no NEOs
of EHC who will receive direct compensation from both EHC and
ECC.
Compensation
Philosophy
Historically, ECCs executive compensation program was, and
following the spin-off our executive compensation program will
continue to be, guided by the following principles:
|
|
|
Attraction, retention and motivation of executive officers over
the long-term; and
|
|
|
Creation of shareholder value by aligning the interest of
management with that of the shareholders through equity
incentives.
|
Compensation
Oversights
Our Compensation Committee will be composed entirely of
independent, outside directors and will operate under a
Compensation Committee Charter adopted by our board of
directors. See Committees of the Board
Compensation Committee above for a more detailed
description of the duties of the Compensation Committee.
General
Compensation Levels
Historically. The total direct compensation
opportunities, both base salaries and long-term incentives,
offered to ECCs NEOs have been designed to ensure that
they are competitive with market practice, support ECCs
executive recruitment and retention objectives and will
contribute to its long-term success by aligning the interest of
its executive officers and shareholders.
Mr. Ergen recommends to the board of directors, but
ECCs board of directors ultimately approves, the base
compensation of ECCs other NEOs. ECCs compensation
committee has made and approved grants of options and other
equity-based compensation to ECCs NEOs, and established in
writing performance goals for any performance-based compensation
that together with other compensation to any NEO could exceed
$1 million annually. ECCs compensation committee has
also certified achievement of those performance goals prior to
payment of performance-based compensation. In addition to peer
group analysis, as described below, factors considered by
ECCs compensation committee and board of directors have
included their perception of the individuals performance,
the individuals success in achieving ECCs and
individual goals, equity awards previously granted to the
individual and planned changes in responsibilities. ECCs
compensation committee and board of directors have also
considered each of ECCs NEOs individual
extraordinary efforts resulting in tangible increases in
corporate, division or department success when setting base cash
salaries and annual bonuses.
Going Forward. Following the spin-off, it is
expected that our Compensation Committee and board of directors
will continue to take a similar approach in establishing
compensation levels.
93
Peer
Group Analysis
Historically. In connection with making
recommendations for ECCs executive officer compensation,
ECCs board of directors and compensation committee
considered an internally-prepared, informal benchmarking survey
of the compensation components for the NEOs of companies
selected by the compensation committee, as disclosed in their
respective publicly-filed proxy statements. These surveyed
companies included: The DirecTV Group, Inc., Comcast
Corporation, Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cox
Communications, Inc., Charter Communications, Inc., Adelphia
Communications Corporation, Liberty Media Corporation,
UnitedGlobalCom, Inc., CenturyTel, Inc., and Level 3
Communications, Inc. However, the survey was used merely as an
informal and subjective frame of reference for comparisons to
base cash salaries paid to similarly situated executives.
Moreover, the survey was not a conventional benchmarking
survey but rather a table that listed the compensation
components for the named executive officers of the selected
companies, as disclosed in their respective publicly-filed proxy
statements. Neither ECCs compensation committee nor its
board of directors used the survey to benchmark in
the traditional sense, as ECCs compensation committee and
board of directors do not utilize any kind of formulaic or
standard, formalized benchmarking level or element in tying or
otherwise setting ECCs executive compensation to that of
other companies.
Going Forward. Following the spin-off, it is
expected that our Compensation Committee and board of directors
will take a similar approach to comparing our executive
compensation program against those of other companies comparable
to EHC.
Weighting
and Selection of Elements of Compensation
Historically. Neither ECCs board of
directors nor its compensation committee has in the past
assigned specific weights to any factors considered by the
ECCs board of directors and its compensation committee in
determining compensation, and none of the factors are more
dispositive than others.
Going Forward. Following the spin-off, our
board of directors and Compensation Committee anticipate taking
a similar approach to weighting and selection of elements of
compensation.
Elements
of Executive Compensation
Historically. The primary components of
ECCs executive compensation program have included:
|
|
|
base cash salary;
|
|
|
incentive compensation, including conditional
and/or
performance-based cash incentive compensation and long-term
equity incentive compensation in the form of stock options and
restricted stock units offered under ECCs stock incentive
plans;
|
|
|
401(k) plan; and
|
|
|
other compensation, including perquisites and personal benefits
and post-termination compensation.
|
ECC has not required that a certain percentage of an executive
salary be provided in one form versus another. Each element of
ECCs historical executive compensation and the rationale
for each element is described below.
Going Forward. Following the spin-off, we
expect to use a similar mix of base cash salary, conditional
and/or
performance based cash bonuses and long-term equity incentives
in our compensation program, as described below.
Base
Cash Salary
Historically. ECC has traditionally included
salary in its executive compensation package under the belief
that it is appropriate that some portion of the compensation
paid to its executives be provided in a form that is fixed and
liquid occurring over regular intervals. Generally, for the
reasons discussed in Incentive Compensation, ECC has
weighted overall compensation towards equity components as
opposed to base salaries. ECCs compensation committee and
board of directors have traditionally been free to set salary at
94
any level deemed appropriate and any increases or decreases in
base salary on a year-over-year basis have been dependent on
either the compensation committees or board of
directors respective assessment of ECC, the applicable
business unit and individual performance.
Annual base salaries paid to ECCs executive officers have
historically been at levels below those generally paid to
executive officers with comparable experience and
responsibilities in the telecommunications industry or other
similarly-sized companies. In addition, ECC has stated that it
believes the compensation paid to Mr. Ergen has generally
been at a level that is below amounts paid to chief executive
officers at other companies of similar size in comparable
industries. Since 1996, changes in Mr. Ergens base
salary have been set by ECCs compensation committee.
Going Forward. Following the spin-off, it is
expected that our Compensation Committee and board of directors
will determine the base salaries of our executive officers in
the same manner and in accordance with the same policies and
principles as described above.
Incentive
Compensation
Historically. ECC has traditionally operated
under the belief that executive officers will be better able to
contribute to its long-term success and help build incremental
shareholder value if they have a stake in that future success
and value. ECC has stated it believes this stake focuses the
executive officers attention on managing ECC as owners
with equity positions in ECC and has aligned their interests
with the long-term interests of ECCs shareholders. Equity
awards therefore have represented an important and significant
component of ECCs compensation program for executive
officers. ECC has attempted to create general incentives with
its standard stock option grants and conditional incentives
through special performance-based conditional awards that may
include payouts in cash or equity.
Going Forward. Following the spin-off, we
expect that our Compensation Committee and board of directors
will determine the incentive compensation of our executive
officers in the same manner and in accordance with the same
policies and principles as applied by ECC and described above.
However, we initially expect that incentive awards granted to
our executive officers will consist solely of equity incentives,
consisting primarily of stock options, under our Stock Incentive
Plan.
General
Equity Incentives
Historically. Standard awards under ECCs
stock incentive plans have generally included stock options and
have been based on a review of the individual employees
performance, years of service, position and level of
responsibility with ECC, long-term potential contribution to ECC
and the number of options and terms of any other awards
previously granted to the employee. However, the number of
options to be granted at any one time has not been based on any
objective criteria. ECC has not assigned specific weights to
these factors, although such employees position and a
subjective evaluation of his or her performance have been
considered most important. To encourage executive officers to
remain in ECCs employ, options granted under ECCs
stock incentive plans generally vest at the rate of 20% per year
and have exercise prices not less than the fair market value of
ECCs Class A common stock on the date of grant.
ECCs standard form of option agreement given to executive
officers has included acceleration of vesting upon a change in
control of ECC for those executive officers that do not continue
with ECC or the surviving entity, as applicable.
Going Forward. Following the spin-off, we
expect that we will grant general equity incentives under our
Stock Incentive Plan, consisting primarily of stock options, in
the same manner and in accordance with the same policies and
principles as applied by ECC and described above. In particular,
we expect that options granted under our Stock Incentive Plan
will generally vest at the rate of 20% per year and have
exercise prices that are not less than the fair market value of
our Class A common stock on the date of grant.
95
Practices
Regarding Grant of Equity Incentives
Historically. ECC has generally awarded stock
options and restricted stock units as of the last day of each
calendar quarter and has set exercise prices, as applicable, of
not less than the fair market value of ECCs Class A
common stock on the date of grant.
Going Forward. We intend to grant equity
incentives under our Stock Incentive Plan, including stock
options, as of the last day of each calendar quarter and to set
exercise prices, as applicable, of not less than the fair market
value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant.
Stock
Incentive Plan
We have adopted an employee stock incentive plan, which we refer
to as the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, that will be similar to
ECCs 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The purpose of the 2008
Stock Incentive Plan will be to provide incentives to attract
and retain executive officers and other key employees. Awards
available to be granted under the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan will
include: (i) stock options; (ii) stock appreciation
rights; (iii) restricted stock and restricted stock units;
(iv) performance awards; (v) dividend equivalents; and
(vi) other stock-based awards. Up to
16 million shares of our Class A common stock
will be available for awards under the 2008 Stock Incentive
Plan. No awards will be granted under the 2008 Stock Incentive
Plan prior to the spin-off.
Class B
CEO Stock Option Plan
We have adopted a Class B CEO stock option plan, which we
refer to as the 2008 Class B CEO Stock Option Plan, that is
similar to ECCs 2002 Class B CEO Stock Option Plan.
The purpose of the 2008 Class B CEO Stock Option Plan is to
promote the interests of EHC and its subsidiaries by aiding in
retaining and incentivizing Charles W. Ergen, the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of EHC, whom our board of directors
believes is crucial to assuring our future success, to offer
Mr. Ergen incentives to put forth maximum efforts for our
future success and to afford Mr. Ergen an opportunity to
acquire additional proprietary interests in EHC. Mr. Ergen
abstained from our board of directors vote on this matter.
Awards available to be granted under the 2008 Class B CEO
Stock Option Plan will include nonqualified stock options and
dividend equivalent rights with respect to EHCs
Class B Common Stock. Up to 4 million shares of
EHCs Class B common stock will be available for
awards under the 2008 Class B CEO Stock Option Plan. No
awards will be granted under the 2008 Class B CEO Stock
Option Plan prior to the spin-off.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
We have adopted an employee stock purchase plan, which we refer
to as the 2008 ESPP, that is similar to ECCs employee
stock purchase plan. The purpose of the 2008 ESPP will be to
provide our eligible employees with an opportunity to acquire a
proprietary interest in us by the purchase of our Class A
common stock. All full-time employees who will have been
employed by EHC for at least one calendar year quarter will be
eligible to participate in the 2008 ESPP. Employee stock
purchases will be made through payroll deductions. Under the
proposed terms of the 2008 ESPP, employees will not be permitted
to deduct an amount which would permit such employee to purchase
our capital stock under all of our stock purchase plans which
would exceed $25,000 in fair value of capital stock in any one
year. The 2008 ESPP is intended to qualify under
Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and thereby
provide participating employees with an opportunity to receive
certain favorable income tax consequences as to stock purchase
rights under the 2008 ESPP. Up to 360,000 Shares of
EHCs Class A common stock will be available for
awards under the 2008 ESPP. No stock purchase rights will
be granted under the 2008 ESPP prior to the spin-off.
Nonemployee
Director Stock Option Plan
We have adopted a non-employee director stock option plan, which
we refer to as the 2008 NEDSOP, that is similar to ECCs
non-employee director stock option plan. The purpose of the 2008
NEDSOP will be to advance our interests through the motivation,
attraction and retention of highly-qualified non-employee
directors. The 2008 NEDSOP will grant our non-employee
directors, upon their initial election or appointment
96
to our board, an option to acquire a certain number of shares of
EHCs Class A common stock. We may also grant, in our
discretion, any continuing non-employee directors further
options to acquire our shares of Class A common stock in
exchange for their continuing services. Up to
250,000 shares of our Class A common stock will be
available for awards under the 2008 NEDSOP. No options will be
granted under the 2008 NEDSOP prior to the spin-off.
401(k)
Plan
Historically. ECC has adopted a
defined-contribution tax-qualified 401(k) plan for its
employees, including its executives, to encourage its employees
to save some percentage of their cash compensation for their
eventual retirement. ECCs executives have participated in
the 401(k) plan on the same terms as ECCs other employees.
Under the plan, employees have become eligible for participation
in the 401(k) plan upon completing six months of service with
ECC and reaching age 19. 401(k) plan participants have been
able to contribute up to 50% of their compensation in each
contribution period, subject to the maximum deductible limit
provided by the Internal Revenue Code. ECC may also make a 50%
matching employer contribution up to a maximum of $1,000 per
participant per calendar year. In addition, ECC may also make an
annual discretionary profit sharing or employer stock
contribution to the 401(k) plan with the approval of its
compensation committee and board of directors. 401(k) plan
participants are immediately vested in their voluntary
contributions and earnings on voluntary contributions.
ECCs employer contributions to 401(k) plan
participants accounts vest 20% per year commencing one
year from the employees date of employment.
Going Forward. Following the spin-off, we
expect to offer a 401(k) plan on similar terms as described
above.
Perquisites
and Personal Benefits, Post-Termination Compensation and Other
Compensation
Historically. ECC has traditionally offered
numerous plans and other benefits to its executive officers on
the same terms as other employees. These plans and benefits have
included medical, vision, and dental insurance, life insurance,
and its employee stock purchase plan as well as discounts on its
services. Relocation benefits may also be reimbursed, but are
individually negotiated when they occur. ECC has also permitted
members of its executive team to use its corporate aircraft for
personal use. ECC has also paid for annual tax preparation costs
for certain executive officers.
ECC has not traditionally had any plans in place to provide
severance benefits to employees. However, certain stock options
and restricted stock units have been granted to its executive
officers subject to accelerated vesting upon a change in control.
Going Forward. Following the spin-off, we
anticipate benefits and perquisites offered to our NEOs will be
similar to those described above.
Tax
Deductibility
Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code
places a limit on the tax deduction for compensation in excess
of $1 million paid to certain covered employees
of a publicly held corporation (generally, the
corporations principal executive officer and its next four
most highly compensated executive officers in the year that the
compensation is paid). This limitation applies only to
compensation which is not considered performance-based under the
Section 162(m) rules. ECCs compensation committee
conducts an ongoing review of its compensation practices for
purposes of obtaining the maximum continued deductibility of
compensation paid consistent with ECCs existing
commitments and ongoing competitive needs. However, ECC has
allowed the payment of nondeductible compensation in excess of
this limitation. Following the spin-off, we intend to continue
ECCs policies with respect to the deductibility of our
compensation paid to executive officers.
97
Executive
Compensation
We have not yet paid any compensation to any of our NEOs. After
the completion of the spin-off, certain of our NEOs will
continue to be employed and compensated by ECC. Pursuant to the
Management Services Agreement between us and ECC, we will share
two non-business NEOs focused on providing legal and accounting
services. Bernard L. Han and R. Stanton Dodge will serve as
our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and our
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary,
respectively. As noted above, these NEOs will be employed by ECC
and compensated by ECC as an executive officer or employee of
that company, and will not be directly compensated by EHC. Under
the Management Services Agreement, we will make payments to ECC
based upon a portion of ECCs personnel costs for our NEOs
(taking into account salary and fringe benefits) based upon the
anticipated percentages of time to be spent by our executive
officers performing services for us. Incentive compensation for
Messrs. Han and Dodge will be solely the responsibility of
ECC. See Certain Intercompany Agreements
Agreements with ECC Management Services
Agreement.
Fiscal
2006 Summary Compensation Table
All information included in the following tables reflects
compensation earned by our NEOs in fiscal 2006 for their
services with ECC. All references to stock and stock options
relate to awards of stock and stock options granted by ECC. The
historical compensation set forth below does not necessarily
reflect future compensation to be paid by us to our NEOs
following the spin-off because historical compensation was
determined by ECC and future compensation levels will be
determined based on the compensation polices, programs and
procedures to be established by our compensation committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
|
Compensation(3)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation(4)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Charles W. Ergen
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
550,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,412,882
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
858,171
|
|
|
$
|
2,821,053
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard L. Han(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
88,077
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
203,248
|
|
|
$
|
33,250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
324,575
|
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark W. Jackson
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
305,769
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
800,870
|
|
|
$
|
124,800
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,775
|
|
|
$
|
1,239,214
|
|
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven B. Schaver
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
278,668
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
282,576
|
|
|
$
|
140,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,485
|
|
|
$
|
709,229
|
|
President, EchoStar International Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Stanton Dodge
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
216,925
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
142,753
|
|
|
$
|
60,956
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,614
|
|
|
$
|
438,248
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Han joined ECC as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer on September 28, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the dollar amounts of expense recognized for
financial statement reporting purposes for fiscal 2006, in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R). Assumptions used in the
calculation of these amounts are included in Note 3 to the
audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006, included herein. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the dollar amounts earned pursuant to the 2006 Cash
Incentive Plan that will be paid by ECC during 2007.
Mr. Ergen declined to accept any distributions he was
otherwise entitled to receive pursuant to the 2006 Cash
Incentive Plan. |
98
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents the dollar amounts contributed pursuant to ECCs
401(k) matching program and our profit sharing program.
Mr. Ergens All Other Compensation also
includes tax preparation payments. In addition, with respect to
Mr. Ergen All Other Compensation includes his
personal use of ECC corporate aircraft valued at $821,771. We
calculated the value of Mr. Ergens personal use of
corporate aircraft based upon the incremental cost of such usage
to ECC. |
Fiscal
2006 Grant of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information relating to equity
and non-equity awards granted to our NEOs by ECC under
ECCs plans during Fiscal 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
or Base
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Price of
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Plan Awards
|
|
|
Plan Awards
|
|
|
Stock or
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target (1)
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Approval
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($/sh)
|
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
|
Charles W. Ergen
|
|
|
3/7/2006
|
|
|
|
2/28/06
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/8/2006
|
|
|
|
2/28/06
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bernard L. Han
|
|
|
9/30/2006
|
|
|
|
9/26/06
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
982,200
|
|
|
|
|
9/30/2006
|
|
|
|
9/26/06
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
32.74
|
|
|
$
|
5,432,630
|
|
Mark W. Jackson
|
|
|
3/7/2006
|
|
|
|
2/28/06
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/8/2006
|
|
|
|
2/28/06
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Steven B. Schaver
|
|
|
3/7/2006
|
|
|
|
2/28/06
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/8/2006
|
|
|
|
2/28/06
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
R. Stanton Dodge
|
|
|
3/7/2006
|
|
|
|
2/28/06
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/8/2006
|
|
|
|
2/28/06
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the amount of stock and/or option awards that will
become exercisable upon achievement of specified long-term
business objectives, as discussed in CD&A above. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the total SFAS 123R fair value of the grant. |
Each stock option and equity grant with respect to ECC common
stock outstanding as of the distribution date will be adjusted
in connection with the spin-off. In connection with these
adjustments, certain options to acquire shares of our common
stock will be granted. See The Spin-Off
Treatment of ECC Stock Incentive Awards for a discussion
of these adjustments and grants.
99
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal 2006 Year-End
The following table sets forth information relating to
outstanding equity awards of ECCs common stock held by our
NEOs at fiscal 2006 year-end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Market or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
That
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
That
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Not Vested
|
|
|
Vested(1)
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Charles W. Ergen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
2/17/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.88
|
|
|
|
3/31/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,000
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.75
|
|
|
|
6/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.25
|
|
|
|
12/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
29.57
|
|
|
|
9/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bernard L. Han
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
90,000
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
32.74
|
|
|
|
9/30/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
1,140,900
|
|
Mark W. Jackson
|
|
|
206,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
2/17/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.88
|
|
|
|
3/31/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.75
|
|
|
|
6/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
(8)
|
|
$
|
29.25
|
|
|
|
3/31/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.16
|
|
|
|
6/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.18
|
|
|
|
12/30/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Steven B. Schaver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
2/17/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.88
|
|
|
|
3/31/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
32,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.75
|
|
|
|
6/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
(8)
|
|
$
|
29.25
|
|
|
|
3/31/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
R. Stanton Dodge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
2/17/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.20
|
|
|
|
3/31/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.88
|
|
|
|
3/31/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32.75
|
|
|
|
3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.75
|
|
|
|
6/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
(11)
|
|
|
37,500
|
(8)
|
|
$
|
29.25
|
|
|
|
3/31/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
(8)
|
|
$
|
475,375
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the number of unvested, performance-based restricted
stock units multiplied by the closing market price of ECCs
shares of Class A common stock of $38.03 on
December 29, 2006, the last trading day of fiscal 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
These options are performance-based awards that do not become
exercisable until achievement of specified long-term business
objectives, as discussed in Compensation Discussion and
Analysis above. |
|
(3) |
|
These options were awarded on March 31, 2003 and vest in
20% increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the
date of grant. |
|
(4) |
|
These options were awarded on June 30, 2004 and vest in 20%
increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the date
of grant. |
|
(5) |
|
These options were awarded on September 30, 2005 and vest
in 20% increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the
date of grant. However, these options are performance-based
awards that do not become exercisable until achievement of
specified long-term business objectives, as discussed in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. |
|
(6) |
|
These options were awarded on September 30, 2006 and vest
in 20% increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the
date of grant. |
|
(7) |
|
These options and restricted stock units were awarded on
September 30, 2006 and vest in 10% increments on each of
the first four anniversaries of the date of grant and then at
the rate of 20% per |
100
|
|
|
|
|
year thereafter. However, these options are performance-based
awards that do not become exercisable until achievement of
specified long-term business objectives, as discussed in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. |
|
(8) |
|
These options were awarded on March 31, 2005 and vest in
10% increments on each of the first four anniversaries of the
date of grant and then at the rate of 20% per year thereafter.
However, these options are performance-based awards that do not
become exercisable until achievement of specified long-term
business objectives, as discussed in Compensation
Discussion and Analysis above. |
|
(9) |
|
These options were awarded on June 30, 2005 and vest in 20%
increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the date
of grant. |
|
(10) |
|
These options were awarded on March 31, 2004 and vest in
20% increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the
date of grant. |
|
(11) |
|
These options were awarded on March 31, 2005 and vest in
20% increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the
date of grant. |
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2006
The following table sets forth certain information relating to
exercises and vesting of options for ECCs common stock
during fiscal 2006 by our NEOs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Realized on
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Realized on
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise(1)
|
|
|
Vesting
|
|
|
Vesting
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Charles W. Ergen
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bernard L. Han
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Mark W. Jackson
|
|
|
97,332
|
|
|
$
|
2,846,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Steven B. Schaver
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
R. Stanton Dodge
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value realized on exercise is computed by multiplying the
difference between the exercise price of the stock option and
market price of the shares of ECC Class A common stock on
the date of exercise by the number of shares with respect to
which the option was exercised. |
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Except as described below, we will have no employment contracts,
termination of employment agreements or change in control
agreements with any of our NEOs at the time of the spin-off.
As discussed in Compensation Discussion and Analysis
above, ECCs standard form of option agreement given to
executive officers includes acceleration of vesting upon a
change in control of ECC for those executive officers that do
not continue to be employed by ECC or the surviving entity, as
applicable.
Generally a change in control is deemed to occur upon:
(i) a transaction or a series of transactions the result of
which is that any person (other than the principal or a related
party) individually owns more than fifty percent (50%) of the
total equity interests of either (A) ECC or (B) the
surviving entity in any such transaction(s) or a controlling
affiliate of such surviving entity in such transaction(s); and
(ii) the first day on which a majority of the members of
the board of directors of ECC are not continuing directors.
101
Assuming a change in control were to have taken place as of
December 31, 2006, and the executives were no longer to
continue with ECC or the surviving entity at such date, the
estimated benefits that would have been provided are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
Vesting of
|
|
Name
|
|
Options(1)
|
|
|
Charles W. Ergen
|
|
$
|
2,113,200
|
|
Bernard L. Han
|
|
|
1,851,500
|
|
Mark W. Jackson
|
|
|
1,091,200
|
|
Steven B. Schaver
|
|
|
269,560
|
|
R. Stanton Dodge
|
|
|
200,240
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount reflects the intrinsic value (i.e. the amount by
which the $38.03 closing price of a share of ECCs
Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on
December 29, 2006, the last trading day of fiscal 2006, exceeded
the exercise price) of each of the executive officers
unvested stock options that would become vested as a result of a
change in control. |
Director
Compensation for Fiscal 2006
Historically. ECCs employee directors
are not compensated for their services as directors. Each
nonemployee director of ECC receives an annual retainer of
$40,000 which is paid in equal quarterly installments on the
last day of each calendar quarter, provided such person is a
member of ECCs board of directors on the last day of the
applicable calendar quarter. ECCs nonemployee directors
also receive $1,000 for each meeting attended in person and $500
for each meeting attended by telephone. Additionally, the
chairperson of each committee of ECCs board of directors
receives a $5,000 annual retainer, which is paid in equal
quarterly installments on the last day of each calendar quarter,
provided such person is the chairperson of the committee on the
last day of the applicable calendar quarter. Furthermore,
ECCs nonemployee directors receive:
(i) reimbursement, in full, of reasonable travel expenses
related to attendance at all meetings of ECCs board of
directors and its committees and (ii) reimbursement of
reasonable expenses related to educational activities undertaken
in connection with service on ECCs board of directors and
its committees.
Upon election to ECCs board of directors, ECCs
nonemployee directors are granted an option to acquire a certain
number of shares of ECCs Class A common stock under
ECCs nonemployee director stock option plan. Options
granted under ECCs nonemployee director plans are 100%
vested upon issuance and have a term of five years. ECC also
currently grants each continuing nonemployee director an option
to acquire shares of ECCs Class A common stock every
year in exchange for their continuing services.
The following table sets forth information relating to the
compensation for Fiscal 2006 awarded by ECC to the individuals
who will act as our nonemployee directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Steven R. Goodbarn
|
|
$
|
54,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,509
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
86,009
|
|
Tom A. Ortolf
|
|
$
|
53,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,509
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
85,009
|
|
C. Michael Schroeder
|
|
$
|
54,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,509
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
86,009
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the dollar amount recognized for financial statement
reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006, in accordance with SFAS 123R. Assumptions used in the
calculation of these amounts are included in Note 3 to
ECCs audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006, included in ECCs Annual
Report on
Form 10-K/A
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 6, 2007. On June 30, 2006, each of ECCs
nonemployee directors was |
102
|
|
|
|
|
granted an option to acquire 5,000 shares of ECC
Class A common stock at an exercise price of $30.81 per
share. Options granted under ECCs nonemployee director
plans are 100% vested upon issuance. Thus, the amount recognized
for financial statement reporting purposes and the full grant
date fair value are the same. |
Nonemployee directors of ECC have been granted the following
options under ECCs nonemployee director plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Steven R. Goodbarn
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
22.26
|
|
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
34.62
|
|
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
31.12
|
|
|
|
9/30/2009
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
30.16
|
|
|
|
6/30/2010
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
27.18
|
|
|
|
12/30/2010
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
30.81
|
|
|
|
6/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Options Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom A. Ortolf
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
30.16
|
|
|
|
6/30/2010
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
27.18
|
|
|
|
12/30/2010
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
30.81
|
|
|
|
6/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Options Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Michael Schroeder
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
33.99
|
|
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
31.12
|
|
|
|
9/30/2009
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
30.16
|
|
|
|
6/30/2010
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
27.18
|
|
|
|
12/30/2010
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
30.81
|
|
|
|
6/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Options Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Going Forward. We expect that our Board of
Directors will adopt similar policies to those listed above.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of outside
directors. The Compensation Committee members are
Mr. Goodbarn, Mr. Ortolf and Mr. Schroeder. None
of these individuals will be an officer or employee of EHC at
any time during the 2007 fiscal year. Following the spin-off,
none of our executive officers will serve as a member of the
compensation committee of any entity that has one or more
executive officers serving on our Compensation Committee.
103
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
As of the date hereof, all of our outstanding shares of common
stock are owned by ECC. None of our directors or executive
officers currently owns any shares of our common shares, but
those who own shares of ECC common stock will receive shares of
the same class of our common stock in the distribution on the
same basis as the shares held by other ECC shareholders.
The following table sets forth, to the best of our knowledge,
the anticipated beneficial ownership of EHC voting securities
immediately following the distribution by: (i) each person
known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of
ECCs voting securities; (ii) each of our directors;
(iii) each officer named in the Summary Compensation Table;
and (iv) all of our directors and executive officers as a
group. We base the share amounts on each persons
beneficial ownership of ECC common stock as of November 30,
2007. Unless otherwise indicated, each person listed in the
following table (alone or with family members) has sole voting
and dispositive power over the shares listed opposite such
persons name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
of Class
|
|
Name(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles W. Ergen(5),(6)
|
|
|
41,870,946
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
David K. Moskowitz(7)
|
|
|
5,403,050
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
Barclays Global Investors, NA(8)
|
|
|
4,380,290
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
Dodge & Cox(9)
|
|
|
2,930,816
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
Fairholme Capital Management, L.L.C.(10)
|
|
|
2,742,728
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
Harris Associates L.P.(11)
|
|
|
2,080,690
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Michael T. Dugan(12)
|
|
|
104,896
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Mark W. Jackson(13)
|
|
|
82,542
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Carl E. Vogel(14)
|
|
|
64,083
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Tom A. Ortolf(15)
|
|
|
24,240
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Steven B. Schaver(16)
|
|
|
16,216
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
C. Michael Schroeder(17)
|
|
|
17,020
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Steven R. Goodbarn(18)
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Bernard L. Han(19)
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
R. Stanton Dodge(20)
|
|
|
6,464
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
(11 persons)(21)
|
|
|
49,189,410
|
|
|
|
58.2
|
%
|
Class B Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles W. Ergen
|
|
|
41,611,830
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
%
|
Trusts(22)
|
|
|
5,226,180
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
(11 persons)(21)
|
|
|
46,838,010
|
|
|
|
98.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
Except as otherwise noted below, the address of each such person
is 9601 S. Meridian Blvd., Englewood, Colorado 80112. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts included in this column represent the shares of our
common stock which will be beneficially owned by the listed
individuals are based on the distribution ratio of one share of
common stock to be received for every five shares of ECC common
stock beneficially owned by such individuals on
November 30, 2007 (unless otherwise specified). Based on
the shares of ECC common stock outstanding on November 30,
2007 and the distribution ratio, there are expected to be
42,012,362 outstanding shares of EHC Class A common stock
and 47,687,042 shares of EHC Class B common stock. |
104
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Represents the percentage of our common stock which we expect to
be outstanding (based on the expected number of our shares to be
distributed based on the number of ECC shares outstanding on
November 30, 2007). An asterisk indicates that the
percentage of common stock projected to be beneficially owned by
the named individual does not exceed 1% of EHC common stock. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The following table sets forth, to the best knowledge of EHC
based on the outstanding shares of ECC common stock on
November 30, 2007 and the distribution ratio, the expected
ownership of EHCs Class A common stock (including
options exercisable within 60 days) without taking into
account the shares into which EHCs Class B common
stock is convertible by: (i) each person expected by EHC to
be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of any class
of EHCs voting shares; (ii) each director of EHC;
(iii) each officer named in the Summary Compensation Table;
and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percentage
|
Name(1)
|
|
Ownership
|
|
of Class
|
|
Class A Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Global Investors, NA
|
|
|
4,380,290
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
Dodge & Cox
|
|
|
2,930,816
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
Fairholme Capital Management, L.L.C
|
|
|
2,742,728
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
Harris Associates L.P
|
|
|
2,080,690
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Charles W. Ergen
|
|
|
259,116
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
David K. Moskowitz
|
|
|
176,870
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Michael T. Dugan
|
|
|
104,896
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Mark W. Jackson
|
|
|
82,542
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Carl E. Vogel
|
|
|
64,083
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Tom A. Ortolf
|
|
|
24,240
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Steven B. Schaver
|
|
|
16,216
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
C. Michael Schroeder
|
|
|
17,020
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Steven R. Goodbarn
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Bernard L. Han
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
R. Stanton Dodge
|
|
|
6,464
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (11 persons)
|
|
|
2,351,400
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Ergen is deemed to own beneficially all of the EHC
Class A Shares owned by his spouse, Mrs. Ergen.
Mr. Ergens beneficial ownership includes:
(i) 89,730 EHC Class A Shares; (ii) 3,704 EHC
Class A Shares held in the Companys 401(k) Employee
Savings Plan, (which we refer to as the 401(k) Plan);
(iii) the right to acquire 160,000 EHC Class A Shares
within 60 days upon the exercise of employee stock options;
(iv) 47 EHC Class A Shares held by Mrs. Ergen;
(v) 200 EHC Class A Shares held in the 401(k) Plan
held by Mrs. Ergen; (vi) 5,435 EHC Class A Shares
held as custodian for his children; and (vii) 41,611,830
EHC Class A Shares issuable upon conversion of
Mr. Ergens EHC Class B Shares.
Mr. Ergens beneficial ownership of EHC Class A Shares
excludes 5,226,180 EHC Class A Shares issuable upon
conversion of EHC Class B Shares held by certain trusts
established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family. |
|
(6) |
|
The percentage of total voting power held by Mr. Ergen is
approximately 80% after giving effect to the exercise of
Mr. Ergens options exercisable within 60 days. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Moskowitzs beneficial ownership includes:
(i) 24,970 EHC Class A Shares; (ii) 3,542 EHC
Class A Shares held in the 401(k) Plan; (iii) the
right to acquire 140,000 EHC Class A Shares within
60 days upon the exercise of employee stock options;
(iv) 265 EHC Class A Shares held as custodian for his
minor children; (v) 1,636 EHC Class A Shares held as
trustee for Mr. Ergens children; (vi) 6,000 EHC |
105
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Shares held by a charitable foundation for which
Mr. Moskowitz is a member of the Board of Directors;
(vii) 457 EHC Class A Shares held in the employee
stock purchase plan; and (viii) 5,226,180 EHC Class A
Shares issuable upon conversion of the EHC Class B Shares
held by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the
benefit of Mr. Ergens family for which
Mr. Moskowitz is trustee. |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
The address of Barclays Global Investors, N.A.
(Barclays) is 45 Fremont Street, San Francisco,
California, 94105. The EHC Class A Shares listed as
beneficially owned by Barclays includes 3,459,087 EHC
Class A Shares owned by Barclays Global Investors, N.A., of
which Barclays has sole voting power as to 3,071,779 EHC
Class A Shares, as well as (i) 178,821 EHC
Class A Shares owned by Barclays Global Fund Advisors,
(ii) 488,625 EHC Class A Shares owned by Barclays
Global Investors, LTD., (iii) 49,140 EHC Class A Shares
owned by Barclays Global Investors Japan Trust and Banking
Company Limited and (iv) 204,617 EHC Class A Shares
owned by Barclays Global Investors Japan Limited. This
information is based solely upon a Schedule 13G filed by
Barclays on May 9, 2007. |
|
|
|
(9) |
|
The address of Dodge & Cox is 555 California Street,
40th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94104. Of the EHC
Class A Shares beneficially owned, Dodge & Cox
has sole voting power as to 2,930,816 EHC Class A Shares.
This information is based solely upon a Schedule 13G filed
on February 8, 2007. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
The address of Fairholme Capital Management, L.L.C.
(Fairholme) is 1001 Brickell Bay Drive,
Suite 3112, Miami, Florida, 33131. Of the EHC Class A
Shares beneficially owned, Fairholme has shared voting power as
to 2,136,844 EHC Class A Shares and shared dispositive
power as to all 2,742,728 EHC Class A Shares. Bruce R.
Berkowitz is the Managing Member of Fairholme, and as such
Mr. Berkowitz has voting and investment control with
respect to the EHC Class A Shares owned by Fairholme, and
therefore beneficially owns such EHC Class A Shares. This
information is based solely upon a Schedule 13G filed by
Fairholme on February 14, 2007. |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
The address of Harris Associates L.P. (Harris) is
Two North LaSalle Street, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois,
60602. Of the EHC Class A Shares beneficially owned, Harris
has shared voting power as to 2,080,690 EHC Class A Shares
and shared dispositive power as to 1,955,000 EHC Class A
Shares. Harris Associates Inc. is the General Partner of Harris,
and as such Harris Associates Inc. has voting and investment
control with respect to EHC Class A Shares owned by Harris,
and therefore beneficially owns such EHC Class A Shares.
This information is based solely upon a Schedule 13G filed
by Harris on February 14, 2007. |
|
|
|
(12) |
|
Mr. Dugans beneficial ownership includes: (i) 86
EHC Class A Shares; (ii) 606 EHC Class A Shares
held in the 401(k) Plan; and (iii) the right to acquire
104,204 EHC Class A Shares within 60 days upon the
exercise of employee stock options. |
|
(13) |
|
Mr. Jacksons beneficial ownership includes:
(i) 83 EHC Class A Shares; (ii) 2,459 EHC
Class A Shares held in the 401(k) Plan; and (iii) the
right to acquire 80,000 EHC Class A Shares within
60 days upon the exercise of employee stock options. |
|
(14) |
|
Mr. Vogels beneficial ownership includes:
(i) 2,033 EHC Class A Shares; (ii) 50 EHC
Class A Shares held in the 401(k) Plan; and (iii) the
right to acquire 62,000 EHC Class A Shares within
60 days upon the exercise of employee stock options; |
|
(15) |
|
Mr. Ortolfs beneficial ownership includes:
(i) the right to acquire 12,000 EHC Class A Shares
within 60 days upon the exercise of nonemployee director
stock options; (ii) 40 EHC Class A Shares held in the
name of one of his children; and (iii) 12,200 EHC
Class A Shares held by a partnership of which
Mr. Ortolf is a partner. |
|
(16) |
|
Mr. Schavers beneficial ownership includes:
(i) 482 EHC Class A Shares; (ii) 3,334 EHC
Class A Shares held in the 401(k) Plan; and (iii) the
right to acquire 12,400 EHC Class A Shares within
60 days upon the exercise of employee stock options. |
|
(17) |
|
Mr. Schroeders beneficial ownership includes:
(i) 3,020 EHC Class A Shares; and (ii) the right
to acquire 14,000 EHC Class A Shares within 60 days
upon the exercise of nonemployee director stock options. |
106
|
|
|
(18) |
|
Mr. Goodbarns beneficial ownership includes:
(i) 1,000 EHC Class A Shares; and (ii) the right
to acquire 13,000 EHC Class A Shares within 60 days
upon the exercise of nonemployee director stock options. |
|
(19) |
|
Mr. Hans beneficial ownership includes the right to
acquire 14,000 EHC Class A Shares within 60 days upon
the exercise of employee stock options. |
|
(20) |
|
Mr. Dodges beneficial ownership includes: (i) 36
EHC Class A Shares; (ii) 428 EHC Class A Shares
held in the 401(k) Plan; and (iii) the right to acquire
6,000 EHC Class A Shares within 60 days upon the
exercise of employee stock options. |
|
(21) |
|
Includes: (i) 888,166 EHC Class A Shares;
(ii) 18,119 EHC Class A Shares held in the 401(k)
Plan; (iii) the right to acquire 954,802 EHC Class A
Shares within 60 days upon the exercise of employee stock
options; (iv) 462,200 EHC Class A Shares held in a
partnership; (v) 46,838,010 EHC Class A Shares
issuable upon conversion of EHC Class B Shares;
(vi) 20,312 EHC Class A Shares held in the name of, or
in trust for, children and other family members;
(vii) 6,000 EHC Class A Shares held by a charitable
foundation for which Mr. Moskowitz is a member of its board
of directors; (viii) 20 EHC Class A Shares held by a
spouse; and (ix) 1,781 EHC Class A Shares held in the
employee stock purchase plan. EHC Class A and EHC
Class B common stock beneficially owned by both Mr. and
Mrs. Ergen is only included once in calculating the
aggregate number of shares owned by directors and executive
officers as a group. |
|
(22) |
|
Held by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the
benefit of Mr. Ergens family of which
Mr. Moskowitz is trustee. |
107
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We expect that our Board will adopt a written policy for the
review and approval of transactions involving related parties,
such as directors, executive officers and their immediate family
members, which policy will cover transactions between us and
ECC. In order to survey these transactions, we plan to
distribute questionnaires to our officers and directors on a
quarterly basis. Our General Counsel will direct the appropriate
review of all potential related-party transactions and schedule
their presentation at the next regularly-scheduled meetings of
the Audit Committee and the board of directors. Both the Audit
Committee and the board of directors must approve these
transactions, with all interested parties abstaining from the
vote. Once each calendar year, the Audit Committee and the board
of directors will undertake a review of all recurring potential
related-party transactions. Both the Audit Committee and the
board of directors must approve the continuation of each such
transaction, with all interested parties abstaining.
In March of 2000, ECC purchased Kelly Broadcasting Systems, Inc.
(KBS). At that time, Michael Kelly, one of our
officers, was a shareholder of KBS and served as its President.
Certain assets and liabilities of KBS will be distributed to us
in connection with the spin-off. Title to certain assets
purchased in the acquisition have been transferred, and payments
of as much as approximately $2 million may be due to
Mr. Kelly in accordance with the terms of the purchase
agreement. No changes to the purchase agreement occurred during
2006 and no assets or payments were exchanged during 2006.
During 2006, ECC entered into a routine mutual release with
Mr. Kelly in connection with certain KBS transactions.
The brother of Mark Jackson, our President, earned approximately
$80,000 during 2006 as an employee of a non-public company that
provides programming content to ECC. Affiliates of that company
also supply us with parts used in the manufacture of our
satellite receivers and related equipment. Neither us or ECC,
nor any of our or ECCs directors or executive officers has
any ownership or other personal financial interest in that
company. We and our contract manufacturers paid that company and
its affiliates a total of approximately $180 million during
2006, representing approximately 48% of their total revenues.
108
CERTAIN
INTERCOMPANY AGREEMENTS
Agreements
with ECC
Following the spin-off, our company and ECC will operate
independently, and neither will have any ownership interest in
the other. In order to govern certain of the ongoing
relationships between our company and ECC after the spin-off and
to provide mechanisms for an orderly transition, we and ECC are
entering into certain agreements pursuant to which we will
obtain certain services and rights from ECC, ECC will obtain
certain services and rights from us, and we and ECC will
indemnify each other against certain liabilities arising from
our respective businesses. The following is a summary of the
terms of the material agreements we are entering into or we
expect to enter into with ECC. We anticipate entering into these
agreements on or prior to the distribution date of
January 1, 2008.
Broadcast
Agreement
It is anticipated that we will enter into a broadcast agreement
with a subsidiary of ECC, whereby ECC will receive broadcast
services including teleport services such as transmission and
downlinking, channel origination services, and channel
management services from us thereby enabling ECC to deliver
satellite television programming to subscribers. Additionally,
ECC will have the right, but not the obligation, to have us
purchase certain equipment on ECCs behalf for a fee that
is equal to a fixed percentage of the equipment cost. The
broadcast agreement will have a term of two years; however, ECC
will have the right, but not the obligation, to extend the
agreement annually for successive one-year periods for up to two
additional years. ECC may terminate channel origination services
and channel management services for any reason and without any
liability upon sixty days written notice to us. If ECC
terminates teleport services for a reason other than our breach,
ECC shall pay us a sum equal to the aggregate amount of the
remainder of the expected cost of providing the teleport
service. The fees for the services to be provided under the
broadcast agreement will be cost plus an additional amount that
is equal to a fixed percentage of our cost.
Employee
Matters Agreement
We will enter into an employee matters agreement with ECC,
providing for our respective obligations to our employees.
Pursuant to the agreement, we will establish a defined
contribution plan for the benefit of our eligible employees in
the United States (including our employees that transferred to
us prior to the spin-off). Subject to any adjustments required
by applicable law, it is our and ECCs present intent that
the assets and liabilities of the ECC 401(k) Employee Savings
Plan attributable to transferring employees, other than certain
employees whose employment has terminated on or prior to the
distribution date, be transferred to and assumed by a defined
contribution plan established by us. In addition, we intend to
establish, on, or as soon as practicable following, the
distribution date, welfare plans for the benefit of our eligible
employees and their respective eligible dependents that are
substantially similar to the welfare plans maintained by ECC. We
will also establish a stock incentive plan and an employee stock
purchase plan as described in Management Performance-Based
Conditional Cash Incentives. There are no payments
expected under the employee matters agreement except for the
reimbursement of certain expenses in connection with these
employee benefit plans and potential indemnification payments in
accordance with the separation agreement. The employee matters
agreement is non-terminable and will survive for the applicable
statute of limitations.
The employee matters agreement also addresses the treatment of
ECC stock options and restricted stock unit awards in connection
with the spin-off. For a discussion of the treatment of these
stock incentive awards in the spin-off, please see The
Spin-Off Treatment of ECC Stock Incentive
Awards.
Installation
Services Agreement
We will enter into an installation services agreement with ECC
whereby we will have the right but not the obligation to engage
ECC and its network of installation service providers to provide
installation services in respect of various types of equipment
we provide to our customers. For the provision of these
services, we
109
will pay ECC fees at cost plus an additional amount that is
equal to a fixed percentage of ECCs cost. The term of the
installation services agreement will be one year.
Furthermore, we may not generally solicit any installer of ECC
for employment during the agreement and for a period of one year
thereafter.
Intellectual
Property Matters Agreement
We expect to enter into an intellectual property matters
agreement with ECC and certain of its subsidiaries in connection
with the spin-off. The intellectual property matters agreement
will govern our relationship with ECC with respect to patents,
trademarks and other intellectual property. Pursuant to the
intellectual property matters agreement ECC and certain of its
subsidiaries will irrevocably assign to us all right, title and
interest in certain patents, trademarks and other intellectual
property necessary for the operation of our set-top box
business. In addition, the agreement will permit us to use, in
the operation of our set-top box business, certain other
intellectual property currently owned or licensed by ECC and its
subsidiaries.
We will grant to ECC and its subsidiaries a non-exclusive,
non-transferable, worldwide license to use the name
EchoStar and a portion of the assigned intellectual
properties as trade names and trademarks for a limited period of
time in connection with ECCs continued operation of the
consumer business. The purpose of such license is to eliminate
confusion on the part of customers and others during the period
following the spin-off. After the transitional period, ECC and
its subsidiaries may not use the EchoStar name as
trademarks. Similarly, the intellectual property matters
agreement will provide that we will not make any use of the name
or trademark DISH Network or any other trademark
owned by ECC or its subsidiaries. There are no payments expected
under the intellectual property matters agreement and it will
continue in perpetuity.
Real
Estate Lease Agreements
We anticipate entering into the following lease agreements with
ECC so that ECC can continue to operate out of these properties,
which will be contributed to us in the spin-off. In each case we
will charge ECC annual rent on a per square foot basis that is
comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial
property in the same geographic area, and ECC will be
responsible for their portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities
and maintenance of the premises.
Inverness Lease Agreement. The lease for
90 Inverness Circle East in Englewood, Colorado will be for
a period of no longer than two years.
Meridian Lease Agreement. The lease for
9601 S. Meridian Blvd. in Englewood, Colorado will be
for a period of two years with annual renewal options for up to
three additional years.
Santa Fe Lease Agreement. The lease for
5701 S. Santa Fe Dr. in Littleton, Colorado will
be for a period of two years with annual renewal options for up
to three additional years.
Management
Services Agreement
In connection with the spin-off, we will enter into a management
services agreement with ECC pursuant to which ECC will make
certain of its officers available to provide services (which are
primarily legal and accounting services) to EHC. Specifically,
Bernard L. Han, R. Stanton Dodge and Paul W. Orban will remain
employed by ECC, but will serve as EHCs Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
and General Counsel, and Senior Vice President and Controller,
respectively. In addition, Carl E. Vogel will remain employed by
ECC but will provide services to EHC as an advisor. We will make
payments to ECC based upon an allocable portion of the personnel
costs and expenses incurred by ECC with respect to such ECC
officers (taking into account wages and fringe benefits). These
allocations will be based upon the anticipated percentages of
time to be spent by the ECC executive officers performing
services for us under the management services agreement. We will
also reimburse ECC for direct out-of-pocket costs incurred by
ECC for management services provided to us. We and ECC will
evaluate all charges for reasonableness at least annually and
make any adjustments to these charges as we and ECC mutually
agree upon.
110
The management services agreement will continue in effect until
the first anniversary of the spin-off, and will be renewed
automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless
earlier terminated (1) by us at any time upon at least
30 days prior written notice, (2) by ECC at the
end of any renewal term, upon at least 180 days prior
notice; and (3) by ECC upon written notice to us, following
certain changes in control. We estimate our costs in 2008 under
the management services agreement will be $1.2 million,
which is based on actual salaries and benefits paid to these
officers in 2007. The actual costs that we incur in 2008 may be
materially different and will depend on the actual level of
services that we ultimately utilize.
Packout
Services Agreement
We will enter into a packout services agreement, whereby we will
have the right, but not the obligation, to engage an ECC
subsidiary to package and ship satellite receivers to customers
that are not associated with ECC or its subsidiaries. The fees
charged by ECC for the services provided under the packout
services agreement will be cost plus an additional amount that
is equal to a fixed percentage of ECCs cost. This
agreement is designed to allow us time to develop our own
packaging and shipping function. The packout services agreement
will have a term of one year unless terminated earlier. We may
terminate this agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior
written notice to ECC. In the event of an early termination of
this agreement, we will be entitled to a refund of any unearned
fees paid to ECC for the services.
Product
Support Agreement
Following the spin-off, ECC will need us to provide product
support (including engineering and technical support services
and IPTV functionality) for all receivers and related
accessories that our subsidiaries have sold and will sell to
ECC. As a result, we will enter into a product support
agreement, under which ECC will have the right, but not the
obligation, to receive product support services in respect of
such receivers and related accessories. The fees for the
services to be provided under the product support agreement will
be cost plus an additional amount that is equal to a fixed
percentage of our cost. The term of the product support
agreement will be for the life of such receivers and related
accessories unless terminated earlier. ECC may terminate the
product support agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior
written notice. In the event of an early termination of this
agreement, ECC shall be entitled to a refund of any unearned
fees paid to us for the services.
Receiver
Agreement
It is anticipated that we will continue to design, develop and
distribute receivers, antennae and other digital equipment for
the DISH Network following the spin-off. ECC will need assurance
that the DISH Network will be able to acquire receivers and
accessories needed to operate its business following the
spin-off. Our subsidiaries will enter into a receiver agreement
for the sale of receivers and other satellite television
programming accessories to ECC. Under the receiver agreement, an
ECC subsidiary will have the right but not the obligation to
purchase receivers and accessories from us for a two year
period. Additionally, we will provide ECC with standard
manufacturer warranties for the goods sold under the receiver
agreement. ECC may terminate the receiver agreement for any
reason upon sixty days written notice We may also terminate this
agreement if certain entities were to acquire ECC. ECC will have
the right, but not the obligation, to extend the receiver
agreement annually for up to two years. The receiver agreement
will allow ECC to purchase receivers and accessories from us at
cost plus an additional amount that is equal to a fixed
percentage of our cost. The receiver agreement will also include
an indemnification provision, whereby the parties will indemnify
each other for certain intellectual property issues.
Remanufactured
Receiver Agreement
It is anticipated that we will enter into a remanufactured
receiver agreement under which we have the right to purchase
remanufactured receivers, services and accessories from ECC for
a two year period. Under the remanufactured receiver agreement
we may purchase remanufactured receivers and accessories from
ECC at cost plus an additional amount that is equal to a fixed
percentage of ECCs cost. We may terminate the
111
remanufactured receiver agreement for any reason upon sixty days
written notice. ECC may also terminate this agreement if certain
entities were to acquire us.
Satellite
Capacity Agreements
It is anticipated that we will enter into satellite capacity
agreements, whereby an ECC subsidiary, on a transitional basis,
will lease satellite capacity on satellites owned by us
and/or slots
licensed by us. Certain DISH Network subscribers currently point
their satellite antenna at these slots and this agreement is
designed to facilitate the separation of us and ECC by allowing
a period of time for these DISH Network subscribers to be moved
to satellites owned by ECC
and/or to
slots that will be licensed to ECC following the spin-off. The
fees for the services to be provided under the satellite
capacity agreements will be based on spot market prices for
similar satellite capacity and will depend upon, among other
things, the orbital location of the satellite and the frequency
on which the satellite provides services. Generally, the
satellite capacity agreements will terminate upon the earlier
of: (a) the end of life or replacement of the satellite;
(b) the date the satellite fails; (c) the date that
the transponder on which service is being provided under the
agreement fails; or (d) two years.
Satellite
Procurement Agreement
We will enter into a satellite procurement agreement, whereby
ECC will have the right, but not the obligation, to engage us to
manage the process of procuring new satellite capacity for ECC.
The satellite procurement agreement will have a term of two
years. The fees for the services to be provided under the
satellite procurement agreement will be cost plus an additional
amount that is equal to a fixed percentage of our cost. ECC may
terminate the satellite procurement agreement for any reason
upon sixty days written notice.
Separation
Agreement
The separation agreement will govern the contribution to us of
ECCs set-top box business and the other assets to be
transferred to us in the spin-off (the distributed
assets), the subsequent distribution of shares of our
common stock to ECC stockholders and other matters related to
ECCs relationship with us.
The Contribution. To effect the contribution,
ECC will, or will cause its subsidiaries to, transfer or agree
to transfer all of the distributed assets to us as described in
this information statement (which assets may include stock or
other equity interests of ECC subsidiaries). We will assume, or
agree to assume, and will agree to perform and fulfill all of
the liabilities (including contingent liabilities) of the
distributed assets in accordance with their respective terms,
except for certain liabilities to be retained by ECC, including
the intellectual property liabilities relating to the
distributed assets for acts or events occurring on or before the
distribution date. ECC will not make any representation or
warranty as to the assets or liabilities transferred or assumed
as part of the contribution or sale or as to any consents which
may be required in connection with the transfers. Except as
expressly set forth in the separation agreement or in any other
ancillary agreements, all assets will be transferred on an
as is, where is basis.
If it is not practicable to transfer specified assets and
liabilities on the separation date, the agreement provides that
these assets
and/or
liabilities will be transferred after the separation date. If
another ancillary agreement expressly provides for the transfer
of an asset or an assumption of a liability, the terms of the
other ancillary agreement will determine the manner of the
transfer and assumption. The parties agree to use reasonable
best efforts to obtain any required consents, substitutions or
amendments required to novate or assign all rights and
obligations under any contracts to be transferred in connection
with the contribution.
The Distribution. The separation agreement
will provide that on the distribution date (which will be
determined by ECC), ECC will distribute all of its shares of our
common stock to its stockholders of record as of the record date
(which also will be determined by ECC). ECC will have the sole
and absolute discretion to determine (and change) the terms of,
and whether to proceed with, the distribution and, to the extent
it determines to so proceed, to determine the date of the
distribution. The separation agreement will provide that the
distribution may be abandoned at any time, or may be accelerated
or delayed, in ECCs discretion. In addition to ECCs
discretion to determine not to proceed with the distribution,
ECCs agreement to
112
consummate the distribution also is subject to the satisfaction
or waiver of a number of conditions, including the following,
each of which conditions may be waived by ECC in its sole
discretion (other than the effectiveness of our registration
statement on Form 10 and other material required regulatory
approvals):
|
|
|
the registration statement for our common stock into which
information from this information statement is incorporated by
reference has been declared effective by the SEC;
|
|
|
a definitive Schedule 14C information statement relating to
amendments to the Articles of Incorporation of ECC that provide
for (i) the change of ECCs name to DISH Network
Corporation, and (ii) the elimination of certain
corporate opportunities provisions; will be filed with the SEC
and mailed to ECC stockholders;
|
|
|
|
our common stock has been accepted for listing on the Nasdaq
Global Market or Nasdaq Global Select Market;
|
|
|
|
there is no legal restraint or prohibition preventing the
consummation of the contribution or distribution or any other
transaction related to the spin-off being in effect;
|
|
|
ECCs receipt of an opinion of White & Case LLP
on the distribution date substantially to the effect that the
spin-off, together with certain related transactions, will
qualify as reorganizations under Section 355 and
368(a)(1)(D) of the Code, in form and substance satisfactory to
ECC;
|
|
|
the contribution shall have become effective in accordance with
the separation agreement and the ancillary agreements;
|
|
|
any consents and governmental approvals, necessary to consummate
the separation and distribution shall have been obtained and be
in full force and effect; and
|
|
|
no other events or developments shall have occurred that, in the
judgment of the ECC board of directors, would result in the
separation or the distribution having a material adverse effect
on ECC, its stockholders, the consumer business or the
non-consumer receiver business.
|
The separation agreement will provide that we and ECC will use
our reasonable best efforts to consummate the distribution,
including to use such efforts to file a registration statement
and any subsequent amendments or supplements thereto with the
SEC regarding our common stock, take such actions as may be
necessary under state blue-sky laws and prepare and mail to ECC
stockholders such other materials as ECC determines necessary or
desirable and required under law. In addition, the separation
agreement will provide that prior to the distribution, we will
agree to prepare, file and use our reasonable best efforts to
make effective an application for listing our stock on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Exchange of Information. We and ECC will agree
to provide each other with information reasonably necessary to
comply with reporting, disclosure or filing requirements of
governmental authorities, for use in judicial, regulatory,
administrative and other proceedings and to satisfy audit,
accounting, claims, litigation or similar requests, whether
business or legal related. We and ECC also will agree to certain
record retention and production procedures and agree to
cooperate in any litigation as described below. After the
spin-off, each party will agree to maintain at its own cost and
expense adequate systems and controls for its business to the
extent reasonably necessary to allow the other party to satisfy
its reporting, accounting, audit and other obligations. Each
party also will agree to provide to the other party all
financial and other data and information that the requesting
party determines necessary or advisable in order to prepare its
financial statements and reports or filings. Each party will
agree to use its reasonable best efforts to make available to
the other party its current, former and future directors,
officers, employees and other personnel or agents who may be
used as witnesses and books, records and other documents which
may reasonably be required in connection with legal,
administrative or other proceedings.
Cooperation in Obtaining New Agreements. ECC
will agree, at our request, to facilitate introductions with
third parties from whom our business has derived benefits under
agreements and relationships which are not being assigned or
transferred to us in connection with the contribution. ECC also
will agree to provide reasonable assistance to us so that we may
enter into agreements or relationships with such third parties
under substantially equivalent terms and conditions that apply
to ECC.
113
Limitation on Damages. We and ECC will agree
to waive, and neither we nor ECC will be able to seek,
consequential, special, indirect or incidental damages or
punitive damages.
Dispute Resolution. If a dispute arises with
ECC under the separation agreement or any ancillary agreement
(unless otherwise provided in any such agreement), we will agree
to the following procedures:
|
|
|
the dispute generally will be submitted to senior executives of
both parties, one appointed by each of us and ECC;
|
|
|
if resolution through the senior executives does not settle the
dispute, the parties must generally make a good faith attempt to
settle the dispute through mediation before resorting to binding
arbitration; and
|
|
|
if resolution through the mediation fails, the parties can
resort to binding arbitration.
|
Termination. The separation agreement and any
of the ancillary agreements may be terminated or the
distribution may be amended, modified or abandoned, in each
case, at any time prior to the effective time by and in the sole
and absolute discretion of ECC, without our approval. In the
event of such termination, neither party shall have any
liability of any kind to the other party.
Services
Agreement
We anticipate entering into a services agreement with ECC under
which ECC will have the right, but not the obligation, to
receive logistics, procurement and quality assurance services
from us. This agreement will have a term of no longer than two
years, and the fees for the services provided under this
agreement will be cost plus an additional amount that is equal
to a fixed percentage of our cost. This limited-term agreement
is designed to facilitate the separation of us and ECC by
allowing a period of time for ECC to provide these services for
its own behalf. ECC may terminate the services agreement with
respect to a particular service for any reason upon sixty days
prior written notice.
Tax
Sharing Agreement
Prior to the spin-off date, we will enter into a tax sharing
agreement with ECC which will govern our and ECCs
respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the
spin-off with respect to taxes for the periods ending on or
before the spin-off. Generally, all pre-spin-off taxes,
including any taxes that are incurred as a result of
restructuring activities undertaken to implement the spin-off,
will be borne by ECC, and ECC will indemnify us for such taxes.
However, ECC will not be liable for and will not indemnify us
for any taxes that are incurred as a result of the spin-off or
certain related transactions failing to qualify as tax-free
distributions pursuant to any provision of Section 355 or
Section 361 of the Code because of (i) a direct or
indirect acquisition of any of our stock, stock options or
assets (ii) any action that we take or fail to take or
(iii) any action that we take that is inconsistent with the
information and representations furnished to the IRS in
connection with the request for the private letter ruling, or to
counsel in connection with any opinion being delivered by
counsel with respect to the spin-off or certain related
transactions. In such case, we will be solely liable for, and
will indemnify ECC for, any resulting taxes, as well as any
losses, claims and expenses. The tax sharing agreement will only
terminate after the later of the full period of all applicable
statutes of limitations including extensions or once all rights
and obligations are fully effectuated or performed.
Transition
Services Agreement
We anticipate entering into a transition services agreement with
ECC pursuant to which ECC, or one of its subsidiaries, will
provide certain transitional services to us. Under such
transition services agreement, we will have the right, but not
the obligation, to receive the following services from ECC or
one of its subsidiaries: finance, information technology,
benefits administration, travel and event coordination, human
resources, human resources development (training), program
management, internal audit and corporate quality, legal,
accounting and tax, and other support services.
We anticipate that the transition services agreement will have a
term of no longer than two years and that the fees for the
services provided under such agreement will be cost plus an
additional amount that is equal to a
114
fixed percentage of ECCs cost. We may terminate the
transition services agreement with respect to a particular
service for any reason upon thirty days prior written notice.
This limited-term agreement is designed to smooth our transition
to a stand-alone public company.
TT&C
Agreement
Following the spin-off, ECC or its subsidiaries will need us to
provide telemetry, tracking and control (TT&C)
services to support ECCs satellite fleet. As a result, we
will enter into a TT&C agreement under which we will
provide TT&C services to ECC or its subsidiaries. The
TT&C agreement will have a term of two years. However, ECC
will have the right, but not the obligation, to extend the
agreement annually for up to an additional two years. The fees
for the services to be provided under the TT&C agreement
will be cost plus an additional amount that is equal to a fixed
percentage of our cost. ECC may terminate the TT&C
agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice.
115
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
The following information reflects our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws as these documents will be in effect at
the time of the spin-off.
General
Upon the completion of the distribution, we will be authorized
to issue the following capital stock:
|
|
|
4,000,000,000 shares of common stock, of which
1,600,000,000 shares are designated Class A common
stock, 800,000,000 shares are designated Class B
common stock, 800,000,000 shares are designated
Class C common stock and 800,000,000 shares are
designated Class D common stock; and
|
|
|
20,000,000 shares of preferred stock.
|
A summary of the powers, preferences and rights of the shares of
each class of common stock and preferred stock is described
below.
Our
Class A Common Stock
Each holder of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote
for each share owned of record on all matters submitted to a
vote of stockholders. Except as otherwise required by law, the
Class A common stock votes together with the Class B
common stock, the Class C common stock and the preferred
stock on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders.
Subject to the preferential rights of any outstanding series of
preferred stock and to any restrictions on the payment of
dividends imposed under the terms of our indebtedness, the
holders of Class A common stock are entitled to such
dividends as may be declared from time to time by our board of
directors from legally available funds and, together with the
holders of the Class B common stock and the Class C
common stock, are entitled, after payment of all prior claims,
to receive pro rata all of our assets upon a liquidation.
Holders of Class A common stock have no redemption,
conversion or preemptive rights.
Our
Class B Common Stock
Each holder of Class B common stock is entitled to ten
votes for each share of Class B common stock on all matters
submitted to a vote of stockholders. Except as otherwise
required by law, the Class B common stock votes together
with the Class A common stock, the Class C common
stock and the preferred stock on all matters submitted to a vote
of the stockholders. Each share of Class B common stock is
convertible, at the option of the holder, into one share of
Class A common stock. The conversion ratio is subject to
adjustment from time to time upon the occurrence of certain
events, including: (i) dividends or distributions on
Class A common stock payable in Class A common stock
or certain other capital stock; (ii) subdivisions,
combinations or certain reclassifications of Class A common
stock; and (iii) issuances of rights, warrants or options
to purchase Class A common stock at a price per share less
than the fair market value of the Class A common stock.
Each share of Class B common stock is entitled to receive
dividends and distributions upon liquidation on a basis
equivalent to that of the Class A common stock and
Class C common stock.
Our
Class C Common Stock
Each holder of Class C common stock is entitled to one vote
for each share of Class C common stock on all matters
submitted to a vote of stockholders, except in the event of a
change in control, in which case each Class C holder is
entitled to ten votes per share. Except as otherwise required by
law, the Class C common stock votes together with the
Class A common stock, the Class B common stock and the
preferred stock on all matters submitted to a vote of
stockholders. Each share of Class C common stock is
convertible into Class A common stock on the same terms as
the Class B common stock. Each share of Class C common
stock is entitled to receive dividends and distributions upon
liquidation on a basis equivalent to that of the Class A
common stock and Class B common stock. We do not currently
intend to issue any shares of Class C common stock.
116
Our
Class D Common Stock
Each holder of Class D common stock is not entitled to a
vote on any matter. Each share of Class D common stock is
entitled to receive dividends and distributions upon liquidation
on a basis equivalent to that of the Class A common stock.
We do not currently intend to issue any shares of Class D
common stock.
Our
Preferred Stock
Our board of directors is authorized to divide the preferred
stock into series and, with respect to each series, to determine
the preferences and rights and the qualifications, limitations
or restrictions of the series, including the dividend rights,
conversion rights, voting rights, redemption rights and terms,
liquidation preferences, sinking fund provisions, the number of
shares constituting the series and the designation of such
series. Our board of directors may, without stockholder
approval, issue additional preferred stock of existing or new
series with voting and other rights that could adversely affect
the voting power of the holders of common stock and could have
certain anti-takeover effects.
Provisions
of Our Articles of Incorporation Relating to Related-Party
Transactions and Corporate Opportunities
In order to address potential conflicts of interest between us
and ECC, our articles of incorporation contain provisions
regulating and defining the conduct of our affairs as they may
involve ECC and its officers and directors, and our powers,
rights, duties and liabilities and those of our officers,
directors and shareholders in connection with our relationship
with ECC. In general, these provisions recognize that we and ECC
may engage in the same or similar business activities and lines
of business, have an interest in the same areas of corporate
opportunities and will continue to have contractual and business
relations with each other, including officers and directors or
both of ECC serving as our officers or directors or both.
If one of our directors or officers who is also a director or
officer of ECC learns of a potential transaction or matter that
may be a corporate opportunity for both us and ECC, our amended
and restated articles of incorporation provides that such
director or officer is required to first present the opportunity
to us only if (A) we have expressed an interest in such
corporate opportunity as evidenced by resolutions appearing in
the minutes of our board of directors; (B) such potential
corporate opportunity was expressly offered to one of our
directors or officers solely in his or her capacity as a
director or officer of us or as a director or officer of any
subsidiary of us; and (C) such opportunity relates to a
line of business in which we or any subsidiary of us is then
directly engaged.
For purposes of our articles of incorporation, corporate
opportunities include, but are not limited to, business
opportunities that we are financially able to undertake, that
are, from their nature, in our line of business, are of
practical advantage to us and are ones in which we would have an
interest or a reasonable expectancy.
The corporate opportunity provisions in our articles of
incorporation will expire on the date that no person who is a
director or officer of us is also a director or officer of ECC.
Nevada
Law and Limitations on Changes in Control
The Nevada Revised Statutes prevent an interested
stockholder defined generally as a person owning 10% or
more of a corporations outstanding voting stock, from
engaging in a combination with a Nevada corporation
for three years following the date such person became an
interested stockholder unless, before such person became an
interested stockholder, the board of directors of the
corporation approved the transaction in which the interested
stockholder became an interested stockholder or approves the
combination.
The provisions authorizing our board of directors to issue
preferred stock without stockholder approval and the provisions
of the Nevada Revised Statutes relating to combinations with
interested stockholders could have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing a change in our control or the removal
of our existing management.
117
LIMITATION
OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION MATTERS
Chapter 78.7502(1) of the Nevada Revised Statutes allows
EHC to indemnify any person made or threatened to be made a
party to any action (except an action by or in the right of EHC,
a derivative action), by reason of the fact that he
is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of EHC, or is
or was serving at the request of EHC as a director, officer,
employee or agent of another corporation, against expenses
including attorneys fees, judgments, fines and amounts
paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in
connection with the action, suit or proceeding if he acted in a
good faith manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of EHC, and, with respect to any
criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his
conduct was unlawful. Under chapter 78.7502(2), a similar
standard of care applies to derivative actions, except that
indemnification is limited solely to expenses (including
attorneys fees) incurred in connection with the defense or
settlement of the action and court approval of the
indemnification is required where the person is seeking advance
payment of indemnifiable expenses prior to final disposition of
the proceeding in question. Under chapter 78.751, decisions
as to the payment of indemnification are made by a majority of
the Board of Directors at a meeting at which quorum of
disinterested director is present, or by written opinion of
special legal counsel, or by the stockholders.
Provisions relating to liability and indemnification of officers
and directors of EHC for acts by such officers and directors are
contained in Article IX of our Articles of Incorporation,
which will be filed by amendment as Exhibit 3.1 hereto, and
Article IX of our Bylaws, which will be filed by amendment
as Exhibit 3.2 hereto, which are incorporated by reference.
These provisions state, among other things, that, consistent
with and to the extent allowable under Nevada law, and upon the
decision of a disinterested majority of EHCs Board of
Directors, or a written opinion of outside legal counsel, or our
stockholders: (1) EHC shall indemnify any person who was or
is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative and
whether formal or informal (other than an action by or in the
right of EHC) by reason of the fact that he is or was a
director, officer, employee, fiduciary or agent of EHC, or is or
was serving at the request of EHC as a director, employee,
fiduciary or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise,
against expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by him in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding, if he conducted himself in good faith and in a
manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the
best interests of EHC, and with respect to any criminal action
or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct
was unlawful; and (2) EHC shall indemnify any person who
was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the
right of EHC to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the
fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee, fiduciary
or agent of EHC, or is or was serving at the request of EHC as a
director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or
other enterprise against expenses (including attorneys
fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with
the defense or settlement of such action or suit if he acted in
good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or
not opposed to the best interests of EHC and except that no
indemnification shall be made in respect to any claim, issue or
matter as to which such person shall have adjudged to be liable
for negligence or misconduct in the performance of his duty to
EHC unless and only to the extent that the court in which such
action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that
despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all
circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expenses which such court shall
deem proper.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
Nasdaq
Listing
We have applied to list our Class A common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol SATS.
118
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed a registration statement on Form 10 with the
SEC with respect to the shares of our common stock being
distributed as contemplated by this information statement. This
information statement is a part of, and does not contain all of
the information set forth in, the registration statement and the
exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. For
further information with respect to our company and our common
stock, please refer to the registration statement, including its
exhibits and schedules. Statements made in this information
statement relating to any contract or other document are not
necessarily complete, and you should refer to the exhibits
attached to the registration statement for copies of the actual
contract or document. You may review a copy of the registration
statement, including its exhibits and schedules, at the
SECs public reference room, located at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, as well as on the Internet
website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. Information
contained on any website referenced in this information
statement is not incorporated by reference in this information
statement.
As a result of the distribution, we will become subject to the
information and reporting requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and, in accordance with the Exchange Act,
we will file periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC.
You may request a copy of any of our filings with the SEC at no
cost, by writing or telephoning the office of:
Investor Relations
EchoStar Holding Corporation
90 Inverness Circle E.
Englewood, Colorado 80112
Telephone:
(303) 723-1000
We intend to furnish holders of our common stock with annual
reports containing combined financial statements prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles and audited and reported on, with an opinion
expressed, by an independent public accounting firm.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
information statement or to which we have referred you. We have
not authorized any person to provide you with different
information or to make any representation not contained in this
information statement.
119
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL TABLES OF ECHOSTAR HOLDING CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Combined Financial Statements of EchoStar Holding
Corporation:
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
F-7
|
F-1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
EchoStar Communications Corporation
EchoStar Holding Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of
EchoStar Holding Corporation (the Company) as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related combined
statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss),
statements of net investment and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006.
These combined financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of EchoStar Holding Corporation as of December 31,
2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in note 3 to the accompanying combined
financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
November 6, 2007
F-2
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
COMBINED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
33,734
|
|
|
$
|
29,621
|
|
|
$
|
16,242
|
|
Marketable investment securities
|
|
|
497,019
|
|
|
|
293,955
|
|
|
|
89,867
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $347 (unaudited), $823, and $243, respectively
|
|
|
38,511
|
|
|
|
19,062
|
|
|
|
18,963
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
13,055
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
10,215
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
592,534
|
|
|
|
347,693
|
|
|
|
126,698
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
187,217
|
|
|
|
70,510
|
|
|
|
26,290
|
|
FCC authorizations
|
|
|
42,873
|
|
|
|
42,873
|
|
|
|
42,874
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
11,037
|
|
|
|
11,919
|
|
|
|
13,096
|
|
Investment in affiliates
|
|
|
81,391
|
|
|
|
40,254
|
|
|
|
18,853
|
|
Other noncurrent assets, net
|
|
|
4,572
|
|
|
|
4,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
919,624
|
|
|
$
|
517,821
|
|
|
$
|
229,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND OWNERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$
|
31,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,095
|
|
|
$
|
2,171
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
24,171
|
|
|
|
12,152
|
|
|
|
9,594
|
|
Current portion of mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
55,555
|
|
|
|
15,247
|
|
|
|
11,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, net of current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
55,856
|
|
|
|
15,538
|
|
|
|
12,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in EHC (Owners Equity (Deficit)):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock of EHC, $.001 par value,
20,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EHC Class A common stock, $.001 par value,
1,600,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EHC Class B common stock, $.001 par value,
800,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EHC Class C common stock, $.001 par value,
800,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EHC Class D common stock, $.001 par value,
800,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
103,863
|
|
|
|
63,805
|
|
|
|
4,063
|
|
Owners net investment
|
|
|
759,905
|
|
|
|
438,478
|
|
|
|
213,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment in EHC (Owners equity (deficit))
|
|
|
863,768
|
|
|
|
502,283
|
|
|
|
217,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and net investment in EHC (Owners equity
(deficit))
|
|
$
|
919,624
|
|
|
$
|
517,821
|
|
|
$
|
229,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-3
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
COMBINED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For The Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and other sales ECC
|
|
$
|
1,019,729
|
|
|
$
|
948,683
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,691
|
|
|
$
|
1,295,861
|
|
|
$
|
1,543,513
|
|
Equipment sales
|
|
|
163,039
|
|
|
|
184,216
|
|
|
|
236,629
|
|
|
|
217,830
|
|
|
|
176,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
1,182,768
|
|
|
|
1,132,899
|
|
|
|
1,525,320
|
|
|
|
1,513,691
|
|
|
|
1,720,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment and other sales
|
|
|
1,121,067
|
|
|
|
1,065,216
|
|
|
|
1,440,178
|
|
|
|
1,438,629
|
|
|
|
1,650,775
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
40,634
|
|
|
|
39,093
|
|
|
|
56,451
|
|
|
|
45,928
|
|
|
|
39,809
|
|
General and administrative (Note 12)
|
|
|
56,844
|
|
|
|
43,973
|
|
|
|
60,106
|
|
|
|
56,366
|
|
|
|
65,059
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
5,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,222,936
|
|
|
|
1,152,875
|
|
|
|
1,562,767
|
|
|
|
1,546,755
|
|
|
|
1,760,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(40,168
|
)
|
|
|
(19,976
|
)
|
|
|
(37,447
|
)
|
|
|
(33,064
|
)
|
|
|
(40,623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized (Note 12)
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
|
|
(1,059
|
)
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
(1,123
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
|
|
(10,109
|
)
|
|
|
(1,412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
2,858
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
6,360
|
|
|
|
(10,945
|
)
|
|
|
(2,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(37,310
|
)
|
|
|
(20,005
|
)
|
|
|
(31,087
|
)
|
|
|
(44,009
|
)
|
|
|
(42,809
|
)
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net
|
|
|
(2,633
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(3,075
|
)
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(39,943
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,486
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
(1,430
|
)
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
(948
|
)
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
42,412
|
|
|
|
14,895
|
|
|
|
61,206
|
|
|
|
(11,769
|
)
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
Recognition of previously unrealized (gains) losses on
available-for-sale securities included in net income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,048
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(30,956
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
(6,599
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,580
|
|
|
$
|
(86,438
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42,967
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
COMBINED
STATEMENTS OF NET INVESTMENT IN ECHOSTAR HOLDING
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
in EHC
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
$
|
45,291
|
|
|
$
|
184,731
|
|
|
$
|
230,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,237
|
)
|
|
|
(43,237
|
)
|
Advances from owner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,398
|
|
|
|
71,398
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(948
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(948
|
)
|
Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities, net
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
45,561
|
|
|
$
|
212,892
|
|
|
$
|
258,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,940
|
)
|
|
|
(44,940
|
)
|
Advances from owner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,117
|
|
|
|
45,117
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities, net
|
|
|
(42,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
4,063
|
|
|
$
|
213,069
|
|
|
$
|
217,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,162
|
)
|
|
|
(34,162
|
)
|
Advances from owner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,411
|
|
|
|
256,411
|
|
Stock-based compensation, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,160
|
|
|
|
3,160
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(1,430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,430
|
)
|
Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities, net
|
|
|
61,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
63,805
|
|
|
$
|
438,478
|
|
|
$
|
502,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,943
|
)
|
|
|
(39,943
|
)
|
Advances from owner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358,505
|
|
|
|
358,505
|
|
Stock-based compensation, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities, net
|
|
|
39,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
$
|
103,863
|
|
|
$
|
759,905
|
|
|
$
|
863,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-5
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
COMBINED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(39,943
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,486
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,237
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows
from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
5,071
|
|
Equity in losses (earnings) of affiliates
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
|
|
(1,953
|
)
|
|
|
(5,315
|
)
|
|
|
(9,537
|
)
|
Realized losses (gains) on investments
|
|
|
(4,533
|
)
|
|
|
(2,032
|
)
|
|
|
(8,706
|
)
|
|
|
8,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash, stock-based compensation recognized
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
|
|
2,440
|
|
|
|
3,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
(977
|
)
|
|
|
(890
|
)
|
|
|
3,681
|
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
Change in noncurrent assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
Changes in current assets and current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
(18,972
|
)
|
|
|
10,041
|
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
18,965
|
|
|
|
(14,875
|
)
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(10,329
|
)
|
|
|
(10,396
|
)
|
|
|
(2,219
|
)
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
(2,755
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(7,968
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(1,211
|
)
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
(20,664
|
)
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
28,288
|
|
|
|
(884
|
)
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
(6,028
|
)
|
|
|
3,455
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
12,020
|
|
|
|
15,037
|
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
(705
|
)
|
|
|
(1,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
(34,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,780
|
)
|
|
|
(36,374
|
)
|
|
|
(14,193
|
)
|
|
|
(78,916
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(120,076
|
)
|
|
|
(19,586
|
)
|
|
|
(32,769
|
)
|
|
|
(4,250
|
)
|
|
|
(5,935
|
)
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,321
|
)
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
Purchase of technology-based intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of non-marketable investments
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
|
|
19,541
|
|
|
|
19,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(3,505
|
)
|
|
|
4,052
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
(160,236
|
)
|
|
|
(75,953
|
)
|
|
|
(54,781
|
)
|
|
|
(16,700
|
)
|
|
|
(5,619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in advances from owner
|
|
|
198,625
|
|
|
|
91,555
|
|
|
|
105,030
|
|
|
|
39,933
|
|
|
|
71,281
|
|
Repayment of mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(1,566
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
198,625
|
|
|
|
91,176
|
|
|
|
104,534
|
|
|
|
39,782
|
|
|
|
69,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,113
|
|
|
|
11,443
|
|
|
|
13,379
|
|
|
|
8,889
|
|
|
|
(14,820
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
29,621
|
|
|
|
16,242
|
|
|
|
16,242
|
|
|
|
7,353
|
|
|
|
22,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
33,734
|
|
|
$
|
27,685
|
|
|
$
|
29,621
|
|
|
$
|
16,242
|
|
|
$
|
7,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
1,114
|
|
|
$
|
1,030
|
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received for interest
|
|
$
|
974
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
830
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
2,525
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-6
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 AND 2006 (UNAUDITED) AND
THE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005 AND 2005
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Business Activities
|
On September 25, 2007, EchoStar Communications Corporation
(ECC) announced its intention to separate its
technology and certain infrastructure assets into a separate
publicly-traded company. We were incorporated in Nevada on
October 12, 2007 to effect the separation. We will have no
material assets or activities as a separate corporate entity
until the contribution to us by ECC, prior to the completion of
the spin-off, of the businesses and assets described in this
information statement. Our historical combined financial
statements reflect the historical financial position and results
of operations of entities included in consolidated financial
statements of ECC, representing almost exclusively ECCs
set-top box business, using the historical results of operations
and historical bases of assets and liabilities of this business.
However, our historical combined financial statements do not
include certain satellites, uplink and satellite transmission
assets, real estate and other assets and related liabilities
that will be contributed to us by ECC in the spin-off. These
assets and liabilities, which will primarily comprise our fixed
satellite services business. The financial condition and results
of operations of our fixed satellite services business have not
been included in our historical combined financial statements
because our fixed satellite services business was operated as an
integral part of ECCs subscription television business and
did not constitute a business in the historical
financial statements of ECC. Our historical financial data also
does not include financial information of Sling Media, Inc.,
which was recently acquired by ECC and will be contributed to us
in the spin-off.
Organization
and Legal Structure
The following table summarizes our significant affiliates
included in our combined financial statements as of
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Referred to
|
Legal Entity
|
|
Herein As
|
|
EchoStar Holding Corporation
|
|
|
EHC
|
|
EchoStar Technologies Corporation
|
|
|
ETC
|
|
EchoStar Technology Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
ETH
|
|
EchoStar Data Networks Corporation
|
|
|
EDN
|
|
EchoStar International Corporation
|
|
|
EIC
|
|
EchoStar Asia Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
EAH
|
|
EchoStar Asia Satellite Corporation
|
|
|
EAS
|
|
EchoStar UK Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
EUK
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis
of Presentation
The combined financial statements, which are discussed below,
reflect the historical financial position, results of operations
and cash flows of the entities included in the consolidated
financial statements and accounting records of ECC, principally
representing the digital set-top box and other related products
segment, using the historical results of operations and the
historical basis of assets and liabilities of our business. The
historical combined financial statements do not include
ECCs infrastructure assets and operations to be
contributed to us as part of the spin-off such as certain
satellites, uplink and satellite transmission assets, real
estate and other assets and related liabilities. All significant
intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.
Earnings per share has not been presented in these combined
financial statements.
F-7
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The combined statements of operations include expense
allocations for certain corporate functions historically
provided to us by ECC, including, among other things, treasury,
tax, accounting and reporting, risk management, legal, internal
audit, human resources, investor relations and information
technology. In certain cases, these allocations were made on a
specific identification basis. Otherwise, the expenses related
to services provided to us by ECC were allocated to us based on
the relative percentages, as compared to ECCs other
businesses, of headcount or other appropriate methods depending
on the nature of each item of cost to be allocated. Pursuant to
transition services agreements we will enter into with ECC prior
to the spin-off, ECC will continue to provide us with certain of
these services at prices agreed upon by ECC and us for a period
of two years from the date of the spin-off at cost plus an
additional amount that is equal to a fixed percentage of
ECCs cost, which is believed to be fair market value
pricing. We will arrange to procure other services pursuant to
arrangements with third parties.
We believe the assumptions underlying the combined financial
statements are reasonable. However, the combined financial
statements included herein will not reflect our future results
of operations, financial position and cash flows or reflect what
our results of operations, financial position and cash flows
would have been had we been a separate, stand-alone company
during the periods presented. Our fixed satellite services
assets and Sling Media acquisition are not reflected in our
historical financial statements included herein because they
were not historically operated as part of the business of ECC.
Unaudited
Interim Financial Information
The accompanying unaudited combined financial statements as of
September 30, 2007 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (U.S.) and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
The unaudited combined financial statements as of
September 30, 2007 and for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 have been prepared on the same
basis as the combined financial statements as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 2006 included herein,
and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments,
consisting only of normal and recurring accruals, considered
necessary to present fairly our combined financial position as
of September 30, 2007 and the combined results of
operations and cash flows for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006. The combined results of
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for the year ending December 31, 2007 or for any other
period.
Principles
of Consolidation/Combination
We have included in the combined financial statements all
majority owned subsidiaries and investments in entities in which
we have controlling influence. Non-majority owned investments
are accounted for using the equity method when we have the
ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of
the issuer. When we do not have the ability to significantly
influence the operating decisions of an issuer, the cost method
is used. For entities that are considered variable interest
entities we apply the provisions of Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 46-R,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities An
Interpretation of ARB No. 51
(FIN 46-R).
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) requires us to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses for each reporting period. Estimates are used in
accounting
F-8
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
for, among other things, allowances for uncollectible accounts,
inventory allowances, warranty reserve obligations,
self-insurance obligations, deferred taxes and related valuation
allowances, loss contingencies, fair values of financial
instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based
compensation plans, fair value of assets and liabilities
acquired in business combinations, asset impairments, useful
lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, and royalty
obligations. Actual results may differ from previously estimated
amounts, and such differences may be material to the Combined
Financial Statements. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed
periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected
prospectively beginning in the period they occur.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The functional currency of the majority of our foreign
subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar because their sales and
purchases are predominantly denominated in that currency.
However, for our subsidiaries where the functional currency is
the local currency, we translate assets and liabilities into
U.S. dollars at the period-end exchange rate and revenue
and expenses based on the exchange rates at the time such
transactions arise, if known, or at the average rate for the
period. The difference is recorded to equity as a component of
other comprehensive income (loss). Financial assets and
liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional
currency are recorded at the exchange rate at the time of the
transaction and subsequent gains and losses related to changes
in the foreign currency are included in other miscellaneous
income and expense. Net transaction gains (losses) during 2006,
2005 and 2004 were not significant.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We consider all liquid investments purchased with an original
maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. Cash
equivalents as of September 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006 and 2005 consist of money market funds. The cost of these
investments approximates their fair value.
Marketable
and Non-Marketable Investment Securities and Restricted
Cash
We currently classify all marketable investment securities as
available-for-sale. We adjust the carrying value of our
available-for-sale securities to fair value and report the
related temporary unrealized gains and losses as a separate
component of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) within Total owners equity
(deficit), net of related deferred income tax. Declines in
the fair value of a marketable investment security which are
estimated to be other than temporary are recognized
in the Combined Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income (Loss), thus establishing a new cost basis for such
investment. We evaluate our marketable investment securities
portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether declines in
the fair value of these securities are other than temporary.
This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other
things, the fair value of our marketable investment securities
compared to the carrying amount, the historical volatility of
the price of each security and any market and company specific
factors related to each security. Generally, absent specific
factors to the contrary, declines in the fair value of
investments below cost basis for a continuous period of less
than six months are considered to be temporary. Declines in the
fair value of investments for a continuous period of six to nine
months are evaluated on a case by case basis to determine
whether any company or market-specific factors exist which would
indicate that such declines are other than temporary. Declines
in the fair value of investments below cost basis for a
continuous period greater than nine months are considered other
than temporary and are recorded as charges to earnings, absent
specific factors to the contrary.
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had
gains net of related tax effect of $104.5 million and
$65.2 million as a part of Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) within Total
owners equity (deficit), respectively. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, we did not
record any charge to earnings for other than temporary declines
in the fair value of our marketable investment securities.
F-9
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition, during the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and 2006, we recognized in our Combined Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) realized and net
gains on marketable investment securities of $5.0 million
and $2.0 million, respectively. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2007, our strategic investments have
experienced and continue to experience volatility. If the fair
value of our strategic marketable investment securities
portfolio does not remain above cost basis or if we become aware
of any market or company specific factors that indicate that the
carrying value of certain of our securities is impaired, we may
be required to record charges to earnings in future periods
equal to the amount of the decline in fair value.
The fair value of our strategic marketable investment securities
aggregated $497.0 million and $294.0 million as of
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. These investments are highly speculative and are
concentrated in a small number of companies. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, our strategic investments
have experienced and continue to experience volatility. If the
fair value of our strategic marketable investment securities
portfolio does not remain above cost basis or if we become aware
of any market or company specific factors that indicate that the
carrying value of certain of our securities is impaired, we may
be required to record charges to earnings in future periods
equal to the amount of the decline in fair value.
Non-Marketable
Investments
We also have several strategic investments in certain
non-marketable equity securities which are included in
Investment in affiliates on our Combined Balance
Sheets. Generally, we account for our unconsolidated equity
investments under either the equity method or cost method of
accounting. Because these equity securities are generally not
publicly traded, it is not practical to regularly estimate the
fair value of the investments; however, these investments are
subject to an evaluation for other than temporary impairment on
a quarterly basis. This quarterly evaluation consists of
reviewing, among other things, company business plans and
current financial statements, if available, for factors that may
indicate an impairment of our investment. Such factors may
include, but are not limited to, cash flow concerns, material
litigation, violations of debt covenants and changes in business
strategy. The fair value of these equity investments is not
estimated unless there are identified changes in circumstances
that may indicate an impairment exists and these changes are
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of
the investment. As of September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, we had $81.4 million and
$40.3 million aggregate carrying amount of non-marketable
and unconsolidated strategic equity investments, respectively,
of which $60.4 million and $19.5 million are accounted
for under the cost method, respectively. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, we did not record any
impairment charges with respect to these investments.
Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in
companies that are not publicly-traded is dependent on the
success of their business and their ability to obtain sufficient
capital to execute their business plans. Because private markets
are not as liquid as public markets, there is also increased
risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that
when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair
value for them.
Restricted
Cash
As of December 31, 2005, restricted cash included amounts
set aside as collateral for the construction of a new facility.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value.
Cost is determined using the
first-in,
first-out method. Proprietary products are built by contract
manufacturers to our specifications. We depend on a few
manufacturers, and in some cases a single manufacturer, for the
production of our set-top boxes and related
F-10
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
components. Manufactured inventories include materials, labor,
freight-in, royalties and manufacturing overhead.
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
5,682
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Consignment
|
|
|
7,613
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Inventory allowance
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
(910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
$
|
13,055
|
|
|
$
|
2,726
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is
recorded on a straight-line basis over lives ranging from one to
forty years. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense
when incurred. Renewals and betterments are capitalized.
Long-Lived
Assets
We account for impairments of long-lived assets in accordance
with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144).
We review our long-lived assets and identifiable intangible
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. For assets which are held and used in
operations, the asset would be impaired if the carrying value of
the asset (or asset group) exceeded its undiscounted future net
cash flows. Once an impairment is determined, the actual
impairment is reported as the difference between the carrying
value and the fair value as estimated using discounted cash
flows. Assets which are to be disposed of are reported at the
lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
We consider relevant cash flow, estimated future operating
results, trends and other available information in assessing
whether the carrying value of assets are recoverable.
Goodwill,
Intangible Assets and FCC Authorizations
We account for our goodwill and intangible assets in accordance
with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142), which requires
goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives not
be amortized, but to be tested for impairment annually or
whenever indicators of impairments arise. Intangible assets that
have finite lives continue to be amortized over their estimated
useful lives.
We have determined that our FCC licenses have indefinite useful
lives and evaluate impairment in accordance with the guidance of
EITF Issue
No. 02-7,
Unit of Accounting for Testing Impairment of
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
(EITF 02-7).
In conducting our annual impairment testing, we determined that
the estimated fair value of our FCC licenses, calculated using
the discounted cash flow analysis, exceeded their carrying
amount.
F-11
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and
2005, our identifiable intangibles subject to amortization
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Contract-based
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(89
|
)
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(72
|
)
|
Technology-based
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
(3,014
|
)
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
(2,139
|
)
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,140
|
|
|
$
|
(3,103
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,140
|
|
|
$
|
(2,221
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,140
|
|
|
$
|
(1,044
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of these intangible assets, recorded on a straight
line basis over an average finite useful life primarily ranging
from approximately twelve to fourteen years, was
$0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and $1.2 million and $0.9 million for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Estimated future amortization of our identifiable intangible
assets as of September 30, 2007 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007 (remaining three months)
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
Taxes
In accordance with the guidance of EITF Issue
No. 06-3,
How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to
Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income
Statement
(EITF 06-3),
we account for sales taxes imposed on our goods and services on
a net basis in our Combined Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income (Loss). Since we primarily act as an
agent for the governmental authorities, the amount charged to
the customer is collected and remitted directly to the
appropriate jurisdictional entity.
Income
Taxes
We establish a provision for income taxes currently payable or
receivable and for income tax amounts deferred to future periods
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS 109). SFAS 109 requires that
deferred tax assets or liabilities be recorded for the estimated
future tax effects of differences that exist between the book
and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are
offset by valuation allowances in accordance with SFAS 109,
when we believe it is more likely than not that such net
deferred tax assets will not be realized.
SFAS No. 109 specifies that the amount of current and
deferred tax expense for an income tax return group shall be
allocated among the members of that group when those members
issue separate financial statements. For purposes of the
financial statements, EHC income tax expense has been recorded
as if it filed a consolidated tax return separate from ECC,
notwithstanding that a majority of the operations were
historically
F-12
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
included in the U.S. consolidated income tax return filed
by ECC. EHCs valuation allowance was also determined on
the separate tax return basis. Additionally, EHCs tax
attributes (i.e. net operating losses) have been determined
based on U.S. consolidated tax rules describing the
apportioning of these items upon departure (i.e. spin off) from
the ECC consolidated group.
ECC manages its tax position for the benefit of its entire
portfolio of businesses. ECCs tax strategies are not
necessarily reflective of the tax strategies that EHC would have
followed or will follow as a stand-alone company, nor were they
necessarily strategies that optimized EHCs stand-alone
position. As a result, EHCs effective tax rate as a
stand-alone entity may differ significantly from those
prevailing in historical periods.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the book value
approximates fair value for cash and cash equivalents, trade
accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, and
current liabilities due to their short-term nature. Also, the
book value is equal to fair value for marketable securities as
of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue when an arrangement exists, prices are
determinable, collectibility is reasonably assured and the goods
or services have been delivered.
Cost
of Equipment and Other Sales
Cost of equipment sales associated with set-top boxes and
related components includes materials, labor, freight-in,
royalties and manufacturing overhead. ETC and EIC have designed
and developed digital set-top boxes, antennae and other
equipment for ECC and international satellite service providers
and other international customers. Historically, digital set-top
boxes and related components were sold to ECC at cost.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), on January 1, 2007. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition.
In addition to filing federal income tax returns, we and one or
more of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in all states
that impose an income tax and a small number of foreign
jurisdictions where we have operations. We are subject to
U.S. federal, state and local income tax examinations by
tax authorities for the years beginning in 1996 due to the
carryover of previously incurred net operating losses. As of
September 30, 2007, no taxing authority has proposed any
significant adjustments to our tax positions. We have no
significant current tax examinations in process.
As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized
no adjustment to Accumulated earnings (deficit). We
have $8.7 million in unrecognized tax benefits that, if
recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. We do not
expect that the unrecognized tax benefit will change
significantly within the next 12 months.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157) which defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
expands disclosures about fair value
F-13
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
measurements. This pronouncement applies to other accounting
standards that require or permit fair value measurements.
Accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair value
measurement. This statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
within that fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact
the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on our financial
position and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159), which permits entities to choose to
measure financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an
entitys first fiscal year that begins after
November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact
the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on our financial
position and results of operations.
|
|
3.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R (As Amended),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R)
which (i) revises Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123, Accounting and Disclosure of
Stock-Based Compensation, (SFAS 123) to
eliminate both the disclosure only provisions of that statement
and the alternative to follow the intrinsic value method of
accounting under Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25) and related
interpretations, and (ii) requires the cost resulting from
all share-based payment transactions with employees be
recognized in the results of operations over the period during
which an employee provides the requisite service in exchange for
the award and establishes fair value as the measurement basis of
the cost of such transactions. Effective January 1, 2006,
we adopted SFAS 123R under the modified prospective method.
Prior to January 1, 2006, we applied the intrinsic value
method of accounting under APB 25 and applied the disclosure
only provisions of SFAS 123. Pro forma information
regarding net income and earnings per share was required by
SFAS 123 and has been determined as if we had accounted for
our stock-based compensation plans using the fair value method
prescribed by that statement. For purposes of pro forma
disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options was
amortized to expense over the options vesting period on a
straight-line basis. We accounted for forfeitures as they
occurred. Compensation previously recognized was reversed in the
event of forfeitures of unvested options. The following table
illustrates the effect on net income (loss) as if we had
accounted for our stock-based compensation plans using the fair
value method under SFAS 123:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years
|
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(44,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,237
|
)
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of
related tax effect
|
|
|
(4,208
|
)
|
|
|
(4,003
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(49,148
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Incentive Plans
EHC participates in ECCs stock incentive plans to attract
and retain officers, directors and key employees. Awards under
these plans include both performance and non-performance based
equity incentives. As of September 30, 2007, we had options
to acquire 4.4 million shares of ECCs Class A
common stock and 61,666 restricted stock awards outstanding
under these plans. In general, stock options granted through
September 30, 2007 have included exercise prices not less
than the market value of ECC Class A common stock at the
date of grant and a maximum term of ten years. While
historically ECCs board of directors has issued options
that vest at the rate of 20% per year, some option grants have
immediately vested. As of
F-14
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, 2007, ECC had 66.6 million shares of its
Class A common stock available for future grant under the
stock incentive plans.
A summary of ECC stock option activity (including performance
and non-performance based options) related to EHC employees for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
For the Years
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
4,619,622
|
|
|
$
|
20.86
|
|
|
|
5,024,137
|
|
|
$
|
19.52
|
|
|
|
3,800,561
|
|
|
$
|
15.11
|
|
|
|
3,508,902
|
|
|
$
|
12.05
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
234,500
|
|
|
|
43.43
|
|
|
|
208,500
|
|
|
|
30.93
|
|
|
|
1,522,000
|
|
|
|
29.04
|
|
|
|
575,500
|
|
|
|
31.16
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(372,113
|
)
|
|
|
22.61
|
|
|
|
(367,015
|
)
|
|
|
11.85
|
|
|
|
(170,124
|
)
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
|
|
(250,237
|
)
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
Forfeited and Cancelled
|
|
|
(43,392
|
)
|
|
|
7.60
|
|
|
|
(246,000
|
)
|
|
|
15.37
|
|
|
|
(128,300
|
)
|
|
|
19.91
|
|
|
|
(33,604
|
)
|
|
|
40.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
4,438,617
|
|
|
|
22.89
|
|
|
|
4,619,622
|
|
|
|
20.86
|
|
|
|
5,024,137
|
|
|
|
19.52
|
|
|
|
3,800,561
|
|
|
|
15.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period
|
|
|
1,284,839
|
|
|
|
27.93
|
|
|
|
1,227,566
|
|
|
|
24.43
|
|
|
|
1,305,469
|
|
|
|
19.80
|
|
|
|
1,254,939
|
|
|
|
15.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECC received all cash proceeds and realized all tax benefits
related to the exercise of stock options by EHC employees during
all periods presented. A portion of the tax benefit was
allocated to EHC based on the EHC employees who participate in
the ECC stock option plan. Based on the average market value of
ECCs Class A common stock for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value for the
options outstanding was $94.3 million. Of that amount,
options with an aggregate intrinsic value of $22.4 million
were exercisable at the end of the period.
Exercise prices for ECC options outstanding and exercisable as
of December 31, 2006 for EHC employees are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Exercisable as of
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$ 2.13 - $ 6.00
|
|
|
1,744,358
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
$
|
5.96
|
|
|
|
304,358
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
|
|
$
|
5.77
|
|
$ 6.01 - $20.00
|
|
|
258,564
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
11.45
|
|
|
|
178,564
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
12.01
|
|
$20.01 - $29.00
|
|
|
389,600
|
|
|
|
7.53
|
|
|
|
27.94
|
|
|
|
185,326
|
|
|
|
6.65
|
|
|
|
28.41
|
|
$29.01 - $31.00
|
|
|
1,782,100
|
|
|
|
8.17
|
|
|
|
29.67
|
|
|
|
300,307
|
|
|
|
7.85
|
|
|
|
30.33
|
|
$31.01 - $40.00
|
|
|
348,000
|
|
|
|
6.78
|
|
|
|
35.07
|
|
|
|
206,011
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
|
|
|
36.53
|
|
$40.01 - $79.00
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
72.76
|
|
|
|
53,000
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
|
79.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2.13 - $79.00
|
|
|
4,619,622
|
|
|
|
5.29
|
|
|
|
20.86
|
|
|
|
1,227,566
|
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
|
|
24.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and
2005, the grant date fair value of ECCs restricted stock
awards outstanding for EHC employees was as follows. Vesting of
these restricted performance units is contingent upon meeting a
long-term goal which ECCs management has determined is not
probable as of September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
For the Years
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Restricted Share Units outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
95,666
|
|
|
$
|
29.72
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
$
|
29.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
43.43
|
|
|
|
18,999
|
|
|
|
31.63
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
29.25
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(34,833
|
)
|
|
|
29.25
|
|
|
|
(13,333
|
)
|
|
|
29.25
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
29.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Share Units outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
61,666
|
|
|
|
29.53
|
|
|
|
95,666
|
|
|
|
29.72
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
29.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Performance-Based Plans
In February 1999, ECC adopted a long-term, performance-based
stock incentive plan (the 1999 LTIP) within the
terms of its 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. The 1999 LTIP provided
stock options to key employees which vest over five years at the
rate of 20% per year. Exercise of the options is also contingent
on ECC achieving an industry-related subscriber goal prior to
December 31, 2008.
In January 2005, ECC adopted a long-term, performance based
stock incentive plan (the 2005 LTIP) within the
terms of its 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2005 LTIP provides
stock options and restricted performance units, either alone or
in combination, which vest over seven years at the rate of 10%
per year during the first four years, and at the rate of 20% per
year thereafter. Exercise of the options is also contingent on
achieving an ECC specific subscriber goal within the ten-year
term of each award issued under the 2005 LTIP.
Contingent compensation related to the 1999 LTIP and the 2005
LTIP will not be recorded in our financial statements unless and
until ECCs management concludes achievement of the
corresponding goal is probable. Given the competitive nature of
ECCs business, small variations in subscriber churn, gross
subscriber addition rates and certain other factors can
significantly impact subscriber growth. Consequently, while
ECCs management did not believe achievement of either of
the goals was probable as of September 30, 2007, that
assessment could change with respect to either goal at any time.
In accordance SFAS 123R, if all of the awards under each
plan were vested and each goal had been met, we would have
recorded total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense of
$9.2 million and $16.0 million under the 1999 LTIP and
the 2005 LTIP, respectively. If the goals are met and there are
unvested options at that time, the vested amounts would be
expensed immediately in our Combined Statements of Operations
and Comprehensive Income (Loss), with the unvested portion
recognized ratably over the remaining vesting period. As of
September 30, 2007, if ECCs management had determined
each goal was probable, we would have expensed $9.2 million
for the 1999 LTIP and $3.9 million for the 2005 LTIP.
Of the 4.4 million ECC options outstanding for EHC
employees under ECCs stock incentive plans as of
September 30, 2007, options to purchase 1.4 million
shares and 1.0 million shares were outstanding pursuant to
the 1999 LTIP and the 2005 LTIP, respectively. These options
were granted with exercise prices at least equal to the market
value of the underlying shares on the dates they were issued.
The weighted-average exercise price of these options is $8.18
under the 1999 LTIP and $29.29 under the 2005 LTIP. The fair
value
F-16
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of options granted during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 pursuant to the 2005 LTIP, estimated at
the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing
model, was $18.94 per option share. Further, pursuant to the
2005 LTIP, there were also 61,666 outstanding restricted
performance units as of September 30, 2007 with a
weighted-average grant date fair value of $29.53.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense, net of related
tax effect, is shown in the following table for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and the year ended
December 31, 2006, and was allocated to the same expense
categories as the base compensation for EHC employees who
participate in the ECC stock option plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
788
|
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,774
|
|
|
$
|
1,510
|
|
|
$
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007, total unrecognized compensation
for EHC employees related to ECCs non-performance based
unvested stock options was $9.1 million. This cost is based
on an assumed future forfeiture rate of approximately 6.5% per
year and will be recognized over a weighted-average period of
approximately three years. Share-based compensation expense is
recognized based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is
reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123R requires
forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if
necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates. Changes in the estimated forfeiture rate
can have a significant effect on share-based compensation
expense since the effect of adjusting the rate is recognized in
the period the forfeiture estimate is changed.
The fair value of each option grant for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 and the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was estimated at the date
of the grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
For the Years
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
|
|
4.68
|
%
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
Volatility factor
|
|
|
20.20
|
%
|
|
|
25.09
|
%
|
|
|
24.99
|
%
|
|
|
26.12
|
%
|
|
|
33.23
|
%
|
Expected term of options in years
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
|
|
$
|
13.68
|
|
|
$
|
11.38
|
|
|
$
|
11.66
|
|
|
$
|
10.39
|
|
|
$
|
11.64
|
|
During December 2004, ECC paid a one-time dividend of $1 per
outstanding share of its Class A and Class B common
stock. ECC does not currently plan to pay additional dividends
on its common stock, and therefore the dividend yield percentage
is set at zero for all periods. The Black-Scholes option
valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair
value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and
are fully transferable. Consequently, our estimate of fair value
may differ from other valuation models. Further, the
Black-Scholes model requires the input of highly subjective
assumptions. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate. Therefore, the
existing models do not provide as reliable of a single measure
of the fair value of stock-based compensation awards as a
market-based model would. Changes in the intervals of ECCs
regular historical price observations from daily to monthly
contributed to the 2005 reduction in the estimated volatility
factor.
F-17
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We will continue to evaluate the assumptions used to derive the
estimated fair value of options for ECCs stock as new
events or changes in circumstances become known.
|
|
4.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciable
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
|
|
|
1-10
|
|
|
$
|
34,222
|
|
|
$
|
31,793
|
|
|
$
|
30,043
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
1-40
|
|
|
|
17,089
|
|
|
|
17,077
|
|
|
|
18,050
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,547
|
|
|
|
47,707
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
219,367
|
|
|
$
|
99,156
|
|
|
$
|
50,675
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,150
|
)
|
|
|
(28,646
|
)
|
|
|
(24,385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
187,217
|
|
|
$
|
70,510
|
|
|
$
|
26,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress includes progress amounts
for satellite construction, including launch costs.
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
|
|
$
|
3,149
|
|
|
$
|
3,348
|
|
|
$
|
4,378
|
|
|
$
|
4,359
|
|
|
$
|
4,659
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
4,391
|
|
|
$
|
4,593
|
|
|
$
|
6,032
|
|
|
$
|
5,832
|
|
|
$
|
5,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Satellite Assets. We account for
impairments of long-lived satellite assets in accordance with
the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144).
SFAS 144 requires a long-lived asset or asset group to be
tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in
circumstance indicate that its carrying amount may not be
recoverable.
F-18
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of pretax income (loss) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(34,010
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,166
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41,889
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
(920
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(31,087
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44,009
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42,809
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the (provision for) benefit from income taxes
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current (provision) benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(2,784
|
)
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,784
|
)
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred (provision) benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
(10,212
|
)
|
|
|
16,400
|
|
State
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,206
|
)
|
|
|
8,757
|
|
|
|
(17,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefit (provision)
|
|
$
|
(3,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
(931
|
)
|
|
$
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The actual tax provisions for 2006, 2005 and 2004 reconcile to
the amounts computed by applying the statutory Federal tax rate
to income before taxes as shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax (income)/loss
|
|
|
Statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
State income taxes, net of Federal benefit
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Foreign taxes and income not U.S. taxable
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
Stock option compensation
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany adjustment
|
|
|
(33.2
|
)
|
|
|
(59.5
|
)
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Cumulative change in state tax rate, net of Federal benefit
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All or a portion of the current valuation allowance is expected
to be reversed on the effective date of the spin-off since we
are expected to realize sufficient profit to utilize our
deferred tax benefits as a result of the commercial and
transitional agreements with ECC.
F-19
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The temporary differences, which give rise to deferred tax
assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOL, credit and other carryforwards
|
|
$
|
29,039
|
|
|
$
|
30,613
|
|
Unrealized (gains) losses on investments
|
|
|
51,916
|
|
|
|
50,360
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
7,811
|
|
|
|
8,334
|
|
Research and development credit
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
State taxes net of federal effect
|
|
|
5,358
|
|
|
|
4,479
|
|
Other
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
98,560
|
|
|
|
97,261
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(72,135
|
)
|
|
|
(93,773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset after valuation allowance
|
|
|
26,425
|
|
|
|
3,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
Other
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
24,827
|
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
26,716
|
|
|
|
3,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
(291
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Noncurrent portion of net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
(291
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EHCs deferred tax assets included net operating losses
(NOL) and credits of $29.0 million and
$30.6 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The NOLs and credits represent the amounts
that would be apportioned to these entities in accordance with
the Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations should EHC be
legally separated from ECC. The NOLs and credits decreased
$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 to
correspond to the apportionment of ECCs consolidated tax
groups tax attributes as adjusted for the 2006 utilization
of NOLs in consolidation. The impact of these allocation
rules on the tax attributes determined on a separate company
basis is reflected as an intercompany adjustment in the
statutory income tax rate reconciliation above. The federal NOL
carryforwards begin to expire in 2020, state NOLs begin to
expire in 2019, and the credits will begin to expire in the year
2010.
Overall, EHCs net deferred tax assets are offset by a
valuation allowance of $72.1 million and $93.8 million
as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
valuation allowance was decreased by $21.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006. EHC evaluated and assessed
the expected near-term utilization of NOLs, book and
taxable income trends, available tax strategies and the overall
deferred tax position to determine the valuation allowance
required as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
F-20
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Federal NOL includes
amounts related to tax deductions for exercised options that
have been allocated directly to contributed capital for
exercised stock options totaling $3.6 million and
$3.1 million, respectively.
Stock option compensation expenses for which an estimated
deferred tax benefit was previously recorded exceeded the actual
tax deductions allowed during 2006 and 2005. Tax charges
associated with the reversal of the prior tax benefit have been
reported in Net investment in EHC in accordance with
APB 25 and SFAS 123R. During 2006 and 2005, charges of
$0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, were made
to Net investment in EHC.
|
|
6.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
EHC employees participate in ECCs employee stock purchase
plan (the ESPP). During 2006, this plan was amended
for the purpose of registering an additional
1,000,000 shares of Class A common stock and was
approved by the stockholders at ECCs Annual Meeting held
on May 11, 2006 by the requisite vote of stockholders.
Under the ESPP, ECC is now authorized to issue a total of
1,800,000 shares of Class A common stock.
Substantially all full-time employees who have been employed by
us for at least one calendar quarter are eligible to participate
in the ESPP. Employee stock purchases are made through payroll
deductions. Under the terms of the ESPP, employees may not
deduct an amount which would permit such employee to purchase
ECCs capital stock under all of ECCs stock purchase
plans at a rate which would exceed $25,000 in fair value of
capital stock in any one year. The purchase price of the stock
is 85% of the closing price of ECCs Class A common
stock on the last business day of each calendar quarter in which
such shares of Class A common stock are deemed sold to an
employee under the ESPP. During 2006, 2005 and 2004 our
employees purchased approximately 20,700, 17,600 and
13,300 shares of ECCs Class A common stock
through the ESPP, respectively.
401(k)
Employee Savings Plan
EHC participates in ECCs 401(k) Employee Savings Plan (the
401(k) Plan) for eligible employees. Voluntary
employee contributions to the 401(k) Plan may be matched 50% by
ECC, subject to a maximum annual contribution of $1,000 per
employee. Forfeitures of unvested participant balances which are
retained by the 401(k) Plan may be used to fund matching and
discretionary contributions. Expense recognized related to
matching 401(k) contributions, net of forfeitures, totaled
$0.2 million and $.02 million during the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We did not
recognize any expense related to matching 401(k) contributions
during the year ended December 31, 2004, as 401(k) Plan
forfeitures were sufficient to fund all of the matching
contributions.
ECC may also make an annual discretionary contribution to the
plan with approval by its board of directors, subject to the
maximum deductible limit provided by the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended. These contributions may be made in cash or
in ECCs stock. Discretionary stock contributions, net of
forfeitures, for our employees were $1.9 million,
$1.7 million and $1.5 million relating to the 401(k)
Plan years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
F-21
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
Future maturities of our contractual obligations are summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Satellite-related obligations
|
|
$
|
98,270
|
|
|
$
|
79,530
|
|
|
$
|
18,740
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
4,003
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
614,978
|
|
|
|
614,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
717,251
|
|
|
$
|
695,387
|
|
|
$
|
19,646
|
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
$
|
961
|
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite-Related
Obligations
Satellites under Construction. Future
commitments related to the satellites on the historical balance
sheets are included in the table above under
Satellite-related obligations. CMBStar, an S-band
satellite, is scheduled to be completed during the second
quarter of 2008. If the required regulatory approvals are
obtained and contractual conditions are satisfied, the
transponder capacity of that satellite will be leased to a Hong
Kong joint venture, which in turn will sublease a portion of the
transponder capacity to an affiliate of a Chinese regulatory
entity.
Purchase
Obligations
Our 2007 purchase obligations primarily consist of binding
purchase orders for set-top box and related components.
Rent
Expense
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, total rent expense
for operating leases approximated $1.0 million,
$1.1 million, $1.1 million, and $0.9 million,
respectively.
Patents
and Intellectual Property
Many entities, including some of our competitors, now have and
may in the future obtain patents and other intellectual property
rights that cover or affect products or services directly or
indirectly related to those that we offer. We may not be aware
of all patents and other intellectual property rights that our
products may potentially infringe. Damages in patent
infringement cases can include a tripling of actual damages in
certain cases. Further, we cannot estimate the extent to which
we may be required in the future to obtain licenses with respect
to patents held by others and the availability and cost of any
such licenses. Various parties have asserted patent and other
intellectual property rights with respect to components within
our direct broadcast satellite system. We cannot be certain that
these persons do not own the rights they claim, that our
products do not infringe on these rights, that we would be able
to obtain licenses from these persons on commercially reasonable
terms or, if we were unable to obtain such licenses, that we
would be able to redesign our products to avoid infringement.
F-22
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Contingencies
Acacia
During 2004, Acacia Media Technologies, which we refer to as
Acacia, filed a lawsuit against us and ECC in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit
also named DirecTV, Comcast, Charter, Cox and a number of
smaller cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an intellectual
property holding company which seeks to license the patent
portfolio that it has acquired. The suit alleges infringement of
United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992 (the 992 patent),
5,253,275 (the 275 patent), 5,550,863 (the 863
patent), 6,002,720 (the 720 patent) and 6,144,702 (the
702 patent). The 992, 863, 720 and
702 patents have been asserted against us.
The patents relate to various systems and methods related to the
transmission of digital data. The 992 and 702
patents have also been asserted against several Internet content
providers in the United States District Court for the Central
District of California. During 2004 and 2005, the Court issued
Markman rulings which found that the 992 and 702
patents were not as broad as Acacia had contended, and that
certain terms in the 702 patent were indefinite. In April
2006, ECC and other defendants asked the Court to rule that the
claims of the 702 patent are invalid and not infringed.
That motion is pending. In June and September 2006, the Court
held Markman hearings on the 992, 863, 720 and
275 patents, and issued a ruling during December 2006.
Acacias various patent infringement cases have been
consolidated for pre-trial purposes in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California.
We and ECC intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event
that a Court ultimately determines that we and ECC infringe any
of the patents, we may be subject to an injunction that could
require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features
that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified
by ECC for any potential liability or damages resulting from
this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of
the spin-off.
Broadcast
Innovation, L.L.C.
In 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C., which we refer to as
Broadcast Innovation filed a lawsuit against ECC, DirecTV,
Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in Federal District
Court in Denver, Colorado. The suit alleges infringement of
United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (which we refer to as the
094 patent) and 4,992,066 (which we refer to as the
066 patent). The 094 patent relates to certain
methods and devices for transmitting and receiving data along
with specific formatting information for the data. The 066
patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing the
scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on removable
cards. We examined these patents and believe that they are not
infringed by any of our products or services. Subsequently,
DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving us
as the only defendant.
During 2004, the judge issued an order finding the 066
patent invalid. Also in 2004, the Court ruled the 094
patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation
against Charter and Comcast. In 2005, the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the
094 patent finding of invalidity and remanded the case
back to the District Court. During June 2006, Charter filed a
reexamination request with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office. The Court has stayed the case pending
reexamination. Our case remains stayed pending resolution of the
Charter case.
We and ECC intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event
that a Court ultimately determines that we and ECC infringe any
of the patents, we may be subject to an injunction that could
require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features
that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified
by ECC for any potential liability or damages resulting from
this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of
the spin-off.
F-23
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Finisar
Corporation
Finisar Corporation, which we refer to as Finisar, obtained a
$100 million verdict in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas against DirecTV for patent
infringement. Finisar alleged that DirecTVs electronic
program guide and other elements of its system infringe United
States Patent No. 5,404,505 (the 505 patent).
In July 2006, ECC, together with NagraStar LLC, filed a
Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in the United States District
Court for the District of Delaware against Finisar that asks the
Court to declare that they and we do not infringe, and have not
infringed, any valid claim of the 505 patent. Trial is not
currently scheduled. The District Court has stayed our action
until the Federal Circuit has resolved DirecTVs appeal.
We and ECC intend to vigorously prosecute this case. In the
event that a Court ultimately determines that we and ECC
infringe any of the patents, we may be subject to an injunction
that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly
features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being
indemnified by ECC for any potential liability or damages
resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the
effective date of the spin-off.
Global
Communications
On April 19, 2007, Global Communications, Inc., which we
refer to as Global, filed a patent infringement action against
ECC in the United States District Court for the Eastern District
of Texas. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent
No. 6,947,702 (which we refer to as the 702 patent).
This patent, which involves satellite reception, was issued in
September 2005. On October 24, 2007, the United States
Patent and Trademark Office granted our request for
re-examination of the 702 patent and issued an Office
Action finding that all of the claims of the 702 patent
were invalid. Based on the PTOs decision, we have asked
the District Court to stay the litigation until the
re-examination proceedings is concluded.
We and ECC intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event
that a Court ultimately determines that we and ECC infringe any
of the patents, we may be subject to an injunction that could
require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features
that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified
by ECC for any potential liability or damages resulting from
this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of
the spin-off.
Superguide
During 2000, Superguide Corp., which we refer to as Superguide,
filed suit against ECC, DirecTV, Thomson and others in the
United States District Court for the Western District of North
Carolina, Asheville Division, alleging infringement of United
States Patent Nos. 5,038,211 (which we refer to as the 211
patent), 5,293,357 (which we refer to as the 357 patent)
and 4,751,578 (which we refer to as the 578 patent) which
relate to certain electronic program guide functions, including
the use of electronic program guides to control VCRs. Superguide
sought injunctive and declaratory relief and damages in an
unspecified amount.
On summary judgment, the District Court ruled that none of the
asserted patents were infringed by us. These rulings were
appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit. During 2004, the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and
reversed in part the District Courts findings and remanded
the case back to the District Court for further proceedings. In
2005, Superguide indicated that it would no longer pursue
infringement allegations with respect to the 211 and
357 patents and those patents have now been dismissed from
the suit. The District Court subsequently entered judgment of
non-infringement in favor of all defendants as to the 211
and 357 patents and ordered briefing on Thomsons
license defense as to the 578 patent. During December
2006, the District Court found that there were disputed issues
of fact regarding Thomsons license defense, and ordered a
trial solely addressed to that issue. That trial took place in
March 2007. In July 2007, the District
F-24
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Court ruled in favor of Superguide. As a result, Superguide will
be able to proceed with their infringement action against us,
DirecTV and Thomson.
We and ECC intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event
that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe the
578 patent, we may be subject to a portion of the final
damages, which may include treble damages
and/or an
injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly electronic programming guide and related features
that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified
by ECC for any potential liability or damages resulting from
this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of
the spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the
outcome of this suit.
Tivo
Inc.
During April 2006, a Texas jury concluded that certain of our
digital video recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by
Tivo. The Texas court subsequently issued an injunction
prohibiting us from offering DVR functionality. A Court of
Appeals has stayed that injunction during the pendency of our
appeal.
We and ECC intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event
that a Court ultimately determines that we and ECC infringe any
of the patents, we may be subject to an injunction that could
require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features
that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified
by ECC for any potential liability or damages resulting from
this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of
the spin-off. We and ECC believe that we do not infringe any of
the claims asserted against us and ECC.
Trans
Video
In August 2006, Trans Video Electronic, Ltd., which we refer to
as Trans Video filed a patent infringement action against us and
ECC in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California. The suit alleges infringement of United
States Patent Nos. 5,903,621 (which we refer to as the 621
patent) and 5,991,801 (which we refer to as the 801
patent). The patents relate to various methods related to the
transmission of digital data by satellite. On May 14, 2007,
we and ECC reached a settlement with Trans Video which did not
have a material impact on our results of operations.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various
other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary
course of business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate
liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to
materially affect our financial position, results of operations
or liquidity.
|
|
8.
|
Geographic
Information and Transactions with Major Customers
|
Geographic
Information
We currently operate in one reportable segment: the design,
development and distribution of digital set-top boxes and
related components.
F-25
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes total long-lived assets and
revenue attributed to foreign locations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-lived assets, including FCC authorizations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
65,028
|
|
|
$
|
12,818
|
|
|
$
|
47,456
|
|
|
$
|
125,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
67,961
|
|
|
$
|
14,299
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
1,446,926
|
|
|
$
|
78,394
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,525,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$
|
1,456,276
|
|
|
$
|
57,415
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,513,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
$
|
1,660,525
|
|
|
$
|
59,566
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,720,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue is attributed to geographic regions based upon the
location where the sale originated. United States revenue
includes transactions with both United States and customers
abroad. International revenue includes transactions with
customers in Europe, Africa, South America and the Middle East.
Transactions
with Major Customers
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
and the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
United States revenue in the table above primarily included
sales to two major customers. The following table summarizes
sales to each customer and its percentage of total revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECC
|
|
$
|
1,019,729
|
|
|
$
|
948,683
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,691
|
|
|
$
|
1,295,861
|
|
|
$
|
1,543,513
|
|
Bell ExpressVu
|
|
|
118,170
|
|
|
|
164,680
|
|
|
|
186,387
|
|
|
|
173,168
|
|
|
|
125,313
|
|
Other
|
|
|
44,869
|
|
|
|
19,536
|
|
|
|
50,242
|
|
|
|
44,662
|
|
|
|
51,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
1,182,768
|
|
|
$
|
1,132,899
|
|
|
$
|
1,525,320
|
|
|
$
|
1,513,691
|
|
|
$
|
1,720,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECC
|
|
|
86.2
|
%
|
|
|
83.7
|
%
|
|
|
84.5
|
%
|
|
|
85.6
|
%
|
|
|
89.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bell ExpressVu
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
Valuation
and Qualifying Accounts
|
Our valuation and qualifying accounts as of December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
823
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(214
|
)
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
Reserve for inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
910
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
(648
|
)
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
1,648
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
(1,280
|
)
|
|
$
|
910
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
1,547
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
Our quarterly results of operations are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
447,763
|
|
|
$
|
330,589
|
|
|
$
|
404,416
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(17,972
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,489
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,707
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(18,504
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,789
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,650
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
365,509
|
|
|
$
|
390,107
|
|
|
$
|
377,283
|
|
|
$
|
392,421
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(6,101
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,891
|
|
|
$
|
(15,766
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,471
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(6,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,616
|
|
|
$
|
(18,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,676
|
)
|
Year ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
401,598
|
|
|
$
|
335,651
|
|
|
$
|
380,103
|
|
|
$
|
396,339
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(7,849
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,533
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,782
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,900
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(7,858
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,060
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,588
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,434
|
)
|
|
|
11.
|
Investments
in Affiliates Accounted for Using the Equity Method
|
We own 50% of NagraStar L.L.C. (NagraStar), a joint
venture that is our exclusive provider of encryption and related
security technology used in our set-top boxes. Although we do
not consolidate NagraStar, we have the ability to significantly
influence its operating policies; therefore, we account for our
investment in NagraStar under the equity method of accounting.
F-27
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summarized financial information of NagraStar for the periods in
which we used the equity method to account for NagraStar is as
follows:
Balance
Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
84,426
|
|
|
$
|
43,890
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
85,280
|
|
|
$
|
44,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Owners Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and total liabilities
|
|
$
|
44,470
|
|
|
$
|
7,774
|
|
Owners equity (deficit)
|
|
|
40,810
|
|
|
|
37,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and owners equity (deficit)
|
|
$
|
85,280
|
|
|
$
|
44,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
57,640
|
|
|
$
|
126,651
|
|
|
$
|
126,119
|
|
Operating, selling, general administrative expenses, net
|
|
|
56,278
|
|
|
|
116,677
|
|
|
|
113,102
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
1,117
|
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
|
|
12,499
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
3,564
|
|
|
$
|
10,494
|
|
|
$
|
12,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Related
Party Transactions with NagraStar
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, we purchased
security access devices from NagraStar of $46.6 million,
$55.8 million, $121.4 million and $123.8 million,
respectively. As of September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 and 2005, amounts payable to NagraStar
totaled $6.2 million, $3.3 million and
$3.9 million, respectively. Additionally, as of
September 30, 2007, we were committed to purchase
$22.8 million of security access devices from NagraStar.
Related
Party Transactions with ECC
The Combined Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Loss) include service costs and expense allocations for certain
corporate functions historically provided to EHC by ECC. In
certain cases, these allocations were made on a specific
identification basis. Otherwise, the expenses related to
services provided to EHC by ECC were allocated to EHC based on
relative percentages, as compared to ECCs other
businesses, of headcount or other appropriate methods depending
on the nature of each item of cost to be allocated.
Charges for functions historically provided to EHC by ECC are
primarily attributable to ECCs performance of many shared
services that EHC benefits from such as, among other things,
treasury, tax, accounting and reporting, mergers and
acquisitions, risk management, legal, internal audit, human
resources, investor relations
F-28
ECHOSTAR
HOLDING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and information technology. EHC also participates in certain ECC
insurance, benefit and incentive plans. The Combined Statements
of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) reflect charges
from ECC and its affiliates for these services of
$35.6 million and $30.1 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and
$40.4 million, $36.6 million and $37.4 million
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Certain of these services will continue to be
provided subsequent to the Distribution for varying periods.
Included in the charges above are amounts recognized for
employee benefit expenses (Note 6).
In addition, during the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004, we sold set-top boxes and other services to ECC. The
Combined Statements of Operation and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
reflect revenue from ECC and its affiliates for equipment and
other sales of $1.020 billion and $948.7 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and $1.289 billion, $1.296 billion and
$1.544 billion for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, income before taxes was
$(0.04) million and $0.2 million, respectively, and
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
$(0.3) million, $0.3 million and zero for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
On October 19, 2007, we acquired Sling Media, Inc., a
privately-held digital lifestyle products company. As of
December 31, 2006, Sling Media had total assets of
$49.8 million and a net loss of $20.9 million. The
transaction values Sling Media at approximately
$380.0 million and was paid in cash and EchoStar options.
During October 2007, the Board of Directors of EHC authorized a
stock buy back of up to $1.0 billion of our Class A
common stock.
F-29
INDEX
TO STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS TO BE CONTRIBUTED BY
ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Statement of Net Assets to be Contributed by EchoStar
Communications Corporation (ECC):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
|
|
F-30
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
EchoStar Communications Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying statement of net assets to be
contributed by EchoStar Communications Corporation as of
September 30, 2007. This statement of net assets to be
contributed is the responsibility of EchoStar Communications
Corporations management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the statement of net assets to be contributed
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the statement
of net assets to be contributed is free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the statement
of net assets to be contributed by EchoStar Communications
Corporation, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall presentation of the statement of net assets to be
contributed. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
The accompanying statement was prepared to present the net
assets to be contributed by EchoStar Communications Corporation
to EchoStar Holding Corporation in connection with the proposed
spin-off transaction referred to in note 1, and is not
intended to be a complete presentation of EchoStar
Communications Corporations assets and liabilities.
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of net assets to be
contributed by EchoStar Communications Corporation presents
fairly, in all material respects, the net assets to be
contributed by EchoStar Communications Corporation as of
September 30, 2007 to EchoStar Holding Corporation, in
connection with the proposed spin-off transaction referred to in
Note 1, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
Denver, Colorado
December 12, 2007
F-31
STATEMENT
OF NET ASSETS TO BE CONTRIBUTED BY
ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $319
|
|
|
2,692
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
6,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,013,533
|
|
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,281,682
|
|
FCC authorizations (Note 2)
|
|
|
83,121
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
147,374
|
|
Other noncurrent assets, net
|
|
|
21,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,550,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
14,535
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations, mortgages and
notes payable
|
|
|
38,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
52,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, net of current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, mortgages and notes payable, net of
current portion
|
|
|
349,590
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
237,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
586,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
639,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets to be contributed
|
|
$
|
1,910,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement of
net assets to be contributed.
F-32
NOTES TO
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS TO BE CONTRIBUTED BY
ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
1.
|
Overview
of Proposed Transaction and Assets to be Contributed and Basis
of Presentation
|
On September 25, 2007, EchoStar Communications Corporation
(ECC) announced its intention to separate its
technology and certain infrastructure assets into a separate
publicly-traded company. Pursuant to the spin-off, certain
assets of ECC, consisting of satellites, uplink and satellite
transmission assets and certain real estate and other assets and
related liabilities will be contributed to EchoStar Holding
Corporation (EHC). The net assets to be contributed
by ECC historically were an integral part of ECCs
historical satellite television business. These net assets are
expected to be used by EHC primarily to comprise its fixed
satellite service business as an independent publicly-traded
company.
This Statement of Net Assets to be Contributed by ECC has been
prepared in order to set forth those assets and related
liabilities that will be contributed by ECC to EHC, but which do
not comprise part of the historical combined financial
statements of EHC. These assets and related liabilities are
reflected in this Statement of Net Assets to be Contributed by
ECC rather than in the historical combined financial statements
of EHC and no Statement of Revenues and Direct Expenses has been
included herein because these assets have been dedicated to and
were an integral part of the ECCs DISH Network business, were
not operated as a separate business within ECC and do not
constitute a separate business under
EITF 98-3,
Determining Whether a Nonmonetary Transaction Involves
Receipt of Productive Assets or of a Business.
The accounting policies described herein are the same accounting
policies historically applied by ECC in the preparation of its
Consolidated Financial Statements. The net assets to be
contributed by ECC are shown at ECCs historical basis.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of the Statement of Net Assets to be Contributed
by ECC in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires ECC to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements.
Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things,
allowances for uncollectible accounts, deferred income taxes and
related valuation allowances, fair values of financial
instruments, fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in
business combinations, capital leases, asset impairments, and
useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets.
Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and
such differences may be material to the Statement of Net Assets
to be Contributed by ECC. Additionally, upon contribution of
these net assets to EHC, EHC will be required to make its own
estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions may
be different from those made by ECC and may have a significant
affect on the reported amounts. Estimates and assumptions are
reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are
reflected prospectively beginning in the period they occur.
Cash
and Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment
Securities
The Statement of Net Assets to be Contributed includes
$1.0 billion of cash to be contributed by ECC upon
consummation of the spin-off.
As of September 30, 2007, restricted cash and marketable
investment securities included letters of credit for FCC
authorizations.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at historical cost. The cost
of satellites under construction, including certain amounts
prepaid under our satellite service agreements, are capitalized
during the construction phase, assuming the eventual successful
launch and in-orbit operation of the satellite. If a satellite
were to fail during launch or while in-orbit, the resultant loss
would be charged to expense in the period such loss was
incurred.
F-33
NOTES TO
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS TO BE CONTRIBUTED BY
ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION (Continued)
The amount of any such loss would be reduced to the extent of
insurance proceeds estimated to be received, if any.
Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over lives
ranging from one to forty years. Repair and maintenance costs
are charged to expense when incurred. Renewals and betterments
are capitalized.
Long-Lived
Assets
ECC accounts for impairments of long-lived assets in accordance
with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144).
ECC reviews its long-lived assets and identifiable intangible
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. Based on the guidance under SFAS 144,
ECC evaluates its satellite fleet for recoverability as one
asset group. For assets which are held and used in operations,
the asset would be impaired if the carrying value of the asset
(or asset group) exceeded its undiscounted future net cash
flows. Once an impairment is determined, the actual impairment
is reported as the difference between the carrying value and the
fair value as estimated using discounted cash flows. Assets
which are to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the
carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. ECC considers
relevant cash flow, estimated future operating results, trends
and other available information in assessing whether the
carrying value of assets are recoverable.
FCC
Authorizations and Intangible Assets
ECC accounts for its intangible assets in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142), which requires intangible assets
with indefinite useful lives not be amortized, but to be tested
for impairment annually or whenever indicators of impairment
arise. Intangible assets that have finite lives continue to be
amortized over their estimated useful lives.
ECC has determined that its FCC licenses have indefinite useful
lives and evaluates impairment in accordance with the guidance
of EITF Issue
No. 02-7,
Unit of Accounting for Testing Impairment of
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
(EITF 02-7).
In our most recent annual impairment testing, ECC determined
that the estimated fair value of the FCC licenses, calculated
using the discounted cash flow analysis, exceeded their carrying
amount.
As of September 30, 2007, our identifiable intangibles
subject to amortization consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Contract based
|
|
$
|
189,928
|
|
|
$
|
(57,480
|
)
|
|
$
|
132,448
|
|
Technology-based
|
|
|
20,500
|
|
|
|
(5,574
|
)
|
|
|
14,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
210,428
|
|
|
$
|
(63,054
|
)
|
|
$
|
147,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, ECC
participated in an FCC Auction for licenses in the 1.4 GHz
band and was the winning bidder for several licenses with total
winning bids of $57.4 million. This amount is included in
FCC authorizations in the Statement of Net Assets to
be Contributed by ECC.
Income
Taxes
ECC establishes a provision for income taxes currently payable
or receivable and for income tax amounts deferred to future
periods in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes (SFAS 109). SFAS 109
requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recorded
for the estimated future tax effects of differences that exist
between the book and tax bases of assets
F-34
NOTES TO
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS TO BE CONTRIBUTED BY
ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION (Continued)
and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are offset by valuation
allowances in accordance with SFAS 109, when ECC believes
it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax assets
will not be realized.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
As of September 30, 2007, the book value approximates fair
value for cash, trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts, current liabilities and mortgages and
satellite vendor financing due to their short-term nature.
Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 107 Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, disclosures regarding fair value of
capital leases is not required.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157) which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This pronouncement
applies to other accounting standards that require or permit
fair value measurements. Accordingly, this statement does not
require any new fair value measurement. This statement is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, and interim periods within that fiscal year. ECC is
currently evaluating the impact if any, of the adoption of
SFAS 157 will have on the net assets to be contributed.
|
|
3.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciable
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,155
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
1-10
|
|
|
175,670
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
|
|
1-7
|
|
|
511,367
|
|
Satellites:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar III
|
|
12
|
|
|
234,083
|
|
EchoStar IV fully depreciated
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
78,511
|
|
EchoStar VI
|
|
12
|
|
|
245,022
|
|
EchoStar VIII
|
|
12
|
|
|
175,801
|
|
EchoStar IX
|
|
12
|
|
|
127,376
|
|
EchoStar XII
|
|
10
|
|
|
190,051
|
|
Satellites acquired under capital leases
|
|
10
|
|
|
551,628
|
|
Construction in process
|
|
|
|
|
104,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,417,765
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
(1,136,083
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
1,281,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress includes progress amounts
for satellite construction, including launch costs.
Satellites
ECC is contributing nine of its satellites to EHC, six of which
are owned and three are leased. Each of the owned satellites had
an original minimum useful life of at least 12 years. Two
of the leased satellites are accounted for as capital leases
pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 13, Accounting
F-35
NOTES TO
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS TO BE CONTRIBUTED BY
ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION (Continued)
for Leases (SFAS 13) and are depreciated
over the ten-year terms of the satellite service agreements.
While ECC believes that overall these satellites are generally
in good condition, during 2007 and prior periods, certain of
these satellites have experienced anomalies, some of which have
had a significant adverse impact on their commercial operation.
EchoStar III. EchoStar III was launched
during October 1997 and currently operates at the 61.5 degree
orbital location. The satellite was originally designed to
operate a maximum of 32 transponders at approximately 120 watts
per channel, switchable to 16 transponders operating at over 230
watts per channel, and was equipped with a total of 44
transponders to provide redundancy. Prior to 2006, traveling
wave tube amplifiers (TWTA) anomalies caused 22
transponders to fail. During April and October 2006, further
TWTA anomalies caused the failure of four additional
transponders. As a result, a maximum of 18 transponders are
currently available for use on EchoStar III, but due to
redundancy switching limitations and specific channel
authorizations, we can only operate on 15 of the 30 FCC
authorized frequencies we have the right to utilize at the 61.5
degree location. While we do not expect a large number of
additional TWTAs to fail in any year, and the failures have not
reduced the original minimum
12-year
design life of the satellite, it is likely that additional TWTA
failures will occur from time to time in the future, and those
failures will further impact commercial operation of the
satellite.
EchoStar IV. EchoStar IV was launched
during May 1998 and currently operates at the 77 degree orbital
location, which is licensed by the government of Mexico to a
venture in which we hold a minority interest. The satellite was
originally designed to operate a maximum of 32 transponders at
approximately 120 watts per channel, switchable to 16
transponders operating at over 230 watts per channel. As a
result of past TWTA failures, only six transponders are
currently available for use and the satellite has been fully
depreciated. There can be no assurance that further material
degradation, or total loss of use, of EchoStar IV will not
occur in the immediate future.
EchoStar VI. EchoStar VI was launched during
July 2000 and is currently stationed at the 110 degree orbital
location as an in-orbit spare. The satellite was originally
equipped with 108 solar array strings, approximately 102 of
which are required to assure full power availability for the
original minimum
12-year
design life of the satellite. Prior to 2006, EchoStar VI
experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of 15 solar array
strings. During 2006, two additional solar array strings failed,
reducing the number of functional solar array strings to 91.
While the design life of the satellite has not been affected,
commercial operability has been reduced. The satellite was
designed to operate 32 transponders at approximately 125 watts
per channel, switchable to 16 transponders operating at
approximately 225 watts per channel. The power reduction
resulting from the solar array failures limits us to operation
of a maximum of 26 transponders in standard power mode, or 13
transponders in high power mode currently. The number of
transponders to which power can be provided is expected to
continue to decline in the future at the rate of approximately
one transponder every three years. See discussion of evaluation
of impairment in Long-Lived Assets below.
EchoStar VIII. EchoStar VIII was launched
during August 2002 and currently operates at the 110 degree
orbital location. The satellite was designed to operate 32
transponders at approximately 120 watts per channel, switchable
to 16 transponders operating at approximately 240 watts per
channel. EchoStar VIII also includes spot-beam technology. This
satellite has experienced several anomalies since launch, but
none have reduced the
12-year
estimated useful life of the satellite. However, there can be no
assurance that future anomalies will not cause further losses
which could materially impact its commercial operation, or
result in a total loss of the satellite.
EchoStar IX. EchoStar IX was launched during
August 2003 and currently operates at the 121 degree orbital
location. The satellite was designed to operate 32 FSS
transponders operating at approximately 110 watts per channel,
along with transponders that can provide services in the
Ka-Band (a
Ka-band
payload). The satellite also includes a C-band payload
which is owned by a third party. During 2006, EchoStar IX
experienced the loss of one of its three momentum wheels, two of
which are utilized during normal
F-36
NOTES TO
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS TO BE CONTRIBUTED BY
ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION (Continued)
operations. A spare wheel was switched in at the time and the
loss did not reduce the
12-year
estimated useful life of the satellite. During September 2007,
the satellite experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of
three solar array strings. An investigation of the anomalies is
continuing. The anomalies have not impacted commercial operation
of the satellite to date. The design life of the satellite is
not expected to be impacted since the satellite is equipped with
a total of 288 solar array strings, only approximately 276 of
which are required to assure full power availability for the
design life of the satellite. However, there can be no assurance
future anomalies will not cause further losses, which could
impact the remaining life or commercial operation of the
satellite.
EchoStar XII. EchoStar XII was launched during
July 2003 and currently operates at the 61.5 degree orbital
location. The satellite was designed to operate 13 transponders
at 270 watts per channel, in CONUS mode, or 22 spot beams
using a combination of 135 and 65 watt TWTAs. We currently
operate the satellite in CONUS mode. EchoStar XII has a total of
24 solar array circuits, approximately 22 of which are required
to assure full power for the original minimum
12-year
design life of the satellite. Since late 2004, eight solar array
circuits on EchoStar XII have experienced anomalous behavior
resulting in both temporary and permanent solar array circuit
failures. The cause of the failures is still being investigated.
The design life of the satellite has not been affected. However,
these temporary and permanent failures have resulted in a
reduction in power to the satellite which will preclude us from
using the full complement of transponders on EchoStar XII for
the 12-year
design life of the satellite. The extent of this impact has not
yet been determined. There can be no assurance future anomalies
will not cause further losses, which could further impact
commercial operation of the satellite or its useful life. See
discussion of evaluation of impairment in Long-Lived
Assets below.
Long-Lived Satellite Assets. ECC
accounts for impairments of long-lived satellite assets in
accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires a
long-lived asset or asset group to be tested for recoverability
whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that its
carrying amount may not be recoverable. Based on the guidance
under SFAS 144, ECC evaluates its satellite fleet for
recoverability as one asset group. While certain of the
anomalies discussed above, and previously disclosed, may be
considered to represent a significant adverse change in the
physical condition of an individual satellite, based on the
redundancy designed within each satellite and considering the
asset grouping, these anomalies (none of which caused a loss of
service to subscribers for an extended period) are not
considered to be significant events that would require
evaluation for impairment recognition pursuant to the guidance
under SFAS 144. Unless and until a specific satellite is
abandoned or otherwise determined to have no service potential,
the net carrying amount related to the satellite would not be
written off.
Upon contribution of these satellites, EHC will be required to
perform its own analysis of each satellite for recoverability.
EHCs conclusion regarding the recoverability of each
satellite may be different from the conclusion reached by ECC.
F-37
NOTES TO
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS TO BE CONTRIBUTED BY
ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION (Continued)
Capital
Lease Obligations, Mortgages and Notes Payable
Capital lease obligations, mortgages and notes payable consist
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Satellites financed under capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
379,280
|
|
8% note payable for EchoStar IX satellite vendor financing,
payable over 14 years from launch
|
|
|
8,139
|
|
8% mortgage due in installments through 2015
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
387,757
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(38,167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable,
net of current portion
|
|
$
|
349,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Lease Obligations
Three of the in-orbit satellites that ECC currently leases will
be contributed to EHC. Two of these satellites, discussed below,
are accounted for as capital leases pursuant to SFAS 13 and
are depreciated over the ten-year terms of the satellite service
agreements.
AMC-15. AMC-15, an FSS satellite, commenced
commercial operation during January 2005. This lease will be
renewable by us on a year to year basis following the initial
term, and will provide us with certain rights to replacement
satellites.
AMC-16. AMC 16, an FSS satellite, commenced
commercial operation during February 2005. This lease is
renewable by us on a year to year basis following the initial
term, and will provide us with certain rights to replacement
satellites.
F-38
NOTES TO
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS TO BE CONTRIBUTED BY
ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION (Continued)
As of September 30, 2007, ECC had $551.6 million
capitalized for the estimated fair value of satellites acquired
under capital leases included in Property and equipment,
net, with related accumulated depreciation of
$149.9 million. Future minimum lease payments under these
capital lease obligations, together with the present value of
the net minimum lease payments as of September 30, 2007 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007 (remaining three months)
|
|
$
|
21,588
|
|
2008
|
|
|
86,351
|
|
2009
|
|
|
86,351
|
|
2010
|
|
|
86,351
|
|
2011
|
|
|
86,351
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
254,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
621,365
|
|
Less: Amount representing lease of the orbital location and
estimated executory costs (primarily insurance and maintenance)
including profit thereon, included in total minimum lease
payments
|
|
|
(107,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net minimum lease payments
|
|
|
514,144
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
(134,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
|
379,280
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
(37,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
341,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to its lease of the AMC-15 and AMC-16 satellites,
ECC will also contribute satellite service agreements to lease
all of the capacity on other satellites discussed below.
AMC-2. AMC-2 is an FSS satellite positioned at
the 85 degree orbital location. ECCs lease of this
satellite is expected to continue through 2007 and has been
accounted for as an operating lease.
AMC-14. AMC-14 is a DBS satellite, which is
currently expected to launch in early 2008 and commence
commercial operation at an orbital location to be determined at
a future date. The initial ten-year lease for all of the
capacity on the satellite will be accounted for as a capital
lease.
Our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax
effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets
and liabilities and amounts reported in the Statement of Net
Assets to be Contributed by ECC. We followed the guidelines set
forth in SFAS 109 regarding the recoverability of any tax
assets recorded on the Statement of Net Assets to be Contributed
by ECC and provided any necessary valuation allowances. In
accordance with SFAS 109, we periodically evaluate our need
for a valuation allowance. Determining necessary valuation
allowances requires us to make assessments about historical
financial information as well as the timing of future events,
including the probability of expected future taxable income and
available tax planning opportunities.
F-39
NOTES TO
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS TO BE CONTRIBUTED BY
ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION (Continued)
The temporary differences, which give rise to significant
deferred tax assets and liabilities as of September 30,
2007, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
4,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
248
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
4,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
(219,013
|
)
|
State taxes net of federal effect
|
|
|
(17,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(236,955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
(232,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
4,816
|
|
Noncurrent portion of net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
|
(237,079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
(232,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL TABLES OF SLING MEDIA, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of Sling Media, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
|
|
|
|
|
F-43
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
|
|
F-41
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of EchoStar Communications Corporation, Inc.:
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Sling
Media, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and
2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
other comprehensive income (loss), shareholders equity and
cash flows for each of the years then ended and the period from
inception (June 14, 2004) to December 31, 2004.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility
of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Sling Media, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years then ended and the
period from inception (June 14, 2004) to
December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2(l) to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,
applying the prospective method.
/s/ KPMG LLP
San Francisco, California
November 5, 2007
F-42
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and
|
|
|
|
per-share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
7,763
|
|
|
$
|
24,382
|
|
|
$
|
4,827
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
3,805
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
7,276
|
|
|
|
11,987
|
|
|
|
6,067
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
6,446
|
|
|
|
5,657
|
|
|
|
1,881
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
2,156
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
23,592
|
|
|
|
44,592
|
|
|
|
16,985
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,877
|
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
2,818
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
31,194
|
|
|
$
|
49,829
|
|
|
$
|
17,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, trade
|
|
$
|
3,643
|
|
|
$
|
8,869
|
|
|
$
|
878
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
4,674
|
|
|
|
2,644
|
|
|
|
978
|
|
Accrued employee benefits
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
4,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
10,327
|
|
|
|
12,760
|
|
|
|
6,263
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
2,701
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
17,028
|
|
|
|
14,040
|
|
|
|
6,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Series A preferred stock,$0.0001 par
value. Authorized 8,400,000 shares; outstanding
7,759,082 shares respectively; aggregate liquidation
preference of $11,574,999
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Convertible Series B preferred stock,$0.0001 par
value. Authorized 7,930,000 shares; outstanding 7,695,271,
7,695,271 and 0 shares, respectively; aggregate liquidation
preference of $46,374,501
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value. Authorized 30,670,000,
30,670,000 and 26,600,000 shares, respectively; issued and
outstanding 10,015,923, 9,910,681 and 8,755,763 shares,
respectively
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
70,298
|
|
|
|
61,094
|
|
|
|
15,594
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(56,763
|
)
|
|
|
(25,665
|
)
|
|
|
(4,733
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
14,166
|
|
|
|
35,789
|
|
|
|
11,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
31,194
|
|
|
$
|
49,829
|
|
|
$
|
17,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-43
Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(June 14,
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2004) to
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per-share data)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
21,233
|
|
|
|
13,280
|
|
|
|
29,055
|
|
|
|
10,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
15,408
|
|
|
|
10,430
|
|
|
|
20,191
|
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
8,864
|
|
|
|
6,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
13,078
|
|
|
|
4,012
|
|
|
|
6,515
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
19,695
|
|
|
|
11,205
|
|
|
|
18,555
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,932
|
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
|
|
5,573
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
36,705
|
|
|
|
18,489
|
|
|
|
30,643
|
|
|
|
9,122
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(30,880
|
)
|
|
|
(15,639
|
)
|
|
|
(21,779
|
)
|
|
|
(3,099
|
)
|
|
|
(1,141
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
(659
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(30,995
|
)
|
|
|
(14,981
|
)
|
|
|
(20,858
|
)
|
|
|
(3,587
|
)
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(31,098
|
)
|
|
|
(15,049
|
)
|
|
|
(20,932
|
)
|
|
|
(3,612
|
)
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(31,013
|
)
|
|
|
(15,049
|
)
|
|
|
(20,935
|
)
|
|
|
(3,599
|
)
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
8,098,947
|
|
|
|
5,535,044
|
|
|
|
5,853,470
|
|
|
|
3,451,019
|
|
|
|
1,362,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share (basic and diluted)
|
|
$
|
(3.84
|
)
|
|
|
(2.72
|
)
|
|
|
(3.58
|
)
|
|
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-44
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders
Equity (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible A
|
|
|
Convertible B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per-share data)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,121
|
)
|
Exercise of employee stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock
|
|
|
7,759
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,497
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
7,759
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,906
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,584
|
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,465
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,612
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Exercise of employee stock options, net of share repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature related to convertible notes
payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
7,759
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,756
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
15,594
|
|
|
|
(4,733
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11,070
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,932
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Issue of common stock for patent purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
Issue of preferred stock and preferred stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,028
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
42,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,528
|
|
Conversion of note payable to preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Adjustment of beneficial conversion feature related to
convertible notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,277
|
)
|
Employee stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
Exercise of employee stock options, net of share repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
7,759
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7,695
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9,911
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
61,094
|
|
|
|
(25,665
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
35,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,098
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Issue of preferred stock and preferred stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature related to convertible notes
payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Employee stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
Exercise of employee stock options, net of share repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
|
7,759
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
7,695
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
10,041
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
$
|
70,298
|
|
|
$
|
(56,763
|
)
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
14,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-45
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(June 14,
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004) to
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(31,098
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,049
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,612
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,121
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Accretion of debt discounts
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
4,651
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
(5,860
|
)
|
|
|
(6,067
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
(2,149
|
)
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(789
|
)
|
|
|
(1,588
|
)
|
|
|
(3,777
|
)
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
(689
|
)
|
|
|
(759
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Accounts payable, trade
|
|
|
(5,225
|
)
|
|
|
3,293
|
|
|
|
7,991
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
Accrued employee benefits
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(21,245
|
)
|
|
|
(11,549
|
)
|
|
|
(21,102
|
)
|
|
|
(9,955
|
)
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,608
|
)
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Purchases of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
Deposits received
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales (purchase) of short-term investments
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
|
(3,805
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used) in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,397
|
)
|
|
|
(2,068
|
)
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
|
|
(4,038
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from convertible promissory note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (repayments of) senior loan
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of capital lease
|
|
|
(630
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,528
|
|
|
|
42,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,498
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Issuance costs, Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
5,938
|
|
|
|
38,581
|
|
|
|
38,981
|
|
|
|
8,106
|
|
|
|
11,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of foreign exchange on cash
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(16,619
|
)
|
|
|
24,957
|
|
|
|
19,555
|
|
|
|
(5,874
|
)
|
|
|
10,701
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
24,382
|
|
|
|
4,827
|
|
|
|
4,827
|
|
|
|
10,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
7,763
|
|
|
$
|
29,784
|
|
|
$
|
24,382
|
|
|
$
|
4,827
|
|
|
$
|
10,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure of material non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for purchase of intangible assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of stock options early exercised
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Conversion of notes to Series B preferred stock and
preferred stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired under capital lease
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-46
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
(unaudited) and
the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the
period from
inception (June 14, 2004) to December 31,
2004
Amounts in thousands except share and per-share data
|
|
(a)
|
Description
of Business
|
Sling Media, Inc. (the Company), incorporated in the
state of Delaware on June 14, 2004, manufactures consumer
electronic products that enable users to watch and interact with
their subscription television through an internet connected
computer or mobile device.
|
|
(b)
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Sling Media
Private Limited, Sling Media Pte, Limited, Sling Media UK
Limited and Sling Media Ireland Limited. The consolidated
financial statements include accounts of all wholly-owned
subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany accounts and
transactions.
In September, 2007, the Company agreed to be acquired by
EchoStar Communications Corporation (EchoStar) for
approximately $380,000. EchoStar, through a wholly-owned
subsidiary, was already an investor in the Company.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2005
consolidated financial statements to conform to 2006
presentation.
|
|
(d)
|
Unaudited
Interim Financial Information
|
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements as
of September 30, 2007, and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (U.S.) and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X
for interim financial information. The unaudited consolidated
financial statements as of September 30, 2007 and for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 have
been prepared on the same basis as the consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each of
the years then ended and the period from inception
(June 14, 2004) to December 31, 2004 included
therein, and in the opinion of management, reflect all
adjustments, consisting only of normal and recurring accruals,
considered necessary to present fairly the Companys
consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2007
and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash
flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2007
and 2006. However, they do not include all of the information
and footnotes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. (U.S. GAAP) for complete
financial statements. The consolidated results of operations for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the year ending December 31, 2007 or for any other period.
|
|
(2)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the
U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the
F-47
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
reporting period. Management periodically evaluates such
estimates and assumptions for continued reasonableness.
Appropriate adjustments, if any, to the estimates used are made
prospectively based upon such periodic evaluation. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
|
|
(b)
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
For certain financial instruments, including cash and cash
equivalents, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts
receivable, and accounts payable, recorded amount approximates
fair value due to their relatively short maturity period.
|
|
(c)
|
Cash
Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
|
The Company classifies all highly liquid investments purchased
with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less
at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents and those
investments with an original or remaining maturity of greater
than three months to be short-term investments. Both are stated
at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash equivalents and
short-term investments are maintained with several high credit
quality financial institutions. The Companys investments
consist primarily of cash, money market investments, and
certificates of deposits amounting to $73 and $3,805 at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Although the
Company deposits its cash with multiple financial institutions,
its deposits exceed insured amounts.
|
|
(d)
|
Concentration
of Credit Risk
|
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentration of credit risk consist principally of trade
accounts receivable. The Companys trade receivables result
from sales of its products to large, well-established wholesale
and retail distributors, primarily located in the U.S. and
the European Union. Management reviews the creditworthiness of
its customers in the ordinary course of business, and further
reviews the need for allowances for potential credit losses. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005 there were no such allowances.
As of December 31, 2006, three customers individually
accounted for 43%, 28% and 13% of total accounts receivable and
16%, 31% and 24% of total revenue. As of December 31, 2005,
two customers individually accounted for 57% and 22% of total
accounts receivable and 58% and 35% of total revenue.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, $400 and $
were classified as restricted on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets, and consist of a certificate of deposit held by
a financial institution for the benefit of the landlord of the
Companys corporate headquarters.
Inventories, which consist primarily of finished goods held for
sale, are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a
weighted-average basis) or market. Products are built by
contract manufacturers to Company specifications. The Company
depends on a few manufacturers for its finished good products.
The Company periodically reviews its inventories and reduces the
carrying value for slow-moving or obsolete items to the
estimated market value, if lower, based upon assumptions about
future demand and market conditions.
|
|
(g)
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is
computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated
useful lives of three to five years for the respective assets.
Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis
over the shorter
F-48
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
of the lease term or estimated useful life of the assets.
Depreciation and amortization expense of property and equipment
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $294 and
$54, respectively, and $1 for the period from inception
(June 14, 2004) to December 31, 2004, is included
as a component of operating expenses, dependent upon the
department to which the asset is allocated, in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
Intangible assets with finite lives, which consist of patents
and other intellectual property assets, are stated at cost less
accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed using the
straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the
assets of three to ten years, respectively. Amortization expense
for intangible assets with finite lives for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $72 and $16, respectively,
and $7 for the period from inception (June 14,
2004) to December 31, 2004, and is included as a
component of costs of goods sold in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. Amortization expense is
expected to be $293 for 2007, $289 for 2008, 2009 and 2010, and
$1,658 thereafter.
|
|
(i)
|
Foreign
Currency Translation
|
The functional currencies of the Companys
non-U.S. subsidiaries
are their respective local currencies. Asset and liability
balances denominated in
non-U.S. dollar
currencies are translated into U.S. dollars using
period-end exchange rates, while revenues and expenses based
upon the exchange rate at the time of the transaction, if known,
or at the average rate for the period. Differences are recorded
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Financial assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other
than the functional currency are recorded at the exchange rate
at the time of the transaction and subsequent gains and losses
related to changes in the foreign currency are included in other
income and expense. Net transaction gains (losses) during 2006,
2005 and for the period of inception (June 14,
2004) through December 31, 2004 were not significant.
|
|
(j)
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
|
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived
assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets
with finite lives, are reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount
of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected
to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset
exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is
recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. There were no
indicators of impairment for any period presented.
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability
method as prescribed by SFAS No. 109, Accounting
For Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income (loss) in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in
the period of enactment. The Company is subject to foreign
income taxes on its foreign operations.
F-49
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
(l)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation and Equity Instruments Issued to Nonemployees for
Services
|
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment which
requires that all stock-based compensation be recognized as an
expense in the financial statements and that such cost be
measured at the fair value of the award. This statement was
adopted using the Prospective method of application, which
requires the Company to recognize compensation cost on a
prospective basis. Therefore, prior years financial
statements have not been restated.
Under this method, the Company has recorded stock-based
compensation expense only for awards granted or modified after
January 1, 2006, based on estimated grant date fair value
using the Black-Scholes, single option award approach, which
requires the Company to estimate the fair-value of its common
stock, expected term, expected volatility, risk-free interest
rate, and dividend yield. For expected term, the Company has
estimated the life over which each award will remain outstanding
based on expected behavior of the optionees. Because there is no
open market for the Companys stock, expected volatility is
based upon the historical volatility of several other companies
in the Companys peer group. This peer group was the same
as was used in determining the Companys common stock
valuation. Risk-free interest rate is based on an average
interest rate based on U.S. Treasury instruments whose term
is consistent with the expected term of the Companys
awards. Estimated forfeitures represent the Companys
historical forfeiture rate. As the Company has not declared
dividends for any period presented, and does not anticipate
doing so in the future, dividend yield is zero.
These variables are highly subjective, determined on a periodic
basis and can vary over time, thus changes in these assumptions
can materially affect the fair value estimate. The Company will
continue to evaluate the assumptions used to derive estimated
fair value as new events or changes in circumstances occur.
Compensation cost is recognized in the results of operations
over the period during which an employee provides the requisite
service in exchange for the award, and is adjusted for expected
forfeitures.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for
stock-based employee compensation using the intrinsic value
method in accordance with the provisions of Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, Financial
Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) Interpretation
(FIN) No. 44, Accounting for Certain
Transactions Involving Stock Compensation an
Interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25, and Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 00-23,
Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation.
Under APB Opinion No. 25, compensation expense is based on
the difference, if any, between the fair value of the
Companys common stock and the exercise price of the option
on the measurement date, which is typically the date of grant
and would be recognized on a straight-line basis.
The Company accounted for equity instruments granted to
non-employees under EITF Issue
No. 96-18,
Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other
Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling,
Goods or Services. The options are recorded at fair value
using the Black-Scholes model and are measured and recognized in
accordance with EITF No.
96-18 and
FIN No. 28.
Refer to Note 10 for additional discussion regarding
details of the Companys stock-based compensation plans,
adoption of SFAS 123(R) and recognized compensation expense.
|
|
(m)
|
Shares
Subject to Repurchase
|
The Company has granted to founders shares of restricted stock
that are subject to repurchase at the original exercise price
until they vest. The Companys stock option plan also
allows certain employees to exercise options prior to vesting.
Upon the exercise of an option prior to vesting, the Company has
a right to repurchase the shares purchased upon exercise of the
option at the original exercise price; provided, however, that
its right to repurchase theses shares will lapse in accordance
with the vesting schedule included in the
F-50
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
optionees option agreement. In accordance with
EITF 00-23,
Issues Related to Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB
25 and FIN 44, the consideration received for
restricted stock and for the exercise of an option is considered
to be a deposit of the exercise price, and the related dollar
amount is recorded as a liability. This liability is then
reclassified into equity on a ratable basis as the award vests.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, 2,457,057
and 4,030,402 shares were issued but subject to repurchase.
These shares are presented as outstanding on the accompanying
consolidated statements of stockholders equity and
consolidated balance sheets. See Note 2(n) for discussion of
treatment of these shares in Loss per Share.
Basic loss per share is computed using the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during each period, including
restricted shares outstanding during the period, less the
weighted average number of shares of common stock that are
subject to repurchase. Diluted loss per share is computed by
including the dilutive effect of common stock that would be
issued assuming conversion or exercise of outstanding
convertible notes, convertible preferred stock, stock options,
warrants, stock based compensation awards and other dilutive
securities. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005,
and the period from inception (June 14, 2004) to
December 31, 2004, and the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, there is no difference between
the Companys basic and diluted net loss per share
attributable to holders of common stock because losses were
incurred in each of the periods presented. The following table
presents the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(June 14,
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2004 to
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(31,098
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,049
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,612
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
10,026,145
|
|
|
|
8,841,052
|
|
|
|
8,954,320
|
|
|
|
7,991,763
|
|
|
|
7,788,163
|
|
Less: Weighted average number of shares subject to repurchase
|
|
|
(1,927,198
|
)
|
|
|
(3,306,008
|
)
|
|
|
(3,100,850
|
)
|
|
|
(4,540,744
|
)
|
|
|
(6,425,663
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic and
diluted net loss per share
|
|
|
8,098,947
|
|
|
|
5,535,044
|
|
|
|
5,853,470
|
|
|
|
3,451,019
|
|
|
|
1,362,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(3.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.72
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Potential shares of common stock, which have been excluded from
the determination of net loss per share for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, the period from inception
(June 14, 2004) to December 31, 2004 and the
unaudited nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and
2007, respectively, since their effect was anti-dilutive,
consisted of potential shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options, shares of restricted common stock subject
to repurchase and shares of common stock issuable upon the
conversion of outstanding Series B and Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock and are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(June 14,
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2004) to
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issuable under stock options
|
|
|
2,897,198
|
|
|
|
2,291,814
|
|
|
|
2,733,157
|
|
|
|
1,650,626
|
|
|
|
1,165,126
|
|
Shares exercised but unvested and subject to repurchase
|
|
|
1,022,896
|
|
|
|
679,412
|
|
|
|
1,207,057
|
|
|
|
905,402
|
|
|
|
398,263
|
|
Shares of restricted stock subject to repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,718,750
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
3,125,000
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
Shares issuable upon conversion of preferred stock
|
|
|
15,454,353
|
|
|
|
15,454,353
|
|
|
|
15,454,353
|
|
|
|
7,759,082
|
|
|
|
7,759,082
|
|
Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debt
|
|
|
825,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,681,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issuable upon exercise of warrants
|
|
|
251,846
|
|
|
|
227,093
|
|
|
|
227,093
|
|
|
|
187,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
|
20,451,375
|
|
|
|
20,371,422
|
|
|
|
20,871,660
|
|
|
|
16,309,128
|
|
|
|
14,322,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o)
|
Software
Development Costs
|
The Company accounts for internally generated software
development costs in accordance with SFAS No. 86,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold,
Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Capitalization of software
development costs begins upon the establishment of technological
feasibility of the product, which the Company defines as the
development of a working model which generally occurs upon the
completion of beta testing of the software. The establishment of
technological feasibility and the ongoing assessment of the
recoverability of these costs requires considerable judgment by
management with respect to certain external factors, including,
but not limited to, anticipated future gross product revenue,
estimated economic life, and changes in technology. To date,
internal software development costs that were eligible for
capitalization have been insignificant, and the Company has
charged all software development costs to research and
development expenses as incurred.
Revenue is derived from sales of its products to wholesale and
retail distributors. The Company recognizes revenues in
accordance with SOP
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. Revenue is
recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and
collection is probable. If any of these criteria are not met,
revenue recognition is deferred until such time as all of the
criteria are met.
The Company establishes allowances for expected product returns
in accordance with SFAS No. 48, Revenue Recognition
When Right of Return Exists. These allowances are recorded
as a direct reduction of revenues and accounts receivable.
In accordance with
EITF 01-09,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer
(Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products), certain
payments to retailers and distributors such as market
development
F-52
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
funds and co-operative advertising are shown as a reduction of
revenue rather than as sales and marketing expense. The Company
also records rebates offered to consumers as a reduction to
revenue. The classification of these items was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31
|
|
|
(June 14, 2004) to
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
Reductions to revenue
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expense
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,262
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company offers a basic limited parts and labor warranty on
its hardware products. The basic warranty period for hardware
products is typically one year from the date of purchase by the
end-user. The Company currently estimates warranty costs at the
time the related revenue is recognized based on historical
warranty cost. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the
Company had reserves totaling $68 and $ ,
respectively.
Cost of sales consists primarily of the cost of finished goods
as charged by the Companys outsourced manufacturer. Cost
of sales also includes fees paid to the Companys
third-party customer support providers and amortization of
intangible assets.
|
|
(s)
|
Shipping
and Handling Costs
|
Shipping and handling costs for 2006, 2005 and the period from
inception (June 14, 2004) through December 31,
2004 totaling $256, $69 and $ , respectively, are
classified as a component of sales and marketing expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Comprehensive loss, as defined by SFAS No. 130,
Reporting Comprehensive Income, includes all non-owner
changes to shareholders equity. For the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 comprehensive loss differed from
reported net loss by the cumulative translation adjustment.
There was no such difference for the period from inception
(June 14, 2004) through December 31, 2004.
The Company expenses the cost of advertising as incurred.
Advertising expense costs for 2006, 2005 and the period from
inception (June 14, 2004) through December 31,
2004 totaling $12,556, $3,529 and $33, respectively, are
included as a component of sales and marketing expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
From time to time, the Company may be involved in claims or
lawsuits that arise in the ordinary course of business. We
reserve for legal contingencies when a liability for those
contingencies has become probable and the cost is reasonably
estimable, in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies. Any significant litigation
or significant change in estimates on outstanding litigation
could cause an increase in the provision for related costs,
which, in turn, could materially affect financial results. Any
provision made for
F-53
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
these legal contingencies are expensed to general and
administrative or research and development, dependent upon the
nature of the case, in the accompanying consolidated statements
of operations. Although the outcome of these claims or lawsuits
cannot be ascertained, on the basis of present information and
advice from counsel, it is managements opinion that the
ultimate outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company.
|
|
(w)
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities-Including and amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other
items at fair value. This statement provides entities the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused
by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without
having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This
statement is effective as of the beginning of an entitys
first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007.
Management is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this
statement.
In November 2006 the FASB ratified the EITF consensus reached in
EITF Issue
No. 06-6,
Debtors Accounting for a Modification (or Exchange) of
Convertible Debt Instruments, which provides guidance for
debtors accounting for a modification or exchange of
convertible debt instruments. The guidance is effective for
modifications or exchanges of debt occurring in interim or
annual reporting periods beginning after November, 2006, thus
for the periods presented there is no impact.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
provides a framework for measuring fair value, and expands the
disclosures required for fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting
pronouncements that require fair value measurements; it does not
require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007 (certain provisions related to nonfinancial assets and
liabilities have been deferred to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008). Although the Company will continue to
evaluate the application of SFAS No. 157, management
does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact
on the Companys results of operations or financial
position.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN
No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes by creating a framework for how companies should
recognize, measure, present, and disclose in their financial
statements uncertain tax positions that they have taken or
expect to take in a tax return. FIN No. 48 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is
required to be adopted by the Company beginning in fiscal 2007.
Management has adopted the standard and it currently will not
have a material impact on the Companys results of
operations or financial position.
|
|
(3)
|
Balance
Sheets Components
|
The following tables provide details of selected balance sheet
items as of December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw material
|
|
$
|
577
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
5,080
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,657
|
|
|
$
|
1,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
742
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
Software
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equipment
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,585
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
$
|
2,888
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
Capitalized patent costs
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,818
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories as of September 30, 2007 consist of $1,593
(unaudited) of raw material and $4,853 (unaudited) of finished
goods.
In November 2006, the Company acquired ownership rights of
technology in exchange for $1,500 in cash and
175,000 shares of the Companys common stock, with a
value of $1,313.
In June 2005, the Company signed a Senior Loan and Security
Agreement (the Line) in an aggregate principal amount of $4,000
secured by all tangible and intangible assets of the Company.
The Line bore interest at 10.25% annually with monthly
installment repayments due starting February 1, 2006 and
final payment was due December 1, 2008. The Company drew
the full amount of the Line, all of which was outstanding as of
December 31, 2005, which is included as a component of
current liabilities. On February 28, 2006, the Company paid
the balance drawn on the Line, in full, and terminated the
governing agreement.
The Line also included a provision giving the lender a right to
purchase shares of the Companys equity securities up to an
aggregate amount of $500 upon completion of the Companys
next round of financing. As discussed in Note 9, the
Company completed its Series B round of financing, in which
the lender participated.
Additionally, the agreement required the Company to issue the
lender a warrant to purchase 187,693 shares of
Series A Preferred Stock. The warrants were bifurcated from
the debt and valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The
value was determined based on a risk-free interest rate of 4%,
contractual life of seven years; expected volatility of 70% and
no expected dividends. The resulting value of approximately $194
was recorded as a discount on the Line, and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 approximately $4 and $31 of the
discount was accreted into interest expense. Upon the payoff of
the Line, the remaining discount of $161 was recorded to
interest expense in 2006.
|
|
(5)
|
Convertible
Notes Payable
|
On November 18, 2005, the Company entered into a Note and
Warrant Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the Company issued
Convertible Notes (the Notes) payable to a lender in
the aggregate principal amount of $4,000. A Director of the
Company is a General Partner of the lender. The Notes bore
interest at
F-55
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
6% with a stated maturity of one year, and also required the
Company to issue the lender a warrant to purchase shares of the
Companys preferred stock with a value equal to 6% of the
principal balance of the Notes. The Notes were automatically
convertible into equity securities issued in the Companys
next financing, defined as the sale by the Company of its equity
securities for gross proceeds of not less than $10,000
(including the $4,000 aggregate principal and interest
outstanding under the Notes). If said financing were not to
occur by November 18, 2006, then, at the option of the
lender, the notes were convertible into Series A Preferred
Stock at $1.49 per share subject to anti-dilution adjustments.
The Company determined that an initial conversion feature
existed at the commitment date under the guidance of
EITF 00-27,
Application of Issues
No. 98-5
to Certain Convertible Instruments which should be recorded
based on the best conversion option available to the lender if
the only circumstances to change were the passage of time. Due
to the initial conversion price ($1.49) being less than the fair
value of the Series A Preferred Stock (the stock into which
the note would convert) at the commitment date, the Company
recorded a beneficial conversion feature. The value of the
feature was determined to be in excess of the carrying value of
the debt and, as such, a debt discount equal to the carrying
value of the $4,000 principal was recorded, which reduced the
carrying value of the debt to zero, with a corresponding
increase to additional paid-in capital. This discount was
accreted into interest expense in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations over the life of the Notes, and for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, totaled $250 and
$471, respectively.
As discussed in Note 9, the Company completed its
Series B financing round, during which the Company raised
in excess of the $10,000 trigger in the Notes agreement
discussed above. Under the terms of the Notes agreement, this
financing automatically adjusted the conversion price to the
$6.06 per share price raised in the Series B financing. In
accordance with the provisions of
EITF 00-27,
the Company recalculated the beneficial conversion feature as a
result of the change in conversion price, and determined that
the new value of the beneficial conversion feature was
de minimus. Accordingly, the remaining un-accreted portion
of the debt discount was reversed by reducing additional paid-in
capital and increasing the debt balance to the original $4,000.
This debt balance and accrued interest thereon were converted
into 666,727 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. There
was no impact on the consolidated statement of operations as a
result of the conversion.
Additionally, upon conversion, the Company issued 39,400
warrants to acquire Series B Preferred Stock to the lender,
valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The value was
determined based on a risk-free interest rate of 4%, contractual
life of five years, expected volatility of 75%, and no expected
dividend yield. The resulting value of approximately $153 was
recorded as a separate component of shareholders equity.
In September 2007, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit
Agreement pursuant to which the Company issued Convertible Notes
(the Notes) payable to a lender in the aggregate
principal amount of $5,000. A Director of the Company is a
General Partner of the lender. The Notes bore interest at 9%
with a stated maturity of June 2008. The Notes were
automatically convertible into equity securities issued in the
Companys next financing, defined as the sale by the
Company of its equity securities for gross proceeds of not less
than $15,000 (including the $5,000 aggregate principal and
interest outstanding under the Notes). If said financing were
not to occur by June 7, 2008, then, at the option of the
lender, the notes were convertible into Series B Preferred
Stock at $6.06 per share subject to anti-dilution adjustments.
Due to the initial conversion price ($6.06) being less than the
fair value of the Series B Preferred Stock (the stock into
which the note would convert) at the commitment date, the
Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature. The value of
the feature was determined to be in excess of the carrying value
of the debt and, as such, a debt discount equal to the carrying
value of the $5,000 principal was recorded, which reduced the
carrying value of the debt to zero, with a corresponding
increase to additional paid-in capital. This discount is being
accreted into interest expense in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations over the life of the Notes, and for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2007, totaled $367
(unaudited). The aggregate principal and
F-56
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
interest outstanding under the Notes was repaid by EchoStar
Communications Corporation in connection with its acquisition of
Sling Media, Inc. as discussed in Note 13.
|
|
(6)
|
Capital
Lease Obligations
|
The Company has non-cancelable capital lease agreements in place
for furniture and fixtures, software, and various computer and
office equipment. As of December 31, 2006, and 2005
balances of $1,129 and $ were capitalized as
components of property, plant and equipment, respectively, in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Related accumulated
depreciation of $86 and $ , respectively was also
recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Short-
and long-term obligations are shown as components of notes
payable and long-term liabilities, respectively, in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company recognized
$86, $ and $ of depreciation expense
related to assets held under capital leases for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and the period from inception
(June 14, 2004) through December 31, 2004,
respectively, as a component of operating expenses depending on
which department to which the asset was assigned, in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operation.
Future minimum lease payments under these capital lease
obligations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
and year ended December 31, 2006, respectively are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
$
|
378
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
2010
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
2011
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
3,629
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
Less: amount representing interest
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
|
3,369
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(1,053
|
)
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
2,316
|
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the unaudited nine-month period in 2007, the Company
issued warrants to purchase 24,753 shares of Series B
Preferred stock with a determined value of $186 in conjunction
with the formation of a capital lease agreement. The value was
determined based on a risk-free interest rate of 4%, contractual
life of five years; expected volatility of 75% and no expected
dividends. The value of the warrants was recorded to the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets as a discount to the
short and long term portions of capital lease obligations, and
the discount accreted to interest expense over the life of the
lease agreement, which is four years. Interest expense related
to this transaction for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007 was $29.
F-57
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
(7)
|
Future
Commitments and Obligations
|
The Company rents facilities under non-cancelable operating
lease agreements. As of December 31, 2006, future minimum
payments under these leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
827
|
|
2008
|
|
|
822
|
|
2009
|
|
|
817
|
|
2010
|
|
|
734
|
|
2011 and Thereafter
|
|
|
821
|
|
The terms of certain of the lease agreements provide for rental
payments on a graduated basis, and accordingly the Company
recognizes related rent expense on the straight-line basis over
the term of the lease.
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and the period from inception (June 14, 2004) through
December 31, 2004 was $443, $129 and $28, respectively.
In August, 2006, the Company entered into an operating lease
agreement for its new corporate headquarters. Rather than
terminate the lease agreement for its previous headquarters, the
Company entered into a sub-lease agreement with a third party.
The terms of the sub-lease are such that the Company expects to
recoup all rent and rent-related expenses through the end of the
lease period in May 2008. Sublease income is expected to total
$166 and $69 in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Rental payments for
both the old and new facility are included in the commitments
table above.
In September, 2006, the Company entered into an operating lease
agreement for its new India operations facilities. Rather than
terminate the lease agreement for its previous location, the
Company entered into a
sub-lease
agreement with a third party. The terms of the sub-lease are
such that the Company expects to recoup all rent and
rent-related expenses through the end of the lease period in
January 2009. Sublease income is expected to total $349 in 2007,
$202 in 2008, and $12 in 2009, respectively. Rental payments for
both the old and new facility are included in the commitments
table above.
The Company purchases materials from many domestic and foreign
suppliers. The Company has no long-term purchase commitments or
arrangements with any of its suppliers, and believes it is not
dependent on any one supplier.
The Company undertakes indemnification obligations in its
ordinary course of business. For instance, the Company has
undertaken to indemnify its underwriters and certain investors
in connection with the issuance and sale of its securities. The
Company has also undertaken to indemnify certain customers and
business partners for, among other things, the licensing of its
technology, the sale of its products, and the provision of
engineering and consulting services. Pursuant to these
agreements, the Company may indemnify the other party for
certain losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party in
connection with various types of claims, which may include,
without limitation, intellectual property infringement,
advertising and consumer disclosure laws, certain tax
liabilities, negligence and intentional acts in the performance
of services and violations of laws. The term of these
indemnification obligations is generally perpetual. The
Companys obligation to provide indemnification generally
would arise in the event that a third party filed a claim
against one of the parties that was covered by the
Companys indemnification obligation. As an example, if a
third party sued a customer for intellectual property
infringement arising from the use of the Companys product
and the Company agreed to indemnify that customer against such
claims, its obligation would be triggered.
The Company is unable to estimate with any reasonable accuracy
the liability that may be incurred pursuant to its
indemnification obligations. A few of the variables affecting
any such assessment include but are not limited to: the nature
of the claim asserted; the relative merits of the claim; the
financial ability of the party
F-58
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
suing the indemnified party to engage in protracted litigation;
the number of parties seeking indemnification; the nature and
amount of damages claimed by the party suing the indemnified
party; and the willingness of such party to engage in settlement
negotiations. Due to the nature of the Companys potential
indemnity liability, its indemnification obligations could range
from immaterial to having a material adverse impact on its
financial position and its ability to continue operation in the
ordinary course of business
The components of net loss before income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(June 14,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(21,028
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,649
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,121
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(20,858
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,587
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(June 14,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to
the Companys effective income tax rate is as follows.
F-59
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(June 14, 2004)
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(20,858
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,587
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. statutory rate
|
|
|
(7,092
|
)
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
(1,220
|
)
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
State taxes
|
|
|
(1,604
|
)
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign rate differential
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent items
|
|
|
(1,812
|
)
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
10,569
|
|
|
|
(50.8
|
)
|
|
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
(33.3
|
)
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the
Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
State taxes
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net operating losses
|
|
|
11,388
|
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
Credits
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
12,886
|
|
|
$
|
1,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(556
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
12,330
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(12,330
|
)
|
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax assets/liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, the deferred tax assets were fully
offset by a valuation allowance. The total valuation allowance
for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $12,330.
SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes
provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if
realization of such assets is more likely than not to occur.
Based upon the weight of available evidence, which includes its
historical operating performance, reported cumulative net losses
since inception and difficulty in accurately forecasting its
results, the Company provided a full valuation allowance against
its net deferred tax assets. The Company reassesses the need for
its valuation allowance on a quarterly basis.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company has net
operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income tax
purposes of approximately $29,051 and $24,027 and $3,084 and
$3,123, respectively. The federal
F-60
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
net operating loss carryforwards expire, if not utilized,
beginning in the year 2024. The California net operating loss
carryforwards expire, if not utilized, beginning in the year
2014.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, unused research and
development tax credits of approximately $322 and $159 and $141
and $106 are available to reduce future federal and California
income taxes, respectively. The federal credit carryforward
expires, if not utilized, beginning in the year, 2024. The
California credit will carry forward indefinitely.
Utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards and credits
may be subject to substantial annual limitation due to the
ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The
annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating
losses and credits before utilization.
|
|
(a)
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
Convertible Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2006 and
2005 was comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Issued and
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Preference
|
|
|
Issuance Costs
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
8,400,000
|
|
|
|
7,759,082
|
|
|
$
|
11,575
|
|
|
$
|
11,497
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
7,930,000
|
|
|
|
7,695,271
|
|
|
|
46,633
|
|
|
|
42,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16,330,000
|
|
|
|
15,454,353
|
|
|
$
|
58,208
|
|
|
$
|
54,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
8,400,000
|
|
|
|
7,759,082
|
|
|
$
|
11,575
|
|
|
$
|
11,497
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,400,000
|
|
|
|
7,759,082
|
|
|
$
|
11,575
|
|
|
$
|
11,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 23, January 31 and February 13, 2006, the
Company sold 7,695,271 shares of Series B Preferred
Stock for proceeds of approximately $46,528 net of $107 in
issuance costs. Shares issued include conversion of debt and
accrued interest related to notes payable to 666,727 shares
of Series B Preferred Stock. See Note 5 for further
discussion. Proceeds from the issuance were used to fund ongoing
operations and research and development efforts.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005 there were 227,293 and
187,693 warrants outstanding for the right to purchase Preferred
Series stock, respectively. At September 30, 2007 and 2006
there were 251,846 and 227,293 warrants outstanding for the
right to purchase Preferred Series stock, respectively.
The holders of convertible preferred stock have various rights
and preferences as follows:
Voting
Each share of both Series A Preferred Stock and
Series B Preferred Stock has voting rights equal to an
equivalent number of shares of common stock into which it is
convertible.
Dividends
Holders of both Series A Preferred Stock and Series B
Preferred Stock are entitled to receive noncumulative dividends
out of any assets legally available, prior and in preference to
any declaration or payment of any
F-61
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
dividend on the Common Stock of the Company. For holders of
Series A Preferred Stock the per annum dividend rate is
$0.1193 per share and for holders of Series B Preferred
Stock the per annum dividend rate is $0.4848 per share, when and
if declared by the board of directors (the Board). No dividends
on convertible preferred stock or common stock were declared by
the Board for any period presented.
Liquidation
Upon any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company,
whether voluntary or involuntary, owners of Series B
Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, prior and in
preference to owners of Series A Preferred Stock and Common
Stock, an amount per share equal to the sum of the original
issue price of $6.06 for the Series B Preferred Stock (as
adjusted for any stock dividends, splits, combinations,
recapitalizations, and the like) plus any declared and unpaid
dividends. If upon occurrence of any such event, the assets and
funds of the Company legally available for distribution are
insufficient to permit payment of the aforesaid preferential
amounts, then the assets and funds of the Company legally
available for distribution shall be distributed ratably among
the owners of Series B Preferred Stock in accordance with the
preferences noted above.
On completion of the distribution to owners of Series B
Preferred Stock, the owners of Series A Preferred Stock
will be entitled to receive, prior to and in preference to the
owners of Common Stock, an amount per share equal to the sum of
the original issue price of $1.4918 for the Series A
Preferred Stock (as adjusted for any stock dividends, splits,
combinations, recapitalizations, and the like) plus any declared
and unpaid dividends. If upon occurrence of any such event, and
on completion of the distribution to owners of Series B
Preferred Stock, the remaining assets and funds of the Company
legally available for distribution are insufficient to permit
payment of the preferential amounts to owners of Series A
Preferred Stock, then the assets and funds of the Company
legally available for distribution shall be distributed ratably
among the owners of Series A Preferred Stock in accordance with
the preferences noted above.
After fulfillment of the aforesaid preferences, any remaining
assets of the Company legally available for distribution shall
be distributed ratably to the holders of Common Stock.
The following shall be deemed to be a liquidation, dissolution
or winding up of the Company:
(A) The closing of the sale, transfer, exclusive license or
other disposition of all or substantially all of the
Companys assets,
(B) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the
Company with or into another entity (except a merger or
consolidation in which the holders of capital stock of the
Company, immediately prior to such merger or consolidation,
continue to hold at least 50% of the voting power of the capital
stock of the Company or the surviving or acquiring entity),
(C) the closing of the transfer (whether by merger,
consolidation or otherwise), in one transaction or a series of
related transactions, to a person or group of affiliated persons
(other than an underwriter of the Companys securities), of
the Companys securities if, after such closing, such
person or group of affiliated persons would hold 50% or more of
the outstanding voting stock of the Company (or surviving or
acquiring entity), or
(D) a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.
Conversion
Each share of both Series B Preferred Stock and
Series A Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of
the holder, according to a conversion ratio calculated by
dividing the applicable original issue price by the applicable
conversion price. Each share of Preferred Stock automatically
converts into the number of shares of Common Stock in to which
such shares are convertible at the then effective conversion
ratio upon: (1) the closing of a public offering of Common
stock in which the aggregate public offering price equals or
exceeds
F-62
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
$18.18 per share (as adjusted for any stock dividends, splits,
combinations, recapitalizations, and the like) and $30,000 in
the aggregate, or (2) the written consent or agreement of
the holders of a majority of the then outstanding Preferred
stock provided, however, that the conversion of the shares of
Series B Preferred Stock requires the written consent of
the holders of a majority of the then outstanding shares of
Series B Preferred Stock. The per share effective purchase
price of the Series A Preferred Stock is $1.49 and the
Series B Preferred Stock is $6.06. The per share conversion
prices of the Series A Preferred Stock is $1.49 and the
Series B Preferred Stock is $6.06.
The Companys Articles of Incorporation authorize the
Company to issue 30,670,000 shares of Common Stock at a par
value of $0.0001. The Company issued 7,500,000 shares of
its Common stock to the founders and employees under its stock
purchase agreement, some of which are subject to certain
repurchase provisions. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
1,210,286 and 3,083,973 shares, respectively, are subject
to repurchase. For the majority of such shares of Common Stock
subject to such repurchase rights, the right of repurchase
lapses with respect to the first 25% of the shares subject to
repurchase when the stockholder completes 12 months of
continuous service after the vesting commencement date. The
right of repurchase after the first 12 months lapses at a
rate of 1/48 per month as the stockholder completes each month
of continuous service.
As discussed in footnote 2(m), the Companys stock option
plan allows certain employees to exercise options prior to their
having vested. Upon the exercise of an option prior to its
vesting, the Company has a right to repurchase the shares at the
options original exercise price. For shares that have been
exercised prior to vesting, the Company has recorded a liability
for an amount equal to the consideration received. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, 1,207,062 and
878,267 shares were exercised but not yet vested, and the
related liability was $576 and $111, respectively, which is
reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
In November, 2006 the Company issued 175,000 shares of
Common Stock valued at $7.50 per share as part of an agreement
to purchase technology.
|
|
(10)
|
Stock
Options and Stock-Based Compensation
|
In September 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Stock Option
Plan (the Plan), which authorizes
2,490,000 shares of common stock for the granting of stock
options. The Plan was amended by the board in October 2004 to
authorize an additional 727,500 shares, and in January and
August 2006 to authorize an additional 799,580 and
1,500,000 shares respectively, bringing the total number of
authorized shares to 5,517,080 (2005 and 2004: 3,217,500). The
Plan provides for the granting of stock options to employees,
consultants, and directors of the Company. Options granted under
the Plan may be either incentive stock options or non-statutory
stock options. Incentive stock options (ISO) may be granted only
to Company employees (including officers and directors who are
also employees). Non-statutory stock options (NSO) may be
granted to Company employees, consultants and directors.
Options under the Plan may be granted for periods up to
10 years and at prices no less than 85% of the estimated
fair value of the shares on the date of grant as determined by
the board of directors, provided; however, that (i) the
exercise price of an ISO and NSO shall not be less than 100% and
85% of estimated fair value of the shares on the date of grant,
respectively; and (ii) the exercise price of an ISO and NSO
granted to a 10% stockholder shall not be less than 110% of the
estimated fair value of the shares on the date of grant. Options
generally become exercisable in monthly equal increments over a
four-year vesting period subject to a first year vesting of 25%
upon the first year vesting anniversary and expire at the end of
10 years from the date of grant or sooner if the
optionees service is terminated by the Company.
F-63
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Effective January 1, 2006 the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment requiring
that all stock-based compensation be recognized as an expense in
the financial statements and that such cost be measured at the
fair value of the award. This statement was adopted using the
Prospective method of application, which requires the Company to
recognize compensation cost on a prospective basis. Therefore,
prior years financial statements have not been restated.
Total non-cash, stock based compensation expense net of related
tax effect was $4,096 (unaudited), $271 (unaudited) and $1,014
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and
year ended December 31, 2006, respectively, and is
reflected in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations in the same expense categories as the base
compensation for key employees as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation expense
|
|
$
|
4,096
|
|
|
$
|
271
|
|
|
$
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007 and 2006 and December 31,
2006 the Company had $17,361 (unaudited), $4,288 (unaudited) and
$16,757, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense
related to unvested options, based upon an assumed average
future forfeiture rate of 12% per year, which will be recognized
over a weighted-average period of approximately 4 years.
No compensation cost was recognized in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements of operations prior to 2006 on
stock options granted to employees, since all options granted
under the Companys stock option plan had an exercise price
equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the
date of grant.
The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using
the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Fair value of common stock
|
|
$10.25 - $11.00
|
|
$0.35 - 7.50
|
|
$0.35 - 9.84
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
4.37%
|
|
4.71%
|
|
4.71%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
7 yrs
|
|
7 yrs
|
|
7 yrs
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
70%
|
|
70%
|
|
70%
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
9.79
|
|
$4.85
|
|
7.36
|
F-64
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
A summary of stock option activity for the years ended
December 31, 2006 2005 and 2004 under the Plan is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
for Grant
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Balance as of company inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Shares reserved
|
|
|
3,217,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
(1,563,389
|
)
|
|
|
1,563,389
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(398,263
|
)
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,654,111
|
|
|
|
1,165,126
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional shares reserved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
(1,428,000
|
)
|
|
|
1,428,000
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(850,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
92,500
|
|
|
|
(92,500
|
)
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
318,611
|
|
|
|
1,650,626
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional shares reserved
|
|
|
2,299,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
(2,428,562
|
)
|
|
|
2,428,562
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(979,918
|
)
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
20,017
|
|
|
|
(20,017
|
)
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
346,096
|
|
|
|
(346,096
|
)
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
555,742
|
|
|
|
2,733,157
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
(542,500
|
)
|
|
|
542,500
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129,803
|
)
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
248,656
|
|
|
|
(248,656
|
)
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
|
261,898
|
|
|
|
2,897,198
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised during the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 and the year ended
December 31, 2006 had an aggregate intrinsic value of
$1,371 (unaudited), $923 (unaudited) and $8,351, respectively.
During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 and
2006 and the year ended December 31, 2006, shares with an
aggregate fair value of $292 (unaudited), $262 (unaudited) and
$362, respectively vested. Payments under share-based
liabilities were not material during the year or for either of
the nine-month periods.
As of December 31, 2006 there were 418,638 shares
vested and outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of
$0.16, a weighted-average remaining contractual life of
8.16 years, and aggregate intrinsic value of $4,052. As of
September 30, 2007, there were 1,006,557 (unaudited) shares
vested and outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of
$0.25 (unaudited), a weighted average remaining contractual life
of 7.64 (unaudited) and aggregate intrinsic value of $11,341
(unaudited). Aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding
and options exercisable was $25,715 and $15,134, respectively,
as of December 31, 2006. Aggregate intrinsic value of
options outstanding and options exercisable was $33,030
(unaudited) and $24,201 (unaudited), respectively, as of
September 30, 2007.
F-65
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The Plan provides the right to early exercise options granted
which may not have vested, however this feature excludes non-US
employees. The Plan also provides that the Company can
repurchase those unvested options that were not exercised as of
an employees termination date at the original exercise
price. The table below reflects those options that are
exercisable as of December 31, 2006 taking these factors
into account, and also reflects those shares not exercisable and
unvested. As of September 30, 2007, exercisable shares
totaled 2,150,774 (unaudited), less shares exercisable, but
unvested of 1,144,217 (unaudited), and vested shares were
1,006,557 (unaudited). The Company expects an additional
1,438,000 (unaudited) shares to vest during the twelve month
period ending December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
$0.02
|
|
147,750
|
|
|
7.67
|
|
|
|
17,484
|
|
0.08
|
|
202,188
|
|
|
7.75
|
|
|
|
17,851
|
|
0.15
|
|
808,688
|
|
|
8.19
|
|
|
|
358,774
|
|
0.35
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
9.03
|
|
|
|
7,728
|
|
0.43
|
|
393,000
|
|
|
9.31
|
|
|
|
315,832
|
|
0.73
|
|
422,031
|
|
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
383,031
|
|
0.76
|
|
721,500
|
|
|
9.89
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,733,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,625,700
|
|
|
|
Less shares exercisable but unvested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,207,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
The Company sponsors a 401(k) Employee Savings Plan (the
401(k) Plan) for eligible employees. Employees may make
voluntary contributions to the 401(k) Plan, however the Company
does not match contributions of the employees, nor are there any
discretionary contributions on behalf of the Company to the plan.
In August 2007 the Company entered into a Supply, Development,
and Licensing Agreement with an independent third party,
pursuant to which the Company agreed to develop and provide
certain products to the third party. In connection with the
agreement, the Company received a $4,000 (unaudited) deposit
from the third party which is classified as long term deferred
revenue at September 30, 2007. The revenue has been
deferred due to certain acceptance provisions having not yet
been met. Due to the uncertainty of the timing of this
acceptance, the Company has classified the deferred revenue as
long-term. The revenue is expected to be recognized over the
remaining term of the arrangement subsequent to acceptance.
Pursuant to the Supply, Development, and Licensing Agreement,
the Company issued warrants to the third party to purchase
75,000 shares of common stock. The warrants vest upon the
earlier of the delivery of a specified number of products, a
liquidation event as defined by the Companys Certificate
of Incorporation, or the consummation by the Company to sell its
common stock or other securities under the Securities Act of
1933, or the termination date of August 2017. As such, the
warrants were exercised pursuant to the terms of the Warrant
Agreement in connection with its acquisition of Sling Media,
Inc. by EchoStar Communications
F-66
SLING
MEDIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Corporation as noted below. The value of the warrants was
determined to be $797 based on a risk-free interest rate of 4%,
contractual life of ten years; expected volatility of 75% and no
expected dividends. These warrants will be accounted for using
the guidance in
EITF 01-09,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer
(Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products). This
guidance will require the value to be recorded once the warrants
are probable of vesting. This value will then be netted against
the proceeds from the arrangement and recognized as a revenue
reduction over the life of the arrangement. As the acquisition
of the Company was not consummated until October 15, 2007,
the warrants were not probable of vesting as of
September 30, 2007.
On October 15, 2007, EchoStar Communications Corporation
acquired Sling Media, Inc. for $380,000 in cash and stock
options.
F-67
corresp
December 26, 2007
Ms. Michele M. Anderson,
Legal Branch Chief,
Division of Corporation Finance,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F. Street, N.E.,
Washington, DC 20549.
|
Re: |
|
EchoStar Holding Corporation |
|
|
|
|
Registration Statement on Form 10 |
|
|
|
|
File No. 001-33807 |
Dear Ms. Anderson:
On behalf of EchoStar Holding Corporation (the Company), we have set forth below the
Companys responses to the comments contained in the Staffs comment letter, dated December 21,
2007, relating to the registration statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-33807) (the Registration
Statement) filed by the Company on December 12, 2007. The Company is concurrently filing via
EDGAR Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (the Amendment). The Amendment
reflects the Companys responses to the Staffs comments as well as certain updating information
and conforming changes resulting therefrom. We are also providing courtesy hard copies of the
Amendment, and this letter, including a version of the Amendment marked to reflect changes from the
December 12, 2007, filing, to you, as well as to Michael Henderson, Dean Suehiro and
John Harrington of the Staff. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this letter
have the meanings ascribed to them in the Registration Statement.
The Company continues to anticipate that EchoStar Communications Corporation (ECC)
will be in a position to distribute shares of the Companys common stock to ECCs shareholders on
January 1, 2008, with trading in those shares to commence on January 2, 2008, and would therefore
aim to have the Registration Statement declared effective on or about December 27, 2007, the record
date for the distribution. The Staffs assistance in facilitating this schedule would be greatly
appreciated.
|
|
|
Ms. Michele M. Anderson
|
|
-2- |
Except as otherwise specifically noted in this letter, the information provided in response to
the Staffs comment letter has been supplied by the Company, which is solely responsible for it.
The Company also acknowledges that the Staffs comments or any changes in the disclosure in
response to the Staffs comments do not foreclose the Securities and Exchange Commission from
taking any action with respect to the Registration Statement, and that the Company may not assert
the Staffs comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
To facilitate the Staffs review, we have included in this letter the captions and numbered
comments in bold text and have provided the Companys responses immediately following each numbered
comment. As a result of changes to the draft Registration Statement, some page references have
changed. The page references in the Staffs comments refer to page numbers in the information
statement included in the Registration Statement filed on December 12, 2007; the page numbers in
the Companys responses refer to page numbers in the information statement included in the
Amendment.
Exhibit
99.1 Information Statement
The
Spin-Off, page 33
Conditions
to the Spin-Off, page 43
1. |
|
Staff Comment: We note your revised disclosure here and elsewhere regarding ECCs
ability to waive the conditions to the spin-off under the Separation Agreement. Please
clarify whether ECC has absolute discretion to waive the conditions or there are any limits on
its ability to waive the conditions in the Separation Agreement. |
|
|
|
Response: The
Company has revised pages 10, 14, 27, 39, 42 and 113 of the
Amendment in response to the Staffs comment to clarify that ECC may waive the conditions
to completion of the spin-off in its sole discretion (other than the condition that the
Registration Statement be declared effective by the Commission
as well as the receipt of any other
material required regulatory approvals). |
|
2. |
|
Staff Comment: Disclose whether it is your intent to redistribute the information
statement prior to consummation of the spin-off if ECC waives any material condition. We
believe redistribution would generally be required if you waive a material condition to the
spin-off such that the previously provided disclosure about the terms of the spin-off is
rendered materially misleading. |
|
|
|
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment. The Company
supplementally advises the Staff that ECC does not currently intend to waive any condition
to the consummation of the spin-off. To the extent that ECC waives |
|
|
|
Ms. Michele M. Anderson
|
|
-3- |
any condition to the
spin-off in a manner that would be material to investors in the
Company's shares, ECC will
redistribute the information statement.
Unaudited
Pro Forma and Combined Adjusted Financial Information page 45
3. |
|
Staff Comment: We note your response to prior comment 28. Please disclose that you
performed a preliminary assessment of the recoverability of the satellites to be contributed
by ECC as if the spin-off had been consummated and preliminarily concluded that the
recoverability of the satellites will not be impaired as of the
distribution date. We note
your disclosures on pages 3, 17, 55 and 78. |
|
|
|
Response: The
Company acknowledges the Staffs comment and has updated pages 3,
17, 56 and 78 of the Amendment to include the disclosure requested by the Staff. |
Adjustments
to Pro Forma Combined Statements of Operations, page 53
4. |
|
Staff Comment: We note your response to prior comment 18. Please expand the
description of the adjustment to incorporate your response including the expected
weighted-average interest rate. Also, disclose why you are assuming that the $1 billion cash
contribution is an investment and will not be used for working capital purposes. We note your
disclosures on page 65. |
|
|
|
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment and has updated the
disclosure on pages 51-52 of the Amendment to incorporate the Companys previous response.
The Company does not currently expect that the $1 billion cash contributed by ECC in
connection with the spin-off will be required to fund future working capital requirements.
The Company expects that following the
spin-off, working capital requirements will be funded primarily by cash flow generated from
operations. As a result, the Company has revised the disclosures
on page 65 of the Amendment describing the expected uses for the $1 billion cash
contribution by ECC to delete the reference to future working capital. |
|
5. |
|
Staff Comment: We note your response to prior comment 20. Please disclose the
nature and amount of each intangible asset. Also, disclose how you estimated that 44% of the
excess of the purchase price over the carrying value should be allocated to the intangible
assets. |
|
|
|
Response: The Company has not completed its valuation of the acquired assets for
the Sling Media acquisition. Because the Companys valuation process |
|
|
|
Ms. Michele M. Anderson
|
|
-4- |
is still in its
preliminary stages, the Company is not yet in a position to disclose the nature and amount
of each intangible asset. For purposes of estimating the preliminary allocation of the
portion of the purchase price in excess of carrying value for the Sling Media acquisition,
the Company reviewed purchase price allocations for over 100 transactions and identified 15
target companies that operate in businesses which the Company believes are comparable to
Sling Media and are therefore likely to have identifiable assets that are similar to those
of Sling Media. Using these transactions as a benchmark, the Company determined the
percentage of total intangible assets and goodwill as a percentage of the purchase price
for each transaction and used these percentages to compute the mean percentage of total
intangible assets and goodwill as a percentage of the excess purchase price. The Company
then applied the resulting percentages to the Sling Media acquisition. The Company also
determined the range of useful lives of amortizable assets for these comparable
transactions and used the mean average useful life to estimate the preliminary amortization
expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 for purposes of the pro forma income statements. When the Companys valuation for the
Sling Media acquisition is complete, the purchase price allocation will be adjusted to
reflect the nature and amount of each identifiable asset as finally determined.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page 54
Executive Overview, page 54
6. |
|
Staff Comment: We note your addition of an Executive Overview in response to our
prior comments 21 and 22. Since the agreed upon margin at which you will sell set-top boxes
to ECC appears significant to your expected revenues and income as well as your ability to
meet future capital requirements, please expand your disclosure of the agreed upon margin.
Explain what it is or how it will be determined. Describe the material terms
of the agreement with ECC that will control the sale of set-top boxes. Tell us in your
response letter which of the Certain Intercompany Agreements summarized beginning on page
109 controls this agreed upon margin. If this is not one of the agreements you have filed
as an exhibit, explain to us why not. |
|
|
|
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment. The Company respectfully
advises the Staff that agreed upon margin is an additional amount that is equal to a
fixed percentage of the Companys cost. The Company believes
that the specific disclosure of
the margin it earns on sales to ECC would be detrimental |
|
|
|
Ms. Michele M. Anderson
|
|
-5- |
to
the interests of the Company and its shareholders. Disclosure would cause substantial harm to the Companys competitive position
by enabling third parties to use this information to gain an unfair
negotiating advantage over the
Company and to extract contract terms that are unfavorable to the
Company. With the benefit of a quantification of this term, the Companys current and prospective customers may be
able to calculate financial data that could lower the profit margin earned by the Company.
The Company advises the Staff that it has revised the disclosure to clarify that the
agreed upon margin is an additional amount that is equal to a fixed percentage of the
Companys cost.
The agreed upon margin term will be determined pursuant to the Receiver Agreement, the
material terms of which are disclosed on page 111 of the Amendment. The Company has filed
this agreement as an exhibit to the Amendment.
7. |
|
Staff Comment: Expand your overview to discuss how you expect to earn revenue and
income from the fixed satellite services business, including a discussion of material relevant
agreements with ECC. Additionally, provide insight into material opportunities and challenges
associated with separating these assets from ECC and operating them as an independent
business. |
|
|
|
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment. The Company has revised
pages 54-56 of the Amendment to include the disclosure requested by the Staff. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources, page 65
Capital Requirements, 65
8. |
|
Staff Comment: Revise to provide greater insight into the nature and anticipated
timing of your future capital requirements that will be substantial. As an example, expand
the first bullet point to discuss possible strategic initiatives for which you may require
cash. |
|
|
|
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment. The Company has revised
pages 65-66 of the Amendment to include the disclosure requested by the Staff. |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, page 92
9. |
|
Staff Comment: Revise your introductory paragraph beginning on page 92 to make
clear that you are describing the expected compensation policies of the spun-off company.
While we note that your disclosure often refers back to ECCs policies since you expect the
spun-off companys policies to be |
|
|
|
Ms. Michele M. Anderson
|
|
-6- |
similar, it should be clear that the CD&A is describing the
expected compensation policy of the spun-off company.
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment. The Company has revised
page 92 of the Amendment in response to the Staffs comment to make clear that the
Companys CD&A describes the executive compensation policy
of the Company.
10. |
|
Staff Comment: We note your response to our prior comment 33. In your introductory
part of your CD&A, make clear that the compensation to your named executive officers (other
than Mr. Han and Mr. Dodge) has not yet been determined and you will not have entered into
employment agreements at the time of the spin-off. Therefore, although you expect to
determine such compensation based on similar policies, the historical ECC compensation
disclosure provided is not necessarily indicative of future compensation by the spun-off
company. |
|
|
|
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment and has revised page 93 of
the Amendment to include the disclosure requested by the Staff. |
|
11. |
|
Staff Comment: The disclosure under the headings Incentive Compensation, General
Equity Incentives, and Practice Regarding Grant of Equity Incentives on page 95 discusses
ECCs policies without
reference to the spun-off companys plan going forward. Revise to disclose the spun-off
companys plans going forward. In doing so, explain how the four plans adopted by the
spun-off company described on pages 95 and 96 fit within those plans. |
|
|
|
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment and has revised pages
95-96 of the Amendment in response to the Staffs comment. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management, page 104
12. |
|
Staff Comment: Provide a clear explanation of what the Class A Common Stock
ownership table included in footnote (4) on page 105 represents. Clarify that the table
reflects ownership of the Class A Common Stock without taking into account the shares into
which the Class B Common Stock is convertible. |
|
|
|
Response: The
Company acknowledges the Staffs comment and has revised page 105
of the Amendment in response to the Staffs comment. |
|
|
|
Ms. Michele M. Anderson
|
|
-7- |
13. |
|
Staff Comment: To the extent not widely held, please disclose the natural person(s)
who have voting and/or investment control over the shares held by beneficial holders that are
not natural persons, including Dodge & Cox, Fairholme Capital Management and Harris Associates
L.P. |
|
|
|
Response: The Company respectfully advises the Staff that it is not in a position
to determine the voting and/or investment control over the shares that will be held by
certain beneficial holders that are not natural persons, such as Dodge & Cox, Fairholme
Capital Management, L.L.C. and Harris Associates L.P., other than through the disclosures
that these institutional investors have made with respect to ECC on Schedule 13Gs filed
with the Commission, which the Company has assumed are true and correct. The Company has
revised page 106 of the Amendment to provide certain additional voting and investment
control information that Fairholme Capital Management, L.L.C. and Harris Associates L.P.
have reported on their respective Schedules 13Gs. The information previously disclosed in
the Amendment with respect to the two other institutional investors included in the
beneficial ownership table, Barclays Global Investors NA and Dodge & Cox, includes all of
the voting and/or investment control information reported by these institutional investors
on their respective Schedule 13Gs. The beneficial ownership of each of these institutional
investors has been
determined based on beneficial ownership information that these institutional investors
have reported on these Schedule 13Gs and may not be accurate as of the time of the
spin-off. |
Certain Intercompany Agreements, page 109
14. |
|
Staff Comment: Since the various intercompany agreements will be finalized prior to
the distribution date, please file the agreements as exhibits to the Form 10 or advise us you
believe you are not required to do so. To the extent there are material changes to agreement
provisions as described in the information statement, advise how you will convey such changes
to stockholders after circulation of the information statement. |
|
|
|
Response: The
Company acknowledges the Staffs comment and has amended the
Registration Statement to file three additional intercompany agreements the Receiver
Agreement, the Satellite Capacity Agreement and the Broadcast Services Agreement. The
Company believes that after the filing of these agreements, the Company has filed all material intercompany
agreements. The additional agreements described in the Registration Statement that
have not been filed as exhibits are not required to be filed as material agreements under
Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K. These agreements are primarily standard commercial
agreements of the type and with the terms entered into in the ordinary course of the
Companys business or otherwise involve obligations of a nature |
|
|
|
Ms. Michele M. Anderson
|
|
-8- |
and term that the Company
does not believe are material to its business operations or financial results.
To the extent that after circulation of the information statement there is a material
change in the terms of any material agreement described in the information statement, the
Company will promptly disclose such change by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K (if such
change occurs following the effectiveness of the Registration Statement) and, as necessary,
by redistributing the information statement (if such change occurs prior to the completion
of the spin-off).
15. |
|
Staff Comment: Disclose the amount of expense that the company expects to incur on
an annual basis under the terms of the shared management services agreement. Also provide
enhanced disclosure throughout this section that explains how the parties will determine the
fair market value of the various services provided and quantify the amounts of the fees
payable, if known. |
|
|
|
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment. The Company has revised
pages 109-115 of the Amendment in response to the Staffs comment to include the annual
amount of expenses that the Company expects to incur under the shared management services
agreement and to eliminate the references to fair market value with respect to the
various services provided under other agreements. The Company is unable at this time to
quantify the amounts payable under the other agreements because the Company cannot
determine the actual level of services that will be provided under
these agreements. In particular, it is difficult to predict with
certainty these amounts,
as a number of these services may also be provided by third parties in the Company's or ECC's discretion. |
Description of Our Capital Stock, page 116
Provisions of Our Articles of Incorporation Related to Related-Party Transactions and Corporate
Opportunities, page 117
16. |
|
Staff Comment: We note your revised disclosure stating that shareholders will be
deemed to have consented to the corporate opportunities provisions of your articles of
incorporation. Please explain to us in your response letter the significance of such consent
and why you believe this deemed consent is valid under state law. |
|
|
|
Response: The Companys acknowledges the Staffs comment. The Company has
deleted the sentence in the Amendment referred to in Comment No. 16 of the comment letter
in response to the Staffs comment. |
|
|
|
Ms. Michele M. Anderson
|
|
-9- |
Additional CD&A Comments: The Companys acknowledges the Staffs comment letter,
dated December 7, 2007 (the ECC Letter), to ECC and our subsequent telephone
conversation with Mr. Harrington in which Mr. Harrington advised the Company that the Staff
expected these additional comments with respect to ECCs proxy statement would also be
addressed in the Registration Statement to the extent applicable. In response to
Comment No. 1 of the ECC Letter, the Company confirms its understanding that its
compensation discussion and analysis will, in future filings with the Commission, provide
an analysis as to how the Company arrived at and why the Company paid particular levels and
forms of compensation to each of its named executive officers that it compensates. As the
Company has not historically made any compensation payments to its named executive
officers, this comment is inapplicable to the Companys compensation discussion and
analysis in the Amendment. Comment No. 2 and No. 3 of the Staffs comment letter are
inapplicable to the Company as the Company will not have a long term
incentive plan, a
cash incentive plan or other performance-based incentives as of the distribution date.
* * * *
The Company is grateful for the Staffs continued assistance in this matter and its efforts to
assist the Company in making the important timeline to complete the spin-off by January 1, 2008.
The Company looks forward to continuing to work with the Staff, with the hope that the Staff will
be able to complete its review of the Registration Statement and declare the Registration Statement
effective by December 27, 2007.
|
|
|
Ms. Michele M. Anderson
|
|
-10- |
If you have any questions or comments concerning the matters discussed above, please call me
on (650) 461-5620.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very truly yours,
/s/ Scott D. Miller
Scott D. Miller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cc: |
|
Michael Henderson |
|
|
|
|
Dean Suehiro |
|
|
|
|
John Harrington |
|
|
|
|
(Securities and Exchange Commission) |
|
|
|
|
Bernard L. Han |
|
|
|
|
R. Stanton Dodge |
|
|
|
|
Robert F. Rehg |
|
|
|
|
(EchoStar Communications Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
Manny J. Fernandez |
|
|
|
|
Blaine Versaw |
|
|
|
|
(KPMG LLP) |
|
|
|
|
Daniel G. Dufner |
|
|
|
|
(White & Case LLP) |